| Course | NS480 Medical Nutrition Therapy I |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 10 |
| Paper type | Comprehensive case report |
| Length | About 1,130 words, 7 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Nutrition Science |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NS480 Unit 10
Breathless at the Table: A Unit 10 Comprehensive Case Report of Malnutrition in Severe COPD, From Weigh-In to Four-Week Evaluation
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
NS480: Medical Nutrition Therapy I
Unit 10 Comprehensive Case Report
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The patient and all values are composite; the malnutrition criteria, the respiratory society statement and the nutritional support meta-analysis cited are real.
Introduction
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease often brings weight loss and muscle wasting, which in turn weaken breathing muscles and worsen outcomes. A European Respiratory Society statement recommends nutritional assessment as part of routine COPD care and describes weight loss and low muscle mass as treatable features of the disease (Schols et al., 2014). This report follows one patient, step by step through the care process, after a referral referred from a pulmonary clinic.
Step 1: Assessment
Client history. Walter, 67, a retired machinist, has severe COPD and uses home oxygen at 2 liters during exertion. He lives with his wife, who cooks. He quit smoking five years ago. He was referred because of weight loss noticed at his last clinic visit.
Anthropometrics. Height 172 cm. Weight 55 kg, down from 63 kg six months ago, a loss of 8 kg, or 12.7 percent. BMI 18.6.
Food and nutrition history. Walter eats two meals a day, breakfast at 9 and dinner at 6. He describes getting breathless while chewing and swallowing, feeling full quickly, and stopping meals early. His wife estimates he eats half of a normal plate. A 24-hour recall suggests about 1,250 kcal and 45 g of protein.
Nutrition-focused physical findings. Visible loss of muscle at the temples, collarbones and thighs. Grip strength low for his age and sex.
Biochemical data. No recent nutrition-specific labs; kidney function normal.
Step 2: Diagnosis
The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria require at least one phenotypic criterion and one etiologic criterion (Cederholm et al., 2019). Walter meets two phenotypic criteria, losing over a tenth of his weight within half a year, and reduced muscle mass on physical examination, and two etiologic criteria, reduced food intake and a chronic inflammatory disease. Weight loss above 10 percent within six months meets the threshold for severe malnutrition under those criteria.
Because his weight loss comes from intake limited by breathlessness, the nutrition diagnosis names breathing during meals as the cause, which points the intervention at how he eats as well as what he eats.
Nutrition diagnosis: inadequate oral intake related to breathlessness and early fullness during meals, as evidenced by a recall showing roughly 1,250 kcal against a target near 1,900 and a 12.7 percent weight loss in six months.
Step 3: Intervention
Estimated needs. Energy is estimated at about 30 to 35 kcal per kilogram of current weight, 1,650 to 1,925 kcal, rounded to a target of about 1,900 kcal to allow for weight regain. Protein is set between 66 and 83 g a day, which works out to 1.2 to 1.5 grams for each of his 55 kilograms, to support muscle.
Changes to meal pattern. Based on the diagnosis, the plan changes how he eats.
1. Six small meals and snacks instead of two larger meals, so each eating occasion requires less breathing effort.
2. Main meal at midday, when Walter reports he has the most energy.
3. Rest for 20 minutes before meals and use his oxygen while eating if his physician agrees.
4. Soft, moist foods that need less chewing, such as eggs, fish, stews and yogurt.
5. Drinks between meals rather than with them, to avoid early fullness.
Energy and protein density. His wife adds butter, olive oil, cheese and milk powder to foods he already eats, increasing energy without increasing volume.
Oral nutrition supplement. One energy- and protein-dense supplement drink daily between meals. A meta-analysis of nutritional support in COPD found that supplements increased energy and protein intake and improved body weight and grip strength compared with control (Collins et al., 2012).
Coordination. Referral to pulmonary rehabilitation, since the respiratory society statement recommends combining nutritional support with exercise training to rebuild muscle rather than adding only fat (Schols et al., 2014).
