| Course | HR420 Workplace Law, Labor Relations, and HR Risk Management |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 5 |
| Paper type | Wage and hour review |
| Length | About 950 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Business Administration (Human Resources) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HR420 Unit 5
Same Title, Different Answer: A Unit 5 Wage and Hour Review of Two Salaried Managers
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
HR420: Workplace Law, Labor Relations, and HR Risk Management
Unit 5 Wage and Hour Review
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Wapsi Valley Car Wash, its staff and every figure are composite and illustrative; the regulations and case cited are real, and the review covers federal law only.
The Question
Wapsi Valley Car Wash pays its night closing managers and its detail shop managers a salary and does not pay them overtime. Both titles appear as managers on the chart. The question is whether each job meets the executive exemption under the Fair Labor Standards Act regulations.
The Task Log
For fourteen shifts, each manager logged tasks in quarter hours.
Night closing manager, Cedar Rapids North. About 80 percent of each shift was spent running the pay lane, guiding cars onto the conveyor, answering phones and closing the registers. About 15 percent went to directing the one attendant on shift and checking the tunnel at close. About 5 percent went to the closing report. Average shift: ten hours, five shifts a week. Salary: $850 a week.
Detail shop manager, Iowa City. About a third of the time was spent detailing cars on short-staffed days. The rest went to scheduling, inspecting finished cars, training new detailers and handling discipline for nine full-time detailers. She interviewed and recommended every detailer hired in the last year, and the general manager followed every recommendation. Salary: $960 a week.
The Elements in Order
The executive exemption requires all four of the following (General Rule for Executive Employees, 2024).
Salary basis and level. A predetermined salary not reduced for the quality or quantity of work, at or above the level currently enforced, $684 a week. Both managers pass.
Primary duty of management. Management of the business, or of a recognized department or subdivision within it, must be the employee's main job.
Customarily and regularly directing two or more full-time employees or their equivalent. That means at least eighty hours of subordinate work a week.
Authority to hire or fire, or recommendations given particular weight.
The Detail Shop Manager
Primary duty. The detail shop is a recognized department with its own staff, revenue and schedule. Although she spends about a third of her time detailing, an exempt executive may perform non-exempt work at the same time as management, as long as she remains responsible for the department while doing so (Concurrent Duties, 2024). She schedules, inspects and decides while she works. Her primary duty is management.
Directing two or more. Nine full-time detailers, about 360 hours of subordinate work a week. She passes easily.
Hiring weight. Her recommendations have been followed every time. She passes.
Conclusion. The detail shop manager meets the exemption.
The Night Closing Manager
Primary duty. Four-fifths of his shift is the same work the cashiers and attendants do. Running the pay lane is not managing it. His primary duty is arguably non-exempt work.
Directing two or more. He directs one attendant. Even if every hour of that attendant's ten-hour shift counts, five shifts give about fifty hours, short of the eighty required. He fails this element outright.
Hiring weight. He has never been asked for a hiring recommendation.
Conclusion. The night closing manager does not meet the exemption. Failing the headcount element alone is enough.
A manager title on an organization chart is not an exemption; the exemption is earned task by task, and the night closing manager's tasks are the cashier's.
Reading the Exemption Fairly
The Supreme Court has said that exemptions under the Act are to be given a fair reading, not a narrow one (Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, 2018). A fair reading does not save the night closing manager, because the failure is factual: one subordinate is not two.
The Overtime Exposure
Each night closing manager works about fifty hours a week. If the position is misclassified, the company owes overtime for about ten hours a week. The amount depends on how back pay is calculated.
Half-time method. Treating the $850 salary as covering all fifty hours gives a regular rate of $17. Half-time on ten hours is $85 a week, or about $8,840 per manager over two years.
Full premium on a forty-hour rate. Treating the salary as covering forty hours gives a regular rate of $21.25. Time and a half on ten hours is about $319 a week, or about $33,150 per manager over two years.
With nine night closing managers, the exposure ranges from about $80,000 to about $298,000 over two years, before any liquidated damages, which can double the amount, and longer recovery periods for willful violations.
Why the Two Jobs Drifted Apart
The two titles were created at the same time, when the chain opened its fourth site and wanted a manager on every shift. The detail shop grew into a real department with nine detailers and its own revenue. The night closing role did not grow: evening volume is light, so the company staffs one attendant and expects the manager to fill in everywhere else. The title stayed the same while the job became a cashier's job with keys. Reviews like this one should be repeated whenever staffing at a site changes, because the exemption can be lost without anyone changing a job description.
Recommendation
Reclassify the night closing manager position as non-exempt from the next pay period, with hourly pay set so that expected weekly earnings at fifty hours do not fall. Track hours from that date. Consult employment counsel on whether to calculate and pay back wages voluntarily. Keep the detail shop manager exempt, and document her duties and hiring recommendations annually.
