| Course | MT245 Project Fundamentals and Project Initiation |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 2 |
| Paper type | Project classification exercise |
| Length | About 690 words, 5 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MT245 Unit 2
Ten Jobs on One Parks Department List: A Unit 2 Project Classification Exercise
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
MT245: Project Fundamentals and Project Initiation
Unit 2 Project Classification Exercise
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Ashby Mills, its parks department and its activities are composite and illustrative; the sources cited are real.
Definitions
The exercise uses standard definitions. The PMBOK standard calls a project a temporary effort whose output is unique (Project Management Institute [PMI], 2021). Temporary means it has a definite start and end; unique means the result has not been produced before in the same form. Operations are the ongoing, repeating work that keeps the department running. A program bundles related projects under shared management because coordinating them yields benefits that separate handling would miss.
Shenhar and Dvir (2007) argue that projects differ in novelty and that the novel ones need different handling from routine work, which is the practical reason the sorting matters. Both tests must be passed for an activity to be a project. Work that ends on a date but repeats the same design each year fails the uniqueness test. Larson and Gray (2021) make the same distinction, noting that much seasonal work in public agencies looks temporary but is really a recurring operation.
The Classification Table
Each activity is listed with its end, its result, a verdict and a reason.
Weekly mowing: no definite end; same result every week; operations; it continues as long as the parks exist
Snow plowing: no definite end; same routes each storm; operations; it is a standing service
Summer day camp: ends every August, but the same design each year; operations; it fails the uniqueness test
Converting Linden Park courts 3 and 4 to pickleball: ends at handover; new facility; project; it produces a result the town has never had
Replacing the Elm Street playground: ends at opening; new equipment and layout; project; the new design is unique to that site
Rewriting the facility rental fee schedule: ends at council adoption; new fee structure; project; it replaces the old schedule once
Updating the five-year parks plan: ends at adoption; new plan; project; each update sets new priorities
Launching a pickleball league: ends when the first season begins under normal operations; new service; project; once launched, running it becomes operations
Two Activities Argued Both Ways
Annual crack sealing on the town's paths and courts happens every summer. The case for calling it operations is that it repeats each year with the same crews and materials. The case for calling it a project is that each year's work covers a different set of cracks chosen by inspection, with its own scope and budget. The verdict is operations: although the locations change, the method, crew and purpose are the same each year, and the town budgets for it as a standing line. If one year's work included an unusual repair, such as rebuilding a section of path, that piece could be split off as a small project.
Cleanup after a June windstorm that brought down eleven trees in three parks is harder. It had a definite start and end, about five weeks, and a unique result in the sense that the damage was unlike any previous storm. But the work itself, cutting, hauling and replanting, used the crews and methods of normal operations. The verdict is project, narrowly. The cleanup had its own budget approved by the council, its own end date and a coordinator assigned to it, which together make it worth managing as a project even though the tasks were familiar. PMI (2021) notes that projects can include routine tasks as long as the overall result is unique.
A job that ends is not a project unless what it leaves behind is new.
A Program
The court conversion and the pickleball league are related. The league depends on the courts, and the courts were justified partly by demand the league would serve. Managing them together, with one person responsible for both, would let the department time the league's launch to the courts' opening and use the league's registration to measure whether the conversion met its goals. Together they form a small program.
References
Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2021). Project management: The managerial process (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute.
Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Harvard Business School Press.
MT245 Unit 2 instructions, in plain terms
Unit 2 asks students to apply the definitions of project, operations and program to a list of real activities. The prompt usually expects a table with each activity, whether it has a definite end, whether its result is unique, a verdict and a short reason. Both tests must be met for an activity to count as a project, so seasonal work that repeats the same design each year is usually operations. Pick at least two borderline items and argue them both ways before deciding, since that is where the definitions are really tested. Close by grouping related projects into a program if any belong together. The exercise usually fills three pages, with the definitions credited to the course text and the PMBOK Guide or a comparable standard.
