NS480 Unit 2 Antipsychotic Weight Gain Assessment Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN Medical Nutrition Therapy I Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

An 18 kg weight gain in the two years since a 36-year-old woman started olanzapine is organized into the five assessment domains in this NS480 Unit 2 nutrition assessment. Purdue Global NS 480, Medical Nutrition Therapy I, asks BS in Nutrition Science students to gather and interpret assessment data against named standards. The composite patient drinks about four sodas a day, has a waist of 104 cm, prediabetes on both glucose and A1C, high triglycerides, low HDL and acanthosis nigricans. Each value is compared with a cited standard, including harmonized metabolic syndrome criteria and the diabetes standards, and she meets at least five syndrome components. Her psychiatric medicine is described, not questioned, using a multi-society consensus and a meta-analysis. The summary separates medical diagnoses from nutrition problems.

CourseNS480 Medical Nutrition Therapy I
UnitUnit 2
Paper typeNutrition assessment
LengthAbout 1,110 words, 7 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBS in Nutrition Science
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NS480 Unit 2

1

Five Domains, One Medication History: A Unit 2 Nutrition Assessment of Weight Gain After Starting an Antipsychotic

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

NS480: Medical Nutrition Therapy I

Unit 2 Nutrition Assessment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The patient and all of her values are composite; the care process update, the antipsychotic consensus, the weight-gain meta-analysis, the metabolic syndrome criteria and the diabetes standards cited are real.

What this part is doingPromising a named standard for every value tells the grader the assessment will interpret data, not simply list it.
2

Referral and Purpose

Dana, 36, was referred by her psychiatric nurse practitioner for nutrition assessment after gaining weight steadily since starting olanzapine two years ago. The purpose of this assessment is to organize her data into the five domains of the nutrition care process, compare each finding with an accepted standard, and identify the problems a nutrition diagnosis should address (Swan et al., 2017). Her psychiatric medicine is not a nutrition decision and is not questioned here; the assessment describes its likely effects so the team can plan around them.

Domain 1: Food and Nutrition-Related History

Dana describes a large increase in appetite since starting her medicine, especially in the evening. A 24-hour recall and a usual-intake interview show three meals plus two evening snacks, often chips or cookies, and about four 12-ounce regular sodas a day, supplying roughly 560 kcal from sugary drinks alone. She eats two to three servings of fruit and vegetables a week. She buys most food at a corner store near her supported housing, which has a limited fresh selection. She smokes about a pack a day and drinks no alcohol. Her physical activity is mostly walking to the store.

Standard: federal guidance caps added sugars at under a tenth of daily energy, a ceiling her sodas alone would break at almost any plausible calorie intake.

Domain 2: Anthropometric Measurements

Height 165 cm. Current weight 92 kg; weight two years ago 74 kg, a gain of 18 kg, or about 24 percent. Body mass index 33.8, which falls in the class I obesity range. Waist circumference 104 cm.

Standard: in the harmonized metabolic syndrome criteria, a waist circumference of 88 cm or more is the threshold commonly used for women in the United States (Alberti et al., 2009). Her waist exceeds it by 16 cm.

Domain 3: Biochemical Data, Medical Tests and Procedures

Fasting labs from last month: glucose 108 mg/dL, hemoglobin A1C 5.9 percent, triglycerides 210 mg/dL, HDL cholesterol 42 mg/dL, LDL cholesterol 128 mg/dL. Blood pressure 132/84 mm Hg.

Standards: her fasting glucose and her A1C both sit inside the ranges the diabetes standards use to define prediabetes (American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2025). The harmonized criteria count raised triglycerides, low HDL for a woman, raised blood pressure and raised fasting glucose as separate components, and her values cross each cutoff (Alberti et al., 2009).

Dana meets at least five of the metabolic syndrome criteria, waist, triglycerides, HDL, glucose and blood pressure, which places the weight gain within a pattern of cardiometabolic risk rather than a cosmetic concern.

What this part is doingThe highlighted sentence links separate lab values into one clinical picture, which is the interpretation an assessment is graded on.
3

Her blood pressure meets the systolic threshold but not the diastolic one; under the harmonized criteria, either part qualifies.

