What makes a case analyzable, shown on one acquisition: FI499's Unit 2 proposal here states the decision question, inventories the data and sets two weaker cases aside. Searches like "fi 499 unit 2 assignment example", "fi499 unit 2 sample" and "fi499 unit 2 example" land here.
What a finished FI499 Unit 2 case selection proposal looks like
About three pages, with the decision question set apart at the top: should a composite fourteen-site express car-wash chain buy a six-site rival for 21.0 million dollars, build two new sites for about 11.0 million, or do neither. A data inventory follows as a table, listing what the case file supplies and what it lacks: three years of statements for both firms, monthly membership counts, site-level wash volumes, the rival's two ground leases, and a term-loan quote at 8.25 percent. Missing items, such as the rival's own payroll records, are named with the workaround for each. The evaluation criterion is stated once, value to the buyer's owners against the price, measured by discounted cash flow. A closing section explains why a composite hospital system and a public airline were considered and rejected.
How a FI499 Unit 2 example is structured
Question, evidence, method and scope arrive in that order, so a reader can approve or reject the proposal from its first page. The decision question is written as one sentence with its three alternatives, because a proposal that cannot state its decision that briefly usually has not found it yet. The data inventory follows and does double duty: it proves the case can be analyzed and it becomes the source list every later unit cites. A method paragraph names the valuation approach and the single criterion that will decide, with a sentence ruling out earnings accretion as the test. Scope limits come next, for instance excluding the buyer's real estate strategy. The final section reports the rejected cases in a short paragraph each, since explaining why a subject fails is part of showing why this one works.
One question, three alternatives
Acquire, build or wait is written as a single sentence with prices attached, so every later unit can be checked against the question it was meant to answer.
What the file holds, and lacks
Statements, member counts, wash volumes, lease terms and a loan quote are listed beside the gaps, each gap paired with the proxy the analysis will use instead.
One criterion, named early
Value to the buyer's owners measured against price decides the case, and earnings per share after the deal is explicitly excluded as a test.
Boundaries of the analysis
Real estate strategy, franchising options and a sale of the whole chain sit outside scope, which keeps ten units of work pointed at one decision.
Two cases turned down
A hospital system with bundled payer contracts and an airline with layered fuel hedges were rejected because neither exposed enough data to model credibly.
Where marks go in FI499 Unit 2
Proposals lose the most when the decision is vague: a subject such as a company's growth, rather than a choice with alternatives and a price, leaves the remaining units with nothing to conclude. A data inventory that lists no gaps reads as untested, and graders often ask what the author will do when the file runs out. Criteria left unstated until later invite a recommendation judged on whatever measure happens to look best. Scope that includes everything, a company's whole strategy for instance, predicts a thin analysis spread across too many questions. Rejected alternatives presented without reasons suggest the choice was a default. Formatting counts for more than usual at this stage, since approval often depends on a reader finding the question, the data and the criterion within one page.
Get a FI499 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Which cases does your section offer, or which one do you want approved? Send that with the proposal instructions and rubric. The proposal written for you states the decision in one sentence with its alternatives, inventories what the case supplies and names what is missing. It is free as a first sample and usually arrives in 24-48h.
FI499 Unit 2 questions, answered
Can the proposal choose a real public company?
Many sections allow it, and some prefer it because filings are public. The trade-off is that a real company rarely comes with a clean decision attached, so the proposal has to construct one, such as an announced expansion or a pending refinancing. A composite or assigned case supplies the decision and the data together, which is why the sample uses one.
Why exclude earnings per share as the test?
Because a deal can raise earnings per share while destroying value, for example when it is funded with cheap debt and priced above what the acquired cash flows are worth. Naming the criterion early stops the final recommendation from switching to whichever measure looks best. Graders reading a capstone often check that the closing decision uses the test the proposal promised.
What if my instructor rejects the proposal?
Usually the objection is scope or data, and the fix is a narrower case rather than a different one. The sample's rejected-cases section shows that reasoning in advance. A revised proposal that tightens the question to one decision with priced alternatives, and shows the data exists, tends to be accepted without a second round of objections from the reader.