| Course | PS499 Bachelor's Capstone in Psychology |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 3 |
| Paper type | Literature review |
| Length | About 1,090 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Psychology |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PS499 Unit 3
What Is Known About Awe, Walking and Night-Shift Stress: A PS499 Unit 3 Literature Review
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
PS499: Bachelor's Capstone in Psychology
Unit 3 Literature Review
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The writer and her crew are composite; every study reviewed is real.
Purpose and Approach
The question behind this review is whether short post-shift walks built around awe ease housekeepers' stress more than plain walks of equal length. This review examines four bodies of research that bear on the question. I searched the university library's psychology and health databases using combinations of awe, shift work, night shift, walking, nature, perceived stress and workplace intervention, and kept peer-reviewed studies and reviews that addressed one of the four themes.
Theme 1: Night Shift Work and Stress
Shift work, especially at night, places workers out of step with their biological clocks. Kecklund and Axelsson (2016) pulled together what is known about night and rotating schedules and short sleep, describing links with accidents, impaired performance, metabolic problems, cardiovascular disease and poorer mental health. They noted that the evidence was strongest for short-term effects of lost sleep and that long-term disease risks were real but harder to pin on shift work alone.
The review supports the premise that night workers face elevated stress and health risks, but it also shows a limit. Most research has studied nurses, factory workers and drivers, groups with more training, pay and visibility than the people who clean hospitals at night. Hospital housekeepers, who do physically demanding work with low pay and little control over their schedules, rarely appear as a group of their own. That gap matters, and it is not a small one, because the sources of stress for my crew, such as pressure to turn over rooms quickly and little recognition, differ from those of nurses.
Theme 2: Awe and Well-Being
A small but growing body of research links awe to outcomes relevant to stress. Across several experiments by Rudd et al. (2012), participants led to feel awe felt that they had more time available, were less impatient and reported greater momentary life satisfaction than people in other emotional states. Piff et al. (2015) showed that awe shrinks how large the self feels to the person, and that people in this state gave and helped more. Stellar et al. (2015) found that people who tended to feel awe more often had lower levels of a marker of inflammation, more strongly than for other positive emotions.
The awe studies agree on direction, more time, a smaller self and less inflammation, but most were brief laboratory sessions or surveys, not programs people repeated over weeks.
The most directly relevant study tested a repeated awe intervention. Sturm et al. (2022) asked healthy older adults to take a fifteen-minute outdoor walk each week for eight weeks. Half were taught to cultivate awe on their walks, by noticing vast and novel things, and half simply walked. The awe walk group reported more awe during walks, greater daily prosocial positive emotions such as compassion and gratitude, and less daily distress over time. Photographs they took of themselves showed bigger smiles and the self taking up less of the frame.
Sturm and colleagues' design is the model for my proposal: a short, repeated walk with a comparison walk. But their participants were older adults, mostly retired and well educated, walking at times of their choosing. Whether the effect holds for tired workers at the end of a night shift is unknown.
Theme 3: Walking, Nature and Rumination
Walking outdoors may reduce stress whether or not people feel awe. Bratman et al. (2015) randomly assigned participants to a ninety-minute walk in a natural area or along a busy road. Those who walked in nature reported less rumination afterward and showed reduced activity in a brain region associated with repetitive negative thinking, while the urban walkers did not. The study suggests that the setting of a walk matters, and that nature may interrupt the cycle of worry.
This finding complicates the capstone design. If walking outdoors reduces stress, then any benefit of awe walks must be shown against a comparison walk in a similar setting, so that awe itself, rather than walking or fresh air, is being tested. The hospital's parking ramp and river trail offer the same views to both groups, which helps. Both groups will also walk at the same hour, just after sunrise for much of the year, so that light and time of day are matched as well.
Theme 4: Workplace Stress Programs
Workplace programs to reduce stress have a substantial research base. Richardson and Rothstein (2008) conducted a meta-analysis of randomized studies of occupational stress management programs. They found that interventions had a medium to large effect on average, with cognitive-behavioral programs producing the largest effects and relaxation and other approaches producing smaller but meaningful effects. Programs that were shorter were not necessarily less effective.
The meta-analysis suggests that brief workplace interventions can reduce stress, but most programs it reviewed involved training sessions led by professionals, often for office workers. An awe walk program, led by a coworker and requiring no classroom time, would be a different kind of intervention, closer to an activity than a course.
Synthesis and Gap
Across the four themes, the research points the same way. Night workers face real stress and health risks. Awe produces effects, such as a smaller self and lower inflammation, that plausibly counter stress. Walks in nature reduce rumination. Brief workplace programs can reduce stress. But no study has combined these: no published trial has tested an awe intervention with shift workers, measured perceived stress as the main outcome in a workplace awe study, or compared awe walks with ordinary walks among people coming off a night shift.
The limits of the existing studies also guide the proposal. Samples have been mostly students, older adults and professionals, so a study of hospital housekeepers, many of them immigrants, would extend the research to a population it has overlooked. And because the effects of awe in laboratory studies are short-lived, the proposal should measure stress after several weeks of repeated walks rather than after a single one.
Conclusion
The literature gives the capstone a strong rationale and a design to borrow. It shows that awe, walking and brief workplace programs each have promise, and that no one has tested awe walks for night-shift workers. The proposal in Unit 4 will address that gap with a randomized comparison of awe walks and ordinary walks, measuring perceived stress over six weeks.
