NS490 Unit 2 Plant-Forward Diet in Stage G4 CKD Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN Medical Nutrition Therapy II Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

Lower protein and lower potassium pull in opposite directions in this NS490 Unit 2 renal case analysis, built on a composite 66-year-old man with diabetes, stage G4 kidney disease and a potassium of 5.6 mEq/L. Purdue Global NS 490, Medical Nutrition Therapy II, gives this unit to kidney disease, and BS in Nutrition Science students analyze a case where a diet that helped glucose now meets failing kidneys. Harold had switched to beans, lentils, potatoes and morning orange juice. The paper finds that his potassium has several sources, including a salt substitute and the juice, so the plant foods that steadied his glucose can mostly stay. Protein is set from the 2020 KDOQI guideline, potassium sources are ranked, and the paper closes with monitoring, a conversation with Harold and an evaluation plan.

CourseNS490 Medical Nutrition Therapy II
UnitUnit 2
Paper typeRenal case analysis
LengthAbout 1,100 words, 6 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBS in Nutrition Science
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NS490 Unit 2

1

Keep the Beans, Change the Juice: A Unit 2 Renal Case Analysis of a Plant-Forward Diabetes Plan Meeting Stage G4 Kidney Disease

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NS490: Medical Nutrition Therapy II

Unit 2 Renal Case Analysis

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The patient and all values are composite; the kidney disease guideline, the nutrition guideline and the potassium review cited are real.

What this part is doingFraming the case as a conflict between two goals in the lead tells the grader the analysis will weigh trade-offs rather than list rules.
2

Case Summary

Harold, 66, retired from a bus maintenance garage, is in his nineteenth year of treatment for type 2 diabetes, and his blood pressure medicine predates that. A year ago his physician encouraged a plant-forward diet for his diabetes and heart, and Harold embraced it: oatmeal with banana and a large glass of orange juice each morning, lentil or bean soup most days, baked potatoes several times a week, and less meat. His A1C fell from 8.2 to 7.1 percent and he lost 5 kg.

At his most recent visit his estimated glomerular filtration rate was 22 mL/min/1.73 m², placing him in stage G4 chronic kidney disease, and his serum potassium was 5.6 mEq/L, above the normal range. He takes lisinopril, which can raise potassium, and he recently started using a salt substitute to cut sodium. His weight is 82 kg and he is not on dialysis.

The Apparent Conflict

Two pieces of guidance seem to pull against each other. For people with chronic kidney disease, kidney guidelines favor moderating protein and suggest that plant-based eating patterns may have benefits (Stevens et al., 2024). Plant proteins come packaged with potassium, however, and Harold's potassium is high. Traditional renal diets responded to high potassium by restricting beans, lentils, potatoes, many fruits and vegetables, exactly the foods his new plan relies on.

The conflict is smaller than it looks, because Harold's potassium problem has several sources besides beans, and some of them can be changed without giving up the parts of his diet that improved his diabetes.

What this part is doingThe highlighted sentence reframes the conflict after looking at all the potassium sources, which is the analysis the case is built to show.
3

Protein

The nutrition guideline for chronic kidney disease suggests a protein intake of about 0.6 to 0.8 g per kilogram per day for adults with diabetes and stage 3 to 5 disease who are not on dialysis, to help slow progression while maintaining nutrition status (Ikizler et al., 2020). The newer kidney guideline suggests about 0.8 g per kilogram for people in stages G3 to G5 not on dialysis, and avoiding high intakes (Stevens et al., 2024). At 82 kg, 0.6 to 0.8 g per kilogram is 49 to 66 g per day.

A three-day food record shows Harold eats about 70 g of protein a day, a little above the range, with roughly two-thirds from plants. His plant-forward pattern already keeps protein moderate. Shifting further toward plants and slightly reducing portions of soup and beans could bring protein into range without adding animal protein.

Potassium

His potassium of 5.6 mEq/L needs attention, but the sources must be identified before foods are removed.

1. Salt substitute. Most salt substitutes replace sodium chloride with potassium chloride. A quarter teaspoon can add several hundred milligrams of potassium, in a form absorbed completely. This is likely a major contributor and the easiest to change.

2. Orange juice. A large glass every morning supplies a concentrated dose of potassium without the fiber of whole fruit.

3. Potatoes. Baked potatoes with skin are high in potassium. Boiling peeled, cut potatoes in plenty of water removes a portion of it.

