Nine diagnoses in the chart, four on the page: the NU142CL Unit 2 patient workup, drawn from a composite man awaiting gallbladder surgery, showing selection, lab trends and ranked problems. Searches like "nu 142cl unit 2 assignment example", "nu142cl unit 2 sample" and "nu142cl unit 2 example" land here.
What a finished NU142CL Unit 2 patient workup looks like
The form is filled front and back, and most of the chart never reaches it. History keeps four items: a coronary stent placed [years] ago with clopidogrel still listed, since it bears on surgical timing and bleeding; type 2 diabetes on metformin, because fasting and contrast affect both; an enlarged prostate, because urinary retention after surgery is likely; and a penicillin allergy with its reaction recorded as [reaction]. Gout, cataract surgery and a childhood tonsillectomy are left out. Labs appear as trends, white count [admission value] to [today's value], bilirubin and liver enzymes beside them, with one line each on meaning. Medications carry the reason this patient takes each and one nursing check. Three problems are ranked, acute pain, risk for spreading infection, and fluid balance while fasting, each with a plan and a measurable goal.
How a NU142CL Unit 2 example is structured
Most programs supply a fixed workup form, and the sample fills that layout as given. The header uses a composite descriptor, age, sex, admitting diagnosis, code status and allergies, with no initials, room or dates. Reason for admission comes next in two sentences. Relevant history follows as a short list, each item carrying a clause that says why it matters today. The laboratory block shows each value that moved beside its earlier value, never a lone number. Medications sit in a table with name, reason for this patient, and a nursing consideration. The problem list is ranked, and each problem carries its data, a measurable goal and a short set of interventions. Every patient number is bracketed, since only the assigned record can supply it. A final box lists questions for the assigned nurse, and any signature or instructor field stays blank.
A clause of reason on every history line
Each surviving history item carries a short reason, such as bleeding risk with surgery or retention after anesthesia. The reason is what makes the item earn its space, and it lets a grader see that the selection was made rather than inherited.
Three facts left out on purpose
Gout, cataract surgery and a childhood tonsillectomy are true and irrelevant to this admission. The sample leaves them off the form, and a note beneath names them once, showing the omission was a judgment.
Values in brackets, trends in words
Every lab and vital sign is bracketed, because the real numbers belong to the assigned record. What the sample fixes is the shape: earlier value, current value, direction, and a clause on meaning.
The antiplatelet as a question
Clopidogrel on the list of a surgical patient becomes a question for the assigned nurse about when it was last taken and what the surgeon has decided. The workup records the question, not an answer it cannot know.
Signature lines left empty
Where the form carries an instructor review line or a co-signature field, the sample leaves it blank. Review happens on the unit, between the student and the instructor, and no model stands in for it.
Where marks go in NU142CL Unit 2
Workups that transcribe the chart score in the middle at best, since a form crammed with the full past record and each lab ever drawn looks thorough while hiding the reason for admission. Lab sections carrying single values with no earlier comparison lose the trend marks most rubrics include. Medication entries copied from a drug reference, listing every side effect with nothing tied to this patient, are marked as lookup rather than reasoning. Missing the antiplatelet in a surgical patient is a safety omission graders catch. Problems listed without ranking, or ranked with no justification, cost the prioritization criterion. Goals without measures cannot be evaluated. Any identifier, initials, a room number, a date of birth, draws the most serious comments, well beyond the grade, and a filled-in instructor line reads as misrepresentation.
Get a NU142CL Unit 2 example written to your instructions
The workup for your real patient is yours to complete from the assigned record. What comes back models the same form for a composite patient carrying a similar admitting problem, so attach the blank form and rubric, along with a short summary of the diagnosis and problems stripped of identifiers. The first custom sample is free and generally takes 24-48h.
NU142CL Unit 2 questions, answered
Can you complete the workup for my assigned patient?
No. The model fills the same form for an invented patient admitted with a comparable problem, never for the person on your assignment. The real workup is built from the record you can access and the assessment only you perform, and instructors often question students on it during the shift. What the model shows is selection: which lines belong and why.
How many nursing problems should a first workup rank?
Two or three is typical at this stage, though forms and instructors vary. More problems rarely raise the score; a ranked short list with data and a measurable goal under each usually outscores a long one. Problems that are real but less urgent can be named in a line at the end with the reason they rank lower.
Why are the lab values in brackets?
Because the actual values belong to the assigned patient's record, and a model should not invent them or appear to carry real data. The brackets show where each number goes and the comparison it needs, earlier value against current. In a submitted workup the student fills those from the record, with all identifying details taken out first.