| Course | MT355 Marketing Research and Analytics |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 8 |
| Paper type | Qualitative research analysis |
| Length | About 1,090 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MT355 Unit 8
Being Watched From the Lobby: An MT355 Unit 8 Qualitative Analysis of Interviews With Adults Who Cannot Swim
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
MT355: Marketing Research and Analytics
Unit 8 Qualitative Analysis
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The swim school, interviewees and excerpts are composite; the methods and sources cited are real.
Method
Eleven semi-structured interviews, each 25 to 40 minutes, were conducted in November. Six interviewees came from the school's parent list, adults whose children take lessons but who cannot swim a length themselves. Five were recruited through a community center's evening classes, to include adults with no connection to the school. Interviews followed a guide with five open questions about swimming history, feelings about water, what would make lessons appealing, practical barriers and the school itself. Each interview was recorded with consent, transcribed and stripped of names.
Braun and Clarke (2006) describe thematic analysis as identifying, analyzing and reporting patterns in qualitative data through a process of familiarization, coding, theme development and review. This analysis followed that process. Willis (2005) recommends probing why a respondent gives an answer, and the interview guide used follow-up probes of that kind after each open question. I read every transcript twice before coding, then coded excerpts inductively, merged similar codes and wrote a codebook with a definition, an inclusion rule and an example for each.
Codebook and Counts
Six codes emerged. The counts below show in how many of the eleven interviews each code appeared at least once; they describe these interviews, not the population.
Fear of deep water or of putting the face in the water appeared in 9 interviews. Being watched from the viewing window appeared in 7. Wanting to swim with one's own children appeared in 6. Needing evenings after children's bedtime appeared in 5. A childhood scare in water appeared in 4. Price, raised without prompting, appeared in 2.
Fear
Fear was the most common theme and the most varied. Some interviewees feared deep water, others only putting their face in. One said, "I can stand in the shallow end all day. It's the moment my ears go under." Several said they would only join a class if they could stay in shallow water for the first weeks. This supports the survey's comfort items and suggests the class's first lessons should be in water where adults can stand.
Being Watched
Seven of eleven interviewees mentioned the school's lobby, where parents watch children's lessons through a large window. Every parent-list interviewee had sat in that lobby. "Everyone would see me hanging on to the wall," one said. Another said she would rather learn somewhere no one she knew could see. The survey's barrier list included embarrassment but not the viewing window specifically, so the survey could not show that a physical feature of the building was part of the barrier.
The interviews found something the survey could not: the barrier is not only feeling embarrassed but being seen, through a specific window, by people the adult knows.
Swimming With Children
Six interviewees, all parents, said they wanted to learn so they could swim with their own children. This was the strongest motive offered and suggests a message for the school's marketing.
Evenings After Bedtime
Five said they could only attend after their children's bedtime, around 8 p.m. This matches the inquiry log's emphasis on evenings and suggests later start times than the 7 p.m. the school had assumed.
Childhood Scare
Four described a frightening experience in water as children. These interviewees were the most hesitant about lessons and the most interested in a small class with a patient instructor.
What Surprised the Interviewer
Two findings were unexpected. First, several interviewees who had grown up near water, on lakes or coasts, were among the most fearful, because they had seen or heard of drownings. Second, interviewees from the community center were more interested in lessons than parent-list interviewees, perhaps because they had already chosen to take an evening class of some kind and had a routine for it. Both observations are based on very few people, but they suggest that the school's best prospects may not be only the parents already in its lobby.
Price
Only two raised price without being asked. This does not mean price is unimportant; the interview guide did not ask about price, and the survey's randomized price item tests it directly.
Second Coder
A second coder, a colleague with no involvement in the interviews, applied the codebook to three transcripts. Of 57 coded segments, the coders agreed on 47, or 82.5 percent. Most disagreements involved separating fear from childhood scare, which the codebook was revised to distinguish more clearly. Agreement at this level suggests the codebook can be applied consistently, though it is a simple percentage rather than a statistic that corrects for chance agreement.
How Far Eleven Interviews Can Go
Eleven interviews can show what matters to some adults and suggest themes worth testing. They cannot show how common those themes are in the population. The counts above are not percentages of anything beyond these eleven people. Malhotra (2019) cautions that qualitative findings should inform quantitative research or decisions, not substitute for measurement. The viewing window finding, for example, should be treated as a strong lead: the school might try covering the window during adult classes, but whether that would change enrollment can only be tested by offering it.
Links Between Themes
These patterns overlap. The interviewees most afraid of putting their face in the water were also most concerned about being watched, because, as one said, the moment of panic is the moment everyone would see. Parents who wanted to swim with their children were often the same parents who could only come after bedtime. Seeing these connections helps the school design one class that answers several concerns at once: a shallow start, a covered window and a late evening slot.
Limits
Interviewees were recruited through two channels and may not represent adults who use neither. All interviews were in English. The interviewer works for the school, which may have made interviewees more positive or more careful about criticizing it. One coder developed the codebook, and the second coder checked only three transcripts.
