HS450 Unit 9 Stakeholder Communication Plan Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN Strategic Planning and Change Management for Health Care Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This HS450 Unit 9 stakeholder communication plan sequences who hears first when a composite therapy group closes its warm-water pool and moves aquatic therapy to a community center through a partnership. As part of Purdue Global HS 450 in the BS in Health Science, the ninth unit asks students to plan communication for a change. The sample places eleven groups on a power-interest grid, from the two aquatic therapists and 41 patients in water-based care to the community center board, payer and newspaper. A ninety-day calendar gives each a message, messenger and date, with the therapists told first and patients told only after the board signs, and three signs of success.

CourseHS450 Strategic Planning and Change Management for Health Care
UnitUnit 9
Paper typeStakeholder communication plan
LengthAbout 880 words, 6 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBS in Health Science
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for HS450 Unit 9

1

Those in the Water Hear First: A Unit 9 Stakeholder Communication Plan for Moving Aquatic Therapy Out of a Closing Pool

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

HS450: Strategic Planning and Change Management for Health Care

Unit 9 Stakeholder Communication Plan

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

Halloway Therapy Partners, its staff, patients and partners, and every date are composite; the sources cited are real.

What this part is doingExplaining why the grid comes before the calendar shows that the order of communication is argued, not assumed.
2

The Decision Being Communicated

Halloway's board has approved closing the warm-water pool at its oldest clinic at the end of the quarter, rather than spending 410,000 dollars on repairs. Aquatic therapy will continue at the community center pool three miles away, where Halloway therapists will lead sessions under a referral partnership. No staff positions are eliminated; the two aquatic therapists will split their time between the community center and land-based caseloads.

The Power-Interest Grid

Eleven groups are placed by their power over the decision's success and their interest in it, following the stakeholder analysis approach set out by Bryson (2004).

High interest, low power: the two aquatic therapists; the 41 patients in active water-based care; the families who drive them; the clinic's front desk staff.

High interest, high power: the community center board, without whose agreement the partnership fails; the three referring orthopedic practices, who send many aquatic patients; the largest commercial payer, whose authorization rules cover therapy delivered off site.

Low interest, high power: the local newspaper, until the story breaks; the county commissioner whose district includes the clinic.

Low interest, low power: Halloway staff at other clinics; patients who used the pool in the past but are not in active care.

Those whose work or care changes hear before those whose referrals or opinions change, and everyone in active care hears before the public.

What this part is doingPlacing each group on the grid with a reason justifies the sequence that follows, which is the plan's central argument.
3

Stakeholder Profiles

Each group gets a short profile of what it will want to know. The aquatic therapists will want to know their schedules, whether their skills will still be used, and who decided. Patients will want to know whether their therapy continues, where, when and whether it will cost more. The community center board will want to know the hours Halloway needs, liability arrangements and what the center gains. Referring practices will want to know how to refer and whether outcomes will suffer. The payer will want to know where services are delivered and whether billing changes.

The Calendar

Day 1: the clinic director meets the two aquatic therapists in person, before anyone else learns of the decision. They are asked to help plan the patient transition.

Day 2: the community center board receives a formal partnership proposal at a meeting arranged weeks earlier; the agreement must be signed before patients are told.

Day 5: assuming the board signs, each of the 41 patients hears from their own aquatic therapist, in person at their next session or by phone, with a printed letter. The message: your therapy continues, here is where and when, here is who to call.

Day 6: front desk staff are briefed so they can answer calls.

Day 7: referring orthopedic practices receive a letter and a call from the chief clinical officer.

Day 8: the payer's provider representative is notified of the new site of service.

Day 10: all Halloway staff receive an internal message.

Day 12: the county commissioner's office receives a courtesy call; a short public statement is issued to the newspaper.

Day 90: the pool closes; sessions at the community center have been running for at least four weeks.

Messages

Each message is two or three sentences, drafted in advance. For patients: "Your aquatic therapy will continue with the same therapists at the Oakhurst Community Center pool, starting on your next scheduled date after the move. There is no change to your cost. Call this number with any question." For the newspaper: "Halloway is moving its aquatic therapy program to the Oakhurst Community Center through a new partnership so that patients can keep receiving warm-water therapy while the clinic's aging pool is retired."

What this part is doingDrafting each message in two or three sentences before the calendar starts ensures every messenger says the same thing in plain words.
4

What If the Board Does Not Sign

The calendar depends on the community center board agreeing on day 2. If it asks for changes, patient communication waits; no patient hears about a closure before a replacement exists. If the board declines, Halloway reopens the repair option, and the aquatic therapists are told on the same day so that rumors do not reach them first. This contingency is why patients are not told until day 5, even though the decision was final earlier.

