In NU145's Unit 2 stage analysis, a composite thirteen-month-old's protest at drop-off and calm reunion at pickup are placed within Bowlby's phases, Piaget's substages and the 2022 milestone checklists. Searches like "nu 145 unit 2 assignment example", "nu145 unit 2 sample" and "nu145 unit 2 example" land here.
What a finished NU145 Unit 2 stage analysis looks like
Roughly five pages under three stage headings, physical, cognitive and social-emotional, each ending in a short box titled departures from expectation. The physical section places the boy's cruising along furniture and his first two unaided steps within the typical window for walking, citing the 2022 revision of the CDC milestone checklists, which set each milestone at an age most children, about three in four, have reached. The cognitive section places him in Piaget's fifth sensorimotor substage: he drops a spoon from different heights to watch what happens, a tertiary circular reaction. Most of the weight rests on the social-emotional section. It describes attachment as Bowlby defined it, reads the drop-off and pickup against Ainsworth's descriptions of secure behavior, and says plainly that a home anecdote cannot yield an attachment classification.
How a NU145 Unit 2 example is structured
Each of the three sections moves in one sequence: what is normative for the age, what the composite child does, and the particular stage feature that the behavior displays. Credit concentrates in that third step. Separation protest, for instance, is presented as a sign of Bowlby's clear-cut attachment phase, which typically begins between six and eight months, rather than as a difficulty for the child care provider. Erikson appears once, at the move from trust versus mistrust toward autonomy versus shame and doubt, because a thirteen-month-old sits near that boundary and the paper says so. The departures boxes list what would change the reading: no protest at all with an unfamiliar caregiver, no seeking of the father at reunion, or the loss of skills already gained. A last paragraph states the limits, including that Strange Situation categories come from a structured laboratory procedure.
Walking placed in its window
Cruising and first steps are set against the twelve- and fifteen-month checklist items, with a sentence on why the 2022 revision moved some milestones later, so a reader sees exactly what the checklist measures.
The spoon experiment
Dropping a spoon from the high chair at different heights is named as a tertiary circular reaction, and the paper states which feature makes it so: variation on purpose, to produce a new result.
Protest read as a milestone
Crying at drop-off is framed as evidence that a specific attachment has formed, and the quick settling and the toy offered at pickup are read as the reunion behavior of a secure pattern.
A classification the paper declines
Because the Strange Situation is a timed sequence of separations and reunions scored by trained coders, the paper will not label the boy securely attached from one home anecdote, and explains what the procedure adds.
Stage boundaries kept approximate
His first insistence on holding his own cup is offered as an early sign of autonomy, with a note that Erikson's ages overlap and that a child can show two stages in one week.
Where marks go in NU145 Unit 2
Instructors grading this analysis usually look for three things in order: accurate stage content, behavior linked to a specific element of the stage, and attention to what would count as atypical. Papers that recite Bowlby's four phases without placing the child in one of them forfeit most of the middle criterion. So do papers that call a thirteen-month-old securely attached on the strength of a cheerful pickup, since classification requires a procedure the anecdote never included. Milestone ages quoted from a superseded checklist cost accuracy credit, and treating separation protest as a behavior problem misreads the stage entirely. Leaving out the departures boxes is read as a gap. Identifying details about the child or the child care home draw a deduction no quality of analysis can offset.
Get a NU145 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Infancy papers differ mainly in how old the child is and which theorists are required, sometimes Bowlby alone, sometimes Piaget and Erikson as well. Copy those details out of the Unit 2 instructions, add the grading criteria and any assigned case, and a stage-by-stage model with its departures boxes comes back. No cost for the first custom sample; allow 24-48h.
NU145 Unit 2 questions, answered
Should the paper cover all three domains equally?
Most prompts expect all three, but the weight rarely falls evenly. In infancy the social-emotional domain usually carries the analysis, because attachment is where the unit's theory lives, and physical milestones serve as context. Giving each domain the same length tends to flatten the argument. A short physical section that places the child accurately leaves room for the attachment material, where graders linger.
Can a stage analysis say a baby is securely attached?
Only with care. Attachment classifications come from the Strange Situation, a structured sequence of separations and reunions scored by trained coders, so an everyday observation can describe behavior consistent with a secure pattern but cannot assign the category itself. Saying exactly that, in one sentence, usually earns credit for precision rather than costing any.
What if the infant in my assignment is behind on a milestone?
Then the departures box becomes the center of the paper. Describe the gap precisely, note that the CDC's own guidance treats a missed milestone as a reason for developmental screening rather than a diagnosis, and keep the analysis on what the delay means within the stage. Interpreting a real child's delay is a clinician's job, and the paper can say who would carry it forward.