NU672 Unit 7 Genogram and Bowen Formulation Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN PMHNP Psychotherapy for Individuals, Groups, and Families Clinical Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NU672 Unit 7 sample is a three-generation genogram and Bowen formulation for a composite 16-year-old whose anger outbursts erupt most evenings within an hour of his father coming home. It was written for Purdue Global NU 672, PMHNP Psychotherapy for Individuals, Groups, and Families Clinical, in the MSN psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner program. The genogram is written out in text, from a grandfather with alcohol use disorder and a twelve-year cutoff to a mother who calls her own mother daily. Four Bowen concepts carry the formulation, and it argues that the outbursts keep the parents from facing each other. The Miller review shows which parts of the theory have research support.

CourseNU672 PMHNP Psychotherapy for Individuals, Groups, and Families Clinical
UnitUnit 7
Paper typeGenogram and Bowen formulation
LengthAbout 1,140 words, 7 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramMSN
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NU672 Unit 7

1

A Door Slammed Every Evening at Six: A Three-Generation Genogram and Bowen Formulation for a 16-Year-Old's Anger Outbursts

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NU672: PMHNP Psychotherapy for Individuals, Groups, and Families Clinical

Unit 7 Genogram and Formulation

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The family is composite; names, ages and dates are bracketed. The genogram is given in text form.

What this part is doingThe formulation opens with a daily pattern, so the family system is visible before any theory is introduced.
2

The Referral

Jordan [M.], [16], was referred by his school counselor after he punched a locker and was suspended for [two] days. At home he has had outbursts most evenings since [January]: shouting, slamming doors and, twice, breaking things. The outbursts usually begin within an hour of his father's return from work. His mother, Dana, [44], has begun meeting her husband, Greg, [47], at the door to tell him "not to set him off." Jordan's sister, Mia, [12], spends evenings in her room. Jordan says his father "treats me like I'm nothing." Greg says Jordan is "out of control and his mother lets him get away with it."

The Genogram in Text

Generation one, paternal side: Greg's father, Walt [M.], [74], a retired millworker with alcohol use disorder, described as explosive when drinking; Greg's mother, Ruth, died in [2012] of breast cancer. Greg has not spoken with his father since Ruth's funeral, a cutoff of about [12] years. Greg's older brother, [Ray], lives [two] hours away and has limited contact with everyone.

Generation one, maternal side: Dana's parents, Frank and Lois [P.], [72] and [70], married [50] years, live [ten] minutes away. Dana speaks to her mother every day and describes her as her "best friend." Lois has a history of anxiety and was often ill during Dana's childhood; Dana, the eldest, helped care for her younger siblings.

Generation two: Greg and Dana, married [19] years. Dana describes the marriage as "fine except for the fighting about Jordan." Greg works long hours as a warehouse manager.

Generation three: Jordan, [16], and Mia, [12].

Relationship lines: close and overinvolved between Dana and Lois; close and protective between Dana and Jordan; conflictual between Greg and Jordan; distant between Greg and Dana; cutoff between Greg and Walt.

What this part is doingThe genogram is written out in full so the reader can check each relationship line against the formulation.
3

The Bowen Formulation

Bowen family systems theory describes the family as an emotional unit in which individual symptoms can reflect patterns in the whole system. Four of its concepts carry the formulation.

1. Triangles. When tension between two people rises, a third is drawn in to reduce it. Here, tension between Greg and Dana is not addressed directly; it runs through Jordan. Dana aligns with Jordan against Greg's criticism, Greg criticizes Jordan and, through him, Dana's parenting.

2. Emotional cutoff. Greg manages his unresolved relationship with his father by having no contact. Bowen theory predicts that a cutoff does not resolve the underlying emotion but carries it into new relationships. Greg describes his father as "never satisfied," and Jordan uses the same words about Greg.

