Nine nodes, nine lanes and one loop that doubles back: MT498's Unit 3 current-state map shows media heading west, filters returning east, and a price on each lane. Searches like "mt 498 unit 3 assignment example", "mt498 unit 3 sample" and "mt498 unit 3 example" land here.
What a finished MT498 Unit 3 current-state network map looks like
One wide map and three pages of tables behind it. On the map, nine nodes run left to right from suppliers to customers, each lane drawn at a width set by annual loads: 77.6 media loads a year into Salina for eastern volume against 366.7 trailers of finished filters out to Columbus, about seven a week. Every lane label carries miles, transit days and cost per case, 50 cents for media into Salina and $1.89 for the trailer run east at a [$2.40] rate per mile. Node boxes give days of stock on hand: [14] for media, [8] for staged filters, [26] at the warehouse. A callout marks the loop, noting that more than half of an eastern filter's 1,920 miles point away from its buyer. A second callout records trailers leaving Salina at 8,748 pounds.
How a MT498 Unit 3 example is structured
The map comes first because the tables only make sense against it. Nodes are ordered by the direction money flows, suppliers on the left and customers on the right, so the backtracking media lane appears as a line running against the grain. Behind the map sit three tables: nodes, with capacity, stock on hand and cost to operate; lanes, with loads a year, miles, transit days and cost per case; and service, with fill rate and order cycle time by customer group. Each figure is tagged to its source document or marked as an estimate. A short findings page closes the section without recommending anything. It names the loop, the light trailers and a [93.1] percent fill rate for eastern accounts beside [97.9] in the west, and leaves the causes for the problem statement to argue.
Line width as volume
Drawing each lane at a width set by annual loads makes the Salina-to-Columbus run, 366.7 trailers a year, the heaviest stroke on the page, and shows at a glance where the freight money goes.
Stock inside every box
Days of supply sit inside each node: [14] of media at Salina, [8] of staged filters and [26] at the Columbus warehouse. With two days in transit, roughly five weeks of eastern stock stand between the lines and a shelf.
The loop, measured
Media for an eastern filter covers 1,070 miles to Kansas and 850 back toward Ohio. The westbound leg is labeled with its per-case cost so that the backtrack reads as money, not as geography.
Trailers that fill with space
A trailer of [1,080] cases leaves Salina weighing 8,748 pounds, about a fifth of a [44,000]-pound payload. Inbound media, by contrast, reaches its weight limit first, carrying [5,100] cases' worth per load.
Findings without a fix
The closing page states three observations and stops. Proposing a redesign here would get ahead of the problem statement, and the map is graded on accuracy rather than on ideas.
Where marks go in MT498 Unit 3
Marks on a current-state map follow its numbers. A diagram of boxes and arrows with no volumes attached is the most common shortfall at this stage, because every later unit, from the problem statement to the landed cost model, draws its baseline from these figures. Graders check that lanes carry both a transit time and a cost, and that node inventory is stated in days rather than dollars alone. Sources matter: a freight figure with no invoice or rate basis is treated as a guess. Maps that include flows outside the agreed scope tend to lose clarity and points together. Instructors also look for honesty about gaps; a lane marked as an estimate, with its method, earns more than a confident number that later proves wrong. Recommendations slipped into the map usually draw a comment.
Get a MT498 Unit 3 example written to your instructions
Describe the network in your project, even roughly: suppliers, plants, warehouses and customer groups, with whatever volumes and freight bills you can gather, plus the Unit 3 instructions and rubric. We draft the map and its node, lane and service tables as a composite example. First sample, free; turnaround is commonly 24-48h.
MT498 Unit 3 questions, answered
What software should the map be drawn in?
Any tool that keeps labels legible works. Many students use a slide or diagram program; some use mapping software to place nodes geographically. Geography helps when distances drive the argument, as they do here, but a schematic left-to-right layout is easier to read. What graders assess is the data on each node and lane, not the drawing tool.
How precise do the lane costs need to be?
Precise enough to compare, and honest about their basis. Cost per case to two decimals from actual invoices is ideal. Where invoices are missing, a rate per mile multiplied by distance and divided by cases per load, as this sample does, is an accepted estimate if labeled. Mixing the two methods without saying which is which causes trouble later.
Should the map show the whole company or only my scope?
Only the scope, with anything just outside it drawn faintly or noted. Showing western customers in gray, for instance, tells the reader they exist without inviting analysis of them. Including every flow the company has usually crowds the map and hides the lanes the project will actually change.