Step 4: Monitoring and Evaluation
Indicators set at the start, taken from the assessment and the diagnosis:
1. Weight, weekly, on the clinic scale.
2. Energy and protein intake, by three-day food record at two and four weeks.
3. Grip strength, at baseline and four weeks.
4. Breathlessness at meals, by his own rating from 0 to 10.
Four-Week Evaluation
At four weeks, Walter weighed 56.3 kg, a gain of 1.3 kg. His food record showed about 1,750 kcal and 68 g of protein, up from 1,250 kcal and 45 g. He was drinking the supplement on most days. His grip strength was unchanged. He rated breathlessness at meals at 4 out of 10, down from 7, and said eating six small meals felt easier. He had attended his first two pulmonary rehabilitation sessions.
Evaluation against the diagnosis: intake has risen to about 92 percent of the energy target and within the protein range, and weight has begun to rise. The etiology, breathlessness at meals, has improved. Grip strength is not expected to change in four weeks and will be rechecked at twelve weeks, when rehabilitation has had time to work.
Walter's and His Wife's Part
Much of the plan depends on Walter's wife, who shops and cooks. She was included in the second session, and her questions shaped the changes: she worried that adding butter and cheese would harm his heart, and she needed to hear that for a man losing weight this fast, regaining it took priority, with his physician's agreement. She also suggested the midday main meal, having noticed he was most alert then. Plans for older adults with chronic lung disease often fail when the person cooking is left out, and her involvement is a large part of why intake rose.
Plan Going Forward
Continue the meal pattern and supplement. Recheck weight every two weeks and grip strength at twelve weeks. If weight gain stalls, consider a second daily supplement. Share results with his pulmonary team.
Discussion
The case shows why each step must build on the one before. The assessment found that breathlessness, not appetite or food access, limited his intake. The diagnosis named that cause. The intervention therefore changed meal timing, texture and size as well as adding energy, and the monitoring tracked breathlessness alongside weight. If the plan had simply prescribed more calories, Walter might not have been able to eat them.
Limitations
Intake estimates rely on food records kept by his wife. Grip strength was measured once at baseline. Four weeks is too short to judge changes in muscle. The case is composite and illustrates the process rather than reporting a real outcome.
References
Cederholm, T., Jensen, G. L., Correia, M. I. T. D., Gonzalez, M. C., Fukushima, R., Higashiguchi, T., Baptista, G., Barazzoni, R., Blaauw, R., Coats, A. J. S., Crivelli, A. N., Evans, D. C., Gramlich, L., Fuchs-Tarlovsky, V., Keller, H., Llido, L., Malone, A., Mogensen, K. M., Morley, J. E., . . . Yu, J. (2019). GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition: A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. Clinical Nutrition, 38(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.002
Collins, P. F., Stratton, R. J., & Elia, M. (2012). Nutritional support in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 95(6), 1385-1395. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.023499
Schols, A. M., Ferreira, I. M., Franssen, F. M., Gosker, H. R., Janssens, W., Muscaritoli, M., Pison, C., Rutten-van Mölken, M., Slinde, F., Steiner, M. C., Tkacova, R., & Singh, S. J. (2014). Nutritional assessment and therapy in COPD: A European Respiratory Society statement. European Respiratory Journal, 44(6), 1504-1520. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00070914
NS480 Unit 10 instructions, in plain terms
The final NS480 unit asks students to write a comprehensive case report covering assessment, diagnosis, intervention, and monitoring and evaluation. Prompts often supply follow-up data and expect an evaluation of progress. Introduce the condition's nutrition relevance briefly. Present assessment data across all domains. Apply a recognized framework, such as malnutrition criteria, to classify the problem. Write a diagnosis whose etiology drives the plan. Calculate needs and describe interventions that address the cause, not only the numbers. Coordinate with other care such as rehabilitation. Set indicators at the start and evaluate them against follow-up data. Include family or caregiver roles where relevant. Discuss how the steps connect and the case's limits. Expect eight to twelve pages.
How this NS480 Unit 10 example is built
The sample opens with the respiratory society statement on nutrition in COPD. Assessment covers client history, a 12.7 percent weight loss, a two-meal pattern limited by breathlessness and visible muscle wasting. The diagnosis applies GLIM criteria, and a highlighted sentence links the cause to the plan. Intervention calculates energy and protein, lists five meal-pattern changes, adds energy density through foods his wife cooks, includes a daily supplement backed by a COPD meta-analysis and refers him to rehabilitation. Monitoring sets four indicators. The four-week evaluation compares weight, intake, grip strength and breathlessness with targets. A section on his wife's role, a forward plan, a discussion of how the steps connect and limitations close the report.