How the MT 245 Unit 2 example is put together
A definitions box opens the exercise with the PMBOK Guide's temporary and unique tests, operations and programs, and Shenhar and Dvir on why novelty changes how work is managed. The table follows with eight rows, each carrying a verdict and a one-sentence reason, and a margin note explains why every row gets a reason. Crack sealing is then argued as a project, because locations change, and as operations, because method and crew repeat, with operations winning. The windstorm cleanup is argued the same way and called a project, narrowly, because it had its own budget, end date and coordinator. The highlighted line restates the two-part test. A closing section groups the court conversion and league into a program, marked by a third note.
Where the points sit in the MT245 Unit 2 rubric
Credit in a classification exercise follows correct application of the definitions, consistent reasoning and judgment on borderline cases. Each verdict should rest on both tests, an end and a unique result, rather than on whether the work feels like a project. Graders reward a short reason in every row, since it shows the definition was applied each time. The borderline items carry the most marks: arguing each side fairly and choosing with a reason shows understanding the clear cases cannot. Identifying a program among the projects shows the writer can use the concepts to organize work. A clean table, accurate definitions cited to a standard and consistent verdicts complete the rubric.
Common MT245 Unit 2 mistakes, and how to avoid them
The most frequent error is treating anything with an end date as a project, which puts recurring seasonal work such as a summer camp in the wrong column. Another is copying the definitions without applying them, so the table has verdicts but no reasons. Some students avoid borderline items, which leaves nothing to argue. Others confuse a program with a large project. Make sure each reason uses the definition's language, end and uniqueness. Send the list of activities from your workplace, and a writer will sort them, give each row its reason and argue your two hardest cases from both sides.
Get an MT245 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Classification exercises usually supply their own list of activities, so paste that list in next to the task wording and grading criteria, or name a workplace whose jobs should be sorted instead. A first sample arrives free within 24-48h, every verdict resting on the same two stated tests and every hard case argued. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More MT245 papers and BS in Business Administration samples
- MT245 Unit 1: Discussion Board Post
- MT245 Unit 3: Business Case
- MT245 Unit 4: Project Charter
- MT245 Unit 5: Scope Statement
- MT245 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- MT245 Unit 7: Stakeholder Register
- MT245 Unit 8: Feasibility Assessment
- MT245 Unit 9: Assumption and Constraint Log
- MT245 Unit 10: Initiation Package
- MT243 Unit 2: Asset Inventory
- MT242 Unit 2: Program Structure Analysis
- MT241 Unit 2: Metric Definition Exercise
- MT240 Unit 2: Concept Application Paper
MT245 Unit 2 questions, answered
Is a recurring event such as an annual festival a project?
Usually not, if it repeats to the same design each year, since the result is not unique. A first festival, or one redesigned from scratch, can be a project. The example treats the day camp as operations for this reason, and would reclassify it only in a year when the program was rebuilt.
How does a program differ from a project?
A project produces one result and ends. A program groups related projects, and sometimes ongoing work, so they can be managed together for a shared benefit. The example calls the court conversion a project and places it inside a court renewal program that includes later resurfacing of the remaining tennis courts.
What if an item could honestly go either way?
Then the strongest answer says so and argues it. Instructors often include ambiguous items on purpose, and credit tends to follow a paragraph that weighs both tests before choosing. The example does this for crack sealing and the windstorm cleanup. A confident verdict with no discussion on a genuinely mixed case usually earns less than a reasoned one.
Where can I find a free MT245 Unit 2 sample paper?
The full MT245 Unit 2 project classification exercise can be read here. It sorts ten parks department activities into projects and operations, argues two borderline cases both ways and groups two projects into a program.
Why is the summer day camp operations in the MT245 Unit 2 sample?
It ends every August, but it runs to the same design each year, so it fails the uniqueness test. Work that stops on a date is not a project unless what it leaves behind is new.