What the School Can Do
Three actions follow. First, cover the viewing window, or schedule adult classes when the lobby is closed, and mention this in the class description. Second, start adult classes at 8 p.m. rather than 7 p.m. at least once a week. Third, begin the first two lessons in shallow water and say so in advance.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Malhotra, N. K. (2019). Marketing research: An applied orientation (7th ed.). Pearson.
Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Sage.
Reading the MT 355 Unit 8 instructions
Unit 8 asks students to analyze qualitative data, usually interview transcripts. The method should be described first: who was interviewed, how they were found, how long interviews ran and how they were recorded and coded. Instructors expect a codebook with a definition, an inclusion rule and an example for each code. Findings should be organized by code, each opening with its claim and supported by excerpts. Counts should describe the interviews, not the population. A second coder or other reliability check strengthens the analysis. Links between themes, surprises and plain limits on what eleven or so transcripts can support are expected. The analysis should end with actions the findings support, framed as leads to test rather than proven effects.
How the MT 355 Unit 8 example is put together
The sample's method section describes the eleven interviews and the two recruitment channels, citing Braun and Clarke and Willis. Six codes are listed with counts. Findings follow by code, from fear with a quoted excerpt to being watched, under the highlighted line that the barrier is being seen through a specific window by people the adult knows. Swimming with children, evenings after bedtime, childhood scares and price follow. A section on surprises notes that community center recruits were more interested. The second coder's agreement is reported with its limits. Connections between themes are described. A section explains how far eleven interviews can go, citing Malhotra, and three actions close the analysis.
Reading the MT355 Unit 8 grading rubric
Qualitative analyses are commonly assessed on transparent method, a usable codebook, findings grounded in excerpts and honest limits. Graders reward codebooks clear enough for a second coder to apply. Counts should be presented as describing the interviews only. Findings should connect to the research question and, ideally, reveal something a survey could not. A reliability check shows rigor, even if simple. Connections between themes show analysis beyond listing. Recruitment and interviewer effects should be acknowledged. Actions should follow from findings. Methods sources appear in APA 7. Analyses that report themes as percentages of the population, or that offer no excerpts, tend to receive lower marks than those that show exactly how each claim was supported.
MT355 Unit 8 help: mistakes that cost points
Qualitative papers often summarize what interviewees said without coding it, so patterns cannot be traced. Another common weakness is reporting counts as if they were percentages of a larger population. Some students skip reliability checks entirely. Surprises are sometimes dropped because they spoil the story the writer expected. Before drafting, read every transcript twice before coding anything, then write a definition and an example for each code. Ask a colleague to code one transcript with your codebook. Where you disagree, the definition usually needs sharpening, and that revision makes the analysis more convincing. Keeping a log of each coding decision also makes the second coder's job easier.
Get an MT355 Unit 8 example written to your instructions
Send the transcripts or notes your Unit 8 assignment supplies with the prompt and rubric, noting whether a codebook or a second-coder check is required. The analysis comes back within 24-48h with codes defined, excerpts attributed and every claim sized to what the interviews can carry. There is no charge for a first custom sample. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More MT355 papers and BS in Business Administration samples
- MT355 Unit 1: Published Statistic Critique Post
- MT355 Unit 2: Marketing Research Question Brief
- MT355 Unit 3: Secondary Market Research Review
- MT355 Unit 4: Marketing Questionnaire Draft
- MT355 Unit 5: Survey Pilot Revision Memo
- MT355 Unit 6: Published Study Seminar Reflection
- MT355 Unit 7: Market Research Sampling Plan
- MT355 Unit 9: Data Analysis Exercise
- MT355 Unit 10: Research Report
- MT340 Unit 8: Virtual Team Conflict Case
- MT330 Unit 8: Distributor Selection Paper
- MT314 Unit 8: Social Impact Measurement Plan
- MT313 Unit 8: Supplier Responsibility Memo
MT355 Unit 8 questions, answered
Can counts appear in a qualitative analysis?
Yes, as descriptions of the interviews, never as estimates for a population. Saying seven of eleven participants raised the viewing window tells a reader how often it came up in this study. Converting that to 64 percent implies a precision the design cannot deliver. The MT355 sample uses counts to show recurrence and leaves prevalence to the survey data collected in the next unit.
Is a second coder required?
Not always. Many MT355 prompts accept a single coder with a clear codebook and a reflexive note on the analyst's assumptions. Where a second coder is used, report where disagreements fell and what changed as a result, not only an agreement percentage. The sample's second reader led to splitting one code in two, which is the kind of outcome graders credit.
How long should excerpts be?
Usually a sentence or two, enough to show the code in the participant's own words without burying the analysis. Attribute each excerpt by participant number and, where relevant, recruitment source. The sample quotes one short excerpt per code in the codebook and a few more in the findings. Long quotations tend to read as padding and are often marked that way.
Where can I find a free MT355 Unit 8 sample paper?
The complete MT355 Unit 8 qualitative analysis is on this page, coding eleven interviews with adults who cannot swim.
What did the interviews find that the survey missed in the MT355 Unit 8 sample?
Seven of eleven adults raised the lobby viewing window, a specific physical barrier the survey's embarrassment item could not capture.