| Course | GB580 Strategic Management |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 2 |
| Paper type | External environment scan |
| Length | About 1,120 words, 7 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | MBA |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for GB580 Unit 2
Nineteen Factors and One Question: A Unit 2 External Environment Scan for a Refrigerated Truck Body Builder
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
GB580: Strategic Management
Unit 2 External Environment Scan
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Tollefson Body Works, its responses and the matrix ratings are composite and illustrative; the regulations, programs and sources described are real.
Summary
Three factors matter most. California's rule moving truck refrigeration units toward zero emissions is already in force and reaches any Tollefson customer whose trucks run in that state. Federal emissions standards for new trucks, which would push fleets toward electric chassis, are in dispute and may not survive. And high interest rates have stretched fleet replacement cycles, so most customers will keep buying diesel trucks for several more years. The scan finds an imbalance: most factors favoring the electric bet are regulatory, distant or contested, while most factors favoring the status quo are economic and present now. That imbalance argues for a strategy that pays off under either outcome, which later units will test.
Method
The scan follows the PESTEL categories, whose roots lie in the early study by Aguilar (1967) of how managers scan their business environment. Each factor carries its source and the year of the most recent information, a horizon (now, within three years, or later), and a direction: whether it favors the electric bet, the diesel status quo, or neither. Sorting by direction keeps the scan tied to the term question rather than producing a general list of trends.
Political Factors
Federal truck emissions standards in dispute. The Environmental Protection Agency finalized Phase 3 greenhouse gas standards for heavy-duty vehicles in 2024, covering model years 2027 to 2032 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2024). The agency moved in 2025 to reconsider vehicle greenhouse gas rules, so the standards' future is uncertain. Horizon: three years. Direction: electric, if they survive.
California's authority over truck rules contested. In 2025 Congress voted to revoke federal waivers that let California enforce its own truck sales rules, and California challenged the revocation in court. Horizon: now. Direction: neither, until the courts decide.
Aluminum tariffs. Tariffs on imported aluminum, first imposed in 2018, were raised twice in 2025. Aluminum is a major material in truck bodies. Horizon: now. Direction: electric, weakly, because high aluminum prices reward designs that use less of it, including lightweight composite designs.
Economic Factors
Fleet replacement cycles stretched by high interest rates. Higher borrowing costs since 2022 have led many regional fleets to keep trucks longer. Source: customer interviews and trade press, 2025. Horizon: now. Direction: status quo.
Chassis allocation. Truck makers allocate chassis to dealers and body builders, and electric chassis arrive in small numbers. Source: dealer reports, 2025. Horizon: now. Direction: status quo.
Electric chassis price premium. Electric Class 4 to 6 chassis cost substantially more than diesel equivalents, and the federal commercial clean vehicle credit ended for vehicles acquired after September 30, 2025. Horizon: now. Direction: status quo.
Material prices for lightweight panels. Composite panel materials cost more than conventional aluminum and foam construction per square foot, though the gap has narrowed. Source: supplier quotes, 2025. Horizon: three years. Direction: neither.
Social Factors
Growth in grocery delivery. Online grocery ordering has increased the number of smaller refrigerated trucks making urban deliveries. Horizon: now. Direction: electric, because short urban routes suit electric range.
Driver hiring and the 26,001-pound line. Drivers need a commercial license to operate trucks rated at 26,001 pounds or more, and fleets struggling to hire licensed drivers prefer trucks below that line (Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, n.d.). Heavy batteries push electric trucks toward it. Horizon: now. Direction: electric, strongly, but only for bodies light enough to keep the truck below the limit.
Grocers' public climate commitments. Several large grocery chains have published targets to cut emissions from their delivery fleets. Horizon: later. Direction: electric.
Technological Factors
Electric medium-duty chassis entering the market. Established truck makers and new entrants now offer electric Class 4 to 6 chassis. Horizon: three years. Direction: electric.
Battery-powered refrigeration units. The two companies that dominate truck refrigeration both sell electric units, which draw power from the truck battery or their own battery packs. Horizon: three years. Direction: electric.
