SAFE-T supplies the frame and the C-SSRS the questions in this NU674 Unit 4 assessment of a composite retiree, ending on a stated risk level and documented response. Searches like "nu 674 unit 4 assignment example", "nu674 unit 4 sample" and "nu674 unit 4 example" land here.
What a finished NU674 Unit 4 suicide risk assessment looks like
Three pages under SAFE-T's five headings, the Suicide Assessment Five-step Evaluation and Triage published by SAMHSA: risk factors, protective factors, suicide inquiry, risk level with intervention, and documentation. Risk factors list his age and sex, living alone after a divorce, chronic pain, a depressive episode now in its [fourth] month and access to opioids. Protective factors record a daughter who visits on Sundays, a map restoration commission he wants to finish and a stated religious objection he calls weaker than it was. The inquiry reports the C-SSRS in its baseline version, each ideation item beside his quoted answer: wish to be dead, yes; active thoughts, yes, [twice] in the past month; method, the tin; intent, no; plan, no. Behavior items record no actual, interrupted or aborted attempt and one ambiguous preparatory act.
How a NU674 Unit 4 example is structured
The five steps are followed in their published order, and the document never skips ahead to a level before the inquiry supports one. Factors on both sides are specific to him rather than copied from a generic list, and each protective factor is weighed honestly: the religious objection is recorded as weakening because he said so. The inquiry keeps every C-SSRS item and answer together, including the items answered no, because a reader must see that intent and plan were asked about. The tin receives its own paragraph. Collecting pills can count as preparatory behavior on the C-SSRS, and the assessment records his first explanation, pain relief, then his later admission that he has thought of the tablets as a way out, and codes the act accordingly. The level, moderate, is stated once with its reasoning.
Five steps in published order
Risk factors, protective factors, inquiry, level with intervention, and documentation appear as headings in SAFE-T's sequence. Anyone auditing the note can confirm the level came after the questions, not before, which graders tend to verify before anything else.
Every item, including the noes
The C-SSRS ideation and behavior items appear with his quoted answer after each. Recording intent, no, and plan, no, as asked questions keeps the note from collapsing into denies SI, which tells a later reader nothing about what was explored.
The tobacco tin, coded
His two explanations for keeping the tablets are both recorded in his words, in the order he gave them. The assessment then states how the act is coded on the C-SSRS and why the second explanation decides it.
Moderate, with reasons attached
Active ideation with a method, no stated intent, an ambiguous preparatory act and real protective factors place him at moderate risk under SAFE-T's descriptions. The level appears once, followed by the facts that produced it, so a reviewer can disagree precisely.
What was documented as done
The documentation step records actions taken by the treating team, not advice: the daughter's agreement to remove the tin that evening, a safety plan begun in session, and a return visit in [three] days, each with who acted and when.
Where marks go in NU674 Unit 4
Precision about the instruments is the first thing checked. Calling SAFE-T a scored scale, or describing the C-SSRS as a test that predicts suicide, costs accuracy before any reasoning is read. The inquiry draws the heaviest scrutiny: a note that records denial of ideation without the intent, plan and behavior questions behind it, or that summarizes answers instead of quoting them, leaves a supervisor unable to verify what was asked. Access to means matters as much: an assessment of a man with opioids at home that never asks where they are misses the most modifiable factor. A level stated without reasoning, or reasoning that ignores protective factors, reads as a guess. Minor losses come from passive constructions that hide who acted and from protective factors listed without any weight.
Get a NU674 Unit 4 example written to your instructions
Risk instruments vary by site, from the SAFE-T and C-SSRS pairing used here to a facility's own form. Name the instruments your NU674 site uses, and include the Unit 4 rubric with a de-identified outline. A first sample, free and back within 24-48h, applies that framework to a composite patient and keeps every answer verbatim, exactly as given.
NU674 Unit 4 questions, answered
What is SAFE-T, and how does it relate to the C-SSRS?
SAFE-T, the Suicide Assessment Five-step Evaluation and Triage, is a SAMHSA framework: identify risk factors, identify protective factors, conduct a suicide inquiry, determine risk level and intervention, and document. It is a structure rather than a scored scale. The C-SSRS, developed by Posner and colleagues, supplies standardized questions for the inquiry step, which is why the two are often paired.
Does saving medication always count as preparatory behavior?
No. On the C-SSRS, preparatory behavior means acts toward making an attempt, and collecting pills counts when that is its purpose. Many people keep leftover medication for ordinary reasons. The assessment has to ask why the tablets were kept and record the answer as it was given, which is exactly why the sample gives the tin its own paragraph.
Can the sample stand in for my site's risk documentation?
No. Any risk assessment of a real patient belongs to the clinician who conducted it and follows your site's policy and your preceptor's direction. The sample is a composite written to show what complete documentation contains: questions asked, answers quoted, a reasoned level and actions with owners. It is a model of the written record, not guidance for a live situation.