EF310 Unit 7 Progression Plan for Claudication Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN Applied Exercise Science for Healthy Aging and Special Conditions Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Calf pain that arrives at minute four on the treadmill, eases with two minutes of rest and returns on the next bout is the signal the EF310 Unit 7 progression plan reads for a composite sixty-nine-year-old former trucker with peripheral artery disease. Purdue Global EF 310 asks BS in Health Science students to progress clients by response, not by calendar. The plan explains why walking to moderate claudication is the stimulus, records a baseline at a set speed and grade, and logs three numbers each session. A decision table sets four outcomes: advance by grade, then speed, once he walks about eight to ten minutes before moderate pain; hold; step back; or stop and refer for rest pain, wounds or chest symptoms.

CourseEF310 Applied Exercise Science for Healthy Aging and Special Conditions
UnitUnit 7
Paper typeProgression plan
LengthAbout 720 words, 5 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBS in Health Science
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for EF310 Unit 7

1

Advance When the Pain Comes Later: A Unit 7 Progression Plan for Walking With Peripheral Artery Disease

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

EF310: Applied Exercise Science for Healthy Aging and Special Conditions

Unit 7 Progression Plan

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The client and his session figures are composite; the scientific statement on exercise for peripheral artery disease, the guidelines text and the perceived exertion paper cited are real.

What this part is doingTying progression to a symptom in the lead tells the grader the plan is criterion-based rather than calendar-based.
2

The Client

A sixty-nine-year-old former long-haul trucker with peripheral artery disease in both legs, worse on the left. He quit smoking two years ago. His vascular physician has referred him for supervised exercise and cleared him for treadmill walking. He has no rest pain, no foot wounds and no chest symptoms. His goal is to walk to the end of his street and back, about half a mile, without stopping.

Why Walking to Pain

In peripheral artery disease, narrowed leg arteries cannot meet the muscles' demand during walking, and the result is claudication, a cramping pain that stops with rest. Supervised treadmill walking that brings on moderate claudication, with rest between bouts, is the best-supported exercise treatment and improves the distance people can walk before pain and in total (Treat-Jacobson et al., 2019). Walking to that level of discomfort is the stimulus; stopping at the first twinge produces less benefit.

Baseline

From his first three supervised sessions, at a treadmill speed of 2.0 miles per hour and a 2 percent grade: Onset of claudication: about 4 minutes. Moderate pain, about 3 on a 4-point claudication scale: about 6 minutes. Recovery to no pain after stopping: about 2 minutes.

Each Session

Warm-up: five minutes of easy walking below the pain threshold. Work: repeated walking bouts at the current speed and grade until pain reaches moderate, then seated or standing rest until pain is gone, then the next bout. Total walking time, not counting rests, starts at 15 minutes and builds by five minutes every two weeks to 35 minutes. Cool-down: five minutes of easy walking and calf stretches. Frequency: three supervised sessions a week, for at least twelve weeks, as the scientific statement recommends.

What Is Logged

Three numbers each session: minutes to onset of pain, minutes to moderate pain on the first bout, and minutes to recover. He also rates overall effort on the 6 to 20 scale, which helps separate leg pain from general fatigue (Borg, 1982).

What this part is doingLogging the same three numbers every session is what makes the decision table usable, since each rule depends on them.
3

The Decision Table

Advance: when he can walk about 8 to 10 minutes at the current workload before reaching moderate pain on the first bout, for two sessions in a row. Increase grade by 1 to 2 percent first; once grade reaches 10 to 12 percent, increase speed by 0.1 to 0.2 miles per hour instead.

Hold: when time to moderate pain is improving but still under 8 minutes. Keep the workload and keep logging.

Step back: when time to moderate pain falls by more than two minutes from his recent average, or recovery takes longer than five minutes. Reduce grade by 1 to 2 percent for the next session and look for a cause, such as poor sleep, a missed medication or a cold.

Stop and refer: if he reports pain at rest, a new wound or color change in the foot, chest discomfort, unusual breathlessness, dizziness, or pain that does not ease within ten minutes of rest. Notify his vascular physician the same day.

The plan never advances on the calendar, because the whole point of the program is to push the onset of pain later, and the onset of pain is the only honest measure of whether that is happening.

What this part is doingThe highlighted sentence explains why the table uses pain timing as its rule, which is the reasoning a progression plan should make explicit.
4

Expected Course

Most people in supervised programs walk noticeably farther before pain after about twelve weeks. If his onset time moves from 4 to around 8 or 9 minutes, he would be able to cover the half mile to the end of his street and back at an easy pace, with a rest at the turn if needed.