Domain 4: Nutrition-Focused Physical Findings

Thick, darkened skin with a velvet texture on her neck and under both arms, consistent with acanthosis nigricans, which is associated with insulin resistance. No signs of muscle or fat wasting. No edema. Teeth show some decay, which she attributes to sodas.

Domain 5: Client History

Dana has schizoaffective disorder, stable for eighteen months on olanzapine 15 mg daily. Before olanzapine she tried a different medicine that did not control her symptoms. She lives in supported housing with a shared kitchen, receives disability income and SNAP benefits, and has a case manager. Her mother has type 2 diabetes. She says she wants to "stop gaining" and is worried about developing diabetes like her mother.

Second-generation antipsychotics as a group are associated with weight gain and metabolic changes, and a consensus statement from diabetes, psychiatric and obesity organizations recommends regular monitoring of weight, waist, blood pressure, glucose and lipids in people taking them (American Diabetes Association et al., 2004). A meta-analysis of antipsychotic studies found that almost all of these medicines lead to weight gain with prolonged use, with the effect most pronounced in people starting a medicine for the first time (Bak et al., 2014). Her pattern of gain fits that evidence.

Summary of Findings

The assessment identifies several problems a nutrition diagnosis could address:

1. High intake of sugar-sweetened beverages, about 560 kcal a day.

2. Increased appetite and evening snacking, likely related to her medicine.

3. Low fruit and vegetable intake, shaped by limited food access.

4. Obesity with central fat distribution.

5. Prediabetes and metabolic syndrome.

The last two are medical diagnoses made by her care team. The first three are nutrition-related problems within the dietitian's scope and could form the basis of a diagnosis statement.

How the Domains Fit Together

Read one at a time, each domain gives part of the story. Read together, they describe a sequence. The medicine raised her appetite, especially in the evening. Her food environment offered mostly packaged snacks and sodas to meet it. The extra intake, about 560 kcal a day from drinks alone, matches the scale of her weight gain over two years. The gain settled around her waist, and her labs and skin now show the insulin resistance that often follows. That sequence matters for planning. Changing the medicine is not nutrition's decision, but her drinks, her evening eating and her access to food are areas where nutrition care can act directly, and they sit early in the chain where a change could slow everything after it.

Strengths and Barriers

Strengths: she is motivated by her mother's diabetes, she has stable psychiatric symptoms, a case manager and SNAP benefits, and she has a shared kitchen. Barriers: limited food access near her housing, medicine-related appetite, smoking, and limited cooking experience.

Coordination With the Care Team

The assessment will be shared with her nurse practitioner and case manager. Her prescriber may wish to consider her metabolic findings when reviewing her treatment, a decision outside nutrition's scope. Her primary care provider should know about her prediabetes and acanthosis nigricans so that diabetes risk can be followed.

Limitations

Diet history depends on self-report, and the 24-hour recall may not reflect a typical day. Waist measurement was taken once, by one assessor, over light clothing, so a repeat reading at the next visit would make the value more reliable. Her activity level was estimated from conversation rather than measured with a step counter or log. Lab values are from a single draw. Her weight before olanzapine came from a clinic record rather than a measured trend.

What this part is doingEnding with limitations specific to each data source shows the writer understands how reliable each domain's evidence is.
4

References

Alberti, K. G. M. M., Eckel, R. H., Grundy, S. M., Zimmet, P. Z., Cleeman, J. I., Donato, K. A., Fruchart, J.-C., James, W. P. T., Loria, C. M., & Smith, S. C. (2009). Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome. Circulation, 120(16), 1640-1645. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644

American Diabetes Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, & North American Association for the Study of Obesity. (2004). Consensus development conference on antipsychotic drugs and obesity and diabetes. Diabetes Care, 27(2), 596-601. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.2.596

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. (2025). 2. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: Standards of care in diabetes 2025. Diabetes Care, 48(Suppl. 1), S27-S49. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-S002

Bak, M., Fransen, A., Janssen, J., van Os, J., & Drukker, M. (2014). Almost all antipsychotics result in weight gain: A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 9(4), e94112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094112

Swan, W. I., Vivanti, A., Hakel-Smith, N. A., Hotson, B., Orrevall, Y., Trostler, N., Beck Howarter, K., & Papoutsakis, C. (2017). Nutrition care process and model update: Toward realizing people-centered care and outcomes management. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 117(12), 2003-2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2017.07.015

