One composite filter maker, one eastern flow and two measures, landed cost per case and fill rate, set the limits this MT498 Unit 2 proposal commits to. Searches like "mt 498 unit 2 assignment example", "mt498 unit 2 sample" and "mt498 unit 2 example" land here.
What a finished MT498 Unit 2 project scope proposal looks like
Four pages and a one-page boundary diagram. Page one names the organization, a composite pleated-filter maker shipping [650,000] cases a year from one plant, and the sponsor, a vice president of operations. The diagram shades what is in: media and board inbound to Salina for eastern volume, the trailer run to a leased Columbus warehouse, and deliveries to home-center and HVAC distributor accounts. Unshaded, and stated as out: western customers, filter design, and the choice of overseas supplier for premium media. Two measures carry the project, landed cost per eastern case and eastern fill rate, each with a current figure in brackets and a named data source. A list of risks to the project itself closes the document, led by the chance that freight bills arrive incomplete.
How a MT498 Unit 2 example is structured
Organization, problem area, boundary, measures, data, constraints and schedule, in that order. The boundary section does the heaviest work: each node and lane is placed either inside or outside the project, and each exclusion carries a reason, such as the premium media supplier being a sourcing decision rather than a network one. Measures follow from the boundary, so nothing is measured that the project cannot change. The data section lists twelve months of freight invoices, the warehouse's monthly billing, the plant's production records and fill-rate reports from the largest retail account's vendor portal, with the owner of each. Constraints appear as numbers where possible: capital below [$2 million], no change to the product line, and staffing effects at Salina reported in brackets rather than decided. A schedule then ties each later deliverable to the unit where it falls.
Why the east and not the whole
Eastern accounts take 396,000 of 650,000 cases and the largest share of freight. Narrowing to that flow keeps the model small enough to finish while still covering most of the money at stake.
Inside and outside the line
Nine nodes sit inside the boundary and four outside, each exclusion given one sentence of reason. Premium media sourcing is left out on purpose and treated as a fixed input that every later option inherits.
Two measures, both with owners
Landed cost per eastern case comes from freight and warehouse invoices; fill rate comes from the retail account's portal. Each measure names who produces the number, so the baseline can be rebuilt later by anyone.
Constraints stated as figures
A capital ceiling of [$2 million], an unchanged product line and a rule that headcount effects are reported rather than decided keep the eventual alternatives realistic for a company of this size.
A unit-by-unit schedule
Each later deliverable, from the current-state map to the redesign report, is pinned to its unit, with the data it needs listed beside it so that gaps surface while there is still time to fill them.
Where marks go in MT498 Unit 2
Scope proposals in this capstone are graded chiefly on the boundary. A proposal that promises to optimize the whole supply chain has chosen nothing, and instructors usually say so in the first comment. Credit goes to a boundary a reader could draw, with reasons attached to what is left out. Measures matter nearly as much: a project without a baseline figure for cost and service has no way to show later that a change helped. Data sources named by document and owner read as feasible, while phrases like company records do not. Constraints expressed as numbers earn more than constraints expressed as values. A frequent weak spot is a schedule that bunches the modeling into the last two units, leaving no room for the risk and phasing work.
Get a MT498 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Say which organization the project will study and how much of its data is within reach, then add the Unit 2 proposal instructions with their rubric. The composite scope proposal we send back has a drawn boundary, reasons for each exclusion and two measured baselines. There is no charge for a first custom sample, typically delivered in 24-48h.
MT498 Unit 2 questions, answered
Can the organization be one I do not work for?
Yes, in most sections, provided enough data exists to build the model. Students without an employer to study often use a composite company, building its figures from public sources and saying so plainly in the proposal. Instructors generally care that the boundary and measures are sound and traceable, not that the company named on the cover is real.
How narrow should the boundary be?
Narrow enough to cost completely in the units remaining. One flow, one region or one product family is typical. A boundary covering an entire company usually forces shortcuts later, and the landed cost model suffers first. If a reviewer could not list each node and lane inside your boundary from the diagram alone, it is probably still too wide.
Should the proposal already name the redesign?
Usually not. The scope proposal identifies the part of the network worth studying and the measures that will judge any change; the alternatives come later, after the current state is mapped. A proposal that announces its answer invites the grader to ask why the analysis is needed. Naming a suspected problem area, as this sample does with eastern freight, is fine.