| Course | HD570 Health Education Leadership and Management |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 8 |
| Paper type | Resource proposal |
| Length | About 750 words, 5 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | MS in Health Education |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HD570 Unit 8
$92,160 Against $1.46 Million: A Unit 8 Resource Proposal Asking Health Plan Leadership for a Bilingual Educator and Two-Way Texting
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
HD570: Health Education Leadership and Management
Unit 8 Resource Proposal
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Ashcombe Health Plan, its withhold, measure rates and projections are composite; the text messaging, postpartum care and interpreter sources cited are real.
Proposal
To: Chief Operating Officer and Chief Quality Officer From: Manager, Health Education Re: Postpartum measure: request for $92,160 a year
Request. Fund one bilingual (Spanish and English) health educator at $81,920 a year including benefits, and expand the texting platform to two-way postpartum messaging in English and Spanish at $10,240 a year. Total: $92,160.
What is at stake. The state withholds a share of the plan's capitation and returns it based on quality results. About $1.46 million depends on the postpartum visit measure. The plan's rate is 67.3 percent; the target is 73.5 percent. With about 4,100 births a year among members, closing the 6.2-point gap means about 254 more mothers completing a timely postpartum visit.
What the money buys. The department now reaches about 45 percent of Spanish-speaking postpartum members, because only one educator speaks Spanish. A second bilingual educator would raise that to about 95 percent. In the plan's own data, members reached by outreach complete a postpartum visit at 74 percent, against 62 percent for members not reached. Applying that 12-point difference to about 700 additional Spanish-speaking members reached gives roughly 84 more visits. Two-way texting for all postpartum members, with reminders and a reply option to book, is estimated to add about 3 points across the plan, or roughly 123 visits; text reminders have been widely used to improve attendance in health services (Schwebel & Larimer, 2018). Together: about 207 visits, or about 5 points of the 6.2-point gap.
If the plan's withhold is returned in proportion to progress toward the target, closing even half the projected gain would return several times the cost of the request in the first year, and closing none of it would cost the plan far more than the request.
Return. If only half the projected gain is realized, about 2.5 points, the plan would recover roughly $590,000 of withhold, assuming proportional return. If the full projection holds, about $1.18 million. The request is $92,160.
Why it matters beyond the measure. Postpartum visits are the main opportunity to address conditions such as hypertension and depression after birth, and many mothers miss them (Tully et al., 2017). Roughly one member in three chooses Spanish for plan communications; outreach in their language is more effective than interpreted calls and reduces miscommunication (Karliner et al., 2007).
Risks. The projected effects come from the plan's own observational data, in which members who are reached may differ from those who are not, so the 12-point difference may overstate what outreach causes. Hiring may take three months, so the first year's gain will be smaller. Texting depends on accurate phone numbers, which about 15 percent of postpartum members lack.
Checkpoint. At six months, the department will report Spanish outreach coverage, text response rates and the postpartum measure's interim rate. If coverage has not reached 80 percent and the interim rate has not moved, leadership can end the texting expansion and reconsider the position at the next budget cycle.
What leadership is not asked to fund. A third component, a daily delivery notice from the plan's largest hospital, would let outreach start within days of birth instead of about five weeks. It requires no new money and is being negotiated separately.
Alternatives Considered
The department considered three cheaper options. Contracting a vendor for Spanish outreach calls would cost about the same per hour but without local knowledge or continuity, and vendors in the region have struggled with postpartum calls that require booking help. Using the interpreter line for all Spanish calls would cost about $44,650 a year in interpreter charges and still require English-speaking educators' time. Expanding texting alone, at $10,240, would help but would not reach members who need a conversation to book a visit. The proposal combines the most effective option with the least expensive, and each part can be ended separately if it does not perform.
Notes on the Proposal
The proposal leads with the request and keeps health arguments secondary because leadership decides budgets on the plan's obligations. It states its assumptions and offers a checkpoint so that leaders can approve it without betting the full amount on projections.
References
Karliner, L. S., Jacobs, E. A., Chen, A. H., & Mutha, S. (2007). Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Services Research, 42(2), 727-754. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00629.x
Schwebel, F. J., & Larimer, M. E. (2018). Using text message reminders in health care services: A narrative literature review. Internet Interventions, 13, 82-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2018.06.002
Tully, K. P., Stuebe, A. M., & Verbiest, S. B. (2017). The fourth trimester: A critical transition period with unmet maternal health needs. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 217(1), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.032
What the HD570 Unit 8 assignment asks for
Unit 8 typically asks students to write a proposal requesting resources from organizational leadership. Prompts commonly ask for the request, the problem it addresses, expected results, costs, risks and how success will be judged. Lead with the request and its cost. Connect it to something the organization is accountable for, such as a quality measure, a grant deliverable or a penalty. Show how the projected benefit was calculated and what assumptions it rests on. State risks plainly, including weaknesses in your own estimates. Offer a checkpoint so leaders can approve without committing to everything. Compare alternatives. Keep the proposal to a length leaders will read, often two to three pages. Attach detailed calculations rather than putting them in the body.
