NU803 Unit 10 Sustainability Plan, Resource Nurse Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN Change Management and Clinical Data Analysis Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NU803 Unit 10 sample is a sustainability plan that hands a steroid glucose routine on two composite medical units to a day-shift diabetes resource nurse, with four protected hours a month the plan admits are still only requested. It was prepared for Purdue Global NU 803, Change Management and Clinical Data Analysis, the capstone assignment of a DNP course. The plan states what must be sustained, explains why fading is common, and follows four principles: put the routine in documents staff already use, give it an owner with a fallback, keep data moving through an existing monthly report, and anchor it in the culture. Four triggers each lead to a named action, and spread waits six months.

CourseNU803 Change Management and Clinical Data Analysis
UnitUnit 10
Paper typeSustainability plan
LengthAbout 850 words, 6 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramDoctor of Nursing Practice (DNP)
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for NU803 Unit 10

1

Four Hours a Month, Still Only Requested: A Sustainability Plan Handing a Steroid Hyperglycemia Routine on Two Composite Medical Units to a Diabetes Resource Nurse, With Routines Built Into Documents Staff Already Use

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NU803: Change Management and Clinical Data Analysis

Unit 10 Sustainability Plan

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The units, roles and figures are composite; hours, dates and thresholds are bracketed.

What this part is doingThe plan states plainly which resource is not yet secured, because a sustainability plan that hides its weakest link is not a plan.
2

What Must Be Sustained

Three things must continue after the project ends: afternoon checks for patients on qualifying steroids, at or above [80] percent of eligible days at each check time; escalation of qualifying episodes with a scheduled insulin response in at least [70] percent; and hyperglycemic monitored days at or below the implementation median of [15.5] per 100. Low-glucose days must stay near the baseline of about [1.1] per 100.

Why Sustainability Needs Its Own Plan

Improvements in clinical practice often fade after implementation support ends. A systematic review of clinicians' adherence to guidelines over time found that adherence frequently declined, and that sustained adherence was associated with factors including integration of the practice into routines, ongoing monitoring and feedback, and the continued involvement of people responsible for it (Ament et al., 2015). A review that developed a definition of sustainability treated it as more than keeping a program running: the program or its parts continue after implementation support ends, the behavior change persists, benefits keep flowing, and adaptation along the way is expected (Moore et al., 2017). These units have already seen what happens without such a plan: a memo adding afternoon checks four years ago faded within six weeks.

Principle 1: Put the Routine Where Work Already Happens

Every part of the routine will live in a document staff already use rather than in a new one. The order-set trigger already generates checks automatically, and informatics has agreed to extend it to the cancer-care and emergency admission order sets by [month]. The technicians' daily assignment sheet now prints steroid-triggered checks with their times beside diabetic checks, so the sheet itself tells technicians what to do. The escalation script is embedded in the paging template. The lunch-wave timing agreed in implementation is written into the unit's break schedule, signed by both nurse managers. Nothing depends on a poster or a memo.

A routine written into the assignment sheet survives staff turnover; a routine written into a memo survives only as long as someone remembers the memo.

Principle 2: Give the Routine an Owner

The change agent, a DNP student on the hospitalist team, will step back at the end of the project. Ownership will pass to a day-shift diabetes resource nurse on 4 North, who has agreed to serve and who already answers colleagues' questions about insulin. The role needs [four] protected hours a month to review the monthly data, audit a sample of escalations and bring problems to the nurse managers. Those hours have been requested in the next budget cycle but not yet approved. If they are not approved, the fallback is to fold the review into the clinical nurse specialist's existing monthly quality time, which would work but with less attention.

What this part is doingThe owner is named, the hours are costed, and a fallback is given, so the committee can see what is at stake in its decision.
3

Principle 3: Keep the Data Moving Without Extra Work

The point-of-care testing coordinator already sends a monthly glucometer report to nursing leadership. The plan adds three lines to that report: afternoon check completion by check time, hyperglycemic monitored days per 100 and low-glucose days per 100. The script that produced the project's figures will be handed to the coordinator, who will run it monthly. Run charts will continue on the huddle board, updated monthly rather than weekly.

Triggers for Action

The diabetes resource nurse will act when any of four conditions appears. Afternoon checks fall below [70] percent for two consecutive months at either time. Hyperglycemic monitored days rise above the implementation median for three consecutive months. Low-glucose days exceed [3] per 100 in any month. Or the trigger coverage measure shows a qualifying order route without checks. Each trigger leads to a named action: a huddle review with technicians, an audit of escalations with the hospitalist director, a pharmacy review of NPH suggestions, or an informatics ticket.

Principle 4: Anchor the Change in the Culture

Kotter argued that changes last when they become "the way we do things around here," and that leaders must show people how the new approaches have improved performance (Kotter, 1995). The monthly run chart on the huddle board does that, and the units' quarterly recognition will include a mention of the steroid glucose routine when targets are met. New staff will learn the routine in orientation, where it has been added to the glucose management module.

