| Course | PS497 Bachelor's Capstone in Addiction |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 7 |
| Paper type | Discussion board post |
| Length | About 380 words, 2 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 discussion post |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Psychology |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PS497 Unit 7
One Phone, Five People and a Spanish Check-In: A PS497 Unit 7 Discussion Post on Access and Culture
PS497 · Unit 7 Discussion Board Post
Posted by [Student Name]
The writer, the program, the clients and the classmates are composite; the sources cited are real.
Initial Post
I am designing phone-based continuing care for people who finish our intensive program in Boise. When I described it to clients in the current intensive group, two responses changed it.
Rosa, thirty-four, works in food processing and shares one phone with her husband and three children; Spanish is her first language. She said a weekly check-in about craving would be read by whoever picked up the phone. Hank, sixty-eight, runs cattle near Mountain Home and said, "I don't put my business in a phone." His nearest neighbor is two miles away and his cell signal works only on the hill behind the barn.
Trust and openness are the foundation of any digital mental health tool, Torous and Roberts (2017) argued, because people will not use tools honestly when they are unsure who sees their information. For Rosa, trust meant privacy within her own household as much as from outsiders. For Hank, trust in technology itself was the barrier.
My design assumed one person, one phone and one language, and none of those held for these two clients.
Lin et al. (2019) found that telemedicine can expand access to substance use treatment, especially for rural patients, but only where the basic technology works. Hank's hill is not a platform.
Three changes followed. The check-in will be available in Spanish, with a passcode and a neutral app name so that household members do not see recovery content. Clients can choose a weekly phone call from a counselor instead of an app. And clients with poor coverage can use plain text messages, which often get through when data does not.
Whose daily life might your capstone design not fit?
Reply to Keanu
Keanu, your point about younger clients preferring video is a good counterweight. Offering several formats may serve more people than choosing one.
Reply to Lila
Lila, I agree that interpreters matter for family sessions. Torous and Roberts (2017) would add that families also need to understand what the program keeps private.
References
Lin, L. A., Casteel, D., Shigekawa, E., Weyrich, M. S., Roby, D. H., & McMenamin, S. B. (2019). Telemedicine-delivered treatment interventions for substance use disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 101, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2019.03.007
Torous, J., & Roberts, L. W. (2017). Needed innovation in digital health and smartphone applications for mental health: Transparency and trust. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(5), 437-438. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0262
The Purdue Global PS497 Unit 7 instructions
The Unit 7 board in PS497 asks you to discuss culture and access in your capstone. Describe composite clients whose daily lives your design did not fit, such as differences in language, household, trust in technology or location. Explain what the design assumed and how it changed. Use research on trust in digital tools and on rural or remote access. Avoid treating any group as uniform; describe specific barriers. End with a question asking whose life classmates' designs might not fit. Open with roughly 400 words and follow with two replies, each naming a group or barrier a classmate overlooked. Keep every client composite. Say how the changes will be checked.
Inside the PS497 Unit 7 example
The post opens with two clients the design did not fit. A paragraph describes the capstone. A paragraph introduces Rosa's shared phone and Hank's single hill of signal. A paragraph applies Torous and Roberts on trust and transparency to both. A highlighted line names the three assumptions the design made. A paragraph applies Lin and colleagues on rural telemedicine. A paragraph lists three changes: a Spanish check-in with a neutral name and passcode, a phone-call option and plain text for weak coverage. The closing question asks classmates whose lives their designs might miss. Replies discuss video for younger clients and interpreters for family sessions. Each change is traced to the client who prompted it.
Reading the PS497 Unit 7 grading rubric
Strong posts show culture and access entering a project through specific clients and specific design changes. Naming the design's hidden assumptions earns credit. Research on trust and on rural access should be applied to the clients described, not summarized generally. Respectful, specific description of barriers, without stereotyping a group, is expected. Changes should be concrete and feasible. Replies should add a group or barrier rather than agree. Cite digital health and telemedicine sources in APA style with composite clients. Mentioning how the program will check whether the changes worked, such as tracking use by format, strengthens the post noticeably. Keep it practical and specific throughout. Show the changes.
Common PS497 Unit 7 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Culture posts often discuss diversity in general without changing anything in the project. Others describe a group's traits instead of a client's barriers. Students frequently assume every client has a private phone, a data plan and reliable coverage. Trust in technology is commonly overlooked. Replies tend to compliment rather than add. Before posting, list three things your design assumes about clients' lives and test each against one composite client. Change at least one feature. Cite one source on trust or access. In replies, name a group or barrier the classmate missed. Describe composite clients precisely and with respect. Then ask a client whether the change actually helps.
Get a PS497 Unit 7 example written to your instructions
Send the prompt and the rubric. A custom post discusses culture and access in an addictions capstone. It is free the first time and back in 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More PS497 papers and BS in Psychology samples
- PS497 Unit 1: Addictions Capstone Focus Post
- PS497 Unit 2: Case Formulation Paper
- PS497 Unit 3: Digital Recovery Ethics Paper
- PS497 Unit 4: Digital Continuing Care Review
- PS497 Unit 5: Continuing Care Treatment Plan
- PS497 Unit 6: Continuing Care Program Design Paper
- PS497 Unit 8: Evaluation Plan
- PS497 Unit 9: Capstone Presentation
- PS497 Unit 10: Capstone Reflection
- PS498 Unit 7: Culture and Family Post
- PS452 Unit 7: Drug Research Methods Post
- PS499 Unit 7: Culture and Diversity Board Post
- PS450 Unit 7: Treatment Team Paper
PS497 Unit 7 questions, answered
How can culture affect recovery apps?
Language, trust in technology and privacy norms all shape use.
What about rural clients?
Distance makes remote support valuable, but coverage and data can be barriers.
What should replies add?
A group or barrier the classmate's design might miss.
Where can I find a free PS497 Unit 7 sample paper?
This page holds the complete PS497 Unit 7 post on culture and access in a composite continuing care capstone, with replies.
What changes does the PS497 Unit 7 sample make?
A Spanish check-in with a neutral app name and passcode, a phone-call option, and plain text messages for weak coverage.