| Course | MT245 Project Fundamentals and Project Initiation |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 7 |
| Paper type | Stakeholder register |
| Length | About 970 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MT245 Unit 7
Fifteen Parties, Their Levers and the Month Each Will Act: A Unit 7 Stakeholder Register for the Linden Park Courts
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
MT245: Project Fundamentals and Project Initiation
Unit 7 Stakeholder Register
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Ashby Mills, Linden Park and every party, stance and date are composite and illustrative; the sources cited are real.
How the Register Works
The register lists every party with a stake in the Linden Park pickleball conversion. For each it records the party's role, its lever, meaning the specific way it can help or stop the project, its stake, and the three attributes of the salience model: power, legitimacy and urgency (Mitchell et al., 1997). Those attributes give each party a class. A party with all three is definitive and needs close management; a party with only one is latent and needs watching. The register also records the month each party is most likely to act, its current stance and the staff member who owns the relationship.
Month one is March, when the grant application is filed. Construction is now planned for months six to eight, August through October, after the high school tennis season.
The Register
Each entry gives role, lever, stake, salience attributes and class, likely month, stance and owner.
Town council: appropriates funds; lever, votes on the $150,000 appropriation and grant acceptance; stake, budget and constituents; power, legitimacy, urgency in month three; definitive; month 3; supportive; owner, parks director
Parks director: sponsor; lever, approves charter and changes over $5,000; stake, department goals; power and legitimacy; dominant; months 1 to 8; supportive; owner, recreation coordinator
Public works superintendent: maintains courts and parking; lever, approves drainage and lot work, controls upkeep crews; stake, workload; power and legitimacy; dominant; month 5; neutral; owner, recreation coordinator
Pickleball club board: main user group; lever, turnout at hearings, donated windscreens; stake, outdoor courts; legitimacy and urgency; dependent; month 3; strongly supportive; owner, recreation coordinator
Adult tennis association: loses two courts; lever, speaking at the hearing; stake, court time; legitimacy; discretionary; month 3; opposed to losing courts, accepting if 1 and 2 are kept; owner, parks director
High school athletic director: signs the shared-use agreement; lever, the agreement gives spring access to all four courts; stake, the team's season; power and legitimacy; dominant; month 1; satisfied since construction moved; owner, parks director
Varsity tennis coach: uses the courts each spring; lever, influence with the athletic director; stake, practices and home matches; legitimacy and urgency; dependent; month 1; satisfied; owner, recreation coordinator
Six Orchard Lane households: neighbors; lever, testimony at the hearing, complaints under the noise bylaw; stake, noise and parking; legitimacy and urgency; dependent; month 3; mixed; owner, recreation coordinator
Nearest Orchard Lane homeowner: fence 110 feet from court 8; lever, a formal objection at the hearing and a noise complaint after opening; stake, daily noise; power through the bylaw, legitimacy, urgency; definitive; month 3; opposed; owner, parks director
Town accessibility coordinator: reviews the accessible route; lever, can withhold sign-off at handover; stake, compliance; power and legitimacy; dominant; month 8; supportive; owner, recreation coordinator
State grant officer: reviews the $40,000 application; lever, award decision; stake, program rules; power and legitimacy; dominant; months 1 to 4; neutral; owner, recreation coordinator
Surfacing contractor: builds the courts; lever, schedule and quality; stake, contract; power and legitimacy; dominant; months 6 to 8; supportive; owner, recreation coordinator
Town insurance pool: insures the facility; lever, coverage conditions; stake, liability; power; dormant; month 8; neutral; owner, finance director
Recreation staff: run programs on the courts; lever, scheduling and supervision; stake, workload; legitimacy; discretionary; month 8; supportive; owner, recreation coordinator
Planning board: may require site plan review; lever, approval; stake, land use rules; power and legitimacy; dominant; month 2; unknown; owner, parks director
The Month Strip
Above the table, a strip shows when parties are likely to act. Month one belongs to the grant officer and the school district. Month two brings the planning board's decision on whether site plan review is needed. Month three is the busiest: the public hearing on accepting the grant, where the council votes and the pickleball club, the tennis association and the Orchard Lane neighbors all speak. Months six to eight belong to the contractor, public works and, at handover, the accessibility coordinator and insurance pool.
A party without a vote can still decide the project if it speaks at the one meeting where the vote happens.
Why the Nearest Neighbor Has His Own Row
The six Orchard Lane households share concerns, but one homeowner differs from the rest. His fence is 110 feet from court 8, closer than any other house, and the feasibility work projects noise at his lot line above the bylaw's limit unless acoustic panels are installed. That gives him power the others lack: a noise complaint from him after opening could force the town to limit hours. Listing him separately lets the coordinator plan a visit before the hearing to show him the panel design.