What this part is doingTriggers for action are specific and each leads to a named response, so a decline cannot drift unnoticed.
4

Spread

The community hospital's medical unit has asked about the bundle. Spread will begin only after [six] months of sustained results on 4 North and 4 South, and will use the same documents, adapted to that hospital's order sets.

Timeline

Handover of ownership: week [14]. First monthly report with added lines: month [four]. Review of the sustainability plan by the nurse managers: month [nine]. Decision on spread: month [ten].

5

References

Ament, S. M. C., de Groot, J. J. A., Maessen, J. M. C., Dirksen, C. D., van der Weijden, T., & Kleijnen, J. (2015). Sustainability of professionals' adherence to clinical practice guidelines in medical care: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 5(12), Article e008073. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008073

Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

Moore, J. E., Mascarenhas, A., Bain, J., & Straus, S. E. (2017). Developing a comprehensive definition of sustainability. Implementation Science, 12, Article 110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0637-1

The Purdue Global NU803 Unit 10 instructions

The final NU803 assignment asks you to plan how your change will last after the project ends. Most versions ask what must be sustained, who will own it, how it will be embedded in routines, how it will be monitored, what will trigger action if it slips, and whether and how it will spread. Around 1,500 to 2,500 words is common. Faculty reward plans that name an owner and the time the role requires, embed the routine in documents staff already use, piggyback monitoring on existing reports, set specific triggers for action, and admit which resources are not yet secured. If nobody has agreed to own the change, propose an owner and say the agreement is pending.

Inside the NU803 Unit 10 example

The plan opens with three things to sustain and their thresholds. It cites a review of declining guideline adherence and a published definition of sustainability, and recalls the memo that faded on these units. Principle one embeds the routine in the order set, assignment sheet, paging template and break schedule, with the highlighted sentence contrasting the sheet and a memo. Principle two names the diabetes resource nurse, the requested hours and a fallback. Principle three adds three lines to an existing monthly report. Four triggers each lead to a named action. Principle four anchors the routine through huddles, recognition and orientation, citing Kotter. Spread and a timeline close the plan.

Reading the NU803 Unit 10 grading rubric

Sustainability plans are generally scored on ownership, embedding, monitoring, responsiveness and realism. Ownership earns credit when a role is named with its tasks and time. Embedding rewards routines placed in documents and systems staff already use. Monitoring is judged on whether data continue to flow without new work. Responsiveness is credited when specific triggers lead to named actions. Realism scores well when the plan admits which resources are pending and offers a fallback. Plans that learn from a previous failure in the same setting often earn credit for insight, because they show that the design responds to evidence rather than general advice about sustainability.

NU803 Unit 10 help from the desk

A frequent weakness is assigning ownership to a committee or to everyone, which usually means no one. Another is relying on reminders, posters or memos instead of changing the documents that drive daily work. Some plans create new reports that nobody has time to produce. Others describe monitoring without saying what would trigger action. Many present every element as secure. And spread is often proposed before the change has been sustained where it began. Name one owner and the hours needed, embed the routine where work happens, add lines to a report that already exists, write triggers with actions, and say which parts are still only requested. Finally, name a date when the plan itself will be reviewed, since sustainability plans also need maintenance.

Get an NU803 Unit 10 example written to your instructions

Placing each routine in a document staff already use, defining a numeric drift signal and marking every agreement pending, the plan arrives free within 24-48h as a first custom sample. It needs the person you would hand the change to, the documents staff work from, what the unit reports now and the Unit 10 instructions with rubric. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More NU803 papers and DNP samples

NU803 Unit 10 questions, answered

What if nobody at the site has agreed to own the change?

Propose an owner and say the agreement is pending. A plan naming a role, the tasks involved and the time required gives a manager something concrete to approve or decline. The sample proposes a diabetes resource nurse with four monthly hours and marks both as requests, so nothing in the plan depends on an agreement it cannot show.

Where can I find a free NU803 Unit 10 sample paper?

This page holds the complete NU803 Unit 10 sustainability plan, with what must be sustained, why fading is common, four principles, triggers for action, spread and a timeline, plus three references. A plan for sustaining your own change can be drafted.

Why use an existing report in NU803 Unit 10?

Because a new report needs someone to produce it, and that work is the first to stop. Adding three lines to the point-of-care testing coordinator's monthly report keeps data moving without extra effort.

What triggers action in NU803 Unit 10?

Afternoon checks below 70 percent for two months, hyperglycemic days above the implementation median for three months, low-glucose days above 3 per 100 in any month, or an order route without checks. Each leads to a named action.

What if the protected hours are not approved in NU803 Unit 10?

The review would fold into the clinical nurse specialist's existing monthly quality time. The plan says this fallback would work with less attention, so the committee can see what its funding decision affects.