Owner, measure, review rhythm and reaction trigger, set out as a control plan for scan-confirmed picking: GM504's Unit 9 sustainment plan once the project team steps away. Searches like "gm 504 unit 9 assignment example", "gm504 unit 9 sample" and "gm504 unit 9 example" land here.
What a finished GM504 Unit 9 sustainment plan looks like
Four pages centered on a control plan table, the format Six Sigma projects use to hand a process back to its owner. Each row covers one thing that must stay true: the correction rate, bin-location accuracy, the share of picks confirmed by scan rather than overridden, and item master changes for new products. Columns give the measure, the owner, the review frequency, the method, the threshold, and the reaction when the threshold is crossed. Ownership passes from the project lead to the yard operations manager, with location accuracy assigned to the inventory control lead. Around the table sit three short sections: standard work for picking and moving stock, written from how the pilot crews actually worked; onboarding for new pickers; and a one-year review date on which the plan itself is checked.
How a GM504 Unit 9 example is structured
The plan starts from the question the earlier staging check never answered: what happens when the person who cared moves on? Its first section names the transfer date and the new owner, who has accepted it in writing. The control plan follows, and its thresholds are set from the pilot data rather than from targets: a weekly correction rate above 4.5 percent for two consecutive weeks, location accuracy below 97 percent on the Friday sample, or scan overrides above 2 percent of lines each trigger a cause review within five working days. A section explains why the system-enforced scan makes this plan lighter than a manual one would need to be, since the process resists reverting on its own. The last section lists signs of decay that would not show in any metric, such as scanners left charging while picks happen on paper.
Transfer of ownership
The date the project lead steps back, the yard operations manager who takes the process, and the inventory control lead who takes the location record. Both accept in writing, and the plan says what each gives up time for.
Control plan table
Four rows and seven columns, from measure to reaction. Thresholds come from the pilot's own weekly spread, so a trigger fires on a real change rather than on an ordinary bad week.
Standard work from the floor
Picking and stock-move procedures written from observation of the pilot crews, with photographs of the scan screens. Written this way, the standard describes what people already do, which is the version most likely to be followed.
New pickers and seasonal staff
Summer hires arrive when volume peaks, the same moment the old staging check collapsed. The plan builds the scan routine into the first shift of onboarding and assigns a trained picker to each new hire for a week.
Decay that no metric shows
Scanners left in chargers, overflow stock stacked without a move scan, override codes shared among pickers. The owner walks the yard monthly with this list, and the plan is itself reviewed after one year.
Where marks go in GM504 Unit 9
Sustainment plans are where many GM504 projects quietly lose the marks they earned earlier. The usual failure is a plan that restates the improvement and adds that it will be monitored, with no owner, no frequency, and no stated reading that would prompt action. A named person who has accepted the process, thresholds drawn from data, and a reaction specified in advance are what many sections reward. Plans also lose credit for assigning ownership to a committee or a department, since nobody in particular then holds the gain. Weak plans ignore the predictable threats, such as seasonal hiring or the departure of a sponsor. The strongest versions explain why the change itself resists reverting, and say how the plan would be reviewed and retired rather than left to lapse unnoticed.
Get a GM504 Unit 9 example written to your instructions
Describe the improvement that needs holding, who could realistically own it once the project ends, and what data already gets reviewed where you work. Attach the Unit 9 prompt and rubric as well. The first sustainment plan is free, arrives in 24-48h, and names an owner, a threshold and a reaction for each measure.
GM504 Unit 9 questions, answered
What is a control plan?
A table, common in Six Sigma work, listing each measure that must be maintained after an improvement, with its owner, method, frequency, limits and the response when a limit is breached. It turns sustainment from an intention into a set of assigned tasks. Some instructors accept a simpler owner-and-review table instead; the example uses the fuller version.
How are the reaction thresholds chosen?
From the process's own behavior. The example sets its trigger just above the highest weekly rate seen during the pilot, so ordinary fluctuation does not cause false alarms while a real slide does. Thresholds chosen as round targets, such as zero errors, tend to fire constantly or never, and either way people stop responding to them.
Can the sustainment plan be short if the change is automated?
Shorter, not absent. System enforcement removes the most common decay, people skipping a step they are supposed to remember, but workarounds still appear. The example keeps a monthly yard walk for exactly that reason. It also needs an owner for the system configuration itself, since a software update or a new product line can quietly undo the safeguard.