4. Medicine. Lisinopril reduces potassium excretion. Whether to adjust it is his physician's decision.

5. Beans and lentils. They contain potassium, but a review of plant foods and potassium notes that potassium from whole plant foods may be absorbed less completely than from additives or juices, and that fiber may help move potassium through the gut, so the potassium on a nutrient label may overstate the effect on blood levels (St-Jules et al., 2016).

What to Keep and What to Change

Keep: oatmeal, beans and lentils at moderate portions, vegetables, and the overall plant-forward pattern that improved his A1C and weight.

Change: stop the potassium-based salt substitute and use herbs, garlic and lemon instead. Replace the large glass of orange juice with a smaller portion of a lower-potassium fruit, such as apple or berries. Prepare potatoes by peeling, cutting and boiling them, or swap some for rice or pasta. Check processed foods for potassium additives listed as potassium chloride or potassium phosphate.

Refer: share the potassium finding with his physician, who may review his lisinopril or consider a potassium binder, and who should know the diet is being adjusted.

Monitoring

Repeat potassium in two weeks after removing the salt substitute and orange juice. Recheck A1C at three months to confirm glucose control holds. At six weeks, a fresh three-day intake record should show protein landing between 49 and 66 g. Weigh monthly to watch for unintended loss, since lowering protein and changing familiar foods can reduce total intake in older adults without anyone noticing.

Talking With Harold

Harold was proud of his new diet and worried, when he heard about his kidneys, that he had harmed himself by eating so many beans. The conversation matters as much as the plan. He needs to hear that his plant-forward eating helped his blood sugar, weight and heart, and that the changes are adjustments, not a reversal. Framing the salt substitute and the juice as the first suspects, rather than his whole way of eating, keeps him engaged. He also needs a clear explanation of why potassium matters, since high levels can affect heart rhythm, and what symptoms such as muscle weakness or palpitations should prompt a call to his physician. Written examples of lower-potassium swaps, in the portions he actually eats, will help more than a long list of foods to avoid.

Why Not Simply Restrict Plants?

A traditional low-potassium diet would remove many foods that helped Harold's diabetes and heart, likely raise his intake of refined foods, and reduce fiber. Because his main potassium sources include a salt substitute and juice, restricting beans first would address a smaller contributor at a larger cost. If his potassium stays high after the first changes, more restriction can be considered with his team.

Evaluation Plan

Success would be potassium below 5.0 mEq/L within a month, protein within range, stable A1C and stable weight. If potassium does not fall, medicines get reviewed again and a more structured potassium plan follows.

Limitations

The food record relies on Harold's reporting. Potassium content varies by portion and preparation. The guidance on plant-food potassium absorption is still developing, so changes should be monitored with lab values rather than assumed to work.

What this part is doingEnding with how uncertain evidence will be checked against labs shows the plan is cautious where the science is unsettled.
4

References

Ikizler, T. A., Burrowes, J. D., Byham-Gray, L. D., Campbell, K. L., Carrero, J.-J., Chan, W., Fouque, D., Friedman, A. N., Ghaddar, S., Goldstein-Fuchs, D. J., Kaysen, G. A., Kopple, J. D., Teta, D., Yee-Moon Wang, A., & Cuppari, L. (2020). KDOQI clinical practice guideline for nutrition in CKD: 2020 update. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 76(3, Suppl. 1), S1-S107. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.05.006

Stevens, P. E., Ahmed, S. B., Carrero, J. J., Foster, B., Francis, A., Hall, R. K., Herrington, W. G., Hill, G., Inker, L. A., Kazancıoğlu, R., Lamb, E., Lin, P., Madero, M., McIntyre, N., Morrow, K., Roberts, G., Sabanayagam, D., Schaeffner, E., Shlipak, M., . . . Levin, A. (2024). KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney International, 105(4, Suppl.), S117-S314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018

St-Jules, D. E., Goldfarb, D. S., & Sevick, M. A. (2016). Nutrient non-equivalence: Does restricting high-potassium plant foods help to prevent hyperkalemia in hemodialysis patients? Journal of Renal Nutrition, 26(5), 282-287. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2016.02.005

What the NS490 Unit 2 assignment asks for

For the second NS490 unit, students receive or build a kidney disease case and analyze the nutrition problems it raises. Prompts usually ask for a summary of the case, the relevant labs, the nutrient targets and a justified plan. Identify the guideline edition you use and quote its ranges accurately. Explain any conflict between conditions instead of applying each diet separately. Show the arithmetic for protein and energy from the weight you chose. List potassium sources from the patient's actual intake, including drinks and seasonings. Address how the plan will be monitored and when labs will be repeated. Include a section on talking with the patient, since adherence decides whether a renal plan works. Most analyses land between four and six pages in APA 7. Cite current sources, and avoid relying on older lists that restrict all plant foods.

