| Course | HD570 Health Education Leadership and Management |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 5 |
| Paper type | Staffing plan |
| Length | About 840 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | MS in Health Education |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HD570 Unit 5
A Surplus in English, a Shortfall in Spanish: A Unit 5 Staffing Plan for a Health Plan's Health Education Department
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
HD570: Health Education Leadership and Management
Unit 5 Staffing Plan
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Ashcombe Health Plan, its staff, workload and hours are composite; the regulatory, interpreter and budgeting sources cited are real.
Supply
Six health educators deliver program work. Each holds a full-time position of 2,080 paid hours. From that, the plan subtracts 248 hours of leave and holidays, 40 hours of required training and 220 hours of department meetings and supervision, leaving 1,572 productive hours per educator. Six educators supply about 9,430 hours. The manager, materials specialist and coordinator are not counted as program capacity, since their time goes to supervision, production and administration.
Demand
Next year's work, after the Unit 4 changes end the newsletter and the open-enrollment classes, requires these hours:
Outreach calls and texts to pregnant and new mothers and to families due for well-child visits: 4,100 hours. Review of other departments' member notices: 1,520 hours. Department materials development: 900 hours. Remaining classes, prenatal series only: 600 hours. Health fairs: 400 hours. Educators' administrative tasks and documentation: 1,445 hours. Total: 8,965 hours.
Hours per task come from the October time log, the outreach call system's records of average call length and attempts per member, and last year's notice volume.
The Language Requirement
About a third of the plan's members prefer Spanish, and among pregnant members the share is higher. Federal rules require that plans provide member information in prevalent non-English languages and make oral interpretation available (Information Requirements, 2024). The department's Spanish-required hours by activity are: outreach, 1,720; notice review, 380; materials, 300; classes, 300; health fairs, 225. Total: 2,925 hours.
One health educator speaks Spanish fluently. Even if that person did only Spanish-language work, they could supply 1,572 hours. The shortfall is 1,353 Spanish hours.
The department has enough hours in total and not enough in the language a third of its work requires, and a staffing plan that reported only the total would send the department into the year promising work it cannot deliver.
Options
Option 1: use the telephone interpreter line. English-speaking educators would make Spanish outreach calls through an interpreter. Trained interpreters raise the quality of communication and care when patients speak limited English, according to a systematic review (Karliner et al., 2007), yet every interpreted call runs longer than a direct one. Using an estimate of 1.6 English-speaking educator hours per Spanish contact hour, covering 1,353 hours would require about 2,165 educator hours, far more than the 465-hour surplus. Interpreter charges would add about $44,650 a year. This option cannot close the gap.
Option 2: redeploy the bilingual educator entirely to Spanish work and move their English work to colleagues. This uses the surplus fully and still leaves a shortfall of about 1,350 Spanish hours.
Option 3: reduce Spanish-language commitments. Not acceptable; the notice review and outreach in Spanish are required or directly tied to the quality withhold.
Option 4: hire a second bilingual health educator. Cost: about $81,920 a year including benefits. This closes most of the gap, combined with Option 2.
Recommendation
Adopt Option 2 now and request Option 4 in the Unit 8 resource proposal. Until a second bilingual educator is hired, use the interpreter line for the highest-priority Spanish outreach, postpartum calls, and accept that some lower-priority Spanish work, such as health fair attendance, will be reduced. The department will tell other departments plainly that Spanish notice review may take longer.
Effect on Quality
Spanish-speaking postpartum members are the group the department currently reaches least. The outreach system shows that 45 percent of them received a completed call last year, compared with 78 percent of English-speaking members. Every Spanish hour the department cannot supply falls mostly on that group, and through it on the plan's postpartum measure. Closing the Spanish shortfall is therefore both a language access obligation and the department's most direct lever on the quality withhold.
How the Plan Will Be Communicated
Staff will see the plan before it goes to leadership. The bilingual educator's assignment will change most, and the manager will discuss the change, including workload limits and a plan to prevent burnout, before it is final. Other departments will be told in writing which Spanish services will be slower until a second bilingual educator is hired, with expected turnaround times for each.
Risks
If the one bilingual educator leaves, the department loses nearly all its Spanish capacity at once. That risk is the strongest argument for a second hire, and the plan names it as such. Naming single points of failure alongside totals is part of honest capacity planning, and personnel is by far the largest and least flexible cost in a department like this one (Finkler et al., 2019).
Review
The plan will be checked each quarter against actual hours logged by language. If Spanish demand differs from the estimate by more than ten percent, the plan will be revised and the change explained to staff.
References
Finkler, S. A., Smith, D. L., & Calabrese, T. D. (2019). Financial management for public, health, and not-for-profit organizations (6th ed.). CQ Press.
