HS450 Unit 5 Strategic Goal Memo Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN Strategic Planning and Change Management for Health Care Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This HS450 Unit 5 strategic goal memo turns a composite therapy group's environmental scan and SWOT into four goals for the coming year, each with one owner, a horizon, a measure and a baseline. Within Purdue Global HS 450 in the BS in Health Science, the fifth unit asks students to set strategic goals for leadership. The memo leads with its recommendation, retires two goals carried from last year and frames the structure with hoshin kanri: three-year objectives above, annual goals below, linked in a matrix. A recorded round of negotiation with clinic directors changed two goals, adding retention to rural hiring and a second pelvic health site.

CourseHS450 Strategic Planning and Change Management for Health Care
UnitUnit 5
Paper typeStrategic goal memo
LengthAbout 770 words, 5 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBS in Health Science
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for HS450 Unit 5

1

Four Goals, One Owner Each: A Unit 5 Strategic Goal Memo Built With Hoshin Kanri for an Outpatient Therapy Group

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

HS450: Strategic Planning and Change Management for Health Care

Unit 5 Strategic Goal Memo

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

Halloway Therapy Partners, its leaders, baselines and targets are composite; the sources cited are real.

What this part is doingLeading with a recommendation a busy executive could act on alone puts the decision first and the support after it.
2

Memorandum

To: Chief Executive Officer, Halloway Therapy Partners

From: Director of Strategy and Operations

Re: Strategic goals for the coming fiscal year

Recommendation

Adopt four goals for the coming year, retire two goals carried over from last year's plan, and review progress formally in the ninth month. The four goals answer the four binding forces in the environmental scan and the position statement in the SWOT analysis. Each has one owner and one measure.

The Goals

1. Reduce Medicare Advantage visits denied or delayed by authorization from 11 percent to 6 percent. Owner: revenue cycle manager. Horizon: twelve months. Measure: share of Medicare Advantage visits with an authorization denial or a delay of more than five business days, from the denial report. Source: binding force 3.

2. Fill both vacant physical therapist assistant positions at the rural clinics and hold them for twelve months. Owner: director of human resources. Horizon: nine months to fill, twelve to retain. Measure: filled positions and retention at twelve months. Baseline: two vacancies open for seven months. Source: binding force 6.

3. Grow pelvic health visits by 20 percent, from 9,400 to about 11,300 a year, by adding a third certified specialist and a second site. Owner: pelvic health program lead. Horizon: twelve months. Measure: visits from the scheduling system. Source: the SWOT's single VRIO-tested advantage and the waitlist of 70 patients.

4. Retain at least 95 percent of referral volume from the three independent orthopedic practices. Owner: chief clinical officer. Horizon: twelve months. Measure: referrals by practice, quarterly. Baseline: about 14,000 referred visits last year. Source: binding force 8.

Goals Retired

Two goals from last year's plan are retired. Opening a twelfth clinic in the northern suburb is retired because the SWOT showed that growth there competes with the sports performance center rather than adding new patients. Raising satisfaction to 4.9 is retired because satisfaction is already high and not a differentiator; it will be monitored, not pursued.

Retiring two goals is as much a strategic decision as adopting four, because every goal kept on the list draws on the same managers' time.

What this part is doingNaming what is dropped, with a reason, shows the executive that the goals were chosen against alternatives rather than accumulated.
3

How Hoshin Kanri Shapes the Goals

Hoshin kanri, a planning approach developed in Japanese manufacturing and adopted in health care, links a few breakthrough objectives over three to five years to annual goals that departments negotiate rather than receive (Akao, 1991). It is used here in two places.

First, vertical alignment. Halloway's three-year objectives, drawn from the SWOT's position statement, come down to three: keep the independent surgeons' referrals, make more of the pelvic health program, and lean less on payers whose prior-approval rules eat staff time. Each annual goal sits under one objective: goals 1 and 2 under reducing exposure and stabilizing the rural clinics, goal 3 under pelvic health, goal 4 under the referral base. An attached matrix shows the links.

Second, catchball, the negotiated exchange between levels. Draft goals went to all eleven clinic directors in a two-week comment period. Directors at the rural clinics argued that goal 2 should include retention, not only filling the positions, because the last two assistants hired left within a year; the goal was revised. The pelvic health lead asked for a second site rather than only a third specialist, because the waitlist is concentrated on the south side; the goal now includes both. Recording these changes shows that the goals were negotiated, which is what makes the owners accountable.