Reading the NS480 Unit 10 grading rubric
Comprehensive case reports carry the greatest weight in NS480 and are typically graded on completeness, coherence between steps, accuracy and evaluation against data. Most of the grade depends on each step clearly building on the one before. Instructors reward correct application of malnutrition criteria and a diagnosis whose etiology shapes the intervention. Interventions should address both how and what the patient eats. Evaluation must compare follow-up data with the criteria set earlier. Including caregivers shows realistic practice. A discussion of connections and honest limitations earns credit. Professional presentation and a correct APA 7 list are part of the mark as well. Instructors also check that needs are calculated from the current weight and that the evaluation separates changes expected at four weeks from those that need longer.
NS480 Unit 10 help: mistakes that cost points
Many case reports present the four steps as separate sections that never refer to each other. Others misapply malnutrition criteria or skip them. Diagnoses name low intake without a cause, so the plan becomes simply eat more. Interventions ignore the patient's breathing, swallowing or energy limits. Evaluation repeats the plan instead of judging results. Caregivers are left out even when they cook. Limitations are generic. If you have case data and follow-up values but cannot connect the steps, our team can help you build the report so every stage cites the one before it. Another error is judging muscle outcomes too early, before rehabilitation could have had an effect.
Get an NS480 Unit 10 example written to your instructions
Some sections want the NS480 Unit 10 report in ADIME layout, some add a slide summary, and others set a page count. Upload the full case, your report template and the grading rubric. What returns in 24-48h has every stage answering the one before it and needs worked out in full, and the first custom sample carries no charge. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More NS480 papers and BS in Nutrition Science samples
- NS480 Unit 1: Nutrition Care Process Post
- NS480 Unit 2: Antipsychotic Weight Gain Assessment
- NS480 Unit 3: Energy Needs After Femur Fracture
- NS480 Unit 4: Nutrition Diagnosis Statement
- NS480 Unit 5: High LDL Seminar Reflection
- NS480 Unit 6: ADIME Note for Pressure Injury
- NS480 Unit 7: Dumping Syndrome Handout
- NS480 Unit 8: Crohn's Disease Case Study
- NS480 Unit 9: Semaglutide Monitoring Plan
- NS465 Unit 10: Reflux Functional Case Study
- NS460 Unit 10: Fish Oil Product Review
- NS105 Unit 10: Nutrition Case Summary
- NS455 Unit 10: Nutrition Trends Synthesis
NS480 Unit 10 questions, answered
How long should a comprehensive case report be?
As long as your section specifies, which in many courses means roughly eight to twelve pages plus references. Coverage matters more than length: every care process stage needs substance, and a report that spends five pages on disease background and one on intervention will read as unbalanced however long it is. Allocate space in proportion to the rubric's weighting.
Should the report include an evaluation if the case gives no follow-up data?
Check the prompt first. Some cases supply follow-up values and expect you to judge them; others stop at the plan, and then the evaluation section describes how progress would be judged, against which criteria, and when. Inventing follow-up results the case never gave is a common error, and a marker will notice it quickly.
Is it acceptable to write the report in ADIME format?
If your section allows it, yes, and some require it. ADIME maps directly onto the care process, so the content is the same; the difference is density, with ADIME sections written more tersely. Where the prompt asks for a narrative report, keep full paragraphs and use ADIME only if it is named as an acceptable alternative.
Where can I find a free NS480 Unit 10 sample paper?
A complete Unit 10 case report is on this page, following a man with severe COPD and an 8 kg weight loss through assessment, GLIM-based diagnosis, intervention and a four-week evaluation.
Why does the NS480 Unit 10 plan change how the patient eats?
Breathlessness during meals was limiting his intake, so the diagnosis named it as the cause. Six small soft meals, the main meal at midday and drinks between meals reduce breathing effort, which helped his intake rise.