| Course | FI499 Bachelor's Capstone in Finance |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 1 |
| Paper type | Discussion board post |
| Length | About 360 words, 2 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 discussion post |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Finance |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for FI499 Unit 1
The Price Looks Like the Question, but the Swimmers Are: A Unit 1 Capstone Post on One Acquisition's Hinge
FI499 · Unit 1 Discussion
Posted by [Student Name]
Tidewell, Paddlemark, the classmates and every figure are composite; the article and book cited are real.
Initial Post
My case is Tidewell Swim Schools, a composite chain of fourteen indoor swim schools in central Ohio with $7.38 million of EBITDA last year. A rival, Paddlemark Swim Academy, has offered its six schools for $21.0 million, ten times their trailing EBITDA of $2.10 million. On first reading the question is whether ten times is too much.
I do not think the decision lives in the multiple. Just over half of Paddlemark's revenue, about $4.35 million a year, comes from roughly 2,420 children enrolled on monthly tuition plans averaging about $150. Parents can cancel any month with a click. When the signs change from Paddlemark to Tidewell, every one of those families gets a reason to reconsider: a new app, new instructors' names, perhaps new class times. Families choose a swim school partly for a particular instructor their child trusts.
If most families stay, the price is defensible and the savings make it attractive; if a meaningful share leave, no multiple is cheap enough, so the case hinges on retention after rebranding rather than on the price itself.
The evidence that would settle the hinge is specific: three years of monthly enrollment counts, so I can see normal churn, and what happened to enrollment after any earlier rebrand in the region. Research on customer value shows that small changes in retention move the value of a subscription business far more than small changes in price (Gupta et al., 2004). Valuation texts make the same point from the other side: the forecast, not the multiple, carries the decision (Koller et al., 2020).
Reply to Ana
Ana, your hospital case looks like a staffing question. Can you put its hinge in one sentence that a number could settle?
Reply to Devin
Devin, the airline's fuel hedge matters, but is it the hinge, or would the answer change more if load factors moved two points?
References
Gupta, S., Lehmann, D. R., & Stuart, J. A. (2004). Valuing customers. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(1), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.41.1.7.25084
Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2020). Valuation: Measuring and managing the value of companies (7th ed.). Wiley.
FI499 Unit 1 instructions, in plain terms
Unit 1 of FI499 asks for an initial post naming the hinge of your capstone case, plus replies. Put the case in figures first: the companies, their earnings and the decision on the table. Then argue where the decision really lives, which is often not where it first appears. State the hinge in a single sentence that a number could settle. Name the evidence that would settle it and say whether the case file supplies it. Support the argument with a valuation text or research showing why that kind of driver matters. Keep the post within the word range your section sets. Write replies that push a classmate to state their own hinge just as plainly, ideally by asking which figure would change their answer. Cite your sources in APA 7.
How the FI 499 Unit 1 example is put together
The sample's first paragraph sets out Tidewell's fourteen schools, its $7.38 million of EBITDA and a price equal to ten times the rival's $2.10 million. The second paragraph moves the question away from the multiple. Just over half of the rival's revenue comes from monthly plans averaging about $150 that parents can cancel with a click, and a new name, app and instructors give every family a moment to reconsider. The highlighted sentence states the hinge. The post asks for three years of monthly enrollment counts and any record of an earlier rebrand, and cites research on how retention drives customer value. Replies ask Ana for her hospital case's hinge in one sentence and ask Devin whether load factors outweigh a fuel hedge.
FI499 Unit 1 rubric: what earns full points
FI499 opening posts earn points for locating the decision precisely and saying what evidence would resolve it. Graders look for the case stated in figures, an argument that moves past the obvious framing when the facts support doing so, and a hinge put in one sentence that a measurement could settle. The rubric rewards naming specific data, admitting whether the case file contains it and citing sources on why the driver matters. Replies score when they press a classmate toward the same precision. Posts that restate the assignment, list every possible issue or treat the purchase multiple as the whole question receive fewer points. Clear figures and a single committed hinge set up the rest of the term.
FI499 Unit 1 help from the desk
Weak Unit 1 posts summarize the case and stop before naming what it turns on. Others list five possible issues without choosing one, which leaves later units without a focus. Many accept the first framing, such as the purchase multiple, without asking whether something else would change the answer more. The evidence needed is rarely named. Replies drift into agreement. If your capstone concerns a refinancing, an expansion or a capital budgeting choice, the same move applies: put the case in figures, find the question that decides it and name the data that would settle it.
Get an FI499 Unit 1 example written to your instructions
Name the case your section set, or the one you plan to propose, and add the discussion prompt with its peer-reply rule. Back comes a post that finds the decision your case actually rests on, lists the evidence that would settle it and shapes replies to your classmates' cases. No charge attaches to a first sample, typically inside 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More FI499 papers and BS in Finance samples
- FI499 Unit 2: Case Selection Proposal
- FI499 Unit 3: Assumption Set
- FI499 Unit 4: Financial Statement Analysis
- FI499 Unit 5: Valuation Model
- FI499 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- FI499 Unit 7: Risk Assessment
- FI499 Unit 8: Sensitivity Analysis
- FI499 Unit 9: Executive Summary
- FI499 Unit 10: Capstone Recommendation
- FI310 Unit 1: Discussion Post on Mobile Deposit
- FI410 Unit 1: Discussion Post on Ledger Fit
- FI311 Unit 1: Discussion Post on Fintech Complaints
FI499 Unit 1 questions, answered
Where can I find a free FI499 Unit 1 sample paper?
This page holds a full FI499 Unit 1 discussion post naming the hinge of a composite swim school acquisition, with the case in figures, the evidence needed, two replies and APA 7 references.
Is the swim school chain a real company?
No. Tidewell and its rival are composites built so the figures hold together across all ten units. Capstone sections usually assign a case or approve one the student proposes, and your own post works from whichever applies.
Why isn't the purchase multiple the hinge?
Because ten times earnings is reasonable or expensive depending on what happens to those earnings after the deal. If enrolled families leave when the name changes, any multiple is too high; if they stay, the price can be defended.
What evidence would settle the hinge?
Monthly enrollment counts over several years, to show normal churn, and any record of what happened to enrollment after an earlier rebrand in the region. The sample notes the case file has the first and lacks the second.
How long should a capstone reply be?
Long enough to ask one precise question and say why it matters. The sample's replies are two sentences each, asking a classmate to state their case's hinge in a line a number could settle.