| Course | PS498 Bachelor's Capstone in Applied Behavior Analysis |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 7 |
| Paper type | Discussion board post |
| Length | About 410 words, 2 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 discussion post |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Psychology |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PS498 Unit 7
A Water Bottle on the Bathroom Shelf: A PS498 Unit 7 Discussion Board Post on Culture and Family
PS498 · Unit 7 Discussion Board Post
Posted by [Student Name]
The writer, the clinic, the families and the classmates are composite; the sources cited are real.
Initial Post
Toilet training two young children with autism is the heart of my supervised capstone. Before writing the protocol, my supervisor and I met each family and asked a question I had never asked before: how does toileting work in your home?
Amara's family is Somali American. Her mother explained that at home everyone rinses with water from a little bottle kept by the toilet, and that she wanted only women helping Amara there. Her grandmother, who cares for Amara two afternoons a week, uses a Somali word for the bathroom. Leo's parents, both nurses on rotating shifts, worried less about methods than about time: any home routine had to work for whichever parent was awake.
Fong et al. (2016) argue that cultural awareness starts at home, with a practitioner noticing her own assumptions. Mine were clear once I looked: I had assumed toilet paper, assumed any trained staff member could assist, and assumed an evening schedule that suited a family with one parent home every night.
The protocol I would have written fit my bathroom, not theirs.
The protocol now includes Amara's water bottle in her task analysis, female staff only for her, the Somali word as a valid request and a one-page summary in Somali for her grandmother. Leo's home routine is built around a sit schedule either parent can run, with a shared phone note for handoffs between shifts.
Wolf (1978) made the case that a program's goals and methods are acceptable only if the people living with them say so. Both families rated the revised procedures as highly acceptable. I doubt they would have rated my first draft the same way.
What did a family teach you that the research did not?
Reply to Priya
Priya, your point about grandparents is important. A protocol that only parents know can fall apart on the day a grandparent picks the child up, so including them in training seems essential.
Reply to Sam
Sam, I agree that asking about values can feel intrusive at first. Fong et al. (2016) suggest framing it as learning about the family's routines, which both of my families found easy to answer.
References
Fong, E. H., Catagnus, R. M., Brodhead, M. T., Quigley, S., & Field, S. (2016). Developing the cultural awareness skills of behavior analysts. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9(1), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0111-6
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203
Reading the PS 498 Unit 7 instructions
The Unit 7 board in PS498 asks you to discuss culture and family in your capstone. Describe what you learned by asking families, real or composite, how the target routine works in their home. Identify your own assumptions that the families' answers exposed. Explain how the protocol changed as a result. Use research on cultural awareness and on social validity. Report how families rated the procedures if you asked. Close by asking classmates what families taught them. The opening post runs near 400 words, followed by two replies, each naming a family factor a classmate's plan might miss. Keep families composite and avoid stereotypes. Note who interpreted.
Inside the PS498 Unit 7 example
The post opens with practical details the research never mentioned. A paragraph describes asking each family how toileting works at home. A paragraph reports Amara's family's water-cleaning practice, request for female staff and the grandmother's word for the bathroom, and Leo's parents' rotating shifts. A paragraph applies Fong and colleagues and names three of the writer's assumptions, under a highlighted line that the first protocol fit the writer's bathroom. A paragraph lists the protocol changes. High family ratings follow, framed by Wolf's case for social validity. Replies stress training grandparents and framing questions about values as questions about routines. The closing question asks what families taught classmates that research did not.
Where the points sit in the PS498 Unit 7 rubric
Graders of this post look for culture entering the project through specific changes to procedures, not general statements about diversity. Admitting what the writer took for granted demonstrates the self-examination the research recommends. Describing families as individuals, without stereotyping a group, shows respect. Linking changes to social validity, with families' ratings, earns credit. Replies should add a family factor or a practical suggestion rather than praise. Cite cultural awareness and social validity sources in APA style with composite families. A brief note on how families were asked, and in what language, often strengthens the post. Show the protocol change in one line. Ratings from families before and after the changes make the point clearly.
Common PS498 Unit 7 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Culture posts often describe a group's customs in general terms rather than asking a particular family. Others mention culture without showing any change to the plan. Students frequently overlook their own assumptions, which are the part they can most easily change. Grandparents and other caregivers are commonly left out. Replies tend to agree rather than add. Before posting, write down three assumptions your first plan made about the family's home. Ask the family how the routine works there. Change at least one procedure in response. Name the language each caregiver prefers. In replies, suggest one family factor to ask about. Keep families composite. Then check the post for any group generalization.
Get a PS498 Unit 7 example written to your instructions
Send the prompt and the rubric. A custom post discusses culture and family in a capstone project. It arrives within 24-48h, free for a first request. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More PS498 papers and BS in Psychology samples
- PS498 Unit 1: Capstone Focus Post
- PS498 Unit 2: Measurement and Design Paper
- PS498 Unit 3: Capstone Ethics Paper
- PS498 Unit 4: Toilet Training Literature Review
- PS498 Unit 5: Pre-Training Assessment Paper
- PS498 Unit 6: Toilet Training Protocol
- PS498 Unit 8: Caregiver Training Paper
- PS498 Unit 9: Results and Evaluation Paper
- PS498 Unit 10: Capstone Reflection
- PS499 Unit 7: Culture and Diversity Board Post
- PS450 Unit 7: Treatment Team Paper
- BA200 Unit 7: Current Trends in ABA Board Post
- PS440 Unit 7: PTSD Case Paper
PS498 Unit 7 questions, answered
How does culture affect toilet training?
Families differ in timing, methods, language and who handles toileting.
Why ask families before planning?
Their routines and values decide whether a protocol is used at home.
What should replies add?
A family factor the classmate's plan might miss.
Where can I find a free PS498 Unit 7 sample paper?
This page holds the complete PS498 Unit 7 post on how two composite families shaped a toilet training capstone, with replies.
What changed in the protocol in the PS498 Unit 7 sample?
Water cleaning in the task analysis, female staff only for one child, a Somali request word, a translated summary and a shift-friendly home routine.