| Course | EF310 Applied Exercise Science for Healthy Aging and Special Conditions |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 10 |
| Paper type | Comprehensive program portfolio |
| Length | About 870 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Health Science |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for EF310 Unit 10
Four Constraints, One Traceable File: A Unit 10 Comprehensive Program Portfolio for a Breast Cancer Survivor
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
EF310: Applied Exercise Science for Healthy Aging and Special Conditions
Unit 10 Comprehensive Program Portfolio
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The client, her history and every test result are composite; the cancer survivor exercise guidelines, the lymphedema trial, the osteoporosis recommendations and the guidelines text cited are real.
Cover Memo
To the course instructor and the client's oncology team: this portfolio holds the screening, assessment, prescription, progression and education documents prepared for one client over twelve weeks, in the order the work happened. A cross-reference table links each programming decision to the finding that produced it.
The Client
A sixty-six-year-old woman treated two years ago for right-sided breast cancer with surgery that removed several lymph nodes, followed by radiation. She now takes an aromatase inhibitor, which has caused aching in her hands, knees and hips. A bone density scan shows osteopenia. She has no swelling in her right arm but has been told she is at risk of lymphedema. Her energy varies; some weeks she feels well, others tired by midday. Her goal is to play piano for an hour without hand pain and to garden again.
Cross-Reference Table
1. Decision: begin supervised upper-body resistance at light loads and progress slowly. Finding: lymphedema risk after lymph node removal. Evidence: a trial in women with breast cancer related lymphedema found that slowly progressive weight lifting did not worsen swelling and reduced flare-ups (Schmitz et al., 2009). Pages: screening summary, prescription.
2. Decision: avoid loaded spinal flexion and twisting; include back extensor strengthening and balance. Finding: osteopenia on bone density scan. Evidence: exercise recommendations for people with low bone mass (Giangregorio et al., 2014). Pages: assessment, prescription.
3. Decision: moderate aerobic exercise three times a week, with low-impact options on bad joint days. Finding: aromatase inhibitor joint pain. Evidence: consensus guidelines for cancer survivors recommend moderate aerobic and resistance exercise, which may help joint symptoms and fatigue (Campbell et al., 2019). Pages: prescription, progression log.
4. Decision: a weekly energy check that sets that week's targets. Finding: fluctuating fatigue. Evidence: the same guidelines report that exercise reduces cancer-related fatigue, and flexible targets keep her exercising on low-energy weeks. Pages: progression plan, education handout.
5. Decision: hand and wrist mobility work before piano. Finding: hand stiffness and her goal. Pages: prescription, education handout.
Every exercise in the file can be traced to a finding and a source, so a reader can see not only what she does but why, and can check whether the reason still applies as her condition changes.
Documents Summarized
Screening summary. Cleared by her oncologist for exercise. No signs or symptoms of cardiovascular disease. Arm circumference measured at four points on both arms as a baseline.
Assessment. Six-minute walk: 470 meters. Thirty-second chair stand: 11. Grip strength: lower on the right. Single-leg stance: 12 seconds on each side.
Prescription. Aerobic: walking or stationary cycling, 30 minutes, moderate effort, three days a week. Resistance: two days a week, eight exercises; upper-body loads start at the lightest weight and rise only after two weeks without arm symptoms. Balance and back extensor work on resistance days. Hand mobility daily.
Progression plan. Weekly energy check on a 0 to 10 scale. At 7 or above, full session; 4 to 6, aerobic time halved and resistance at the previous week's load; 3 or below, a short walk and stretching only. Arm circumference rechecked every four weeks; any increase of more than about 5 percent, or new heaviness, means pausing upper-body loading and contacting her oncology team.
Education handout. A one-page sheet on lymphedema warning signs, wearing a compression sleeve if prescribed, and the energy check.
Twelve-Week Results
Six-minute walk: 470 to 540 meters. Chair stand: 11 to 14. Arm circumference unchanged. She reports hand pain during piano reduced from 5 to 2 out of 10 and is gardening twice a week. She missed six sessions, mostly in two low-energy weeks, which the flexible targets absorbed without her stopping the program.
What the Oncology Team Receives
A two-page summary goes to her oncology nurse navigator every twelve weeks: the arm measurements in a short table, her test results against baseline, the number of sessions completed and any symptoms reported. The summary uses plain clinical language and avoids exercise jargon, since its readers want to know whether the program is safe for her arm and bones and whether it is helping her fatigue and joints. Any change that would alter treatment, such as new arm swelling, is reported to the team on the day it is found, outside the regular summary.
Reflection on the Portfolio
Assembling the file in order showed how each decision depended on an earlier finding. The most important document turned out to be the screening summary, because it set the arm baseline that every later lymphedema check relied on. The second most important was the energy check, which turned a variable that could have ended the program into one that simply adjusted it each week. Following the guidelines text, the program will be reviewed with her oncology team at six months (American College of Sports Medicine, 2021).