3. Differentiation of self. Differentiation is the ability to stay connected to others while keeping one's own thinking and feelings. Dana's daily reliance on her mother and her role as a caretaker in childhood suggest lower differentiation; her anxiety rises when Jordan is upset, and she acts to calm him rather than letting father and son work things out.

4. Multigenerational transmission. Patterns repeat across generations: an explosive father in generation one, a critical father in generation two, an explosive son in generation three; a caretaking eldest daughter in generation two who now caretakes her son.

What the Symptom Accomplishes

Jordan's outbursts keep his parents from facing each other: every evening's argument is about him, and none of it is about the distance in their marriage. The outbursts also keep Dana close to Jordan and give Greg a target for the frustration he cannot direct at his own father. For Jordan, the outbursts are painful, but they bring his mother's protection and keep his father's attention on him, even if negatively. In Bowen's terms, the symptom stabilizes the system at the cost of the child.

What this part is doingThe central claim is stated once, directly, and the rest of the section shows what each member gains or loses.
4

How Well Supported Is This Formulation?

Bowen theory is influential in family therapy, but its concepts have uneven research support. A review of basic research found empirical support for the link between differentiation of self and chronic anxiety, marital satisfaction and psychological distress, but little support for Bowen's specific theories of triangulation and sibling position, and noted that research on multigenerational transmission had largely not tested Bowen's own version (Miller et al., 2004). Differentiation can be measured with a validated self-report scale, the Differentiation of Self Inventory (Skowron & Friedlander, 1998).

This means the formulation's strongest element, that lower differentiation relates to Dana's anxiety and the couple's distress, has the best support. The triangle, although it fits the family's evening pattern, is a clinical interpretation rather than a tested finding. The formulation should be treated as a working hypothesis that guides questions and interventions, not as a fact about the family.

How the Family Responded to the Genogram

The genogram was drawn with the family in the second session, with Jordan present for the first half. When the line between Greg and his father was drawn as a cutoff, Greg said, "That's got nothing to do with this." Later in the same session he said, without prompting, that his father used to wait for him at the door "to see what mood he was in." Dana was quiet when her daily calls with her mother were drawn as an overinvolved line, and then laughed and said her husband had been saying that for years. Jordan said little but asked to take a photo of the drawing. These reactions do not confirm the formulation, but they suggest the family found parts of it recognizable, which is a useful starting point for treatment.

Implications for Treatment

1. Assess safety first: the two incidents of breaking things and the locker punch call for a clear safety plan, including what each parent will do if an outburst escalates.

2. Interrupt the triangle: ask Dana to stop meeting Greg at the door, and support Greg and Jordan to have one short, structured conversation each week with Dana not present.

3. Address the couple directly: offer Greg and Dana sessions about their relationship, framed as supporting Jordan.

4. Invite Greg to explore his relationship with his father, at his own pace, since the cutoff appears to shape how he responds to his son.

5. Measure: ask both parents to complete the Differentiation of Self Inventory at intake and after [12] sessions, and track the frequency of outbursts weekly.

The genogram itself is a tool for this work. McGoldrick and colleagues describe genograms as a way to engage families in seeing patterns across generations (McGoldrick et al., 2020). Showing the family the repeated patterns may help them see Jordan's anger as part of a family story rather than as his problem alone.

5

References

McGoldrick, M., Gerson, R., & Petry, S. (2020). Genograms: Assessment and treatment (4th ed.). W. W. Norton.

Miller, R. B., Anderson, S., & Keala, D. K. (2004). Is Bowen theory valid? A review of basic research. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30(4), 453-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2004.tb01255.x

Skowron, E. A., & Friedlander, M. L. (1998). The Differentiation of Self Inventory: Development and initial validation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.45.3.235

Reading the NU 672 Unit 7 instructions

The Unit 7 assignment asks you to construct a genogram of at least three generations for a family you worked with and to write a formulation using a family systems theory, usually Bowen's. Prompts typically want relationship patterns marked, the concepts that fit the family's material, an explanation of what the presenting symptom does within the system, and implications for treatment. Four to six pages plus the genogram is common. Graders reward formulations that use only the concepts the family's history supports, state the evidence base honestly, and lead to specific interventions. Including safety concerns, where the symptom involves aggression or self-harm, is expected in stronger papers.