References
Concurrent Duties, 29 C.F.R. § 541.106 (2024).
Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, 584 U.S. 79 (2018).
General Rule for Executive Employees, 29 C.F.R. § 541.100 (2024).
Reading the HR 420 Unit 5 instructions
Unit 5 of HR420 asks you to review whether salaried jobs meet a federal overtime exemption. State the question and the titles involved. Gather evidence of what each job actually involves, such as a task log, and summarize it. List the exemption's elements before applying them. Apply each element to each job in order, citing the regulation, and explain any rule that allows mixed duties. Conclude for each job, noting which element decides the result. Explain how exemptions are read. Estimate overtime exposure for any misclassified job, showing the methods and the range. Explain how the jobs came to differ. Recommend reclassification or documentation as needed. About four pages, with a task table summarizing the logged duties, is a common format for this wage and hour review in the course.
How this HR420 Unit 5 example is built
The sample summarizes fourteen logged shifts for each manager. All four elements appear before any is applied, and a margin note explains why one strong element cannot hide a failing one. The detail shop manager passes, with concurrent duties explaining why detailing does not defeat the exemption. The night closing manager fails the headcount element with one attendant, as the highlighted sentence explains. Encino Motorcars supports a fair reading that still does not save him. Exposure is calculated by two methods, from about $8,840 to $33,150 per manager, with a margin note on bracketing. A section explains how the titles drifted apart, and the recommendation reclassifies without cutting expected pay.
Reading the HR420 Unit 5 grading rubric
HR420 instructors grade the wage and hour review on evidence and correct application of the exemption. Duties should come from logged evidence, not titles. Listing every element before applying them shows method. Each element should be applied to each job, with the regulation cited. Explaining rules on concurrent duties shows depth. Identifying the decisive element makes each conclusion clear. Estimating exposure with shown methods and a range demonstrates practical judgment. Explaining how jobs changed over time shows insight into how misclassification happens. Recommendations should protect employees' expected pay. The exemption regulations and the Supreme Court's reading of them should be cited in APA 7 legal form, and the back-pay arithmetic should be shown line by line.
Common HR420 Unit 5 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Many HR420 wage and hour reviews decide exemptions from titles or salary alone. Others apply only the salary test and skip duties. Students often miss the requirement to direct two or more full-time employees or their equivalent. Mixed duties are treated as automatically disqualifying. Exposure is either ignored or given as a single number with no method. Gather duty evidence, list the elements, apply each to each job, explain concurrent duties, identify the decisive element, estimate exposure with methods, explain drift and recommend carefully. Send the logged duties for each title, and our team can help apply the exemption tests one element at a time.
Get an HR420 Unit 5 example written to your instructions
Send the job descriptions or duty facts the Unit 5 case provides, along with the rubric. Classification turns on those duties far more than on any title, so the sample applies each exemption element to exactly what the case describes. Delivery runs 24-48h, and a first review is free of charge. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More HR420 papers and BS in Business Administration (Human Resources) samples
- HR420 Unit 1: Discussion Board Post
- HR420 Unit 2: Employment Law Case Analysis
- HR420 Unit 3: Discrimination Claim Analysis
- HR420 Unit 4: Accommodation Process Memo
- HR420 Unit 6: Workplace Investigation Report
- HR420 Unit 7: Labor Relations Brief
- HR420 Unit 8: Seminar Reflection
- HR420 Unit 9: Supervisor Guidance Document
- HR420 Unit 10: Risk Management Plan
- HR410 Unit 5: Program Design Outline
- HR400 Unit 5: Selection Criteria Matrix
HR420 Unit 5 questions, answered
Could a state law change the answer?
Yes. Several states apply stricter exemption tests, higher salary levels or daily overtime rules, and an employer must meet whichever standard gives the employee more. The example keeps to federal law because the case names no state, and it flags the question in one line. If your scenario names a state, the analysis needs that state's rules alongside the federal ones.
Where can I find a free HR420 Unit 5 sample paper?
This page holds a full HR420 Unit 5 wage and hour review of two salaried car wash managers, applying the executive exemption to logged duties.
Why does the detail shop manager stay exempt if she details cars?
An exempt executive may do non-exempt work at the same time as managing, as long as she remains responsible for the department while doing it.
Why does directing one attendant fail the test?
The exemption requires customarily directing two or more full-time employees or their equivalent, about eighty subordinate hours a week. One attendant falls short.
Why give overtime exposure as a range?
Courts may calculate back pay for misclassified salaried workers in different ways, so showing both common methods gives a realistic bracket.