| Course | MT203 Human Resource Management |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 2 |
| Paper type | Job analysis |
| Length | About 1,110 words, 7 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MT203 Unit 2
Keep the Pools Clean and the Customers Happy: A Unit 2 Job Analysis of the Pool Service Technician
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
MT203: Human Resource Management
Unit 2 Job Analysis
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Bluebonnet Pool Care, its technicians, routes and every figure are composite and illustrative; bracketed figures stand where the company's records would supply the numbers; the sources cited are real.
Method
Four sources fed the analysis. I rode along with [four] technicians for a full route day each in June: a newer technician in Arlington, two experienced technicians in Fort Worth and one in Keller who also covers repairs. I interviewed [three] technicians, two route supervisors and the dispatcher. I reviewed a year of customer callbacks, which the company logs when a customer reports a problem after a visit, and the current job posting, which lists a driver's license and "attention to detail" as its only requirements. Sanchez and Levine (2012) argued that the purpose of a job analysis should decide its method, and here the purpose is a description that can support hiring, training and pay decisions later in the course, so observation was weighted most heavily. Morgeson and Campion (1997) also warned that people describing their own jobs can inflate or simplify them for social reasons, such as wanting the job to sound skilled, and a ride-along shows what the technician actually does between pools.
Duty Areas and Share of the Day
The work falls into six duty areas. Driving between pools takes about [30] percent of the day, more on routes with spread-out customers. Water testing and chemical balancing takes about [25] percent: the technician tests chlorine, pH, alkalinity and, every month, stabilizer, then adds chemicals by calculation. Cleaning, which means skimming, brushing walls and vacuuming, takes about [25] percent. Equipment checks, such as emptying pump baskets, backwashing filters and reading pressure gauges, take about [10] percent. Customer communication, including notes left on the door, gate reports and the occasional conversation with a homeowner, takes about [5] percent. Loading and restocking the truck at the shop takes the remainder.
The smallest areas are not the least important. The callback log shows that most complaints trace to two small moments: a gate left unlatched and a note not left when a problem was found. A homeowner who comes home to an open gate does not care how well the walls were brushed.
Physical and Working Conditions
The physical demands were measured, not estimated. A pail of chlorine tablets weighs [50] pounds, and technicians lift it from the truck bed several times a day. A full five-gallon jug of liquid chlorine weighs about [53] pounds. Vacuum poles extend to sixteen feet and are worked overhead and at arm's length for ten to fifteen minutes per pool. Technicians kneel at equipment pads and climb in and out of pools to clear drains. In July the observed technicians worked in air temperatures above 100 degrees for most of the afternoon, with surfaces near the pool deck hotter still.
Chemical exposure is a working condition in its own right. Technicians handle chlorine, muriatic acid and other products that must never be mixed or stored together. One observed technician kept acid and chlorine in separate locked bins, as company policy requires. Another kept them side by side in an open crate, which he said was faster.
Knowledge, Skills and Abilities
Water chemistry is the core knowledge the job requires. A technician must read a test kit accurately and calculate how much of each chemical to add for a pool of a given volume. The experienced technicians did these calculations mentally in seconds; the newer technician used a phone app and still checked twice.
Judgment matters almost as much. On one observed day, a technician found a pump making a grinding noise. He shut it off, left a note explaining why and called the repair line, which prevented a burned motor. A less experienced technician might have let it run.
Two skills appear nowhere in the current posting: time management across a route of about [65] pools a week, and written communication short enough to fit on a door hanger.
The route itself demands planning that the owner's phrase hides. The experienced Fort Worth technician started each morning by reading the weather forecast and the previous week's notes, then reordered his stops so that pools with known algae problems came early, before the afternoon heat. He also kept a running list of customers who wanted a text before arrival. None of this is written anywhere, and the newer technician in Arlington did none of it, so his day ran in the order the dispatcher printed it.
Draft Job Description
The description below follows the format most HR texts recommend: a title and reporting line, a one-sentence summary, essential duties weighted by time, and requirements that can be defended because each one rests on an observation.
Title: Pool Service Technician. Reports to: Route Supervisor.
Summary: Maintains water quality, cleanliness and equipment function at about 60 to 70 residential pools each week on an assigned route, and communicates findings to customers and the office.
Essential duties, with approximate share of time: drives the route safely and on schedule (30 percent); tests water and adds chemicals by calculation (25 percent); skims, brushes and vacuums pools (25 percent); checks and maintains equipment and reports faults (10 percent); leaves written notes and secures gates at every visit (5 percent); loads and restocks the truck and stores chemicals according to policy (5 percent).
Requirements, each traced to the observations: ability to lift 50 pounds repeatedly, from the tablet pails; ability to work outdoors in heat above 100 degrees, from the July observations; working knowledge of pool water chemistry or completion of the company's certification course within [60] days, from the testing duties; a valid driver's license and clean driving record, from the driving share; and the ability to write clear short notes, from the callback log.
Two of the six duty areas fill a third of the day, and they produce most of the callbacks.
Using the Analysis
The analysis already suggests where later units should look. The gate and note duties belong in training and appraisal, since they cause complaints far out of proportion to their time. The chemical storage difference between technicians belongs in safety training. And the physical requirements belong in the posting, so applicants know before they apply what the job asks of their bodies in July. Dessler (2020) notes that job descriptions and specifications built from careful analysis support nearly every other HR activity, from recruiting to compensation, and this one is meant to serve all of them.
