One source passage paraphrased badly and then properly, cited correctly, followed by reasoned answers to short integrity scenarios: a complete MT106 Unit 7 academic integrity exercise. Searches like "mt 106 unit 7 assignment example", "mt106 unit 7 sample" and "mt106 unit 7 example" land here.
What a finished MT106 Unit 7 academic integrity exercise looks like
The exercise is a set of short, labeled parts rather than an essay. Part one reproduces a brief passage on job outlook from the federal occupational handbook, cited in full. Part two shows a patchwritten version, the original skeleton with a few words swapped, each borrowed phrase annotated. Part three gives a genuine paraphrase in new structure and vocabulary, with in-text citation, reference entry, and a sentence on why credit is still owed when no words were copied. Part four answers scenarios: resubmitting a paper from a previous course, splitting an individual assignment with a friend, lifting a salary figure from an uncited blog. Each answer names the principle and the right action. The last paragraph turns to business reporting, where one uncited figure can sink a proposal.
How a MT106 Unit 7 example is structured
Integrity exercises vary more than most units, because instructors design their own scenarios, but the example follows a sequence many sections share. The source comes first, quoted exactly with a complete citation, so every later part can be checked against it. The flawed paraphrase follows, with its problems annotated in line or in a short list: retained structure, retained phrasing, missing citation. The corrected paraphrase comes next with its in-text citation, and the matching reference entry is formatted beneath it. A quotation sometimes appears here too. The scenario section follows, each case restated briefly and answered in a few sentences covering the principle involved, the right action, and the consequence of the wrong one. A reflection paragraph, often required, closes the exercise by naming how sources will be tracked in later courses.
The source, exactly
A short passage from the occupational handbook quoted word for word with a complete reference entry, the fixed point every later part is checked against.
Patchwriting, annotated
A near-copy with swapped synonyms and the original skeleton intact, each borrowed phrase marked so the problem is shown rather than asserted.
A real paraphrase, cited
The idea restated in new structure and vocabulary, with in-text citation and reference entry, plus a line on why credit is still owed.
Scenarios with reasons
Reuse, collaboration and weak-source cases answered by naming the principle, the correct action and the consequence of the alternative.
A tracking habit
A closing note on how sources will be recorded from here on, such as a reference manager or a running bibliography file kept per course.
Where marks go in MT106 Unit 7
Points drain first from a paraphrase that is still patchwriting, the original sentence skeleton with synonyms dropped in, submitted as the corrected version. Instructors look for exactly this, and similarity reports catch it. Next is a paraphrase delivered without a citation, which misreads the core point: restating an idea in new words does not transfer ownership of it. Reference entries formatted inconsistently, missing a date, a retrieval source or correct capitalization, cost mechanics points in a unit devoted to precision. Scenario answers that give a verdict with no principle behind them earn little. So do answers that hedge every case into uncertainty. And a reflection promising more care in future, with no specific habit named, reads as filler in a course that keeps asking for evidence and plans.
Get a MT106 Unit 7 example written to your instructions
Include the source passage your section assigned, the scenarios exactly as written, the Unit 7 directions and the grading rubric. An example exercise worked to those materials is returned in 24-48h, and a first request is free. Citations follow whichever style your section names, APA unless told otherwise. Its flawed paraphrase is labeled as such.
MT106 Unit 7 questions, answered
What exactly is patchwriting?
It is the middle ground between copying and paraphrasing: keeping a source's sentence structure and much of its phrasing while swapping in synonyms. Even with a citation, many instructors treat it as plagiarism, because the expression still belongs to the original author. A real paraphrase changes structure and vocabulary together, and it still carries a citation because the idea is borrowed.
Does a paraphrase still need a citation?
Always. Changing the words does not change where the idea came from. A paraphrase needs an in-text citation and a matching reference entry, exactly as a quotation does, though without quotation marks. This is the point most often missed in this unit, and it matters for the rest of your program and in business writing afterward.
Is it acceptable to study a sample for an integrity unit?
Studying a model of correct paraphrase and citation is how the skill is usually learned, and reading one closely is ordinary preparation. What the unit tests is whether your own submission reflects your own work. Use the example to see patchwriting next to a real paraphrase, then produce yours from the passage your section actually assigned.