| Course | MT498 Bachelor's Capstone in Supply Chain Management |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 9 |
| Paper type | Implementation phasing plan |
| Length | About 890 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MT498 Unit 9
Three Gated Steps, One Line at a Time: An MT498 Unit 9 Implementation Phasing Plan for Lowry Filter's Ohio Site
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
MT498: Bachelor's Capstone in Supply Chain Management
Unit 9 Implementation Phasing Plan
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Lowry Filter Company, the Groveport site and every figure are composite; the sources cited are real.
Timeline
The plan runs twelve months. Months one to three fit out the Groveport building: electrical service for the pleating lines, compressed air, racking and a receiving dock for media. Phase one begins in month four, phase two in month six or seven, and phase three in month nine or ten, depending on when each gate is met. The Columbus warehouse lease is released at the end of phase three.
Why One Line at a Time
Each line move takes the line out of production for about three weeks: dismantling in Salina, trucking, reinstallation and test runs in Ohio. A line on two shifts makes about 3,360 cases a week, so covering one move requires about 10,080 cases built ahead in Salina and stored at Columbus. Moving all three lines together would require about 30,240 cases of pre-built stock, more than the Columbus warehouse can hold beside its normal inventory, and would leave no Ohio line running to learn from. Moving them singly also means the first move teaches the second: how long installation really takes, and how much scrap a new crew produces in its first weeks.
The Three Phases
Phase one moves one line and the 14 standard filter sizes with the highest eastern volume, about 38 percent of eastern cases or roughly 2,894 a week, comfortably inside the line's 3,360-case capacity. Salina continues to supply every other eastern item.
Phase two adds a second line and the next group of standard sizes, bringing Ohio to about 76 percent of eastern cases, roughly 5,788 a week, against two lines' capacity of 6,720.
Phase three adds the third line and the premium filters. Premium moves last because it depends on the safeguards from the Unit 6 seminar: 35 days of premium media on hand in Ohio and a standing Norfolk booking with the forwarder. The port lesson becomes a precondition rather than an afterthought.
A missed gate pauses the sequence; it never forces the next move.
Gates
A phase opens only when the previous phase has held three targets for four consecutive weeks: eastern fill rate at or above 96 percent on the items already moved, scrap on the Ohio lines at or below 2.5 percent, and conversion cost per case within 30 cents of the $7.87 plan. If a gate is missed, the sequence pauses, Salina keeps supplying the affected items and the team investigates before trying again. Terwiesch and Bohn (2001) found that production ramp-ups lose much of their early output to yield problems and that deliberate learning during the ramp shortens it, which is why the gates measure scrap as well as service.
People
Ohio crews are hired and trained about six weeks before their line arrives: about 14 people for phase one, 12 for phase two and 12 for phase three, 38 in all, including a site manager hired in month one. Each moved line arrives with two seasoned Salina operators, who stay a fortnight to coach the Ohio crew. The effects on Salina staffing, where three lines' crews will no longer be needed on two shifts, are listed by phase but not decided here, since those choices belong to the company and may involve transfers, attrition or the third-shift capacity the risk assessment relies on.
Cost
Phasing adds one cost the landed cost model lacked. Because the Columbus warehouse holds pre-built stock and continues serving Salina-supplied items until phase three ends, its lease must run about three months longer than the model assumed, at a cost of about $149,500. That raises the one-time total from $1,526,800 to $1,676,300 and moves payback from 2.27 years to about 2.49. The plan reports the change rather than leaving the older figure standing, and the final report will use the revised payback throughout. The total stays inside the $2 million capital ceiling. Chopra and Meindl (2016) note that network changes are judged on their total cost over the transition as well as their steady-state savings, and the overlap is part of that transition.
Risks to the Plan
Three risks could stretch the timeline. The building fit-out could run late if the utility needs longer to upgrade electrical service, which would push every phase back; the plan keeps Salina fully staffed until phase one's gate is met, so a delay costs time rather than service. Hiring in the Columbus labor market could fall short, in which case phase two waits. And the first line move could reveal installation problems that make three weeks optimistic, which is exactly why one line moves first. Simchi-Levi et al. (2008) stress that the transition between two network designs is often riskier than either design itself, and the plan treats each phase as a test before the next.
Communication With Customers
The largest home-center account will be told before phase one which items will ship from Ohio and when, so that its distribution centers can update ship-from records. Fill rate on moved items will be reported to the account weekly during each phase.
References
Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation (6th ed.). Pearson.
Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2008). Designing and managing the supply chain: Concepts, strategies, and case studies (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Terwiesch, C., & Bohn, R. E. (2001). Learning and process improvement during production ramp-up. International Journal of Production Economics, 70(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00045-1
The Purdue Global MT498 Unit 9 instructions
The MT498 Unit 9 plan moves volume onto the new design in stages while customers keep being served. Lay out the timeline, from preparing the new site through each phase. Size every phase against the new node's capacity and explain why the steps are as large as they are. Set gates as numbers that must hold for a stated period before the next phase starts, and say in advance what happens when a gate is missed. Plan the people side: hiring, training and the effects on the old site, recorded for the company to decide. Add any costs the landed cost model lacked, such as lease overlaps or pre-built stock, and revise the payback openly. Include how customers will be told about changes in where their orders ship from.
How this MT498 Unit 9 example is built
Lowry's plan opens with a twelve-month timeline from fit-out to lease release. A section explains why lines move singly: three weeks out per move, 10,080 pre-built cases, against 30,240 for all at once. The three phases are sized against line capacity, with premium last because of the port lesson. Gates follow: fill rate of 96 percent, scrap of 2.5 percent and conversion within 30 cents, held four weeks, under a highlighted line that a missed gate pauses rather than forces the sequence, with Terwiesch and Bohn on ramp-up losses. People, 38 Ohio hires and Salina effects left to the company, come next. The cost section adds the lease overlap with Chopra and Meindl, and plan risks and customer communication close it.
MT498 Unit 9 rubric: what earns full points
Implementation plans in this capstone are judged on whether the network keeps serving customers during the change. A plan that moves all capacity at once, however well described, draws the sharpest comments, because it ignores ramp-up losses and offers no way back. Instructors look for stages sized against capacity, gates stated as numbers and a named fallback when a gate is missed. The people side matters, with hiring timed ahead of each phase and effects on the old site reported honestly. Revising cost and payback when phasing reveals new costs earns credit for integrity. Customer communication shows awareness that the change is visible from outside. Consistency with earlier units and APA references for ramp-up or transition research complete the paper.
Common MT498 Unit 9 mistakes, and how to avoid them
The most frequent weakness is a single cutover date with everything moving at once. Another is gates described as readiness or stability with no numbers attached, so nobody can tell whether one has been met. Students often forget that moving a line removes its output for weeks, which leaves customers short unless stock is built ahead. Staffing is usually treated in one sentence, or the plan makes decisions about the old site's workforce that belong to the company. New transition costs are frequently left out to protect the payback figure. Before submitting, check that each phase fits inside the new node's capacity, that each gate has a number and a duration, and that your payback includes every cost the phasing created.
Get an MT498 Unit 9 example written to your instructions
Share your chosen redesign, the capacities and volumes involved, any lease or hiring dates you know, and the Unit 9 prompt and rubric. Our composite phasing plan sizes each stage against capacity, sets numeric gates and feeds any new costs back into the payback. Nothing is charged for the first custom sample, which normally arrives in 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More MT498 papers and BS in Business Administration samples
- MT498 Unit 1: Product Path Board Post
- MT498 Unit 2: Network Project Scope Proposal
- MT498 Unit 3: Current-State Network Map
- MT498 Unit 4: Fill Rate and Cost Problem Statement
- MT498 Unit 5: Network Alternatives Analysis
- MT498 Unit 6: Port Closure Seminar Reflection
- MT498 Unit 7: Total Landed Cost Model
- MT498 Unit 8: Risk and Resilience Assessment
- MT498 Unit 10: Network Redesign Report
- MT497 Unit 9: Pilot Change Management Plan
- LI410 Unit 9: Feedback and Coaching Plan
- MT494 Unit 9: Marketing Metrics Dashboard
- MT102 Unit 9: Seminar Reflection on Shrink
MT498 Unit 9 questions, answered
How many phases should the plan have?
As many as the change requires to keep service steady, commonly two to four. Each phase should move a quantity the new node can absorb with some capacity to spare, and each should end with a measured gate. A single phase is rarely credible for a network change, and more than five usually signals a plan that has not decided what matters.
What should happen if a gate is missed?
The plan should say, in advance. Pausing the sequence while the old network continues supplying the affected items is the usual answer, with a limit on how long the pause can last before the plan is revisited. Graders look for that fallback because it shows the writer expects problems rather than hoping to avoid them.
Should the phasing plan change the cost figures?
If phasing reveals costs the model omitted, yes. Lease overlaps, pre-built inventory, duplicate staffing and ramp-up scrap are common examples. Updating the payback and saying why is stronger than leaving an earlier figure untouched, and it keeps the final report's numbers consistent from one section to the next.
Where can I find a free MT498 Unit 9 sample paper?
This page holds the complete MT498 Unit 9 plan moving a composite filter maker's eastern volume to Ohio in three gated phases, with the revised payback.
Why do premium filters move last in the MT498 Unit 9 sample?
Premium media arrives by container through one port, so its move waits until 35 days of media cover and a Norfolk booking are in place.