Kolbe Street's radio sold pinched-by-hand quality while its grocery circular sold a free second bag; the Unit 1 discussion board post for MT359 names the one shoppers believed. Searches like "mt 359 unit 1 assignment example", "mt359 unit 1 sample" and "mt359 unit 1 example" land here.
What a finished MT359 Unit 1 discussion board post looks like
About [380] words of post and a [150]-word reply, written by a composite sales coordinator at Kolbe Street, a family pierogi maker selling frozen twelve-count bags through roughly [340] grocery stores in western Pennsylvania, eastern Ohio and northern West Virginia. The first paragraph lays the two messages side by side: radio spots and freezer-door clings calling the pierogi pinched by hand and worth [$6.49], and a chain circular running buy one, get one free in 17 of 52 weeks, close to a third of the year. Paragraph two brings in reference price from the unit reading, along with a shopper-card estimate that [58] percent of bags sold on deal. The third names which side the post would change, and why. One course source and one trade article are cited in APA style.
How a MT359 Unit 1 example is structured
Claim first, evidence second, proposal third, then a question to the thread. Its first sentence carries the argument whole: the brand spent a year quoting shoppers two prices, and the one printed in the circular was the one they believed. Next the post separates what each tool said from what each tool did, since the radio only asserted quality while the deal changed behavior at the freezer case. Reference price carries the middle paragraph: a shopper who sees a free second bag every third week learns to treat [$3.25] as the real figure and [$6.49] as an overcharge. The proposal keeps the premium claim and cuts the deal weeks rather than the reverse, with the reason stated. Answering a classmate's pizza chain example, the reply asks whether that chain's discounting is its true position, in which case the ads, not the offers, are what drifted.
Two prices in one year
Radio and freezer-door clings said pinched by hand and worth [$6.49]; the chain's circular offered a free second bag in 17 of 52 weeks. The post puts both facts in its first three sentences before interpreting either of them.
What the shopper learned
Reference price, taken from the unit reading, explains the damage: a bag given away every third week resets what a fair price feels like. The post cites the shopper-card estimate that [58] percent of volume moved on deal.
Which side gives way
Either the ads drop the premium claim or the circular drops the deal. The post keeps the claim, arguing that a pinched-by-hand product priced as a commodity loses to the national machine-made brand on that brand's home ground.
A question for the thread
Classmates are asked to name one brand whose offers and advertising disagree, and to say which of the two is telling the truth about where that brand actually competes.
Reply: the pizza chain case
A classmate faults a pizza chain whose ads praise its dough while its app never shows a full price. The reply suggests the discount may be the real position, which would make the dough ads the piece out of line.
Where marks go in MT359 Unit 1
Graders reading MT359 opening posts usually look for a named contradiction between tools, stated precisely, rather than a general complaint that a campaign felt inconsistent. Posts that quote both messages, give the frequency of the offer and say what the offer taught buyers tend to collect the analysis credit in full. Applying a course concept by name, reference price here, lifts a post above opinion. Credit also follows a decision about which side of the contradiction should change, since integration can be repaired from either end and the prompt often asks which. Posts listing every flaw in a campaign, from casting to jingle, drift away from the unit's question. Replies that merely agree score lower than replies testing the classmate's case, and uncited statistics about deal buying read as guesses.
Get a MT359 Unit 1 example written to your instructions
Some Unit 1 boards assign a campaign; others leave the choice to each student. Either way, pass along the brand, the board question and how participation is graded. Back within 24-48h: a post that states the contradiction in two sentences, applies one course concept to it, and adds a reply for a classmate. Nothing is charged for that first one.
MT359 Unit 1 questions, answered
Can the post use a small or regional brand instead of a national campaign?
Yes, and a regional brand often makes the sharper post, because its circulars, radio spots and store signs are easy to collect side by side. A national campaign works too, but the contradiction has to be documented rather than remembered. Whichever you choose, quote the two conflicting messages directly and give a source or date for each, so classmates can check the reading.
Does a price promotion always contradict premium advertising?
Not always. A rare, well-framed promotion can sit comfortably beside a quality claim, especially one tied to an occasion or a new product. The contradiction appears when the deal runs often enough to reset what buyers expect to pay, or when its wording treats the product as ordinary. Frequency and framing are the two things worth measuring in your post.
How should the reply to a classmate be framed?
As a test of their reading rather than agreement with it. Ask whether the contradiction they found might run the other way, with the offer reflecting the real position and the advertising out of line, or whether a detail they cite has another explanation. Most rubrics reward a reply that adds evidence or a concept the original post did not use.