PS498 Unit 6 Toilet Training Protocol Example

Reviewed by Romilly Dunmore, MEd Bachelor's Capstone in Applied Behavior Analysis Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

A written toilet training protocol for two children with autism sets every step a technician or parent needs in this PS498 Unit 6 intervention protocol. The composite capstone student drafts it for her supervising behavior analyst from Cicero and Pfadt's reinforcement-based procedure and LeBlanc and colleagues' outpatient program: underwear from day one, pediatrician-limited fluids, sits every twenty-five or thirty minutes thinned in three phases, crackers and stickers or a musical toy kept in the bathroom, a calm walk back after accidents and every request honored. Each child's assessment shapes the routine, from Amara's water bottle to Leo's delayed flush, and sections cover privacy, assent, data, bowel movements, home phases, Kroeger and Sorensen-Burnworth's generalization gap and decision rules. Purdue Global PS 498, Bachelor's Capstone in Applied Behavior Analysis, uses this protocol in its BS in Psychology sequence.

CoursePS498 Bachelor's Capstone in Applied Behavior Analysis
UnitUnit 6
Paper typeIntervention protocol
LengthAbout 880 words, 6 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBS in Psychology
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for PS498 Unit 6

1

Sits, Crackers and a Calm Walk Back: A PS498 Unit 6 Intervention Protocol

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

PS498: Bachelor's Capstone in Applied Behavior Analysis

Unit 6 Intervention Protocol

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The writer, the clinic, the families, the children and every figure are composite and illustrative; the articles cited are real.

What this part is doingListing the protocol's parts in the lead shows the plan is complete before the reader reaches the steps.
2

Purpose and Approval

This protocol guides toilet training for Amara, five, and Leo, four, at our Omaha autism clinic during clinic hours, 8:30 to 2:30. It follows the core supported by research: scheduled sits, immediate reinforcement for voids and a calm response to accidents, as in the reinforcement-based procedure studied by Cicero and Pfadt (2002), with modest added fluids and parent training as in the outpatient program described by LeBlanc et al. (2005). Our supervising behavior analyst approved this protocol and is the only person who may change it. Both children's pediatricians approved the fluid limits.

Clothing

From the first training day, both children wear cotton underwear and elastic-waist pants at the clinic, so that accidents are noticed quickly and clothing steps are easier. Diapers are worn only for naps and the drive home in the first phase.

Fluids

Each child is offered a drink every thirty minutes. Total added fluid each day stays within the amount each pediatrician approved, recorded on the data sheet. Extra fluids stop for the day if a child seems unwell.

Sit Schedule

Phase 1: Amara sits every thirty minutes, timed for thirty minutes after each drink; Leo sits every twenty-five minutes. Each sit lasts up to three minutes, or until a void. Sits use a child-sized seat and a footstool.

Phase 2 begins after three consecutive clinic days with no more than one accident: sit intervals lengthen by fifteen minutes.

Phase 3 begins after three more such days: sits occur only at set times, after arrival, after snack, before lunch, after lunch and before leaving, while self-initiations are honored at any time.

Reinforcement

A void in the toilet produces immediate, enthusiastic praise and the child's bathroom reinforcer: two crackers and a sticker for Amara, one minute with the musical toy for Leo. These items are kept in the bathroom and used only for toileting. A self-initiation, any request or sign for the bathroom, is honored immediately and praised, whether or not a void follows. Dry checks every thirty minutes produce brief praise and a high five for dry pants.

A self-initiation is honored every time, because asking is the skill we most want to keep.

Accidents

When an accident is noticed, the technician says calmly, "Let's go to the bathroom," and guides the child to sit for one minute. The child is changed without comment, with privacy, and returned to the activity. There are no reprimands, no positive practice and no loss of activities. The accident is recorded.

Teaching the Full Routine

Each child's task analysis guides the remaining steps. The technician uses the least prompt needed for each step and fades prompts across days. Amara's routine includes cleaning with water from her bottle, following her family's practice. Leo does not flush in Phase 1; staff flush after he leaves, and his separate flush desensitization program runs twice a day outside toileting.

What this part is doingWriting each child's assessment findings into the routine shows the protocol fitted to individuals rather than applied generically.
3

Staff and Privacy

Amara's bathroom help always comes from a woman on staff. Sits happen in the one-toilet bathroom, its door left slightly open. Data are recorded outside the bathroom.

Assent

If a child cries, heads for the door or will not sit on three sits in a row, the technician ends the session and contacts the supervisor before the next sit.

Data

Technicians record accidents, voids in the toilet, self-initiations, dry checks and fluids on the tablet, with times. A second technician records independently on at least one day in four.

Home Phase

After a child meets the Phase 2 criterion at the clinic, parents begin the protocol at home in the evenings and on weekends, following training with the capstone student and the supervisor. Leo's family will use a sit every forty-five minutes in the evening; Amara's family will begin with sits after dinner and before bath. Each family has a one-page summary in plain language, and Amara's is also in Somali.