How this HD570 Unit 8 example is built
The proposal opens with the request: $81,920 for a bilingual educator and $10,240 for two-way texting. The stakes follow: a $1.46 million withhold, a 6.2-point gap and about 254 more visits needed. The calculation for each component is shown, from reach rates in the plan's own data to a projected 207 visits. The highlighted sentence states the upside and the downside. Returns at half and full projection, health and language arguments, risks including observational data, a checkpoint and a third component that needs no money follow. Alternatives considered and notes on framing close the proposal. Each component is priced separately so leaders can approve one without the other.
HD570 Unit 8 rubric: what earns full points
Resource proposals are assessed on clarity of the request, alignment with organizational accountability, transparency of projections, honest treatment of risk and practicality. A request stated first, with its cost, earns the most. Alignment rewards proposals that speak to obligations leaders already carry. Projections should show their arithmetic and assumptions. Risk sections score well when they include weaknesses in the proposal's own evidence. Practical features, such as a checkpoint or separable components, make approval easier and are valued by graders. Plain, businesslike prose and correct references account for the rest. Instructors also look for alternatives considered, since showing cheaper options were tested makes the request more credible.
Common HD570 Unit 8 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Students often lead with the health problem and leave the request and cost for the last page. Another weakness is a projection with no visible calculation. Some proposals ignore what the organization is accountable for and argue only from need. Others hide uncertainty, which can undermine trust once results arrive. Writing the request in one sentence, then asking what a skeptical finance officer would want to see, usually shapes a stronger proposal. If you are preparing a request in your own setting, share the obligation it serves and your figures, and a writer can help you frame the case. A checkpoint date lets leaders say yes with less risk.
Get an HD570 Unit 8 example written to your instructions
What does your organization reward: quality scores, cost, risk or reputation? Name it, add the resource your scenario needs and the HD570 Unit 8 prompt and rubric. A free first custom sample, drafted in 24-48h, argues the request in those terms, shows the arithmetic, and states what happens if leadership declines. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More HD570 papers and MS in Health Education samples
- HD570 Unit 1: Discussion Board Post
- HD570 Unit 2: Organizational Placement Analysis
- HD570 Unit 3: Budget Construction
- HD570 Unit 4: Budget Reduction Memo
- HD570 Unit 5: Staffing Plan
- HD570 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- HD570 Unit 7: Supervision and Performance Case
- HD570 Unit 9: Partnership Negotiation Plan
- HD570 Unit 10: Unit Strategic Plan
- HD560 Unit 8: Ethical Review Determination
- HD520 Unit 8: Data Analysis Section
- HD550 Unit 8: Testimony
- HD535 Unit 8: Objective and Indicator Set
HD570 Unit 8 questions, answered
What if my organization does not use quality withholds?
Use whatever it is accountable for. A hospital may answer to readmission penalties, a county health department to grant deliverables or accreditation, an employer to claims costs or absence. The structure stays the same: identify the obligation, compute what depends on it, and show how the request changes that figure. A withhold is simply the example's version of that obligation.
Is it acceptable to mention health outcomes at all?
Yes, as a supporting argument. Leadership in health organizations cares about outcomes, but decides budgets on the obligations it answers for. Lead with the organizational stake, then show that the same work benefits members. A proposal that puts health first and money nowhere tends to lose to requests that do the reverse, however strong its evidence.
How should the proposal handle uncertainty about results?
Openly. State the assumptions behind the projected gain, show what happens if only part of it arrives, and propose a checkpoint where the investment is reviewed. Leadership generally trusts a request that admits risk and offers a way to stop more than one promising certainty. Keep the arithmetic simple enough to verify during the meeting itself.
Where can I find a free HD570 Unit 8 sample paper?
A complete Unit 8 resource proposal is available on this page, asking a health plan for $92,160 to close a postpartum quality gap.
Should a resource proposal focus on health outcomes?
Use them as support, but lead with what the organization is accountable for, such as quality payments or penalties, since budgets are decided on those obligations.