How the NU 672 Unit 7 example is put together

The referral describes the outbursts, the suspension and each family member's view. The genogram section lists both sides of generation one, the parents' marriage and the two children, then the relationship lines. The formulation applies triangles, emotional cutoff, differentiation of self and multigenerational transmission, each with evidence from the family. A highlighted sentence states what the son's symptom accomplishes, and the section then shows what each member gains or loses. The evidence section cites the Miller review and the Differentiation of Self Inventory. A section records how the family reacted when the genogram was drawn, and five numbered treatment implications close the paper. Each step is tied to one concept.

Reading the NU672 Unit 7 grading rubric

Rubrics for a genogram and formulation usually cover the genogram's completeness, correct application of theory, the function of the symptom, critical appraisal and treatment planning. Completeness earns full points for three generations with relationship lines, significant health history and key dates. Application rewards concepts matched to the family's material rather than a tour of all eight Bowen concepts. The symptom row asks you to say plainly what the son's outbursts do for the family as a whole. Appraisal points go to an honest account of which concepts have research support. Treatment planning earns credit when interventions follow from the formulation and include safety planning where aggression is present.

NU672 Unit 7 help: mistakes that cost points

Students often draw a genogram with names and dates but no relationship patterns, which leaves nothing to formulate. Another common error is using every Bowen concept whether or not the family's history supports it. Some formulations blame one parent, which misreads systems theory. Others present triangulation as proven when research support for it is limited. Safety is often overlooked when a teenager's anger involves property damage or violence. And interventions that address only the identified patient miss the point of a family systems formulation, which is that change in one relationship can shift the whole pattern around the symptom. Draw the genogram with the family where possible, since their reactions are part of the assessment.

Get an NU672 Unit 7 example written to your instructions

Genogram prompts in NU672 differ in the model they want, Bowen, structural or strategic, and in whether a family is supplied. Share the case or the constraints for an invented family, the model and the rubric. Ready in 24-48h, with no fee on a first request, the sample pairs a relational genogram and timeline with a formulation stating what the symptom does. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More NU672 papers and MSN samples

NU672 Unit 7 questions, answered

Does the genogram need medical history as well as relationships?

Include medical and psychiatric history where it bears on the pattern, such as a grandparent's untreated anxiety or a parent's drinking. A family therapy genogram is mainly a map of relationships and events, so a figure crowded with unrelated diagnoses can hide the emotional process the formulation depends on. Relationship lines, nodal events and a household boundary usually matter most.

What does it mean to say a symptom serves the family?

It means the symptom, whatever its origins, has come to stabilize something in the system, such as keeping a parent occupied or giving a strained couple a shared concern. The claim is not that anyone chose it. Systems formulations describe function to explain why a problem persists, which then suggests where an intervention could loosen the pattern.

Which of Bowen's eight concepts should appear?

Only those the family's material supports. Triangles and multigenerational transmission appear in most formulations; emotional cutoff, sibling position and the family projection process when the history shows them. Listing all eight with a sentence each reads as a summary of theory. Four concepts, each tied to a line on the genogram, usually make the stronger paper.

Where can I find a free NU672 Unit 7 sample paper?

The complete NU672 Unit 7 genogram and formulation can be read here, with the three-generation genogram in text, four Bowen concepts applied, the symptom's function, the evidence review, the family's reactions and five treatment steps, plus three references. A formulation for your own family case can be requested.

How well supported is Bowen theory in NU672 Unit 7?

The paper cites a review that found support for links between differentiation of self and chronic anxiety, marital satisfaction and distress, but little support for Bowen's theories of triangulation and sibling position. The formulation is therefore treated as a working hypothesis.