NU672 · Nursing

NU672 PMHNP Psychotherapy for Individuals, Groups, and Families Clinical sample papers, unit by unit

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN PMHNP Psychotherapy for Individuals, Groups, and Families Clinical Purdue University Global Free custom samples in 24–48h

Therapy is learned partly by writing down exactly what was said and then asking why it was said. NU672 samples model the process recording, the group session analysis, the family genogram write-up and the supervision notes that surround psychotherapy practicum work.

How this shelf works

Send the exact assignment or rubric from your classroom and a custom sample written to it lands in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. NU672 is Purdue Global’s PMHNP Psychotherapy for Individuals, Groups, and Families Clinical course. It centers on turning supervised psychotherapy sessions with individuals, groups and families into written analysis a clinical supervisor can review and question. Searches like "nu 672 unit 4 assignment example", "NU672 sample paper", and "NU672 unit samples" land on this page.

What NU672 is really about

The process recording sits at the center of NU672. A verbatim exchange runs down one column, and beside each line the writer records what they were thinking, what technique they intended and what they would say differently now. Graders read those right-hand columns far more closely than the dialogue, because that is where therapeutic reasoning becomes visible and where a practicum student shows whether the theory from earlier courses is reaching the room. Everything on this page is built on composite clients. Session hours, the practicum log, site agreements and any evaluation a preceptor signs are yours alone and are never drafted here; the samples cover only the analysis written after and around those sessions.

Groups and families add structure that individual work lacks. Group writing usually asks which stage a group has reached, using whichever developmental model the section teaches, and which therapeutic factors were visible in a session, such as universality, instillation of hope or interpersonal learning. Family work shifts the unit of analysis from one person to a system. A genogram maps three generations of relationships and patterns, and the written formulation that follows explains how a symptom in one member serves or stabilizes the whole. Supervision preparation ties the three together: a short document naming the moment you want reviewed, what you noticed in yourself, and the question you are bringing.

What NU672’s assessments ask for

Process recordings recur across the term rather than arriving once. A first one, on an individual session and analyzed column by column, commonly appears early beside a set of practicum learning goals. Group material typically arrives mid-term, with an observation or co-facilitation write-up identifying stage, member roles and therapeutic factors. Family prompts often require a genogram with a systems formulation and a proposed intervention drawn from a named family therapy model. Many sections request a second recording late in the term so growth can be compared against the first. Countertransference reflections, treatment plans with measurable goals and a termination summary also appear frequently. Peer feedback on a classmate's de-identified exchange is a common board prompt, and the live hour in some sections works as group supervision.

Where students lose points in NU672

Process recordings lose the most when the analysis column restates the dialogue instead of examining it, so a reader learns what was said and nothing about why. The missed moment ranks second, where the client offered something significant and the recording passes over it without comment, which graders catch because they read for exactly those openings. Group papers slip when stages are named from a textbook with no behavior from the session offered as evidence. Family formulations lose ground when the genogram is drawn and never interpreted. Credit also disappears for countertransference confessed without any account of how it shaped the next response, for treatment goals that cannot be measured, and for details specific enough that a classmate at the same site could recognize the client.

NU672 grading scale at Purdue Global: how the work is graded, from Purdue Assignments
How Purdue Global grades NU672, visualized by Purdue Assignments.

The NU672 drawers

Unit 1

NU672 Unit 1 practicum learning goals example

Unit 1 often asks for goals tied to the modalities you expect to practice this term. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Unit 2

NU672 Unit 2 process recording example

Unit 2 typically analyzes an individual session line by line in a separate reasoning column. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Unit 3

NU672 Unit 3 supervision preparation note example

Unit 3 in many sections names the moment you want reviewed and your question about it. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Unit 4

NU672 Unit 4 countertransference reflection example

Unit 4 often examines a reaction a client provoked and how it steered your next reply. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Unit 5

NU672 Unit 5 group session analysis example

Unit 5 usually identifies group stage, member roles and the therapeutic factors actually visible. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Unit 6

NU672 Unit 6 discussion board post example

Unit 6 frequently offers written feedback on a classmate's de-identified therapy exchange. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Unit 7

NU672 Unit 7 genogram and formulation example

Unit 7 typically maps three generations and explains what the presenting symptom does for the family. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Unit 8

NU672 Unit 8 treatment plan example

Unit 8 often sets measurable goals and names the therapy model each goal follows from. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Unit 9

NU672 Unit 9 comparative process recording example

Unit 9 in many sections repeats the recording late so growth shows against the first. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Unit 10

NU672 Unit 10 termination summary example

Unit 10 usually closes a therapy relationship on paper, recording gains, open issues and referrals. On request, free, 24-48h.

See the example →
Different?

Your classroom shows something else?

Purdue University Global revises courses; unit counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.

Send it over →

Using a NU672 sample the right way

Start with the right-hand columns of a sample recording and only then read the dialogue. If the analysis could have been written without looking at the words, it is generic and the sample is showing you what to avoid; if it quotes the exchange and argues with it, it is showing you the standard. For group and family pieces, count how many interpretations rest on something observed in session. Your own recordings must come from your own sessions. A first model recording, genogram or group analysis, written to the format and rubric you attach, is yours free within 24-48h.

How these samples are written

The discipline behind every paper here: the rubric is the outline, each row gets its section, seminar-option write-ups follow their expected shape, and the format layer ships exact. Send your unit's instructions with a request and the sample matches them, revisions included.

NU672 questions, answered

How long should a process recording excerpt be?

Long enough to contain one real moment, which often means several minutes of dialogue rather than an entire session. Choose a stretch where something shifted, an emotional disclosure, a rupture or a silence, because the analysis needs material to work on. A long transcript with thin commentary tends to earn less than a short one examined closely.

Which family therapy model should the formulation use?

Whichever your section introduced, applied consistently. Structural, Bowenian and strategic approaches each read a family differently, looking at boundaries and hierarchy, differentiation across generations, or the sequences that keep a problem going. The formulation should use one model's vocabulary throughout and say what intervention follows from it, rather than borrowing a concept from each.

Should I admit mistakes in a process recording?

Yes, and with specifics. Supervisors expect errors in early sessions, and a recording that finds none reads as unexamined rather than skillful. Identify the response you regret, say what you think drove it, and write the alternative you would try next time. That sequence is usually what reflection criteria reward most heavily.