References
Dessler, G. (2020). Human resource management (16th ed.). Pearson.
Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (1997). Social and cognitive sources of potential inaccuracy in job analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 627-655. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.627
Sanchez, J. I., & Levine, E. L. (2012). The rise and fall of job analysis and the future of work analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 397-425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100401
What the MT203 Unit 2 assignment asks for
Unit 2 usually asks for a job analysis of one position, leading to a job description and specification. Most prompts want the method stated first: which sources you used, such as observation, interviews, records or questionnaires, and why. The duties should then be grouped and weighted, often by share of time or importance, and the physical and working conditions described. Knowledge, skills and abilities follow, each drawn from what the job actually requires. The analysis ends with a draft description and specification, where every requirement can be traced to the evidence. Many sections accept an analysis of your own job, with the employer's name removed. Composite figures are acceptable if labeled. Five pages is a common length, and graders expect Dessler or your assigned text plus at least one source on how job analysis is done, all in APA 7. Tables are common but not required.
How this MT203 Unit 2 example is built
The method section lists four sources and explains, with Sanchez and Levine, why observation was weighted most for a description meant to support later HR decisions. Morgeson and Campion's warning about incumbents inflating their own jobs justifies the ride-alongs. Six duty areas are then weighted by time, and a margin note marks the point that the smallest areas, gates and notes, cause most callbacks. Physical conditions are measured, including pails, jugs, sixteen-foot poles and heat, and two technicians' chemical storage habits are contrasted. A skills section covers water chemistry, judgment at a grinding pump and two skills missing from the posting. A further paragraph records the experienced technician's unwritten route planning. The draft description gives duties with time shares and requirements with their sources, and the closing section shows where training, appraisal and the posting should use the findings.
Where the points sit in the MT203 Unit 2 rubric
Job analyses are mostly graded on method and traceability. Stating the sources and explaining why they suit the purpose earns early credit. Weighting duties shows the writer knows the difference between time and importance, especially when a small duty carries large consequences, as the gate checks do here. Physical demands should be specific and measured, not described as moderate or heavy. Skills and abilities score higher when they are drawn from observed behavior. The draft description is where many marks sit, because each requirement must point back to something in the analysis; requirements with no evidence suggest padding or bias. A short section on how the analysis will be used shows awareness that job analysis supports other HR work. Citations to Sanchez and Levine, Morgeson and Campion and the Dessler text should follow APA 7 and support specific method choices.
MT203 Unit 2 help: mistakes that cost points
Job analyses commonly go wrong by copying a generic description from the internet and calling it an analysis. Another weakness is listing duties without any weighting, which hides what fills the day. Some papers describe physical demands vaguely or leave them out, which later causes problems in hiring and accommodation decisions. Others list requirements, such as a degree, that no observed duty supports. A method section that says only that the writer has done the job leaves graders unsure where the evidence came from. If you analyze your own job, ask a coworker to check your time estimates, since incumbents often misjudge them. Share the job and the access you have to observe it, and our writers can help you plan the method, weight the duties and draft a description whose requirements are each backed by evidence.
Get an MT203 Unit 2 example written to your instructions
Pick the role for the analysis, one held now or once, or the position the Unit 2 prompt names, and forward it with the rubric. Observation notes help if any exist. A job analysis with duty shares, measured demands and a draft description is returned in 24-48h, free the first time. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More MT203 papers and BS in Business Administration samples
- MT203 Unit 1: Discussion Board Post
- MT203 Unit 3: Recruitment Plan
- MT203 Unit 4: Selection Method Comparison
- MT203 Unit 5: Employment Law Brief
- MT203 Unit 6: Training Needs Assessment
- MT203 Unit 7: Performance Appraisal Exercise
- MT203 Unit 8: Compensation Analysis
- MT203 Unit 9: Seminar Reflection
- MT203 Unit 10: Human Resources Case Analysis
- MT202 Unit 2: Buyer Profile
- MT140 Unit 2: Management Functions Analysis
- MT106 Unit 2: Self-Assessment
- MT102 Unit 2: Retailer Profile
MT203 Unit 2 questions, answered
Can the analysis be of my own job?
Usually, and it often produces the sharpest paper, since you already know which tasks fill the day. The employer's name and anything identifying are best left out of what gets sent. The example's order suits most roles: why the analysis is needed, how evidence was gathered, duties by share of time, measured demands, the old description compared, and a new one drafted from the findings.
Where can I find a free MT203 Unit 2 sample paper?
This page holds a full MT203 Unit 2 job analysis of a pool service technician. It states the method, weights six duty areas, measures physical demands, drafts a description with traced requirements and includes three sources and margin notes.
Why ride along with technicians of different experience?
Because one technician hides part of the job. The newer technician showed which steps get skipped, and the experienced ones showed unwritten skills such as reordering stops by weather and algae history, which the posting never mentioned.
Are the percentages and weights in the sample real?
They are composite figures, placed in brackets to show which numbers illustrate the method. A real analysis would take them from timed ride-alongs and from weighing the actual pails and jugs on the truck.
Why does the analysis focus on gates and notes if they take so little time?
Because the callback log shows they cause most complaints. Weighting duties only by time would rank them last, while weighting by consequence puts them where training and appraisal need to look first.