| Course | MT260 Group and Organization Dynamics |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 3 |
| Paper type | Role and structure paper |
| Length | About 1,140 words, 7 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MT260 Unit 3
Three Jobs Nobody Was Hired to Do: A Unit 3 Role and Structure Paper on an Independent Bookstore
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
MT260: Group and Organization Dynamics
Unit 3 Role and Structure Paper
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The bookstore, its owner, staff and every event are composite and illustrative; the sources cited are real.
The Store and Its Formal Structure
Hollis Street Books is a composite independent bookstore in a small city, with an owner, two shift leads and six booksellers. The formal structure is simple. The owner buys inventory, sets prices and handles the store's finances. The two shift leads open and close the store and supervise whoever is on shift. The six booksellers work the register, shelve, help customers and handle special orders. On the organization chart the owner would draw, every line of authority runs from the owner through the shift leads to the booksellers.
The writer has worked at the store for three years as a bookseller.
The Roles the Chart Leaves Out
The chart omits much of the work that keeps the store running. A role table lists eight recurring functions that no one was assigned but someone performs.
Writing the weekly staff schedule: done by Dana, a bookseller, for four years; never assigned; on her days off, nobody changes the schedule
Handling returns without receipts: done by Marcus, a shift lead, by informal agreement; other staff send these customers to him
Ordering for the children's section: done by Priya, a bookseller and former teacher; the owner signs her lists without changes
Carrying staff complaints to the owner: done by Dana; staff bring concerns to her rather than to the shift leads
Telling the owner no: done by Marcus, the only person who questions the owner's ideas in staff meetings
Training new booksellers on the register: done by whoever is on shift
Keeping the point-of-sale system running: done by the writer, who fixes printer and card reader problems
Organizing author events: done by Priya and the owner together, with no clear lead
Classifying the Roles
Benne and Sheats (1948) divided the roles people take in groups into three kinds: task roles that help the group get its work done, maintenance roles that keep relationships working, and individual roles that serve one person's needs at the group's expense. The store's unassigned roles fall mostly into the first two.
Scheduling, ordering for the children's section, handling receiptless returns, training and keeping the register system running are task roles. They are the kind Benne and Sheats called coordinator, information giver and procedure developer, and the store would stop functioning without them.
Carrying staff complaints is a maintenance role, close to what Benne and Sheats called the harmonizer or gatekeeper. Dana keeps tensions from building by bringing them to the owner in a form he will hear.
Telling the owner no is harder to classify. It works like a task role, since it prevents bad decisions, and like a maintenance role, since Marcus does it in a way the owner accepts. Benne and Sheats included an evaluator-critic among task roles, and Marcus fits that description, but his value depends on a relationship nobody else has.
No individual roles appeared in the table, though the writer notes that author events, with no clear lead, sometimes become a contest between Priya and the owner over who decides.
The Two Weeks Dana Was Away
Last spring Dana took two weeks of leave. Nobody else knew how she built the schedule, which balances booksellers' class schedules, second jobs and the shift leads' preferences. The owner tried to write it himself using the previous week's schedule as a template. Over two weeks, three shifts were double-booked and one Saturday morning had no shift lead. Staff complaints, which normally reached the owner through Dana, came to him directly and angrily, and one bookseller said in a staff meeting that she would look for another job.
Forsyth (2019) notes that informal roles often carry as much of a group's structure as formal ones, and that groups discover this when a role holder leaves. The store learned it in two weeks.
The schedule was never in the chart because it was in Dana's head.
How the Owner Sees It
When the writer showed the owner a draft of the role table, his first reaction was surprise at the scheduling entry. He had assumed the shift leads wrote the schedule together, because they hand it out. He knew Marcus pushed back in meetings but described it as Marcus's personality rather than a function the store relied on. He had never thought of the register system as anyone's job. His view of the store matched the formal chart almost exactly, which is common among owners of small businesses who are present every day but see the work through the structure they built. The gap between his picture and the role table is itself a finding: the person who controls the formal structure is the one least aware of the informal one.
What the Booksellers Said
Four booksellers read the table and agreed with it, with one addition. Two said that Priya also answers most customer questions about school reading lists, which they send her way. That role was added to her row. None of the booksellers wanted their own informal roles formalized without a conversation about pay.
Why Unassigned Roles Persist
Unassigned roles persist because they work until they do not. Each one grew from a person's skill or willingness: Dana was good at puzzles, Priya knew children's books, Marcus was not afraid of the owner. Nobody saw a reason to write them down, and writing them down might have raised questions about pay. Mintzberg (1979) observed that small organizations coordinate mostly through direct supervision and mutual adjustment, and Hollis Street Books relies on mutual adjustment far more than the chart suggests. The risk is that the store's structure exists in a few people.
The Writer's Own Role
The writer keeps the point-of-sale system running, a role taken on after fixing a card reader during a busy Saturday two years ago. Nobody else knows the vendor's support process or the workarounds for the receipt printer. If the writer left, the store would face the same kind of gap it faced with the schedule. Recognizing this was the most useful result of the analysis.