The Purdue Global NS480 Unit 2 instructions

In Unit 2, NS480 asks for a full nutrition assessment of a case, organized by the care process domains. Prompts generally expect food and nutrition history, anthropometrics, biochemical data, physical findings and client history, each interpreted. Introduce the referral and the purpose of the assessment. Present data domain by domain. For every value, name the standard you compare it with and cite it. Calculate derived values such as percent weight change and BMI. Interpret findings together, not only one at a time. Describe medicines and their known nutrition effects without recommending changes. Separate medical diagnoses made by the team from nutrition-related problems. Note strengths, barriers and coordination needs. End with limitations specific to each data source. Five to seven pages is common.

How this NS480 Unit 2 example is built

The sample opens with the referral and states that medicine decisions are outside nutrition's scope. The food history quantifies soda calories and sets them against federal added-sugar guidance. Anthropometrics calculate a 24 percent gain and compare her waist with the harmonized cutoff. Biochemical data are matched to diabetes and metabolic syndrome standards, and a highlighted sentence pulls them into one cardiometabolic picture. Physical findings note acanthosis nigricans and dental decay. Client history covers her diagnosis, housing, benefits and family history, with a consensus statement and meta-analysis on antipsychotics. A section on how the domains fit together traces a sequence from appetite to labs. A summary, strengths and barriers, team coordination and limitations close the assessment.

Reading the NS480 Unit 2 grading rubric

Nutrition assessments are mostly graded on completeness across domains, accuracy of calculations, correct use of standards and quality of interpretation. A large part of the credit depends on comparing each value with a named, cited standard rather than calling it high or low. Instructors reward interpretation that links domains into a coherent picture. Calculations such as percent weight change must be correct. Handling medicines accurately and within scope is expected. Separating medical diagnoses from nutrition problems shows understanding of roles. Specific limitations earn credit. A heading for each domain, plus correctly formatted APA 7 sources, finishes the grade. Instructors also look for a summary that names the problems clearly enough for the diagnosis unit to build on.

Common NS480 Unit 2 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Weak assessments list data without interpreting it. Others call values abnormal without naming a standard. Writers often report BMI alone, without waist or weight trajectory. Medicines are blamed, or changes recommended, which oversteps scope. Domains get mixed, with labs under client history or diet details under physical findings. Physical findings such as skin changes are skipped. The summary jumps to an intervention plan instead of identifying problems. If you have case data but are unsure how to sort and interpret it, a writer can help you build each domain with its standard and tie the findings together. Sources for standards are often missing or outdated, which weakens every comparison.

Get an NS480 Unit 2 example written to your instructions

Your Unit 2 case may center on a different body-weight picture, a low one as easily as a high one, or supply a table instead of a narrative. Upload the case in the form your instructor issued it, together with the assessment form and the rubric. Expect five filled domains, every value paired with its standard, in 24-48h; the first custom sample is on us. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More NS480 papers and BS in Nutrition Science samples

NS480 Unit 2 questions, answered

Is BMI enough for the anthropometric domain?

Rarely on its own. BMI classifies weight relative to height but says nothing about where fat sits or how fast weight changed. Most assessments in this course pair it with waist circumference, a weight history with dates, and percent change over a stated period. If your case supplies only a single weight, say what that limits rather than inventing a history.

Can the assessment name the medication as a cause of weight gain?

It can record the timeline and cite the known effect of the drug class, and that is usually what the rubric wants. What it should not do is recommend stopping or switching the drug, since that decision belongs to the prescriber. The nutrition side of the paper works on what nutrition can change, which in this case is intake.

Should the assessment end with a diagnosis statement?

Not unless the prompt requests one. Plenty of units separate the two so the assessment can be marked on its own, and a summary naming the problem areas the data support is the usual close. If your section does want the statement, write it last, and check that each part of it points back to a finding already on the page.

Where can I find a free NS480 Unit 2 sample paper?

A complete Unit 2 nutrition assessment is on this page, sorting a woman's 18 kg weight gain on an antipsychotic into five domains and comparing every value with a cited standard.

What are the five domains in the NS480 Unit 2 nutrition assessment?

Food and nutrition-related history, anthropometric measurements, biochemical data with medical tests and procedures, nutrition-focused physical findings, and client history. The sample places every piece of the patient's data under one of them.