What this part is doingRecording what changed during catchball, and why, is the evidence that the goals were negotiated rather than handed down.
4

Why One Owner and One Measure

Each goal has one owner, named by title, because shared ownership tends to mean no ownership. Each has one measure with a baseline, so progress can be judged without argument. Balanced scorecard practice recommends a small number of measures tied directly to strategy rather than long lists of indicators (Kaplan & Norton, 1996), and four goals is within what Halloway's leadership team can review monthly.

Review

The leadership team will look at the four measures each month, with a formal checkpoint in month nine, when any goal off track by more than a third will be revised or retired. Health care strategy texts describe the review as the point where a plan either becomes management or becomes a document (Ginter et al., 2018).

Decision Requested

Approve the four goals and the two retirements for the coming fiscal year.

5

References

Akao, Y. (Ed.). (1991). Hoshin kanri: Policy deployment for successful TQM. Productivity Press.

Ginter, P. M., Duncan, W. J., & Swayne, L. E. (2018). The strategic management of health care organizations (8th ed.). Wiley.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press.

HS450 Unit 5 instructions, in plain terms

The fifth unit typically asks for a memo to an executive proposing strategic goals grounded in your earlier analysis. Expect a recommendation, a goal table with owners, horizons, measures, baselines and targets, a link to the scan and SWOT, and a review plan. Two pages plus an attachment is common. Put the decision in the first paragraph so a busy reader can act on it alone. Trace every goal to a specific source in earlier work. Give each goal one owner by title and one measure with a baseline. Say which goals are dropped and why. If you use a framework such as hoshin kanri, apply it, for instance by showing alignment between levels and how goals were negotiated.

How this HS450 Unit 5 example is built

The memo opens with a recommendation to adopt four goals, retire two and review in month nine. A goal list follows, from cutting Medicare Advantage denials and delays to retaining independent referral volume, each with owner, horizon, measure, baseline and source. A section retires a twelfth clinic and a satisfaction target, and the highlighted sentence explains why retiring is strategic. The hoshin kanri section shows vertical alignment to three-year objectives and records catchball changes from clinic directors. A section explains one owner and one measure, citing balanced scorecard practice. Review arrangements and the decision requested close the memo. A matrix of objectives and goals is attached.

Reading the HS450 Unit 5 grading rubric

Goal memos are usually graded on alignment with prior analysis, quality of goals and measures, clarity for the executive reader, use of a framework and professional format. Alignment and goal quality often weigh most: graders check that each goal traces to the scan or SWOT and has an owner, a measure and a baseline. Clarity is rewarded when the recommendation can stand alone. Framework use earns credit when it shapes the goals rather than being named. Dropping goals with reasons shows judgment. Memo format and APA citations finish the grade. Memos that list many goals with shared ownership, or measures without baselines, tend to lose points. Retiring old goals openly is a mark of strategic thinking that graders tend to notice.

HS450 Unit 5 help from the desk

Goal memos lose the most when their goals appear from nowhere, with no link to earlier analysis. Another is shared ownership, which leaves no one accountable. Some students give targets without baselines, so progress cannot be judged. Long lists of goals signal that nothing was prioritized. Frameworks are often named but not applied. Retired goals are rarely discussed, though they show strategic choice. When your organization's scan points elsewhere, perhaps to staffing or a new service line, bring your binding forces and position statement and we will set four goals with owners from them. Leaving the review date out makes the goals impossible to hold anyone to.

Get an HS450 Unit 5 example written to your instructions

A Unit 5 goal memo can be built from the prompt, the organization, any scan or SWOT already written and your rubric. Each goal gets one owner, a horizon, a baseline and a target, traced to earlier findings. The memo arrives within 24-48h; no fee applies to the first custom sample. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More HS450 papers and BS in Health Science samples

HS450 Unit 5 questions, answered

Why Hoshin kanri instead of SMART goals?

SMART describes a single goal's qualities; Hoshin kanri describes how goals connect across levels and how they are negotiated. The memo's goals still have the qualities SMART names, and a reader will find them specific and dated. The cascade adds what an HS450 memo often lacks, a visible link from annual work to long-range objectives. Your section may prefer another framing.

How many goals should the memo contain?

Few enough that each has an owner who can carry it. The example sets four and retires two. Sections vary, and some prompts specify a number. More than six annual goals for an organization of this size usually signals that nothing has been prioritized, which is the weakness this unit tends to probe.

Where can I find a free HS450 Unit 5 sample paper?

The complete Unit 5 memo appears here, with four owned goals, two retirements and a hoshin kanri alignment.

What is catchball in hoshin kanri?

The negotiated exchange of draft goals between leadership and the people who will carry them, so goals are revised with their input before being finalized.

Why should each strategic goal have only one owner?

Because shared ownership tends to mean no one is accountable. One named owner per goal makes progress and problems clear at each review.