PS499 Unit 7 Culture and Diversity Board Post Example

Reviewed by Romilly Dunmore, MEd Bachelor's Capstone in Psychology Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Culture and diversity in a proposed awe walk study for a multilingual night-shift housekeeping crew are examined in this PS499 Unit 7 discussion board post. The composite writer describes a fourteen-person crew that includes refugees from Bhutan, workers from the Democratic Republic of Congo and Michigan natives, then uses Bai and colleagues' study of awe in the United States and China, which found shared small-self effects but different triggers, to question walk instructions built around the sky. Three coworkers name a river, a church choir and an emergency team, and two design changes follow, including reviewed translations of the Perceived Stress Scale. Purdue Global PS 499, Bachelor's Capstone in Psychology, sets this post in the BS in Psychology.

CoursePS499 Bachelor's Capstone in Psychology
UnitUnit 7
Paper typeDiscussion board post
LengthAbout 520 words, 2 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 discussion post
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBS in Psychology
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for PS499 Unit 7

1

Whose Sky Counts as Vast: A PS499 Unit 7 Discussion Post on Culture in an Awe Walk Study

PS499 · Unit 7 Discussion Board Post

Posted by [Student Name]

The writer, her crew and the classmates are composite; the sources cited are real.

What this part is doingPromising specific design changes in the lead shows the diversity discussion will alter the study, not just describe the crew.
2

Initial Post

My capstone proposes awe walks after the night shift for hospital housekeepers in Lansing, Michigan. Of the fourteen people on my own crew, five came to the United States as refugees from Bhutan and speak Nepali at home, three are from the Democratic Republic of Congo and speak French or Swahili, and six were born in Michigan. Their religions include Hinduism, Buddhism, Catholicism, Pentecostal Christianity and none at all. This week's question made me ask whether my study assumes one culture's idea of awe.

Bai et al. (2017) studied awe among participants in the United States and China. In both countries, awe produced a smaller sense of self and greater engagement with the group, which suggests that core features of awe are shared. But what triggered awe differed. American participants more often described awe in response to nature, while Chinese participants more often described awe in response to other people, such as someone's skill or kindness.

If awe can come from people as well as from the sky, then telling everyone to look for vastness in nature may fit some of my coworkers better than others.

That finding changed how I see my walk instructions, which ask participants to notice vast things like the sky and the river. I asked three coworkers what makes them feel small in a good way. One, who grew up near the Himalayas, said the river reminds her of home but the sky here feels low. Another said his strongest moments of awe come in church when the choir sings. The third said she feels it watching nurses save someone in the emergency department.

I have made two changes. First, the awe instructions will invite participants to notice anything vast or surprising, including people and memories, not only the view from the trail. Second, the stress questionnaire will use translated versions of the Perceived Stress Scale reviewed by bilingual staff, since a scale built in one culture may not mean the same thing in another (Cohen et al., 1983).

What assumption in your own study might not hold for everyone in your sample?

What this part is doingAsking classmates to find their own hidden assumptions turns the post into shared work.
3

Reply to Lauren

Lauren, your plan to study parenting stress among military spouses could face a similar issue. Spouses who are also service members, or who come from military families, may describe stress very differently from those new to that life. Bai et al. (2017) found shared patterns and different triggers, which might be a useful way to frame your groups.

Reply to Andre

Andre, I agree that translation is not only about language. When a bilingual coworker reviewed the Nepali stress scale for me, she pointed out that one item about feeling things were going your way sounded like a question about luck, which carries religious meaning for some readers. A back-translation step would catch problems like that.

4

References

Bai, Y., Maruskin, L. A., Chen, S., Gordon, A. M., Stellar, J. E., McNeil, G. D., Peng, K., & Keltner, D. (2017). Awe, the diminished self, and collective engagement: Universals and cultural variations in the small self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 185-209. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000087

Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385-396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404

The Purdue Global PS499 Unit 7 instructions

The Unit 7 board in PS499 asks how culture and diversity affect your capstone study. Describe the diversity of your likely participants without stereotyping. Use research to examine whether your key concept, intervention or measure works the same way across groups. Identify at least one assumption in your design that may not hold for everyone, and explain how you will change it. Consider language and translation of measures. End by asking peers to look for hidden assumptions in their own designs. Aim for about 450 words up front, then two replies adding a diversity consideration the classmate has not yet addressed. Keep coworkers and participants composite.

Inside the PS499 Unit 7 example

The post introduces the crew's countries, languages and religions and asks whether the study assumes one culture's idea of awe. A research paragraph summarizes Bai's comparison of American and Chinese participants, under a highlighted line that awe from people as well as sky changes the instructions. Three coworkers' answers about what makes them feel wonder lead to two changes: broader awe instructions and translated stress scales reviewed by bilingual staff. The post asks classmates to name an assumption in their own designs. Replies suggest framing military spouse groups by shared patterns and different triggers, and describe how a Nepali item about things going your way raised a translation problem. Both replies cite or apply research.

Reading the PS499 Unit 7 grading rubric

Graders look for a respectful, specific description of participants and research used to test whether the study's assumptions hold across groups. The strongest posts pin down one concrete assumption and changes the design in response. Attention to translation and measurement equivalence shows methodological awareness. Including participants' own voices, gathered informally and respectfully, strengthens the analysis. Replies should add new considerations rather than agree. Citations in APA style for cross-cultural research are expected. Avoiding stereotypes while still recognizing real differences is the balance instructors usually look for in this post. Posts that change the design because of what participants said, rather than only noting differences, usually earn the top band. Specific changes help.

PS499 Unit 7 help: mistakes that cost points

Diversity posts often list demographic categories without saying how they affect the study. Others describe cultures in sweeping terms that slip into stereotype. Students frequently ignore language and assume measures translate perfectly. Design changes are commonly promised but not specified. Replies tend to compliment the classmate's sensitivity. Before posting, name one assumption in your design, cite one study that tests it across cultures, describe one specific change, and mention how your measures will work in the languages your participants speak. In replies, raise one diversity issue the classmate missed, such as age, religion or literacy, and suggest a practical response. That keeps the post practical. Keep every coworker composite.

Get a PS499 Unit 7 example written to your instructions

Send the Unit 7 question and the rubric. A custom post examines how culture and diversity affect your capstone study. It is free the first time, delivered within 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More PS499 papers and BS in Psychology samples

PS499 Unit 7 questions, answered

Is awe universal?

Awe has been described across cultures, though its triggers and meanings vary.

Should materials be translated?

When participants speak other languages, validated translations improve accuracy and inclusion.

What should replies add?

A diversity consideration the classmate's design may have missed.

Where can I find a free PS499 Unit 7 sample paper?

This page holds the complete PS499 Unit 7 post on culture and diversity in a composite awe walk study for a multilingual night crew, with two replies.

What did the writer change in the PS499 Unit 7 sample?

The awe instructions now include people and memories as well as nature, and translated stress scales will be reviewed by bilingual staff.