Why Patients Do Not Hear From the Chief Executive

Patients hear from their own therapist, not from an executive letter, because people trust the person who knows them. Communication research on change finds that frontline staff and those closest to the people affected are the most credible messengers (Larkin & Larkin, 1994).

Measuring Whether It Worked

Three signs: no patient learns of the change from the newspaper; at least 37 of 41 patients continue aquatic therapy at the community center; and calls to the front desk about the pool fall to near zero within two weeks of the move. Transition research warns that people experience loss before they see gain (Bridges & Bridges, 2016), so complaints in the first week are expected and are logged rather than treated as failure.

5

References

Bridges, W., & Bridges, S. (2016). Managing transitions: Making the most of change (4th ed.). Da Capo Lifelong Books.

Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675722

Larkin, T. J., & Larkin, S. (1994). Communicating change: Winning employee support for new business goals. McGraw-Hill.

What the HS450 Unit 9 assignment asks for

The ninth unit commonly asks for a communication plan for a decision affecting several stakeholder groups. Expect a stakeholder analysis, profiles of what each group needs, a calendar with messages and messengers, and a way to judge success. Several pages built around a grid and a calendar is typical. Use a grid such as power and interest to justify the order of communication. Let those whose work or care changes hear before those whose opinions change, and people in active care before the public. Draft each message in two or three plain sentences. Choose messengers people trust. Plan for the case where a key partner does not agree, and define success in observable terms.

Inside the HS450 Unit 9 example

A section states the decision. The grid places eleven groups by power and interest, with reasons, following stakeholder analysis guidance, and the highlighted sentence states the ordering principle. Profiles list what each group will want to know. A calendar runs from the therapists on day 1 through the board, patients, staff, surgeons, payer and public to closure on day 90. Draft messages for patients and the newspaper follow. A section covers what happens if the board does not sign. Sections on why patients hear from their therapist, citing change communication research, and on measuring success with transition theory close the plan. Each date depends on the step before it.

HS450 Unit 9 rubric: what earns full points

Communication plans are usually scored on stakeholder analysis, sequencing logic, quality of messages, choice of messengers and evaluation. Sequencing and stakeholder analysis often weigh most: graders reward plans where the order follows from who is most affected and who has power over success. Messages earn credit when they are short, plain and answer what each group needs. Messenger choices should reflect trust, not hierarchy. A contingency for a partner's refusal shows realism. Evaluation needs observable signs. The grid and calendar should be readable at a glance. Plans that announce to everyone at once, or route patient news through executives, tend to lose points. Explaining why each messenger was chosen is frequently where the extra points sit.

Common HS450 Unit 9 mistakes, and how to avoid them

A frequent weakness in communication plans is a single announcement presented as a plan. Another is sequencing that lets the public or the newspaper learn before affected staff and patients. Some students draft long messages that bury the key point. Messengers are often chosen by rank. Contingencies for a partner saying no are commonly missing. Success is sometimes defined as messages sent. When your decision involves different groups, such as a clinic relocation or a service line closure, list the groups and their stakes, and we will build the grid and calendar from them. Plans also falter when draft messages are left for the day itself.

Get an HS450 Unit 9 example written to your instructions

Describe the decision your Unit 9 prompt covers, the organization and the groups it affects, and include the rubric. The plan sorts those groups, sets the order, drafts each message with a messenger and a date, and adds a contingency in case word gets out early. It is returned within 24-48h; a first custom sample is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More HS450 papers and BS in Health Science samples

HS450 Unit 9 questions, answered

What does Mendelow's grid add to a stakeholder list?

Prioritization. Placing each group by power and interest suggests how closely to manage it: high on both means close engagement, high interest with low power means keeping the group informed, and so on. The example uses the grid to justify the order of the calendar. A list alone cannot explain why one group hears before another.

Why do patients not hear from the chief executive?

Because credibility depends on the relationship. Patients in active care trust the therapist treating them, and a call from that therapist can answer clinical questions a senior executive cannot. The example matches each audience with the messenger it already trusts. Your organization's structure may suggest different messengers, and the reasoning should be stated either way.

Where can I find a free HS450 Unit 9 sample paper?

The whole Unit 9 plan appears here, with an eleven-group power-interest grid, a ninety-day calendar and draft messages.

Who should hear about a program closure first?

Those whose work or care changes, such as the staff who run the program and the patients in active care, before referrers, payers, other staff and the public.

What if a partner needed for the change does not agree?

Hold communication to patients until the partner signs, and have a fallback ready, so no one hears about a closure before a replacement exists.