Bowel Movements

Both families report that bowel movements usually happen at home after breakfast. Parents will offer a five-minute sit with a favorite book after breakfast each morning, with the same reinforcer used at the clinic. A bowel movement in the toilet at the clinic earns a larger reinforcer, chosen with each family.

Generalization and Follow-Up

Kroeger and Sorensen-Burnworth (2009) noted that generalization and maintenance are often under-measured in toilet training research. This protocol probes both. Once a child meets Phase 3, a different technician runs one day of sits each week, and Amara's preschool and Leo's grandparents' home each report accidents for one day per week. Follow-up data are collected for two weeks one month after the success criterion is met.

Decision Rules

If accidents have not fallen by half within ten training days, the supervisor reviews the protocol. If a child regresses to baseline levels for three days in a later phase, the child returns to the previous phase. Success means fourteen straight days at the clinic with one accident or fewer each day and a self-initiation every day.

What this part is doingStating phase rules and a success criterion in advance keeps decisions tied to data rather than impressions.
4

References

Cicero, F. R., & Pfadt, A. (2002). Investigation of a reinforcement-based toilet training procedure for children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 23(5), 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-4222(02)00136-1

Kroeger, K., & Sorensen-Burnworth, R. (2009). Toilet training individuals with autism and other developmental disabilities: A critical review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3(3), 607-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2009.01.005

LeBlanc, L. A., Carr, J. E., Crossett, S. E., Bennett, C. M., & Detweiler, D. D. (2005). Intensive outpatient behavioral treatment of primary urinary incontinence of children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(2), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576050200020601

What the PS498 Unit 6 assignment asks for

Unit 6 of PS498 asks you to write the intervention protocol for your capstone. Base it on the research reviewed earlier and on each learner's assessment results. Include approval and roles, materials, the schedule of teaching opportunities and how it will be thinned, reinforcement for target behaviors, the response to errors or problem behavior, teaching of the full routine, privacy and assent rules, data collection, a home or generalization phase, follow-up and decision rules with a success criterion. Write each step so a technician or parent could follow it without you present. Keep it to about four pages in APA style, with composite clients. Translate where needed. State who may change the protocol.

How this PS498 Unit 6 example is built

The protocol opens with its purpose, approvals and research basis. Sections set clothing, fluids within pediatrician limits and a three-phase sit schedule. A section describes immediate reinforcement for voids and requests, under a highlighted line that asking is honored every time. A section sets a calm response to accidents without reprimands. A section fits the routine to each child's task analysis, including Amara's water step and Leo's delayed flush. Sections cover staff and privacy, assent, data, a home phase with summaries in two languages, bowel movements, generalization and follow-up probes drawing on Kroeger and Sorensen-Burnworth, and decision rules with a success criterion. Each phase change has a written criterion based on accidents per clinic day.

PS498 Unit 6 rubric: what earns full points

Instructors grading this protocol look for a complete, usable document that a technician or parent could follow on any day. A schedule with clear thinning criteria earns credit. Reinforcement and error responses should be specific, immediate and consistent with research. Each learner's assessment results should visibly shape the routine. Privacy, assent and safety rules show ethical practice built into procedures. Data collection, generalization probes, follow-up and decision rules prepare for evaluation. A success criterion set in advance prevents moving goalposts. Cite the research behind each component in APA format with composite clients. A summary page in plain language for families helps graders and readers alike. Show the phase rules.

PS498 Unit 6 help: mistakes that cost points

Protocols often describe the intervention in general terms that would leave a new technician guessing. Others copy a published procedure without fitting it to the learners' assessment results. Students frequently leave out what to do after an error, accident or refusal. Thinning criteria are commonly vague, so learners stay on dense schedules too long. Home phases and follow-up are sometimes missing. Before submitting, hand the protocol to someone unfamiliar with the project and ask what they would do at each step. Add a rule for every decision point. Fit each routine to the learner. Write a family summary. Keep clients composite and every figure illustrative throughout. Then confirm the fluid limits.

Get a PS498 Unit 6 example written to your instructions

Share the case and the instructions with the rubric. A custom protocol sets out each step of a capstone intervention. Delivery is within 24-48h, and the first is free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More PS498 papers and BS in Psychology samples

PS498 Unit 6 questions, answered

What goes in a toilet training protocol?

Sit schedule, fluids, reinforcement, accident response, data and criteria for change.

How are sits scheduled?

Often frequently at first, then lengthened as success grows.

How are accidents handled?

Calmly, with a brief prompt to the toilet and no reprimand.

Where can I find a free PS498 Unit 6 sample paper?

This page holds the complete PS498 Unit 6 toilet training protocol for two composite children with autism.

How does the PS498 Unit 6 protocol respond to accidents?

Staff calmly guide the child to sit for one minute, change the child privately without comment and return to the activity.