MT240 Unit 2 Concept Application Paper Example

Course	MT240 Sport in Society
Unit	Unit 2
Paper type	Concept application paper
Length	About 1,090 words, 6 pages double-spaced
Format	APA 7 student paper
School	Purdue University Global
Program	BS in Business Administration
Updated	October 2026

Free sample paper for MT240 Unit 2

Radar Guns and a Results Page by Evening: A Unit 2 Concept Application Paper on a Youth Baseball Showcase

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

MT240: Sport in Society

Unit 2 Concept Application Paper

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The showcase, its players, fees and figures are composite and illustrative; the sources cited are real.

What this part is doingNaming the two characteristics in the lead tells the reader the paper will rank the framework's parts, not just list them.

The Showcase

On a Saturday in July, a composite showcase company rents a college baseball complex outside Atlanta. Two hundred forty players aged 14 to 17 arrive, each having paid a [$450] entry fee. They rotate through stations. At the first, they run a timed 60-yard dash. At the second, they hit balls off a tee while a radar unit records exit velocity, the speed of the ball leaving the bat. At the third, they throw from the outfield or across the infield, and a radar gun records throwing velocity. Pitchers throw a short bullpen session clocked for velocity and spin rate. In the afternoon, players are grouped into teams for a few innings of games, which scouts watch less closely than the stations.

By 9 p.m. the company publishes a results page listing every player's measurements, with a ranking by position and graduating class. Players and parents share their numbers on social media that night. College coaches who could not attend sort the page by exit velocity or throwing velocity and send messages to the players at the top.

Guttmann's Framework

Guttmann (1978) argued that modern sport differs from earlier forms of play and ritual in seven characteristics: secularism, equality of opportunity to compete, specialization of roles, rationalization of rules and training, bureaucratic organization, quantification and the quest for records. Each can be found in the showcase, but they do not carry equal weight.

Five Characteristics Present but Secondary

Secularism is present but unremarkable: the showcase has no religious or ritual purpose, only athletic and economic ones.

Equality of opportunity is present in form and absent in practice. Any player may enter, and all face the same stations and the same radar. But the [$450] fee, travel and the hotel the night before mean that the 240 players are mostly from families who can afford them, a point later units on access take up.

Specialization shows in the station design, which separates pitchers from position players and catchers from both, and in the players themselves, many of whom play baseball year-round. Jayanthi et al. (2013) raised concerns that early specialization in one sport may increase overuse injury risk in young athletes, and pitchers throwing for maximum velocity in July are a case in point.

Rationalization shows in the standardized drills, the same distances and timing methods for every player, and in the training industry that prepares players for them. Bureaucratization shows in the showcase company's registration system, waivers and staff roles.

What this part is doingPlacing five characteristics in a supporting role, with a reason for each, is what makes the ranking that follows credible.

Quantification: The Showcase's Purpose

Quantification is not one feature of the showcase among others; it is the product being sold. The company's main service is turning a player into numbers: a 60 time of [6.9] seconds, an exit velocity of [92] miles per hour, a throwing velocity of [86]. Families pay for the measurement, not for the instruction or the games. Coaches attend, or read the results page, because the numbers let them compare players they have never seen in the same games or leagues.

Ritzer (2019) described calculability, the emphasis on what can be counted over what cannot, as a feature of rationalized modern institutions. The showcase applies calculability to adolescents. A player who reads pitches well, runs the bases smartly or keeps teammates focused has no station that measures it. In the afternoon games, where those skills might show, scouts are already looking at their phones.

Records: Comparison Beyond the Field

Guttmann's quest for records is the second characteristic that does most of the work. A record, in his sense, is a number that can be compared across time and place, not only against the opponent in front of you. The results page turns every player's numbers into records: the fastest 60 time in the 2027 class at this event, the highest exit velocity among shortstops, a personal best since last spring's showcase. Players attend several showcases a year partly to improve their numbers and post new bests.

The online page also makes the records permanent and portable. A coach in Oregon can compare a Georgia shortstop's exit velocity with an Arizona shortstop's measured at a different event months earlier, as if they had played on the same field.

The showcase sells a number, and the number travels farther than the player ever will that summer.

The Afternoon Games

The games that close the day show the framework from another angle. In older forms of baseball, the game itself was the event, and a player's worth showed in how he played it. At the showcase, the game is an afterthought scheduled when the measuring is done. Several parents leave before it starts because the numbers they paid for are already recorded. A shortstop who makes a difficult play in the fourth inning gets a nod from a coach in the stands; a shortstop whose exit velocity was three miles per hour higher gets the message that night. The games still have outcomes, but nobody records them on the results page, which is the clearest sign of what the event values.

Why the Two Matter Most

The two characteristics explain the showcase's existence. Without quantification, there would be nothing to sell; without records, the numbers would be meaningless outside the day. The other five characteristics shape the event's form, but these two shape its purpose. Coakley (2021) notes that youth sport has increasingly become organized around adult goals, such as college recruiting, rather than children's play, and the showcase is organized almost entirely around measurement for recruiters.

