Eleven interviews, six codes, a second coder and one lobby-window finding: the MT355 Unit 8 qualitative analysis shows how far transcripts from non-swimming adults can be pushed. Searches like "mt 355 unit 8 assignment example", "mt355 unit 8 sample" and "mt355 unit 8 example" land here.
What a finished MT355 Unit 8 qualitative analysis looks like
Six pages: a method paragraph, a codebook, a findings section organized by code, and a limits page. The method paragraph describes eleven semi-structured interviews of 25 to 40 minutes, six with adults from the parent list and five recruited through a community center's evening classes. The codebook gives each code a definition, an inclusion rule and an example excerpt: fear of deep water or of putting the face in, raised in 9 interviews; being watched from the viewing window, 7; wanting to swim with one's own children, 6; evenings after children's bedtime, 5; a childhood scare in water, 4; price raised unprompted, 2. A second coder applied the codebook to three transcripts, agreeing on 47 of 57 segments, or 82.5 percent.
How a MT355 Unit 8 example is structured
Method comes first because a reader needs to know who was interviewed, and how they were found, before judging any pattern. The codebook follows so that every finding can be traced to a definition and an excerpt. Findings are organized by code, but each opens with what the code can support and what it cannot: seven of eleven raising the viewing window shows the concern exists and recurs, and cannot show how common it is among local adults. Disagreements from the second coder are reported rather than hidden; most fell on the fear code, where one reader separated deep-water fear from face-in-water discomfort, and the codebook was revised to split them. Excerpts are short and attributed by participant number. The limits page names who the recruitment missed and converts each finding into something the survey data can test.
Who was heard
Eleven adults, six from the parent list and five from a community center's evening classes. All live within fifteen minutes of North or Riverside, and none can swim a length.
A codebook with rules
Each code carries a definition, an inclusion rule and one excerpt. Price raised unprompted counts only when a participant mentions cost before being asked about it.
The window nobody asked about
Seven participants mentioned parents watching from the lobby. Participant 4 compared it to learning in a shop window. The finding supports testing an evening slot after the lobby closes.
Two fears, not one
The second coder separated fear of deep water from discomfort with the face in water. Agreement reached 47 of 57 segments, and the codebook now splits the two.
What eleven people cannot show
How common any concern is across local adults. Each finding becomes a survey item or a design test, and none becomes a percentage of the market.
Where marks go in MT355 Unit 8
The distance between evidence and claim decides most of the grade for qualitative work in MT355, and the weakest version turns seven of eleven into 64 percent of adults, a figure that means nothing at this sample size. A codebook with definitions and inclusion rules is checked next; codes listed as labels, with no rule for applying them, cannot be checked. Excerpts that are long, unattributed or chosen only to confirm a theme cost evidence points. A second-coder check reported as a single agreement figure, with no account of where disagreements fell, misses the most useful part of that exercise. Findings that never connect to the swim school's decision earn little application credit, and limits confined to small sample size miss the recruitment bias the design actually carries.
Get a MT355 Unit 8 example written to your instructions
Send the transcripts or notes your Unit 8 assignment supplies with the prompt and rubric, noting whether a codebook or a second-coder check is required. The analysis comes back within 24-48h with codes defined, excerpts attributed and every claim sized to what the interviews can carry. There is no charge for a first custom sample.
MT355 Unit 8 questions, answered
Can counts appear in a qualitative analysis?
Yes, as descriptions of the interviews, never as estimates for a population. Saying seven of eleven participants raised the viewing window tells a reader how often it came up in this study. Converting that to 64 percent implies a precision the design cannot deliver. The MT355 sample uses counts to show recurrence and leaves prevalence to the survey data collected in the next unit.
Is a second coder required?
Not always. Many MT355 prompts accept a single coder with a clear codebook and a reflexive note on the analyst's assumptions. Where a second coder is used, report where disagreements fell and what changed as a result, not only an agreement percentage. The sample's second reader led to splitting one code in two, which is the kind of outcome graders credit.
How long should excerpts be?
Usually a sentence or two, enough to show the code in the participant's own words without burying the analysis. Attribute each excerpt by participant number and, where relevant, recruitment source. The sample quotes one short excerpt per code in the codebook and a few more in the findings. Long quotations tend to read as padding and are often marked that way.