Six forces, six pending decisions and a line between settled trends and open questions fill this GB600 Unit 2 environmental scan memo for a stenography firm's founder. Searches like "gb 600 unit 2 assignment example", "gb600 unit 2 sample" and "gb600 unit 2 example" land here.
What a finished GB600 Unit 2 environmental scan memo looks like
A three-page memo from the firm's director of operations to its founder and managing partner. A bottom-line paragraph opens it: two decisions cannot wait for the uncertain forces to resolve, and two should. Most of the memo is one table, a row per force and five columns: the force, the evidence for it, whether it is predetermined or genuinely uncertain, the decision it changes, and the month that decision falls due. Stenographer retirements take the first row, with the firm's own age data bracketed. Video depositions, a digital-certification proposal pending before one state's board, speech recognition drafts, clients consolidating vendors and security questionnaires fill the rest. Below the table, two popular trends are named and set aside because neither alters a decision this year.
How a GB600 Unit 2 example is structured
A distinction from scenario planning, as practiced at Shell and described by Pierre Wack, organizes the memo: predetermined elements already in motion, which can be planned around, and critical uncertainties, which could break either way. Predetermined forces come first because they justify acting now; the firm's reporters are aging whatever any board decides, so a training commitment is argued in that row. Uncertain forces follow, each paired with the signal that would reveal which way it is breaking and the decision it holds open. Every row ends in a verb the founder could approve or refuse. A short section then excludes two trends, general inflation and national filing volumes, with a sentence each on why the firm's own booking data makes them redundant. One signal, which the director proposes to report every month, ends the memo.
Bottom line in four sentences
Fund two apprentice seats this year and decline the downtown lease renewal; hold digital hiring until the second state's board votes; price same-evening rough drafts now. Each recommendation points to a row in the table, so the founder can check the reasoning behind any single one.
An aging roster, bracketed
[Thirty-one] percent of the firm's stenographers are past fifty-five, and the nearest training program graduated [six] students last year. The memo classes this as predetermined, since no ruling changes anyone's age, and ties it to one decision: sponsoring apprentice seats before the shortage reaches the schedule.
Video depositions and a lease
About [sixty] percent of depositions booked last year were taken by video, a share that has held since 2021. The decision it changes is concrete: a downtown lease up for renewal in [March], whose conference rooms were booked on [nine] days last quarter.
A board proposal still open
One state already lets a digital reporter certify a deposition transcript, a second has a proposal before its licensing board, and the third requires a certified shorthand reporter. The row names the vote date as its signal and holds the hiring decision until then.
Drafts from speech software
Speech recognition now yields a usable rough draft of clean two-person testimony and a poor one of crosstalk or heavily accented witnesses. Accuracy is treated as uncertain and tied to a pricing decision: what a rough draft delivered the same evening should cost.
Two trends left out
General inflation and national court filing volumes appear in most industry reports. Both are excluded, because the firm's own bookings already measure the demand they would stand in for, and neither alters a decision on the founder's desk this year.
Where marks go in GB600 Unit 2
Scans that merely list trends earn little in this unit, because grading in most sections follows the link between each force and a decision it alters for the chosen organization. A row naming artificial intelligence as a threat, with no decision attached, reads as a headline copied in. Forces treated as equally certain cost analysis marks: a retirement curve and a board vote that has not happened call for different responses, and a memo planning for both the same way has not read its own evidence. Credit rises when the memo excludes something and says why, since selection is the judgment a scan exists to show. Evidence from the organization's own records, bracketed where needed, outweighs industry statistics. Format counts too: bottom line first, every row ending in a decision someone could approve.
Get a GB600 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
An environmental scan earns its keep through the decisions it connects to, so the most useful inputs are the organization, the choices on its desk this year, and the memo instructions with the rubric. The finished memo, free as a first sample, lands within 24-48h with every force tied to one of those choices.
GB600 Unit 2 questions, answered
How many forces should an environmental scan include?
Fewer than most drafts contain. Five to seven forces, each linked to a decision, usually outscore a dozen listed by category. If the prompt asks for a PESTEL or similar structure, the categories can organize the table, but a thin category is better left short than padded with trends that change nothing for your organization. Selection is part of what gets graded.
Can I scan an organization I do not work for?
Yes, provided enough public information exists to tie forces to its decisions: annual reports, local news, trade association data, job postings. Your own employer is often easier because you know which decisions are pending. Either way the memo needs a few choices on the organization's desk, since a scan without pending decisions has nothing to connect its forces to.
What separates a predetermined force from an uncertain one?
A predetermined force is already under way and will play out almost regardless of events, such as the ages of a current workforce. An uncertain one could go either way, like a regulator's pending vote. Separating them tells the reader which decisions can be made now and which should wait for a named signal, and that distinction is much of what the memo is for.