What the Framework Misses

Guttmann's framework describes modern sport but says less about who profits from it. The showcase company earns about [$108,000] from one day's entry fees, plus video packages and premium listings. Its business depends on families believing that a number on a page is the route to a scholarship, even though few showcase players receive significant athletic aid. A full reading would add a framework about the commercialization of youth sport.

Conclusion

The showcase is a near-perfect example of modern sport in Guttmann's terms, but the framework is most useful when its parts are weighed rather than listed. Quantification and records explain why the event exists and why families pay for it. The remaining characteristics explain how it is run.

What this part is doingEnding with what the framework misses shows the paper applies the concept critically rather than simply confirming it.

References

Coakley, J. (2021). Sports in society: Issues and controversies (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Guttmann, A. (1978). From ritual to record: The nature of modern sports. Columbia University Press.

Jayanthi, N., Pinkham, C., Dugas, L., Patrick, B., & LaBella, C. (2013). Sports specialization in young athletes: Evidence-based recommendations. Sports Health, 5(3), 251-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738112464626

Ritzer, G. (2019). The McDonaldization of society (9th ed.). Sage.

MT240 Unit 2 instructions, in plain terms

Unit 2 asks students to take one concept or theoretical model from the course and apply it to a sport event, organization or practice in a short paper. Instructions generally say to explain the concept in your own words first, then show where each part appears in the case, then judge how well the concept explains what is going on. The prompt may name a menu of concepts, such as Guttmann's characteristics of modern sport, functionalist or conflict theory, or socialization. Four to five pages is the usual length, formatted in APA 7, and three or more scholarly sources besides the course text. The case can be invented if it is labeled composite, but its details should be specific enough to test the concept: who attends, what is measured, what it costs and who organizes it.

How the MT 240 Unit 2 example is put together

The paper starts with the showcase itself: its entry fee, its stations for the 60-yard dash, tee exit velocity and throwing speed, and the results page published that night. A framework section then explains Guttmann's seven characteristics in plain terms with his 1978 book cited. A section places five characteristics in a supporting role with a reason for each, and a margin note explains why that makes the ranking credible. Two sections follow on the characteristics that dominate, quantification as the event's purpose and records as comparison that leaves the field, with the highlighted line about a number traveling farther than the player. The afternoon games are treated as an afterthought for scouts. The last sections argue why the two characteristics matter most and what the framework cannot see, such as family money and specialization risk.

Where the points sit in the MT240 Unit 2 rubric

Concept application papers are typically graded on four things: an accurate explanation of the concept, a systematic application to the case, a judgment about fit, and clear writing with sources. The explanation earns the most when it is brief and correct rather than long. Application earns more when each part of the concept is tied to observed evidence than when the paper asserts that a part is present. A ranking or rating of parts usually scores higher than a list because it shows judgment. Graders often reserve top marks for papers that say what the concept misses, which shows critical use rather than simple confirmation. APA formatting, reference accuracy and a clear thesis carry the remaining points, so the Guttmann and Ritzer entries should match their editions.

MT240 Unit 2 help from the desk

Students often spend half the paper summarizing the theory and leave too little room to apply it. Another frequent problem is applying every part of a framework with equal weight, which reads like a checklist and hides any judgment. Some papers choose a case so broad, such as all of youth sports, that no part can be tested against evidence. Others pick a concept the case does not fit and force it. Watch the difference between describing an event and explaining it with the concept, and keep the conclusion on what the framework shows about this event. If your prompt lists several concepts, our writers can help you match one to a case where it does real analytical work.

Get an MT240 Unit 2 example written to your instructions

Say which concept your Unit 2 prompt names, or which ones it allows, and suggest a case if one already appeals. Along with the rubric, that is enough for a first custom paper, free and ready in 24-48h, with the concept stated before the case and applied part by part. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More MT240 papers and BS in Business Administration samples

MT240 Unit 2 questions, answered

What makes a concept application paper different from a research paper?

It starts with one concept and tests it against a case, rather than gathering everything known about a topic. The concept provides the structure, and the case provides the evidence. The example could have discussed youth baseball broadly; instead it asks what Guttmann's seven characteristics reveal about one event, which keeps every paragraph tied to the concept.

Is Guttmann's model still used in sport sociology?

It remains a standard reference for describing what distinguishes modern sport, though scholars have criticized parts of it, for instance its fit with sports outside the West. A paper can use it and note the criticism in a sentence. The example acknowledges that the model describes tendencies rather than laws, which is how most course texts present it.

Should the paper apply every part of a concept?

Usually each part should be addressed, but not at equal length. Parts that fit strongly deserve development, parts that fit weakly deserve a sentence explaining why, and a part that strains against the case can become the most interesting section. The example gives equality the most critical attention because the entry fee complicates it.

Where can I find a free MT240 Unit 2 sample paper?

Read the full MT240 Unit 2 concept application paper here; it reads a composite youth baseball showcase through Guttmann's seven characteristics of modern sport, ranks them and closes with what the model leaves out.

Which concept does the MT240 Unit 2 sample use?

It uses Allen Guttmann's seven characteristics of modern sport from From Ritual to Record and finds quantification and records strongest at the showcase, with equality weakest because a $450 fee decides who is measured.