Define, measure, analyze, improve and control, reported in one close-out document for a distributor's owner: the GM504 excellence project report for Unit 10, results and all. Searches like "gm 504 unit 10 assignment example", "gm504 unit 10 sample" and "gm504 unit 10 example" land here.
What a finished GM504 Unit 10 excellence project report looks like
Around twelve pages plus appendices, in the order a leadership team reads. The executive summary, one page long, states the problem, the cause, the change, the result and the cost. The project charter follows as it was approved, including the original goal of 3.5 percent, which the report does not quietly revise. Five sections follow the DMAIC phases, each condensed from earlier work: the delivery-order map, the twelve-week baseline, the Pareto chart and location audit, the scanning changes, and the control plan. Results are reported as levels, trends and comparisons: weekly rates for the baseline, pilot and eight follow-up weeks, with wrong-item corrections down from 52 to 18 a month and short quantities from 41 to 29. A financial section carries the controller's validation of the savings. Acceptance lines for the owner and the process owner are left unsigned.
How a GM504 Unit 10 example is structured
Because the report is written for people who will not read the earlier units, every section stands on its own and cross-references the appendix holding the analysis. The executive summary is written last and kept to one page, with the result stated as a range the data supports rather than the best week. The results section follows the Baldrige habit of levels, trends and comparisons; since the company has no industry benchmark, comparison is made against the charter goal and the baseline, and the report says so. Missing the 3.5 percent goal is addressed directly: wrong-item errors nearly met their prediction while short quantities fell less than expected, and the report traces the gap to fastener items still awaiting cleanup. Validated savings of about $7,100 a month replace the projected figure. Lessons learned close the report, written for the next project team, not as praise.
One page for the owner
Problem, cause, change, result and cost on one page, written for an owner deciding whether to extend the approach to counter orders. The result is stated as 3.5 to 3.9 percent across the follow-up weeks, not as the best single week.
Charter as approved
Scope, goal, team and sponsor exactly as signed at the start, so a reader can see what was promised. The goal of 3.5 percent stays unrevised, and the results section explains why it was narrowly missed.
Five phases, condensed
Two pages per phase at most, each ending with a pointer to the appendix that holds the full map, baseline, cause analysis, proposal or control plan. Figures are reproduced small, and each phase closes with the decision it led to.
Results against goal and baseline
Weekly correction rates plotted across baseline, pilot and follow-up, with each error type shown separately. Wrong items fell close to prediction; short quantities lagged because 212 fastener items still carried the wrong unit of measure.
Savings the controller signed off
Fifty fewer corrections a month at $142 each, about $7,100, validated against credit memo and fleet records rather than projected. After running costs, the one-time $23,556 is recovered in under four months at that rate.
Lessons for the next team
Map before proposing, verify the cause physically, and set the sustainment owner before the pilot ends. Each lesson is tied to a moment in this project where it mattered, written for a counter-order project already being discussed.
Where marks go in GM504 Unit 10
Final project reports lose most when they read as a stack of earlier assignments stapled together, with no executive summary and no single argument running through. Graders in this course generally expect the document an organization would actually file: results first for decision makers, detail in appendices, and financial claims checked against records. Reports also give ground by quietly moving the goal to match the outcome, or by headlining the best week instead of the sustained level. Savings presented as projections after the pilot has run, when actual figures exist, draw criticism. A missed target explained honestly usually costs less than one hidden. The highest-marked reports connect results to the framework chosen at the start, show the control plan in operation, and record lessons in a form another team could use.
Get a GM504 Unit 10 example written to your instructions
Gather what your project has produced so far, whether a map, a baseline, a cause analysis or a proposal, even in rough form, and send it with the Unit 10 instructions and rubric. A first custom report is free and comes back within 24-48h, assembled as an organization would file it, with results stated honestly against the original goal.
GM504 Unit 10 questions, answered
Should the final report repeat everything from earlier units?
No. Condense each phase to what a decision maker needs and move the full analyses into appendices. Earlier feedback from the instructor belongs in the revised versions, and the report should reflect those revisions rather than the first drafts. A reader who wants the whole fishbone can find it; one who wants the result should not have to dig.
What if the improvement was never actually implemented?
Plenty of people take this course without authority to change their workplace, and most sections accept a report built on a planned or simulated implementation. Label it clearly: projected results are shown as projections, with the assumptions behind them, and the control plan is presented as proposed. Presenting invented outcomes as real is the one approach that reliably costs credit.
How long should the excellence project report be?
Instructions set the range, and many land between ten and fifteen pages before appendices. Length matters less than proportion: the executive summary and results deserve the most care, because that is where a leadership reader decides. Appendices can run long without penalty in most sections, provided each one is referenced in the body. The example keeps its body to twelve pages.