NU674 Unit 10 Revised Evaluation, Late-Onset AUD Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN PMHNP Diagnosis and Management Across the Lifespan Clinical I Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NU674 Unit 10 sample is a revised psychiatric evaluation of a composite 66-year-old retired piano teacher, widowed two years, whose fall at a former student's recital came with a blood alcohol level of 0.11 percent. It was written for Purdue Global NU 674, PMHNP Diagnosis and Management Across the Lifespan Clinical I, the course that closes the first clinical term of the MSN psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner program. The evaluation reaches late-onset alcohol use disorder after bereavement, with an AUDIT of 24, weighs depression, prolonged grief and cognition, and sets a plan led by supervised withdrawal. A closing ledger records six concrete changes since the writer's first evaluation of the term.

CourseNU674 PMHNP Diagnosis and Management Across the Lifespan Clinical I
UnitUnit 10
Paper typeRevised psychiatric evaluation
LengthAbout 1,110 words, 7 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramMSN
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NU674 Unit 10

1

The Recital Fall: A Revised Psychiatric Evaluation of Late-Onset Alcohol Use Disorder in a 66-Year-Old Retired Piano Teacher, With a Ledger of What Changed Since the Term's First Evaluation

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NU674: PMHNP Diagnosis and Management Across the Lifespan Clinical I

Unit 10 Revised Psychiatric Evaluation

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The patient is composite; dates, scores and details are bracketed.

What this part is doingThe evaluation promises two things, a full assessment and a record of the writer's own change, and delivers them in that order.
2

Identifying Data and Sources

Mrs. [N.], [66], widowed, retired high school music teacher who still gives a few private piano lessons, lives alone. Referred by her primary care clinician after her daughter called. Sources: the patient, her daughter by phone with consent, and primary care records including a recent emergency visit.

Chief Complaint

"My daughter thinks I have a drinking problem. I think I have a grief problem."

History of Present Illness

Her husband of [38] years died of heart failure [two] years ago. Before his death she drank "a glass of wine with dinner on weekends." In the first months after, she began having wine in the evenings "to get to sleep." Over the past year this has increased to about a bottle a day, beginning in the afternoon. She has stopped playing piano for pleasure, gives fewer lessons, and says evenings are "the worst part of the day." [Three] weeks ago, at a recital given by a former student, she fell on the steps of the hall, bruising her hip; the emergency department noted a blood alcohol level of [0.11] percent. She was embarrassed and has not left the house much since.

She reports low mood, poor sleep with early waking, reduced appetite and loss of interest, which she attributes to grief. She denies suicidal thoughts, intent or plan. She has tried to cut down twice and "managed a week" each time. She reports morning shakiness that settles after her first drink.

Screening and Scales

AUDIT: [24], in the range suggesting possible dependence. The AUDIT was developed in a WHO collaborative project to detect hazardous and harmful drinking and has been validated across settings (Saunders et al., 1993). PHQ-9: [15]. Columbia screen: negative. MoCA: [25], with points lost on delayed recall.

Collateral

Her daughter reports that her mother "was never a drinker," that the change began after her father's death, and that she found empty bottles in the recycling hidden under newspapers. She has noticed her mother repeating stories on the phone in the evenings.

Medical History

Hypertension on lisinopril. Osteopenia. No known liver disease; GGT [78] U/L and MCV [101] fL on recent tests.

Mental Status Examination

Well dressed, with a bruise on her left forearm. Cooperative, slightly defensive at first, then tearful when speaking about her husband. Speech normal. Mood "sad and tired." Affect sad, reactive. Thought process linear. No suicidal ideation. No perceptual disturbance. Mild tremor of outstretched hands at [10:00]. Oriented. Insight partial: sees grief clearly, drinking less so. Judgment fair.

Differential Diagnosis

1. Alcohol use disorder, moderate to severe, late onset. She describes drinking more than intended, unsuccessful attempts to cut down, continued use despite a fall, reduced activities, and withdrawal tremor relieved by drinking.