How the NS 490 Unit 2 example is put together

The analysis opens with Harold's history, labs and the diet he adopted on his own. A short section states the apparent conflict, then the highlighted sentence argues it is smaller than it looks. Protein targets come from the 2020 KDOQI guideline, calculated from his weight in a few lines. The potassium section lists every source in his record, from beans to a salt substitute and orange juice, and ranks which to change first. What to keep and what to change becomes a short table in prose: keep beans in measured portions, swap the juice, stop the substitute and boil or soak potatoes. Monitoring sets dates for potassium, A1C and a repeat intake record. A section on talking with Harold explains the plan in his terms. The paper then answers the obvious alternative, restricting plants, before an evaluation plan and limitations close it.

NS490 Unit 2 rubric: what earns full points

Renal case analyses at this level earn points for accurate targets, a sound reading of the labs and a plan that fits the person. The guideline must be named, quoted correctly and applied with the arithmetic visible. Explaining the conflict between diabetes and kidney goals is where much of the credit sits, because the unit is about combined conditions. Potassium advice is judged on whether it targets the real sources rather than banning whole food groups. Monitoring needs dates and values, not a general promise to follow up. The patient conversation section shows practical judgment and is often part of the rubric. Limitations show awareness that one set of labs is a snapshot. Organization matters, so headings should follow the prompt. APA 7 formatting and current references complete the marks, and a missing reference list costs more than most writers expect.

Common NS490 Unit 2 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Weak renal analyses usually restrict potassium by removing all fruits and vegetables, which can undo glucose control and fiber intake. Some quote an outdated protein range or skip which guideline they used. Many forget drinks and salt substitutes when listing potassium sources. Writers sometimes calculate protein from an ideal weight without saying why. Another common gap is ignoring the patient's own changes and preferences. Monitoring sections often name labs without timing. The section answering the alternative is skipped, leaving the plan looking untested. Long background on kidney physiology crowds out the analysis. If your case pairs kidney disease with another condition and the targets seem to contradict, our team can write the analysis to your case details and your course's guideline.

Get an NS490 Unit 2 example written to your instructions

Renal cases in NS490 Unit 2 might put a patient on dialysis, add a second organ problem or supply fewer labs than this one. Forward the case with all its values, whichever guideline edition your course uses, and the rubric. Expect non-dietary causes sorted first, targets cited narrowly and the conflict resolved on paper. The first custom sample is free and takes 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More NS490 papers and BS in Nutrition Science samples

NS490 Unit 2 questions, answered

Should the analysis use the 2020 KDOQI targets or older ones?

Use the edition your course names, and if it names none, the current one. The 2020 update, produced with the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, revised several statements, including protein ranges for people with diabetes and the approach to potassium. Quoting an older fixed limit when the current guideline frames the target differently is a common deduction.

How low should protein go in stage 4 kidney disease?

The guideline gives ranges that depend on diabetes status and on whether keto acid analogs are used, and it attaches the condition of close dietitian supervision. For a course paper, quote the range that fits the case, show the calculation on the case weight, and say that the prescription in practice belongs to a dietitian working with the nephrology team.

Is a plant-based diet safe with high potassium?

It can be part of the plan, which is why the question is worth a whole unit. Plant foods differ widely in potassium, and recent reviews suggest potassium from whole plant foods may be absorbed less completely than potassium additives in processed foods. A strong paper keeps plant protein where it can, swaps the highest-potassium items, and addresses non-dietary causes, rather than banning a food group.

Where can I find a free NS490 Unit 2 sample paper?

The full NS490 Unit 2 renal case analysis here traces a 66-year-old man with diabetes and stage G4 kidney disease from his potassium sources to protein targets, monitoring and an evaluation plan.

Why does the NS490 Unit 2 sample keep beans in the diet?

Harold's potassium came from several sources, including a salt substitute and daily orange juice. Removing those first lowers potassium while keeping the beans and lentils that helped his glucose, in measured portions.