Lightweight composite panels. Panels with composite skins and improved foam cores can reduce body weight substantially. Horizon: now. Direction: electric.
Temperature telematics. Remote temperature monitoring is now expected by large grocery fleets. Horizon: now. Direction: neither.
Environmental Factors
Phase-down of high-warming refrigerants. Federal law passed in 2020 directs the EPA to cut production and use of hydrofluorocarbon refrigerants in steps, and unit makers are redesigning around lower-impact gases. Horizon: three years. Direction: neither.
Hotter summers. More frequent heat waves raise the insulation performance fleets demand, which can add weight. Horizon: later. Direction: status quo, weakly.
Legal Factors
California's transport refrigeration unit rule. Amendments adopted by the California Air Resources Board in 2022 require truck refrigeration units operating in the state to move to zero-emission technology in phases through the end of the decade (California Air Resources Board, 2022). The rule is in force. Horizon: now. Direction: electric, for customers whose trucks enter California.
Federal food transport rules. The Food and Drug Administration's sanitary transportation rule requires shippers and carriers to keep food at safe temperatures. Horizon: now. Direction: neither.
Federal excise tax threshold. A 12 percent federal excise tax applies to the first retail sale of truck bodies and chassis rated above 33,000 pounds, which keeps most grocery delivery trucks in lighter classes. Horizon: now. Direction: neither.
The factors favoring the electric bet are mostly rules and forecasts; the factors favoring diesel are mostly prices and interest rates that customers face this year.
External Factor Evaluation Matrix
Ten of the nineteen factors were carried into an external factor evaluation matrix, following the method David and David (2017) describe. Each received a weight for its importance to the industry, with weights summing to 1.0, and a rating from 1 to 4 for how well Tollefson currently responds, where 4 is a superior response and 1 is a poor one.
Opportunities: the commercial license line (weight 0.14, rating 2), electric chassis entering the market (0.12, rating 2), grocery delivery growth (0.10, rating 3), lightweight composite panels (0.08, rating 2) and grocers' climate commitments (0.06, rating 3). Threats: stretched replacement cycles (0.14, rating 3), the California refrigeration unit rule (0.10, rating 2), chassis allocation (0.10, rating 3), the electric chassis price premium (0.08, rating 4) and aluminum tariffs (0.08, rating 3).
The weighted total is 2.6, slightly above the midpoint of 2.5. Tollefson responds well to the threats that favor the status quo, because its current business is built for them, and poorly to the opportunities that favor the electric bet, because it has not yet decided to pursue them.
References
Aguilar, F. J. (1967). Scanning the business environment. Macmillan.
California Air Resources Board. (2022). Transport refrigeration unit. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/transport-refrigeration-unit
David, F. R., & David, F. R. (2017). Strategic management: A competitive advantage approach, concepts and cases (16th ed.). Pearson.
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. (n.d.). Commercial driver's license. U.S. Department of Transportation. https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/registration/commercial-drivers-license
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). Greenhouse gas emissions standards for heavy-duty vehicles: Phase 3. Federal Register, 89, 29440.
Reading the GB 580 Unit 2 instructions
In GB580 Unit 2 you scan the environment outside your company for factors that bear on the term question. Organize the scan by PESTEL or a similar framework, and keep political and legal factors distinct: a rule in force is legal, a proposal or dispute is political. For each factor, give the source and date, a time horizon and what it means for the firm. Tie every factor to the strategic question rather than listing general trends. Summarize the three or four factors that matter most at the start. Many sections also expect an external factor evaluation matrix, with weights for importance and ratings for how well the firm currently responds, producing one weighted score. Explain what that score means. Six pages with APA 7 sources is common.