2. Major depressive disorder versus alcohol-induced depressive disorder. Her depressive symptoms began with bereavement and have worsened with drinking; whether they persist after a period of abstinence will help distinguish them.

3. Prolonged grief. Her yearning and avoidance two years after the death may meet criteria and will be reassessed as drinking is addressed.

4. Mild cognitive impairment versus alcohol-related cognitive effects. Recall deficits and evening repetition may reflect intoxication; cognition will be retested after abstinence.

The diagnosis she offered, grief, is part of the answer; the drinking she has been using to manage grief is now the more urgent part.

Why Late-Onset Drinking Deserves Its Own Attention

Older adults are more sensitive to alcohol because of changes in body composition and metabolism, and drinking interacts with common medications and with falls, which reviews highlight as specific risks in this age group (Blow & Barry, 2012). Late-onset problem drinking often follows a loss such as bereavement or retirement and is frequently missed because older adults are not asked (Kuerbis et al., 2014). Her fall is the kind of consequence that brings the problem to light. In her case the problem had been visible to her daughter for months, but it took an injury in public for anyone to name it, and the evaluation treats that delay as part of the history rather than a failing of the family.

Her Own Account of the Drinking

Asked to describe an ordinary day, she said she wakes at [05:00], cannot get back to sleep, and waits for the light. Mornings are manageable; she walks to the shop and sometimes practices scales. The first glass comes "around three, when the house gets too quiet," which was when her husband used to come home from his workshop. By evening she has finished most of a bottle and falls asleep in front of the television. She said the wine "makes the house feel less empty for a few hours," and then, after a pause, "and then it makes it emptier." When asked what she would want if the drinking stopped, she said she would like to play for her grandchildren at Christmas without her hands shaking. That goal was written into the plan in her words, since a reason she chose is more likely to carry her through withdrawal than one offered to her.

Plan

1. Withdrawal risk: given daily heavy drinking and morning tremor, a medically supervised withdrawal plan with her primary care clinician, with a withdrawal scale, rather than stopping abruptly at home alone.

2. Treatment for alcohol use disorder: discussion of naltrexone once liver tests are reviewed, and referral to an older adult outpatient program.

3. Grief: referral to a bereavement group and grief-focused therapy once she is stable.

4. Reassess mood and cognition after [four] weeks of abstinence.

5. Falls: home safety review, and discussion with her daughter about support during withdrawal.

What this part is doingThe plan orders safety first, because unsupervised withdrawal in an older adult is the most immediate risk.
3

Ledger: What Changed Since My First Evaluation of the Term

1. Collateral. First evaluation: none. This evaluation: daughter by phone, which supplied the hidden bottles and the evening confusion.

2. Substance screening. First: one question, "Do you drink?" This one: the full AUDIT, completed with her.

3. Mental status language. First: interpretive words such as "guarded." This one: observations, such as the tremor with its time of day.

4. Differential. First: a single diagnosis. This one: four, each with the finding that will separate it.

5. Cognition. First: not assessed. This one: a MoCA, with a plan to repeat it.

6. Plan order. First: listed by diagnosis. This one: ordered by risk.

What this part is doingThe ledger records concrete differences between two documents, which makes the claim of growth checkable.
4

References

Blow, F. C., & Barry, K. L. (2012). Alcohol and substance misuse in older adults. Current Psychiatry Reports, 14(4), 310-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-012-0292-9

Kuerbis, A., Sacco, P., Blazer, D. G., & Moore, A. A. (2014). Substance abuse among older adults. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 30(3), 629-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2014.04.008

Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption: II. Addiction, 88(6), 791-804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x

What the NU674 Unit 10 assignment asks for

The final NU674 assignment asks you to complete a psychiatric evaluation that shows how your assessment skills have developed over the term. Prompts usually require a full evaluation and a comparison with an earlier one, identifying specific changes in your practice. Evaluations of six to eight pages including the comparison are common. Graders reward evaluations that use structured screening, collateral, observational language and a reasoned differential, and comparisons that point to concrete differences between documents rather than general claims of growth. Safety considerations, such as withdrawal risk in an older adult who drinks daily, should shape the order of the plan. Keep the reflection on growth brief and specific.