Information Requirements, 42 C.F.R. ยง 438.10 (2024). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-42/chapter-IV/subchapter-C/part-438/subpart-A/section-438.10
Karliner, L. S., Jacobs, E. A., Chen, A. H., & Mutha, S. (2007). Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Services Research, 42(2), 727-754. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00629.x
Reading the HD 570 Unit 5 instructions
Unit 5 usually asks students to estimate the staff time a unit's planned work requires and compare it with available capacity. Prompts often ask for workload by activity, productive hours per staff member, a comparison and options for closing any gap. Calculate productive hours by subtracting leave, holidays, training and meetings from paid hours, and state the figures. Estimate demand by activity from logs, records or benchmarks, and explain the source. Look beyond totals at skills, languages and certifications. Consider options before recommending one. Address risks such as a single person holding a critical skill. A plan of five to seven pages with a workload table is typical.
Inside the HD570 Unit 5 example
The plan sets supply at six educators with 1,572 productive hours each, about 9,430 hours, excluding the manager and support staff. Demand by activity follows, totaling 8,965 hours after the Unit 4 changes. The language section shows that 2,925 hours must be in Spanish, required by federal rules on member information, and that one bilingual educator can supply at most 1,572. The highlighted sentence explains why the total is misleading. Four options are weighed, including interpreter calls that would need more hours than the surplus provides. A section links the Spanish shortfall to postpartum outreach, followed by communication with staff, a recommendation, risks and a quarterly review.
HD570 Unit 5 rubric: what earns full points
Staffing plans tend to earn credit for transparent supply and demand figures, attention to skills as well as hours, sound comparison of options and a realistic recommendation. Supply calculations should show every deduction from paid hours. Demand estimates score well when their sources are named. Looking beyond totals to languages, licenses or other skills often separates strong plans from adequate ones. Options should be compared on cost, hours and feasibility. Naming single points of failure shows management judgment. Instructors also value plans that say how staff will be told about changes. A workload table and APA references supply the remaining credit. Plans that link a skills gap to the organization's quality or compliance obligations often make the strongest case.
HD570 Unit 5 help from the desk
Students often stop at totals and miss a skills shortfall hiding inside a surplus. Another weakness is counting paid hours as productive hours, which overstates capacity by a fifth or more. Some plans include the manager's time as program capacity. Others recommend a hire without testing cheaper options first. Breaking demand down by the skill each activity requires, such as language, quickly shows where the real gaps are. If you are planning staffing for your own unit, list the work, the hours and the skills it needs, and we will help you lay out the comparison. Tracking hours by language or skill each quarter keeps the plan honest.
Get an HD570 Unit 5 example written to your instructions
Partial volumes are enough. Pair whatever staffing and workload figures your scenario gives with the HD570 Unit 5 prompt and rubric, and the free first custom sample, built in 24-48h, derives productive hours, builds demand from volumes, splits it by skill and dates the fill for every gap it finds. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More HD570 papers and MS in Health Education samples
- HD570 Unit 1: Discussion Board Post
- HD570 Unit 2: Organizational Placement Analysis
- HD570 Unit 3: Budget Construction
- HD570 Unit 4: Budget Reduction Memo
- HD570 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- HD570 Unit 7: Supervision and Performance Case
- HD570 Unit 8: Resource Proposal to Leadership
- HD570 Unit 9: Partnership Negotiation Plan
- HD570 Unit 10: Unit Strategic Plan
- HD560 Unit 5: Measurement Plan
- HD520 Unit 5: Mixed Methods Protocol
- HD550 Unit 5: Coalition Map
- HD535 Unit 5: Logic Model
HD570 Unit 5 questions, answered
Where do hours per unit of work come from?
From a time study, historical logs, published benchmarks or a structured estimate from experienced staff, in roughly that order of preference. State which one you used for each row. A scenario assignment may supply them. Graders care less about the exact figure than about whether it has a source and whether the plan would change if the figure were wrong.
Should a staffing plan include the manager's time?
Usually not as program capacity, since a manager's hours go to supervision, budgets and the organization's meetings. Say so explicitly and show the manager outside the supply total. If your scenario expects the manager to carry some direct work, include that portion with a stated share, and note what management work it displaces.
What if the plan shows more staff than the work requires?
Report it. A surplus is a management finding, and hiding it undermines everything else in the plan. Check first that it is real, by splitting demand by skill, shift or location, as the example does with language. If the surplus survives that test, propose what to do with it, such as taking on promised work that is currently unstaffed.
Where can I find a free HD570 Unit 5 sample paper?
You can read a complete Unit 5 staffing plan here, finding a Spanish-language shortfall inside an overall surplus of hours.
What are productive hours?
Paid hours minus leave, holidays, training and meetings. They are the hours staff actually have for program work, usually well below 2,080 a year.