Recommendations
The store should make three changes. First, write down how each unassigned task role is done, beginning with the schedule and the register system, so that a second person can do it. Second, decide which roles should become formal, with recognition and possibly pay; scheduling and children's ordering are the clearest cases. Third, keep the maintenance roles informal, since carrying complaints and telling the owner no work because they rest on trust that a title might weaken.
References
Benne, K. D., & Sheats, P. (1948). Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues, 4(2), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1948.tb01783.x
Forsyth, D. R. (2019). Group dynamics (7th ed.). Cengage.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Prentice Hall.
The Purdue Global MT260 Unit 3 instructions
The third unit asks students to compare a group's formal structure with the roles members actually play. Start with the official chart, then list recurring functions the chart leaves out and who performs them. The prompt usually expects a role typology, such as Benne and Sheats's functional roles, applied to each entry. Show what happens when an unassigned role holder is absent, since that is where informal structure becomes visible. Include your own informal role if you have one. Recommendations should distinguish roles worth formalizing from those that work better unwritten. Most papers run near five pages around a chart and a role table, and coworkers' names can be changed.
Inside the MT260 Unit 3 example
The paper first describes the store's formal chart from the owner's point of view. The role table lists eight unassigned functions with their holders and what happens on their days off, under a margin note on hidden dependence. Benne and Sheats's three role types classify the entries, with telling the owner no treated as both task and maintenance. The scheduling gap section follows the two weeks Dana was away, cites Forsyth on discovering informal roles through absence and carries the highlighted line about the schedule living in her head. Sections record the owner's reaction and the booksellers' additions. Mintzberg explains why the roles persist, the writer's own role is examined, and three recommendations close it with a final note.
Reading the MT260 Unit 3 grading rubric
Role and structure papers earn marks for an accurate formal chart, a complete list of informal roles, correct use of a typology and insight into consequences. Graders reward role tables that name who performs each function and what happens without them. Applying a typology to each role, and admitting where a role is hard to classify, shows careful use of theory. A concrete episode, such as an absence that exposed a gap, earns strong credit because it shows the structure at work. Including the writer's own informal role demonstrates honesty. Recommendations that keep some roles informal on purpose show judgment. Accurate citations and changed names where appropriate complete the rubric. A paper that shows the owner or manager's view of the structure, as well as the staff's, tends to read as more balanced.
MT260 Unit 3 help: mistakes that cost points
Students often describe their workplace's official structure in detail and list only one or two informal roles. Another frequent problem is applying a typology loosely, calling every helpful act a maintenance role. Some papers ignore the writer's own role, though readers will notice. Others recommend formalizing every role, which can weaken the trust some depend on. Be careful with coworkers' privacy and change names. Check too that each informal role recurs, since a one-time favor is not a role. Describe your workplace's chart and who really does what, and a writer can build the role table, classify each entry and draw out what an absence would reveal.
Get an MT260 Unit 3 example written to your instructions
Think of a workplace or volunteer group where some jobs are done by whoever always does them. List those informal roles beside the people who fill them, then add the Unit 3 prompt and grading rubric. Your first paper is free, written to those instructions within 24-48h, with roles described so that no coworker is identifiable. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More MT260 papers and BS in Business Administration samples
- MT260 Unit 1: Discussion Board Post
- MT260 Unit 2: Group Development Analysis
- MT260 Unit 4: Norms Observation
- MT260 Unit 5: Communication Pattern Study
- MT260 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- MT260 Unit 7: Decision-making Analysis
- MT260 Unit 8: Conflict and Cohesion Case
- MT260 Unit 9: Intervention Proposal
- MT260 Unit 10: Group Analysis Paper
- MT247 Unit 3: Role Analysis
- MT246 Unit 3: Estimating Exercise
- MT245 Unit 3: Business Case
- MT243 Unit 3: Prospect Research Brief
MT260 Unit 3 questions, answered
What counts as an unassigned role?
Any recurring function someone performs without a title, job description or instruction covering it: keeping minutes nobody requested, calming arguments, training newcomers, remembering where things are, carrying complaints to a manager. The test is whether the group would notice the function's absence. Formal duties performed unusually well are different, and belong in the paper only when they spill beyond the job description.
Which role typology should I use?
Your section's reading usually names one. Benne and Sheats suit papers about informal roles because their categories separate getting the task done from keeping the group together. Belbin's team roles appear in some sections, though they describe preferences more than functions. Whichever you use, apply it to specific entries rather than defining every category in turn.
Is it acceptable to write about my current employer?
Yes, with care. Describe roles and behavior rather than character, change or omit names, and drop whatever would embarrass a colleague if it were read aloud. Most instructors care about the analysis, not the identity of the organization, so a lightly disguised account of a real workplace usually serves the assignment well.
Where can I find a free MT260 Unit 3 sample paper?
The full MT260 Unit 3 role and structure paper is printed here. It maps eight unassigned roles at an independent bookstore, classifies them with Benne and Sheats's types and records what broke when the scheduler was away.
Which roles does the MT260 Unit 3 sample recommend keeping informal?
Carrying staff complaints to the owner and telling the owner no. Both work because they rest on personal trust, which a formal title might weaken, while scheduling and children's ordering should be written down.