Inside the NU674 Unit 10 example

The evaluation opens with identifying data and three sources, then her own view that she has a grief problem. The history traces the drinking from bereavement to a bottle a day and the fall. Screening gives the AUDIT, PHQ-9, Columbia screen and MoCA. Collateral from her daughter, medical findings and a mental status examination follow. Four diagnoses are weighed, with a highlighted sentence on the diagnosis she offered. A section cites Blow and Barry and Kuerbis on late-onset drinking, and her own account of an ordinary day adds her goal of playing for her grandchildren. A five-item plan orders safety first, and a six-row ledger closes the evaluation.

NU674 Unit 10 rubric: what earns full points

Revised evaluations are usually graded on completeness, diagnostic reasoning, safety, the quality of the comparison and professional writing. A complete evaluation names its sources and fills every heading. Diagnostic reasoning rewards a differential that separates substance effects from depression, grief and cognitive decline, with a plan to retest after abstinence. Safety is judged on whether withdrawal and fall risk are addressed first. The comparison row earns credit for specific, verifiable differences between the first and final evaluations, such as the addition of collateral or a structured screen. Writing points depend on observational language, accurate citations and a plan ordered by risk rather than by diagnosis. Correct citations and a clear, consistent structure complete the marks for the evaluation.

NU674 Unit 10 help from the desk

A frequent mistake in older adults is accepting grief or depression as the full explanation and never quantifying drinking. Another is planning abrupt abstinence at home for someone with daily heavy drinking and morning tremor. Students often test cognition while the patient may be intoxicated or withdrawing and treat the result as final. Some evaluations skip collateral, which here supplied the hidden bottles. Others write the growth comparison in general terms, such as better interviewing, that no reader can check. And ignoring the patient's own goal, such as playing for her grandchildren, misses a source of motivation that can carry her through treatment. Name each source.

Get an NU674 Unit 10 example written to your instructions

A revision only makes sense beside the original, so gather the comments returned on your first NU674 evaluation, the Unit 10 prompt and the rubric. The first sample is free, arriving within 24-48h: a full evaluation of a composite patient, preceded by a ledger that maps each kind of comment to a visible change. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More NU674 papers and MSN samples

NU674 Unit 10 questions, answered

Does the revised evaluation have to use the same patient as my first one?

It depends on the prompt. Some sections ask for a new patient so the revision shows skill rather than editing; others want the same case rewritten. The sample uses a new composite patient and carries the lessons across through the ledger, a format that suits either reading and makes the change visible without comparing two cases line by line.

Where can I find a free NU674 Unit 10 sample paper?

The whole NU674 Unit 10 revised psychiatric evaluation is on this page, from history, screening and collateral through a four-part differential and a risk-ordered plan to the six-row ledger of changes, plus three references. A revised evaluation for your own case can be requested.

Why is supervised withdrawal first in the NU674 Unit 10 plan?

She drinks about a bottle a day and has morning shakiness relieved by drinking, which signals physical dependence. Stopping abruptly at home alone could cause dangerous withdrawal, so the plan arranges medically supervised withdrawal with her primary care clinician.

What does the ledger in NU674 Unit 10 show?

Six concrete changes since the first evaluation of the term: collateral from family, a full AUDIT instead of one question, observational language in the mental status examination, a four-item differential, a cognitive screen, and a plan ordered by risk.

Why is late-onset drinking often missed in NU674 Unit 10?

Older adults are less often asked about alcohol, and drinking that begins after a loss can be seen as understandable grief. Older adults are also more sensitive to alcohol and more vulnerable to falls and drug interactions, which makes early detection important.