| Course | GM586 Transformational Leadership |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 1 |
| Paper type | Discussion board post |
| Length | About 390 words, 2 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 discussion post |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | MS in Management |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for GM586 Unit 1
Her Test Plate on the Board: A Unit 1 Post on a Superintendent Who Raised the Bar
GM586 · Unit 1 Discussion
Posted by [Student Name]
The shipyard, the superintendent and the classmates are composite; the sources cited are real.
Initial Post
Over fourteen months at the shipyard where I used to work, nine of our structural welders sat qualification tests in the 6G pipe position. Nobody required it; our structural work did not need pipe certifications. Something about the new welding superintendent made people want them, and I have tried to work out what.
Two behaviors I can describe exactly. Every quarter she welded her own test plate in the shop, had it cut and bend-tested next to the crew's plates, and pinned the result to the board, pass or fail. One quarter her root bend showed an open defect, and that result went up too. Second, she posted rework counts by crew each month and asked each crew what had caused its worst month. She carried their answers to the engineering office, and twice the drawings changed because of them.
Pinning a failed bend test of her own beside the crew's results said more about standards than any speech she gave.
Bernard Bass names four behaviors that make leadership transformational, among them idealized influence, where a leader's own conduct sets the standard, and intellectual stimulation, where a leader invites followers to question assumptions (Bass, 1985). The test plate is idealized influence written as conduct: she held herself to the standard she asked of us, in public, with the risk of failing. The rework question is intellectual stimulation, because it asked crews to rethink a problem the yard had treated as their fault (Bass & Riggio, 2006).
The other two I cannot evidence. People said she made the work feel important, which may be inspirational motivation, but I cannot point to anything she said. Some welders felt she knew them personally; I never saw how.
Classmates, when you describe a leader who raised what people expected of themselves, how much of it can you point to?
Reply to Lauren
Lauren, your charge nurse who worked a night shift on the floor each month sounds like the test plate in another form. Did staff ever see her get something wrong on those shifts, and did that matter?
References
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
What the GM586 Unit 1 assignment asks for
The first GM586 board asks you to describe a leader who raised what people expected of themselves. Begin with what followers did differently, ideally something you can count, since the course defines transformational leadership by its effect on followers. Then describe the leader's behaviors as scenes, specific acts at known times, rather than as qualities. Connect each act you can evidence to one of Bass's four transformational behaviors, explaining why it fits. Be honest about the behaviors you cannot evidence and say so in a sentence each, instead of stretching one memory across all four. Your last line should ask classmates what evidence sits behind their own examples. Most sections expect close to four hundred words, two sources in APA 7 and one reply that asks about a particular act.
How this GM586 Unit 1 example is built
The post opens with a count: nine structural welders took 6G pipe qualification tests over fourteen months without being required to. The second paragraph gives two scenes. Each quarter the superintendent welded her own test plate, had it cut and bend-tested beside the crew's and pinned the result to the board, including one quarter when her root bend failed. She also posted rework counts by crew and carried each crew's explanation of its worst month to engineering, where drawings changed twice. The highlighted sentence says her failed plate said more than any speech. Bass's behaviors place the plate as idealized influence and the rework question as intellectual stimulation, citing Bass and Bass and Riggio. Inspirational motivation and individualized consideration get one candid sentence each as impressions. The reply asks Lauren whether staff saw her charge nurse make mistakes on the floor.
GM586 Unit 1 rubric: what earns full points
GM586 instructors look first for a change in followers that the leader's behavior must explain. Starting from something countable, such as certifications pursued, earns more credit than starting with the leader's personality. Each behavior should be described as a dated or repeated act, then matched to the right transformational behavior with a reason. Honesty about unevidenced behaviors shows the analytical habit the course builds on, and spreading one memory across all four components usually draws a request for evidence. A final question that sends classmates to their own evidence rounds out the post. Replies earn credit when they ask about a specific act. Bass's Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations and Bass and Riggio's Transformational Leadership supply the citations in APA 7.
GM586 Unit 1 help: mistakes that cost points
Many GM586 Unit 1 posts praise a leader's charisma or vision without describing a single act. Others assign every one of the four behaviors to the same story, which convinces nobody. A common gap is the followers: posts that never say what people did differently leave nothing to test the leader's influence against. Some writers choose a famous leader they never observed. Pick a leader you watched, count a change in what followers did, describe two or three acts as scenes, match each to a behavior with a reason, admit what you cannot evidence and ask classmates what they can actually point to.
Get a GM586 Unit 1 example written to your instructions
Name a leader whose arrival altered what colleagues expected of themselves, what those colleagues did differently afterward, and whatever specific acts can be dated; the Unit 1 prompt and rubric complete the request. Composite details fill any gap, bracketed so real ones can replace them. A first post is free and returns within 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More GM586 papers and MS in Management samples
- GM586 Unit 2: Full Range Model Application
- GM586 Unit 3: Self-rating Interpretation
- GM586 Unit 4: Leader Behavior Case
- GM586 Unit 5: Empirical Article Critique
- GM586 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- GM586 Unit 7: Transactional Comparison Paper
- GM586 Unit 8: Destructive Leadership Analysis
- GM586 Unit 9: Behavior Development Plan
- GM586 Unit 10: Applied Leadership Paper
- GM585 Unit 1: Mentoring Functions Discussion Post
- GM543 Unit 1: Functional Structure Discussion Post
- GM541 Unit 1: Outlasted Change Discussion Post
- GM506 Unit 1: Distant Truss Order Discussion Post
GM586 Unit 1 questions, answered
What if I cannot evidence all four components?
Then say so, which is usually the stronger post. A board answer that attaches two components to dated acts and marks the others as unevidenced shows the analytical habit the course builds on. Spreading a single recollection over every component tends to draw a comment asking for the incident behind each, and a short post has no room to supply them.
Can the leader be someone famous?
Many sections discourage it for this board, and the reason is evidence. A public figure arrives already interpreted by biographers and press, so the post ends up summarizing other people's conclusions. A supervisor, officer, coach or teacher whose conduct you watched supplies acts you can date, which is what the four components need before they can be applied at all.
Why measure the followers before describing the leader?
Because the course's subject is defined by its effect on followers' own goals and standards. Starting with a change in what people did, such as certification tests nobody required, gives the post something the leader's behaviors must explain. Starting with the leader's qualities leaves the reader with praise and no way to judge whether anything transformational happened.
Where can I find a free GM586 Unit 1 sample paper?
This page carries a full GM586 Unit 1 discussion post on a shipyard welding superintendent whose posted test plates and rework questions led welders to seek certifications, with a reply and APA 7 references.
Why does the post admit two behaviors are unevidenced?
The writer can describe the test plate and the rework question as specific acts, but has only impressions for the other two. Saying so shows the evidence standard the course expects, rather than attaching every behavior to one memory.