| Course | GB600 Leadership Strategies for a Changing World |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 5 |
| Paper type | Decision briefing |
| Length | About 790 words, 5 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | MBA |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for GB600 Unit 5
Open the Digital Unit Now, in One State: A Unit 5 Decision Briefing Under Incomplete Facts
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
GB600: Leadership Strategies for a Changing World
Unit 5 Decision Briefing
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The firm, its clients and every figure are composite and illustrative; the frameworks and sources cited are real.
Memo
TO: Founder and partners FROM: Director of operations SUBJECT: Decision: open a digital reporting pilot in our first state
Decision
Hire three digital reporters and one stenographer-reviewer in the state whose rules already permit digital reporters to certify deposition transcripts. Run a two-quarter pilot with the four law firm clients who have asked for digital service. Make no move in our second state until its licensing board votes on its pending proposal.
Known
Four clients, who together sent us about 310 depositions last year, have asked in writing whether we offer digital reporting, and two have used a competitor's digital service for some matters. Our first state's rules allow certified digital reporters to produce deposition transcripts. Digital reporters can be trained and certified in about six months through an established professional certification. Our stenographer roster is shrinking, as the Unit 2 memo showed, and we turned away eleven depositions last quarter.
Assumed
We assume that clients who asked will actually use the service at a price about 15 percent below our stenographic rate. We assume a stenographer-reviewer can check digital transcripts fast enough to keep turnaround within our current standard of ten business days. We assume our stenographers will accept a small digital unit if we explain it first and keep the pledge described below.
Unknown
This section is the longest because it matters most.
Whether the second state's board approves digital certification. The vote is expected in about nine months. Courtney et al. (1997) describe this as level two uncertainty: a few discrete outcomes, here approval or rejection, each of which would call for a different strategy. The right posture at level two is to prepare for both outcomes and decide when the vote is known. That is why the pilot stays in the first state.
How many clients will adopt digital service. Four clients asked, but adoption could range from a few depositions to most of their work. This is level three uncertainty, a range of possible outcomes with no natural scenarios. The right posture is a small commitment that reveals the range, which is what a two-quarter pilot does.
How stenographers will respond. Some may see the unit as a threat, others as an opportunity to train as reviewers. We cannot know until we announce it. The Unit 7 communication plan addresses this.
Whether courts will accept digital transcripts in disputed matters. No court in our first state has yet ruled on a challenge to a certified digital transcript. This is a real unknown, and it may not be resolved during the pilot.
The board vote has two possible answers and can be waited for; client demand has a range of answers and can only be learned by trying.
Options Turned Down
Wait for the second state's vote before doing anything. This would let clients who asked for digital service move more of their work to competitors for at least nine months, and it would teach us nothing about demand.
Open digital units in both states now. This would commit staff and money in a state where the service may not be permitted, and would announce a larger change to stenographers than the evidence supports.
Terms That End the Pilot
The pilot ends early, and the digital reporters are offered roles supporting stenographers, if any of the following occurs by the end of the second quarter: fewer than 60 digital depositions booked across the four clients; reviewer turnaround averaging more than twelve business days; or a court rejecting a certified digital transcript in a contested matter. If none occurs and bookings exceed 120, the partners will consider expanding in the first state and, if the second state's board approves, preparing a unit there.
Cost
Hiring, training and equipping the four positions costs about $310,000 for the two quarters. At the expected discount, 120 digital depositions would bring in about $180,000 in revenue during the pilot, so the pilot is an investment in learning rather than a source of early profit. McGrath (1999) describes such small, bounded commitments as real options: the firm pays a limited price for the right to expand later if the results justify it. Snowden and Boone (2007) make a similar point for complex situations, advising experiments that are safe to fail before any large commitment, and the pilot's ending terms are written so that failure costs the firm two quarters and no reputations.
References
Courtney, H., Kirkland, J., & Viguerie, P. (1997). Strategy under uncertainty. Harvard Business Review, 75(6), 67-79.
McGrath, R. G. (1999). Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1580438
Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader's framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68-76.
The Purdue Global GB600 Unit 5 instructions
Unit 5 in GB600 asks you to brief a decision-maker on a choice that must be made before all the facts are known. Put the decision in the first lines, stated as an action with scope and timing. Then separate what is known, what you are assuming and what remains unknown, giving the unknowns the most attention. Classify the unknowns with a framework, such as Courtney, Kirkland and Viguerie's levels of residual uncertainty, and explain how each level shapes the decision. Describe the options you rejected and why. Set out terms that would reverse or end the decision, with dates and measures. Include a cost estimate. Keep the briefing short enough to read before the meeting, usually two pages, with APA 7 citations.