After Supervision

At twelve weeks the plan shifts to a home walking program on the same principle, using a route with benches and a timer. He keeps the same log and reviews it with the program staff monthly. The guidelines text supports this kind of supervised-to-home transition for clients with chronic conditions (American College of Sports Medicine, 2021).

5

References

American College of Sports Medicine. (2021). ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

Borg, G. A. (1982). Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 14(5), 377-381. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012

Treat-Jacobson, D., McDermott, M. M., Bronas, U. G., Campia, U., Collins, T. C., Criqui, M. H., Gardner, A. W., Hiatt, W. R., Regensteiner, J. G., & Rich, K. (2019). Optimal exercise programs for patients with peripheral artery disease: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 139(4), e10-e33. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000623

What the EF310 Unit 7 assignment asks for

Unit 7 commonly asks for a progression plan that explains how and when a client's program will advance, often for a chronic condition where symptoms guide intensity. Plans usually run three to four pages. Graders look for a clear baseline, measures logged each session, rules that decide when to advance, hold or step back, and warning signs that stop exercise and trigger referral. Many sections reward progression tied to the client's response rather than to elapsed time, and a plan for the transition to home exercise. Cite a condition-specific statement or guideline and the guidelines text. Write the decision rules so a colleague could apply them without asking.

How the EF 310 Unit 7 example is put together

The plan introduces the client, his clearance and his goal of walking to the end of his street and back. A section explains claudication and why walking to moderate pain helps, citing a scientific statement on exercise for peripheral artery disease. The baseline gives onset, moderate pain and recovery times at a set workload. Each session's structure follows, then the three logged numbers with an effort rating, citing the perceived exertion scale. The decision table defines advance, hold, step back and stop and refer; the highlighted sentence explains why the plan never advances on the calendar. The expected course and the shift to home walking at twelve weeks close the plan.

EF310 Unit 7 rubric: what earns full points

Progression plans are typically scored on the baseline, the clarity of decision rules, the link between rules and the client's condition, safety and the transition plan. Decision rules usually carry the most weight, since the unit is about knowing when to change a program and why. Baseline credit rewards measured starting values. Rules earn points when they rest on logged measures rather than dates. Safety points go to specific stop-and-refer criteria. The transition to home exercise is rewarded when it keeps the same logic. A source for the condition-specific protocol and correct use of an effort scale complete the expected support and lift the plan's credibility. A plan that a colleague could apply on a day the author is absent is the practical test graders often use.

EF310 Unit 7 help from the desk

The most common error is a plan that advances every week regardless of how the client responds. Another is telling a client with claudication to stop at the first sign of pain, which removes the training stimulus. Some students list measures but never say which one decides progression. Others omit warning signs, such as rest pain or a foot wound, that require referral. A plan that ends when supervision ends leaves the client without guidance. If your client has another condition, perhaps heart failure or COPD, share the symptoms that guide intensity, and the decision table can be built around them.

Get an EF310 Unit 7 example written to your instructions

Send the prescription your Unit 7 plan has to progress, the client's baseline response if the prompt gives one, and the rubric. The plan sets measurable advance, hold, step-back and referral rules, and the log it includes records what those rules need. No payment is due on a first sample, which takes 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

Request this unit free All EF310 units Finished samples

More EF310 papers and BS in Health Science samples

EF310 Unit 7 questions, answered

Can a progression plan include a timeline at all?

Yes, as an expectation rather than a rule. Saying that many clients might reach a given workload in eight to twelve weeks helps a reader plan, provided the document makes clear that response decides each step. The loss comes when the timeline itself triggers advances. A projected range, labeled as such, sitting alongside response criteria is usually well received.

Which variable should progress first?

Whichever the client's condition and the course text support, with the reason stated. For walking programs, many plans raise grade or duration before speed; for resistance work, repetitions often rise before load. The order matters less than consistency and a rationale tied to the client. Changing two variables at once makes it impossible to tell which one caused a poor response.

What should the plan do when a client gets worse?

Separate expected setbacks from warning signs. A bad week after illness or poor sleep calls for holding or stepping back, and the plan should say by how much. A new symptom, or one appearing at rest, is a different category: the progression stops and the finding goes to the client's physician. Keeping those two categories apart earns credit.

Where can I find a free EF310 Unit 7 sample paper?

This page shows the complete Unit 7 progression plan for walking with peripheral artery disease, advanced by pain onset rather than by week.

Should people with claudication walk through the pain?

In supervised programs they usually walk until pain is moderate, then rest until it eases and repeat, which builds walking distance over time.