CBT and a cautiously started SSRI follow from a completed workup in an NU673 Unit 7 plan for a composite adjuster's panic disorder, with a PDSS target set in advance. Searches like "nu 673 unit 7 assignment example", "nu673 unit 7 sample" and "nu673 unit 7 example" land here.
What a finished NU673 Unit 7 initial treatment plan looks like
Three pages beginning with a workup summary table: TSH within range, ECG in sinus rhythm, a [14-day] event monitor showing no arrhythmia during two reported episodes, fasting glucose normal, urine drug screen negative, caffeine at [five cups] daily, AUDIT-C [1] and blood pressure [146/92] on two visits. Diagnosis follows as panic disorder, now supportable because its medical and substance alternatives have been addressed. The plan section lists cognitive behavioral therapy for panic as a first-line element, [sertraline] started at a [low composite step] because early activation can resemble the attacks it is meant to prevent, a gradual caffeine reduction, and no standing benzodiazepine, with reasons for each. Venlafaxine is weighed and rejected because of the elevated readings. A measurement section records a Panic Disorder Severity Scale baseline of [17] and the thresholds for response and remission the plan commits to.
How a NU673 Unit 7 example is structured
Traceability organizes the plan. Each line cites, in parentheses, the workup result that makes it reasonable, so a reader can follow any decision back to evidence. The event monitor supports calling the episodes panic rather than arrhythmia; the negative drug screen supports treating the anxiety as primary; the blood pressure readings shape the drug choice. Where the workup leaves something open, the plan says so, and his readings are referred to primary care rather than treated here. The baseline section then states which additional measures the chosen SSRI requires in a healthy adult of his age, which is few, and explains why, adding an interaction check for his over-the-counter NSAID use. Targets are written as numbers before treatment starts: response as a fall to [10] or lower, remission as [5] or lower. A dated review closes the plan.
Every line with a citation
Parenthetical references tie each element to a finding: event monitor, drug screen, blood pressure, caffeine history. Remove the workup and the plan loses its justification, which is exactly the dependence the unit asks a writer to show.
What the monitor showed
Two episodes occurred while he wore the event monitor, and both showed sinus tachycardia without arrhythmia. That single result carries more diagnostic weight than any other in the table, and the plan treats it accordingly.
Blood pressure in the drug choice
Venlafaxine can raise blood pressure, and his readings are already elevated. The plan records that reasoning explicitly, so the choice of an SSRI reads as a consequence of the workup rather than a preference.
A slow start, explained
Early jitteriness on an SSRI can feel like the attacks themselves and prompt someone to stop. The bracketed low first step and a phone check at [one week] are both justified by that risk.
Targets before the first dose
Response and remission are defined on the PDSS before treatment begins, using his baseline of [17]. Later units can then judge progress against numbers written down in advance rather than against impressions.
Where marks go in NU673 Unit 7
Traceability to the workup is the standard graders apply, and a plan that could have been written before the tests came back fails it. Each result should be used: an elevated blood pressure that never influences the drug choice, or caffeine intake recorded and then ignored, suggests the workup was decoration. Omitting psychotherapy costs substantial credit for panic disorder, where CBT is a first-line treatment. A standing benzodiazepine without discussion of dependence and of its effect on therapy draws comment. A target like fewer attacks cannot be checked, and a course built on measurement marks it down. Smaller comments collect around a starting amount stated outside brackets, a scale cited without its developers, and a review date missing from the plan.
Get a NU673 Unit 7 example written to your instructions
Send the full Unit 7 case from your NU673 section, workup results included, along with the rubric; an initial plan leans entirely on the workup beneath it. Free the first time and ready in 24-48h, the plan traces every element to a finding, gives reasons for what was set aside and fixes response targets before treatment begins.
NU673 Unit 7 questions, answered
Does an initial plan need to include psychotherapy?
For most anxiety and depressive disorders, yes. Guidelines treat psychotherapy as first-line for panic disorder and many other conditions, sometimes ahead of medication. A plan built on medication alone should explain why, for instance patient preference or access, and name what would bring therapy back into the plan.
What should the plan do with an abnormal result unrelated to the diagnosis?
Record it, say who will follow it up, and show whether it affects the psychiatric plan. An elevated blood pressure belongs to primary care, but it can still shape which medication is reasonable. Ignoring the result reads as inattention, while treating it inside a psychiatric plan oversteps the role.
How specific should response targets be?
Specific enough to check. Name the instrument, give the starting score, and state the figures that define response and remission, with a source for those definitions. Words such as improvement or fewer symptoms cannot be evaluated at follow-up, and later assignments in this course usually expect to test the plan against its own targets.