Inside the GB580 Unit 2 example
A summary opens the paper with three factors: California's rule for truck refrigeration units, the disputed federal standards and stretched fleet replacement cycles. A method section explains the direction label and cites Aguilar's early scanning research. The nineteen factors then run category by category, each in a short paragraph ending with its horizon and direction, from aluminum tariffs to the commercial license threshold and the federal excise tax line. The highlighted sentence states the imbalance between rules and prices. The matrix follows David and David's method with ten factors, weights summing to 1.0 and ratings of 2 to 4, and the closing paragraph explains why a total of 2.6 reflects strong responses to threats and weak ones to opportunities.
GB580 Unit 2 rubric: what earns full points
GB580 instructors give points in the scan for evidence and relevance together. Factors with dated sources earn more than undated trends, because the reader can check them. A clear separation of political and legal factors shows command of the framework. Tying each factor to the strategic question, through a direction or implication, is often where the rubric weights most heavily, since it turns a list into analysis. A summary that ranks the few factors that matter shows judgment. Where the matrix is required, weights that sum to one, ratings with stated meaning and a correct weighted total earn credit, and an interpretation of that total earns more. Honest reporting of factors that cut against the writer's preferred answer, tidy category headings and APA 7 citations for every dated source take the remaining points.
GB580 Unit 2 help from the desk
Common problems in GB580 scans start with factors that have no source or date, which makes them impossible to check. Many scans pad the table with distant trends and then cannot weight them sensibly. Political and legal rows are often mixed, so a proposed rule appears as settled law. Another frequent weakness is a scan that never connects to the term question, leaving the reader to guess why each factor matters. Matrices sometimes carry weights that do not sum to one or ratings that are never explained. And some writers quietly drop factors that argue against the strategy they plan to recommend. Date and source every factor, keep the categories clean, tie each row to the question and report the uncomfortable ones. A free custom scan for your own company is available through the form on this page.
Get a GB580 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Share the company you selected in Unit 1 and the scan instructions with their rubric; if your section says PESTLE or STEEP rather than PESTEL, mention it. The custom scan, returned within 24-48h, dates every factor and ties it to that firm's decision. Nothing is billed the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More GB580 papers and MBA samples
- GB580 Unit 1: Company Selection Memo
- GB580 Unit 3: Five Forces Industry Analysis
- GB580 Unit 4: Internal Capabilities Analysis
- GB580 Unit 5: Business-level Strategy Paper
- GB580 Unit 6: Corporate Strategy Analysis
- GB580 Unit 7: Global Strategy Paper
- GB580 Unit 8: Implementation Plan
- GB580 Unit 9: Strategic Control Measures
- GB580 Unit 10: Strategic Plan
- GB570 Unit 2: Value Chain Map
- GB560 Unit 2: Process Requirements Memo
- GB550 Unit 2: Time Value of Money Problems
- GB546 Unit 2: Workforce Demand Forecast
GB580 Unit 2 questions, answered
What is the difference between PESTEL and PESTLE?
Only the order of the letters. Both cover political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal factors, and sections use the two names interchangeably. What matters more is keeping legal and political rows distinct: a statute already in force belongs under legal, while a proposal still being debated is a political factor with a probability attached, which changes how it is weighed.
How many factors should the scan include?
Enough to be credible and few enough to weigh. Many strong scans land between twelve and twenty rows, with the summary naming the three or four that actually matter. Padding the table with factors that touch the firm only distantly tends to weaken it, since each row then needs a weight and an implication the author cannot defend.
Is the external factor evaluation matrix required?
Not everywhere. Some sections ask for it by name, others expect a ranked list or a short synthesis. The matrix is useful because it forces weights, and weights force choices about what matters. If your rubric does not mention it, a ranked summary does the same job, as long as the ranking is explained rather than simply asserted.
Where can I find a free GB580 Unit 2 sample paper?
A complete GB580 Unit 2 external environment scan is on this page, with nineteen dated PESTEL factors for a composite truck body builder, a direction for each and a weighted external factor matrix scored at 2.6.
What does a direction column add to a PESTEL scan?
It ties each factor to the term question by stating which choice the factor favors. Sorting that way shows at a glance whether the environment leans one way, and it keeps the scan from becoming a general trend list.