References
American College of Sports Medicine. (2021). ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
Campbell, K. L., Winters-Stone, K. M., Wiskemann, J., May, A. M., Schwartz, A. L., Courneya, K. S., Zucker, D. S., Matthews, C. E., Ligibel, J. A., Gerber, L. H., Morris, G. S., Patel, A. V., Hue, T. F., Perna, F. M., & Schmitz, K. H. (2019). Exercise guidelines for cancer survivors: Consensus statement from international multidisciplinary roundtable. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 51(11), 2375-2390. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002116
Giangregorio, L. M., Papaioannou, A., MacIntyre, N. J., Ashe, M. C., Heinonen, A., Shipp, K., Wark, J., McGill, S., Keller, H., Jain, R., Laprade, J., & Cheung, A. M. (2014). Too fit to fracture: Exercise recommendations for individuals with osteoporosis or osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Osteoporosis International, 25(3), 821-835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2523-2
Schmitz, K. H., Ahmed, R. L., Troxel, A., Cheville, A., Smith, R., Lewis-Grant, L., Bryan, C. J., Williams-Smith, C. T., & Greene, Q. P. (2009). Weight lifting in women with breast-cancer-related lymphedema. New England Journal of Medicine, 361(7), 664-673. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0810118
What the EF310 Unit 10 assignment asks for
The final unit usually asks for a portfolio assembling all the documents prepared for one client, with a cover memo and an organizing feature that shows how decisions connect to findings. Portfolios can run long, often fifteen to twenty pages. Graders look for completeness, a traceable link from each programming decision to an assessment finding and evidence, revisions noted where earlier documents changed, results against baseline and a reflective element. Many sections reward a cross-reference table or similar device that a reader can use to find their way. Cite condition-specific guidelines for each major decision. Present documents in the order the work happened so the reasoning unfolds naturally.
How the EF 310 Unit 10 example is put together
A cover memo explains what the portfolio holds and how it is organized. The client section describes her treatment, medication, bone density, lymphedema risk, fatigue and goals. The cross-reference table lists five decisions, each with the finding behind it, the evidence and the pages where both appear, citing a lymphedema trial, osteoporosis exercise recommendations and cancer survivor guidelines; the highlighted sentence explains why the table matters. Summaries of the screening, assessment, prescription, progression plan and handout follow. Twelve-week results report test changes, arm measurements and missed sessions. Sections describe the summary sent to her oncology team and reflect on which documents mattered most.
EF310 Unit 10 rubric: what earns full points
Program portfolios are usually marked on completeness, traceability, use of evidence, documentation of results and reflection. Traceability tends to decide the grade, since the purpose of a capstone portfolio is to show that every decision can be followed back to a finding and a source. Completeness rewards including every required document. Evidence earns credit when each major decision cites a guideline or study. Results are rewarded when reported against baseline, including what did not go to plan. Reflection earns points when it names which decisions mattered most and why. Clear organization and a navigable table often make the difference between a good and an excellent portfolio. Including the summary sent to the client's medical team shows the portfolio serves real communication, not only the course.
EF310 Unit 10 help: mistakes that cost points
A frequent problem is a portfolio that stacks earlier assignments without connecting them, so a reader cannot see why any choice was made. Another is leaving out results, or reporting only the good ones. Some students cite general exercise guidelines for decisions that need condition-specific evidence, such as lymphedema precautions. Others forget communication with the client's medical team. A reflection that summarizes the documents again adds little. If your capstone client has different constraints, perhaps heart failure and arthritis, share the earlier documents, and the cross-reference table can be built from them decision by decision. Forgetting to note which earlier documents were revised, and why, hides how the program evolved.
Get an EF310 Unit 10 example written to your instructions
Gather the documents you wrote for your Unit 10 client this term, the instructor comments each one received, and the portfolio instructions with the rubric. The assembled file links every decision to its source finding, corrects what feedback flagged, and closes with a reflective memo. Your first sample is free; allow 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More EF310 papers and BS in Health Science samples
- EF310 Unit 1: Aging Changes Discussion Post
- EF310 Unit 2: Client Screening Summary
- EF310 Unit 3: Risk Stratification Exercise
- EF310 Unit 4: Knee Arthritis Exercise Prescription
- EF310 Unit 5: Diabetes Chronic Condition Case Study
- EF310 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection on Comorbidity
- EF310 Unit 7: Progression Plan for Claudication
- EF310 Unit 8: Fall Prevention Program
- EF310 Unit 9: Client Education Handout
- HS111 Unit 10: Terminology Case Summary
- HS499 Unit 10: Capstone Presentation
- HS140 Unit 10: Polypharmacy Medication Case Analysis
- HS460 Unit 10: Project Closeout Report
EF310 Unit 10 questions, answered
Should earlier documents be revised or included as submitted?
Usually revised, with the change noted, unless the instructions ask for originals. A portfolio carrying an error an instructor already marked suggests the feedback was not used. Marking each revision briefly, with what changed and why, shows the learning without hiding the original reasoning. Where the prompt asks for both versions, place the original behind the revision.
What goes in the reflective memo?
Decisions, mostly. Strong memos name the constraint that shaped the most choices, one decision that changed after new information, and one thing the writer would do differently with the same client. Length is usually one to two pages. Concrete episodes, such as the week her fatigue pattern forced the intensity method to change, make the reflection credible where a general claim of growth would not.
Can the portfolio use a different client from earlier units?
The prompt decides. Many final units ask for one client carried through the whole term, which makes linkage between documents easy to show. If earlier units used different clients, some sections allow a new composite built for the portfolio, with every document written fresh. Check the instructions, since mixing clients across documents breaks the traceability the file exists to demonstrate.
Where can I find a free EF310 Unit 10 sample paper?
You can read the complete Unit 10 portfolio here, a traceable program file for a breast cancer survivor with four programming constraints.
Is resistance training safe with lymphedema risk?
Research on slowly progressive weight lifting in women after breast cancer found it did not worsen swelling, so supervised, gradual upper-body loading is commonly recommended with monitoring.