The Two Rows Most Likely to Change
Two rows are likely to change class before construction. The planning board is listed as dominant but its decision is unknown; if it requires site plan review, it gains urgency and becomes definitive, and the schedule loses about five weeks. The nearest homeowner is listed as definitive and opposed; if the panel design satisfies him, he may drop to discretionary, which would make the hearing far easier. Larson and Gray (2021) recommend revisiting a register at each milestone because stakeholders' positions shift as a project becomes concrete, and the coordinator will update these two rows after month two.
Using the Register
The register will guide the communication plan that follows, which sets how and how often each owner contacts each party. PMI (2021) treats stakeholder engagement as planned work with assigned owners, and every row here has one.
References
Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2021). Project management: The managerial process (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute.
MT245 Unit 7 instructions, in plain terms
Unit 7 asks students to build a stakeholder register that a project manager could use to plan engagement. The prompt usually expects every party listed with its role, its stake, its lever over the project and an assessment using a model such as salience, which rates power, legitimacy and urgency and assigns a class. Adding the month each party is likely to act, its current stance and an owner for the relationship makes the register a planning tool. Parties with different levers should get separate rows even if they belong to one group. A note on which rows are likely to change before construction shows the register is current. Three pages is typical, mostly table, citing the salience model and the course text.
Inside the MT245 Unit 7 example
The register explains its columns and the salience classes, from definitive to latent, citing Mitchell and colleagues, and sets month one as March. Fifteen entries follow, from the council and sponsor to the planning board, each with lever, stake, attributes, class, month, stance and owner, with a margin note on turning the register into a calendar. A month strip shows the grant officer and district in month one and the hearing in month three, and the highlighted line notes that a party without a vote can decide a project at the right meeting. A section explains the nearest homeowner's separate row. Two rows likely to change, the planning board and that homeowner, are discussed with Larson and Gray, under a third note.
Where the points sit in the MT245 Unit 7 rubric
Registers earn their marks for completeness, sound use of the salience model, specific levers and practical planning fields. Every party with influence should appear, including those without formal authority. Graders reward attributes justified by a real lever, such as a vote, a bylaw or a signed agreement, rather than impressions. Separating parties within a group when their levers differ shows care. Adding likely months and owners turns analysis into a plan. A note on rows likely to change shows the register is maintained. A table that is easy to scan, consistent with earlier documents and supported by accurate citations completes the rubric.
MT245 Unit 7 help from the desk
The most common error is a register that lists stakeholders and their interests but not their levers, which leaves the manager unsure who can actually stop the project. Another is assigning salience classes without explaining the attributes behind them. Some students treat a group, such as neighbors, as one row when one member has much more power. Others leave out parties whose power comes from documents, such as a shared-use agreement. Make sure every row has an owner. Send the list of parties your project involves, and a writer can rate each one, assign months and owners and flag the rows most likely to shift.
Get an MT245 Unit 7 example written to your instructions
Registers belong to the parties a particular scenario creates, so pass along the case and whatever initiation documents exist, together with the directions for Unit 7, their rubric and whichever columns the course insists on. A first register returns within 24-48h at no charge, each party given a lever, a stake and a likely month. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More MT245 papers and BS in Business Administration samples
- MT245 Unit 1: Discussion Board Post
- MT245 Unit 2: Project Classification Exercise
- MT245 Unit 3: Business Case
- MT245 Unit 4: Project Charter
- MT245 Unit 5: Scope Statement
- MT245 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- MT245 Unit 8: Feasibility Assessment
- MT245 Unit 9: Assumption and Constraint Log
- MT245 Unit 10: Initiation Package
- MT243 Unit 7: Activation Plan
- MT242 Unit 7: Program Budget
- MT241 Unit 7: Visualization Exercise
- MT240 Unit 7: Identity and Community Paper
MT245 Unit 7 questions, answered
What is the salience model?
A way of classifying stakeholders by three attributes: power to affect the project, legitimacy of their claim, and urgency of their demand. Parties holding all three are definitive and need the closest attention. The model is useful because attributes change; the example's nearest homeowner holds legitimacy and urgency now and could gain power through a petition.
Why give one neighbor a separate row?
Because his position differs from the group's in ways that matter to the project. The homeowner nearest court 8 will hear play most clearly and is most likely to speak at the grant hearing. Grouping him with neighbors further away would average out exactly the information the register exists to capture, which is who acts and when.
How is a register different from a communication plan?
A register records facts about each party: role, lever, stake, stance and timing. A communication plan decides what each party is told, how and how often. Many courses build the plan from the register afterward. The example stays a register, with an engagement owner per row, and leaves messages and channels to a later document.
Where can I find a free MT245 Unit 7 sample paper?
The complete MT245 Unit 7 stakeholder register is on this page. It records fifteen parties to a court conversion with their levers, salience class, likely month to act, stance and relationship owner.
Why is the town council definitive in the MT245 Unit 7 sample?
It has power, through its vote on the appropriation and the grant, legitimacy as the town's governing body and urgency in month three, when the grant must be accepted at a public hearing.