References
Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., Hahn, K. S., Daily, G. C., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(28), 8567-8572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510459112
Kecklund, G., & Axelsson, J. (2016). Health consequences of shift work and insufficient sleep. BMJ, 355, Article i5210. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5210
Piff, P. K., Dietze, P., Feinberg, M., Stancato, D. M., & Keltner, D. (2015). Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 883-899. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000018
Richardson, K. M., & Rothstein, H. R. (2008). Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(1), 69-93. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.13.1.69
Rudd, M., Vohs, K. D., & Aaker, J. (2012). Awe expands people's perception of time, alters decision making, and enhances well-being. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1130-1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612438731
Stellar, J. E., John-Henderson, N., Anderson, C. L., Gordon, A. M., McNeil, G. D., & Keltner, D. (2015). Positive affect and markers of inflammation: Discrete positive emotions predict lower levels of inflammatory cytokines. Emotion, 15(2), 129-133. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000033
Sturm, V. E., Datta, S., Roy, A. R. K., Sible, I. J., Kosik, E. L., Veziris, C. R., Chow, T. E., Morris, N. A., Neuhaus, J., Kramer, J. H., Miller, B. L., Holley, S. R., & Keltner, D. (2022). Big smile, small self: Awe walks promote prosocial positive emotions in older adults. Emotion, 22(5), 1044-1058. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000876
PS499 Unit 3 instructions, in plain terms
Unit 3 of PS499 calls for a review of the research behind your capstone question. Explain your search strategy and inclusion criteria. Organize the review by themes rather than by article, and within each theme compare studies, noting where they agree, where they differ and how their samples and methods limit them. Use findings to shape your design. End with a synthesis that identifies a specific gap your study will address. Use peer-reviewed sources, ideally including at least one meta-analysis or systematic review, and APA style. Many sections expect eight to twelve sources and four to six pages, with clear thematic headings. Explain any limits of your search.
Inside the PS499 Unit 3 example
The review opens with the capstone question and a brief search strategy. A shift work theme summarizes known risks and notes that housekeepers are rarely studied. An awe theme compares four studies, under a highlighted line that most were brief laboratory sessions rather than repeated programs, then describes the weekly walk trial with older adults and its limits. A walking theme uses the nature walk study to argue for a comparison walk on the same route at the same hour. A workplace theme reports the stress program meta-analysis and notes differences from a peer-led walk. A synthesis section names the gap and how sample limits guide the proposal. The conclusion hands the gap to Unit 4.
Where the points sit in the PS499 Unit 3 rubric
Graders look for synthesis: themes that group studies and show how findings relate, rather than a summary of each article. Limits of samples and methods should be discussed, not just results. The review earns the most credit when findings change the proposed design, such as requiring a comparison condition. A clearly stated gap, specific enough that the study can fill it, is essential. Search strategy and inclusion criteria show transparency. Including a meta-analysis or review strengthens the evidence base. APA citations should be complete and correctly formatted, especially for multi-author studies, and headings should reflect themes rather than author names. Reviews that change the design usually stand out. Clear headings help.
Common PS499 Unit 3 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Literature reviews often give each source its own paragraph in turn, each starting with an author's name. Others report findings without limitations, which makes the gap hard to see. Students frequently state a gap so broad that no study could fill it. Search methods are commonly left out. Some reviews rely on websites rather than peer-reviewed research. Before submitting, reorganize any author-by-author section into themes, add one sentence per theme about what the studies cannot show, state the gap in a single sentence that your proposal answers, and confirm that each source is peer-reviewed or an authoritative review. That keeps the review tied to your study. Keep it thematic.
Get a PS499 Unit 3 example written to your instructions
Send your topic, sources and the instructions with the rubric. A custom literature review synthesizes the research and identifies a gap. It comes back in 24-48h, first one free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More PS499 papers and BS in Psychology samples
- PS499 Unit 1: Capstone Question Board Post
- PS499 Unit 2: History and Perspectives Paper
- PS499 Unit 4: Research Proposal
- PS499 Unit 5: Career Plan
- PS499 Unit 6: Research Ethics Paper
- PS499 Unit 7: Discussion Board Post
- PS499 Unit 8: Applied Intervention Plan
- PS499 Unit 9: Capstone Presentation
- PS499 Unit 10: Capstone Reflection
- PS115 Unit 3: Fields of Psychology Comparison
- PS450 Unit 3: Screening and Assessment Paper
- PS200 Unit 3: Working Memory Exercise
- PS440 Unit 3: Classification and Assessment Paper
PS499 Unit 3 questions, answered
What is synthesis?
Organizing sources by finding or theme and showing how they relate, rather than summarizing each one.
How many sources are needed?
Requirements vary; many sections expect eight to twelve scholarly sources.
What is a research gap?
A question the existing studies have not answered, which the proposal will address.
Where can I find a free PS499 Unit 3 sample paper?
This page holds the complete PS499 Unit 3 literature review on awe, walking and stress for a capstone on night-shift hospital housekeepers.
What gap does the PS499 Unit 3 sample identify?
No published trial has tested awe walks with shift workers or compared them with ordinary walks in a workplace.