| Course | PS380 Clinical Psychology |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 6 |
| Paper type | Therapy approaches comparison paper |
| Length | About 1,160 words, 7 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Psychology |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PS380 Unit 6
Three Ways to Treat a Racing Heart: A PS380 Unit 6 Therapy Approaches Comparison Paper
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
PS380: Clinical Psychology
Unit 6 Therapy Approaches Comparison Paper
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The client, the clinic and the treatment course are composite; the theories and trials cited are real.
The Client
Travis, the plant electrician whose intake and second session were described in earlier units, has had panic attacks for seven months. The first came while he was forty feet up a ladder in the plant's crusher building. Since then he has had about two attacks a week, including one that woke him, and two emergency room visits for what he believed were heart attacks. He avoids high work and highway driving and takes his own pulse over and over through the day. At his intake, Dr. Lund, the psychologist at our clinic, recorded a provisional diagnosis of panic disorder. In the second session, motivational interviewing helped him decide to cut back from six or seven beers a night to three.
Travis's father drank hard through his childhood, and his mother lived with anxiety. He describes his father as unpredictable, warm one day and furious the next, and says that as a boy he learned to watch for signs of trouble.
This paper compares three approaches Travis could be offered: cognitive behavioral therapy, psychodynamic psychotherapy and person-centered therapy. For each it describes how the approach would understand and treat his panic, and what evidence supports it. It then considers what all three share and recommends an approach.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Clark (1986) located the engine of panic in the meaning a person gives to ordinary bodily changes. A quickened pulse, read as the first beat of a heart attack, brings fear; fear quickens the pulse further, and the loop tightens into a full attack within minutes. Sitting down, gripping a rail or checking a pulse then feel like the reason the catastrophe was avoided, so the belief that it was coming never gets tested.
Travis's history fits the model closely. On the ladder, height and exertion raised his heart rate, and he read the change as a sign he would pass out and fall. His pulse checking and avoidance of high work are safety behaviors that keep the belief alive. His attack during sleep fits too: he may have noticed a change in his heartbeat as he woke and interpreted it catastrophically.
In the cognitive model, the attack is not caused by the racing heart but by what Travis believes the racing heart means.
Cognitive behavioral therapy for panic teaches the cognitive model, challenges catastrophic interpretations and uses interoceptive exposure, in which clients deliberately produce feared sensations, such as by running in place or breathing through a straw, to learn that they are not dangerous. It also gradually reduces safety behaviors and avoidance. For Travis, that would mean producing a racing heart in the office, then climbing ladders at work in planned steps without checking his pulse.
The evidence is strong. In a large multisite trial, Barlow et al. (2000) compared cognitive behavioral therapy, the antidepressant imipramine, their combination and placebo for panic disorder. Cognitive behavioral therapy outperformed placebo, and its gains tended to hold up better after treatment ended than those from medication alone.
Psychodynamic Psychotherapy
A psychodynamic approach would understand Travis's panic as connected to unconscious conflicts and early relationships. His childhood of watching for signs of his father's anger might have taught him to treat any internal change as a warning of danger. Feelings he could not express as a child, such as anger at his father, might surface as anxiety. The recent increase in his own drinking, and his fear of becoming like his father, could be important themes.
Treatment would explore the circumstances and meanings of his attacks, the feelings that precede them and the ways the relationship with the therapist repeats earlier patterns. Milrod et al. (2007) tested a manualized panic-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy in a randomized trial with 49 adults, comparing it with applied relaxation training over twelve weeks. Significantly more patients responded to the psychodynamic treatment than to relaxation training.
That trial is important but small, and it compared psychodynamic therapy with relaxation rather than with cognitive behavioral therapy. Evidence for psychodynamic treatment of panic is much more limited than for cognitive behavioral therapy.
Person-Centered Therapy
Rogers (1957) proposed that therapeutic change occurs when a client experiences a therapist's congruence, unconditional positive regard and accurate empathic understanding. A person-centered therapist would not target Travis's panic directly. Instead, the therapist would provide a relationship in which Travis could explore his experience, including his fear and his feelings about his father, and move toward greater self-acceptance.
For Travis, the approach would offer acceptance he did not get from his father, and it might reduce his general anxiety. But it does not include exposure to feared sensations, and there is little evidence that person-centered therapy alone resolves panic disorder.
What All Three Share
Wampold (2015) argued that common factors, including the therapeutic alliance, empathy, positive expectations and the therapist's ability to provide a convincing explanation and treatment, explain a large share of why psychotherapy helps, often more than the differences between specific techniques. A synthesis of 295 studies found that clients who rated the working bond with their therapist more highly tended to improve more, by a moderate margin that showed up in every major school of therapy (Flückiger et al., 2018).
These findings matter for Travis. Any approach will work better if he trusts the therapist and believes in the treatment. Rogers's conditions describe that relationship well, and both other approaches depend on it. For a man who grew up watching an unpredictable father, a steady, accepting therapist may be part of what helps.
Recommendation
Cognitive behavioral therapy is the best fit for Travis. It has the strongest evidence for panic disorder, it directly targets the misinterpretations and safety behaviors that maintain his attacks, and it offers a clear explanation he can test against his own experience, which suits a practical electrician. It also works quickly, usually in twelve to fifteen sessions.
Two elements from the other approaches should be included. First, the relationship should reflect what Rogers and the common factors research describe, with particular care because interoceptive exposure asks a frightened client to face what he fears. Second, if his fear of becoming like his father continues to affect his drinking or mood, a later phase of treatment might explore that theme more fully, drawing on psychodynamic ideas.