How the GB 600 Unit 5 example is put together
The briefing opens with a three-sentence decision addressed to the founder and partners. A known section cites 310 depositions from four clients, permissive rules in one state and the shrinking roster. An assumed section states price, turnaround and staff acceptance. The unknown section, the longest, classifies the board vote as level two and client adoption as level three, adding stenographers' response and court acceptance; the highlighted sentence contrasts waiting with learning. Two rejected options follow, waiting and launching in both states. Ending terms set thresholds of 60 bookings, twelve days and a court rejection. A cost section sets $310,000 against $180,000, citing McGrath and Snowden and Boone.
Where the points sit in the GB600 Unit 5 rubric
Points in this GB600 briefing depend on commitment and honesty about uncertainty. A decision stated first, with scope and timing, earns credit because it shows the writer can commit. A clear separation of known, assumed and unknown demonstrates disciplined thinking. Classifying unknowns with a framework, and explaining how each level shapes the decision's form, often carries the most weight. Rejected options with reasons show the choice was compared. Ending terms stated as measurable thresholds with dates make the commitment reversible in practice. A realistic cost estimate shows managerial judgment. A short, scannable format and APA 7 citations complete the rubric.
GB600 Unit 5 help: mistakes that cost points
Many GB600 decision briefings end by recommending more research, which the unit treats as avoiding the decision. Others commit but hide the uncertainty, presenting assumptions as facts. A common gap is a list of unknowns with no analysis of how each should affect the decision. Writers often leave out the options they turned down, which hides the comparison that justifies the pick. Ending terms are frequently vague, such as reassessing if results are poor, rather than stating thresholds. Lead with the decision, separate known from assumed from unknown, classify the unknowns, show the rejected options, write numerical ending terms and price the commitment. Send your prompt through this page for a free custom decision briefing.
Get a GB600 Unit 5 example written to your instructions
Whether the decision comes from the Unit 5 prompt or is pending at work, list what you know and what you are only guessing, and attach the rubric. Back comes a briefing that commits, keeps facts apart from assumptions and dates its own reversal terms, in 24-48h and free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More GB600 papers and MBA samples
- GB600 Unit 1: Discussion Board Post
- GB600 Unit 2: Environmental Scan Memo
- GB600 Unit 3: Leadership Case Analysis
- GB600 Unit 4: Problem Classification Exercise
- GB600 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- GB600 Unit 7: Stakeholder Response Plan
- GB600 Unit 8: Ethical Dilemma Analysis
- GB600 Unit 9: Adaptive Challenge Plan
- GB600 Unit 10: Leadership Philosophy Statement
- GB590 Unit 5: Workplace Ethics Analysis
- GB580 Unit 5: Business-Level Strategy Paper
- GB570 Unit 5: Supplier Dependence Review
- GB560 Unit 5: Failure Mode Review
GB600 Unit 5 questions, answered
How long should a decision briefing be?
Short enough to be read before the meeting where the decision happens, which usually means one or two pages plus exhibits. The recommendation belongs in the first paragraph. If your prompt asks for more depth, put it in appendices, since a briefing that makes the reader hunt for the decision has failed at its main job before anyone reaches the analysis.
What if I genuinely cannot decide between the options?
Decide anyway, and say what would change your mind. The unit usually grades the ability to commit under uncertainty, so recommending further study without a date reads as avoidance. A staged decision, a small pilot with reversal terms, is a legitimate way to commit while respecting what is unknown, provided the stages and triggers are specific.
Is the Courtney framework required?
No. Any approach that sorts unknowns by the kind of action each permits will serve, and your reading may supply one, such as scenario thinking or real options. The four levels of residual uncertainty help because they turn an unknown into a posture: bet, buy an option, run a pilot or wait. Whatever you use, apply it to each unknown separately.
Where can I find a free GB600 Unit 5 sample paper?
This page includes a complete GB600 Unit 5 decision briefing that commits a composite court reporting firm to a one-state digital reporting pilot, with known, assumed and unknown facts and dated ending terms.
What is a real option in a decision like this?
A small, limited investment that gives the firm the right, but not the obligation, to expand later. The pilot costs two quarters of spending and buys information about demand that a larger launch would have had to guess.