Conclusion
The three approaches see Travis's panic differently: as a misinterpretation of sensations, as an echo of childhood danger, or as a symptom that will ease in an accepting relationship. The evidence favors cognitive behavioral therapy for panic disorder, but the common factors research shows that the relationship carries much of the benefit in any approach. The best plan combines the strongest specific treatment with the strongest possible alliance.
References
Barlow, D. H., Gorman, J. M., Shear, M. K., & Woods, S. W. (2000). Cognitive-behavioral therapy, imipramine, or their combination for panic disorder: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 283(19), 2529-2536. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.19.2529
Clark, D. M. (1986). A cognitive approach to panic. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24(4), 461-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(86)90011-2
Flückiger, C., Del Re, A. C., Wampold, B. E., & Horvath, A. O. (2018). The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 316-340. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000172
Milrod, B., Leon, A. C., Busch, F., Rudden, M., Schwalberg, M., Clarkin, J., Aronson, A., Singer, M., Turchin, W., Klass, E. T., Graf, E., Teres, J. J., & Shear, M. K. (2007). A randomized controlled clinical trial of psychoanalytic psychotherapy for panic disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(2), 265-272. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2007.164.2.265
Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(2), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045357
Wampold, B. E. (2015). How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry, 14(3), 270-277. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20238
What the PS380 Unit 6 assignment asks for
Unit 6 of PS380 asks you to compare therapy approaches for one client. Present the client and the presenting problem, including relevant history. For each of at least three approaches, explain how it would understand the problem, what treatment would involve and what research supports its use for this condition. Address common factors, such as the therapeutic alliance, and what they mean for the comparison. Recommend an approach and justify it with evidence and with features of the client, noting what you would borrow from the others. Use APA style with original theory sources and outcome studies. Expect five to seven pages, with a section for each approach. Use a composite or disguised case.
Inside the PS380 Unit 6 example
The paper introduces Travis's attacks, avoidance and pulse checking, plus his father's drinking and his own vigilance as a boy. A cognitive behavioral section applies Clark's model step by step, under a highlighted line that the belief about the racing heart drives the attack, then describes interoceptive exposure and Barlow's trial. A psychodynamic section links vigilance and fear of becoming his father to the panic and presents Milrod's trial fairly with its limits. A person-centered section applies Rogers' conditions and notes the lack of panic-specific evidence. A common factors section adds Wampold and the alliance meta-analysis. The recommendation combines cognitive behavioral therapy with relational care and a possible later exploratory phase.
Reading the PS380 Unit 6 grading rubric
Graders look for each approach applied to the client's specific symptoms and history, not described in general. The cognitive behavioral section should show the model's cycle in the client's own experience. Alternative approaches earn credit when presented at their strongest, with their best evidence and limits. Common factors research should inform the comparison rather than appear as an afterthought. The recommendation must rest on evidence for the condition and on features of the client, and borrowing from other approaches shows mature judgment. Outcome studies, not textbook claims, should support each evidence statement, with citations in APA style. A balanced tone across schools is generally valued. Reasoned borrowing is often what earns top marks.
PS380 Unit 6 help: mistakes that cost points
Comparison papers often describe three theories in textbook terms and only mention the client in the conclusion. Another common weakness dismisses psychodynamic or humanistic approaches without examining their evidence. Students frequently claim one therapy is best for everything. Common factors are sometimes ignored, which leaves out a large body of research. Recommendations may cite a therapy's popularity instead of trials. To strengthen a draft, write each section so that every paragraph mentions the client, cite at least one outcome study per approach, add a paragraph on the alliance, and in the recommendation name what you would take from each approach you did not choose and why.
Get a PS380 Unit 6 example written to your instructions
Share the client and the instructions with the rubric. A custom paper compares three approaches for the case and judges which fits best. It comes back within 24-48h, first one free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More PS380 papers and BS in Psychology samples
- PS380 Unit 1: Clinical Psychologist Role Board Post
- PS380 Unit 2: History of Clinical Psychology Paper
- PS380 Unit 3: Ethics Case Analysis
- PS380 Unit 4: Clinical Interview and Assessment Paper
- PS380 Unit 5: Motivational Interviewing Skills Paper
- PS380 Unit 7: Diversity and Cultural Humility Paper
- PS380 Unit 8: Evidence-based Practice Paper
- PS380 Unit 9: Professional Development Reflection
- PS380 Unit 10: Current Topics Paper
- PS115 Unit 6: Careers Seminar Reflection
- PS370 Unit 6: Tobacco and Substance Use Paper
- PS200 Unit 6: Memory Reliability Seminar Reflection
- PS330 Unit 6: Big Five Trait Assessment Paper
PS380 Unit 6 questions, answered
What are common factors?
Elements shared by many therapies, such as the alliance and expectations, that predict outcome.
Which therapy has the most evidence for panic disorder?
Cognitive behavioral therapy, including interoceptive exposure.
Does the therapeutic alliance matter?
Yes; meta-analyses link a stronger alliance with better outcomes.
Where can I find a free PS380 Unit 6 sample paper?
This page holds the complete PS380 Unit 6 paper comparing cognitive behavioral, psychodynamic and person-centered therapy for a composite client with panic disorder.
Which approach does the PS380 Unit 6 sample recommend?
Cognitive behavioral therapy with interoceptive exposure, delivered with a strong alliance and room for a later exploratory phase.