| Course | HD570 Health Education Leadership and Management |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 9 |
| Paper type | Partnership negotiation plan |
| Length | About 850 words, 6 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | MS in Health Education |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HD570 Unit 9
Learning of Births in Days, Not Five Weeks: A Unit 9 Partnership Negotiation Plan With a Composite Hospital
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
HD570: Health Education Leadership and Management
Unit 9 Partnership Negotiation Plan
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Ashcombe Health Plan, Corliss Regional Medical Center and all figures are composite; the negotiation, privacy and postpartum sources cited are real.
The Problem
The postpartum measure gives credit only for a visit made in a set window, roughly the second through twelfth week after birth. Ashcombe usually learns of a birth when the hospital's claim arrives, about 35 days later. Outreach then has about seven weeks left, and many mothers have already missed the early weeks when support matters most (Tully et al., 2017). A daily notice from Corliss, listing plan members who delivered the day before, would let outreach start in the first week.
Our Interests
Earlier knowledge of births, for the postpartum measure. A simple, secure file, not a complex integration. A relationship with Corliss that could extend to other notices later.
Corliss's Likely Interests
From conversations with Corliss's case management director and the hospital's public statements, Corliss is likely to care about: protecting patient privacy and avoiding legal risk; limiting work for its information technology team, which has a long queue; its own postpartum readmission rate, which affects its standing with payers; and being seen as a good partner by the plan that covers a large share of its births.
Negotiation guidance stresses focusing on interests rather than positions (Fisher et al., 2011). Corliss's position may be "we cannot share patient data." Its interest is avoiding risk and work.
Options That Serve Both
Privacy. Federal privacy rules allow disclosures between covered entities for certain treatment, payment and operations purposes, care coordination for patients they share among them (Uses and Disclosures to Carry Out Treatment, Payment, or Health Care Operations, 2024). The plan will offer a data use agreement drafted by its counsel, limited to member name, identifier, delivery date and discharge date.
Work. The plan will accept a daily file in any format Corliss already produces, such as an extract of its admission and discharge feed, delivered to a secure server. No custom build.
Benefit to Corliss. The plan will share back, monthly, which of Corliss's delivering members completed a postpartum visit, data the hospital cannot easily get. Health educators will also call members flagged by Corliss's case managers as high risk within 48 hours of discharge, which could help the hospital's readmission rate.
The request is easier to grant if the hospital can see what it gains, so the plan arrives offering monthly visit data and fast follow-up calls rather than asking only for a file.
Our Alternatives
If Corliss declines, the plan's best alternative is to use pharmacy and lab claims, which arrive faster than hospital claims, to identify some births earlier. This would cut the delay to about three weeks for some members. Knowing this alternative sets the limit of what the plan should give up to get the agreement.
Walk-Away Point
The plan will not accept a notice delayed by more than seven days, since that would add little to the pharmacy alternative. It will not pay for a custom build above $10,000. It will not agree to share member data with Corliss beyond what is needed for the monthly report.
Preparing the Team
Before the first meeting, the team will hold a one-hour rehearsal. The privacy officer will play Corliss's privacy officer and raise the strongest objections. The analyst will prepare a one-page summary of how many Corliss deliveries are plan members each month, about 147, and how many of those currently miss the postpartum window. The manager will practice the opening and the responses until they can be said without notes.
Measuring Success
If an agreement is reached, the plan will track, each month, the share of Corliss deliveries received within two days, the median days from delivery to first outreach contact and the postpartum visit rate among Corliss deliveries compared with other hospitals.
Who Negotiates
The health education manager leads, with the plan's privacy officer and a quality improvement analyst. Corliss's case management director is the likely counterpart, with its privacy officer and an information technology lead.
Opening and Responses
Opening: "We'd like to find a way to learn of our members' births within days, so our health educators can help them get postpartum visits. We know your IT team is stretched, so we're asking for something you may already produce, and we'd like to share our visit data back to you."
If Corliss raises privacy: offer the draft agreement and invite its counsel to review it. If Corliss raises IT capacity: ask what files already exist and accept the simplest. If Corliss asks for payment: explore a small pilot payment within the walk-away limit.
Timeline
First meeting in September, with a follow-up meeting two weeks later to answer questions raised in the first. Data use agreement drafted by October. Pilot file for one month in December. Full start in January, reviewed after three months.
References
Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (3rd ed.). Penguin Books.
Tully, K. P., Stuebe, A. M., & Verbiest, S. B. (2017). The fourth trimester: A critical transition period with unmet maternal health needs. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 217(1), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.032
Uses and Disclosures to Carry Out Treatment, Payment, or Health Care Operations, 45 C.F.R. ยง 164.506 (2024). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-C/part-164/subpart-E/section-164.506
The Purdue Global HD570 Unit 9 instructions
The ninth unit commonly asks students to prepare for a negotiation with a partner such as a hospital, agency or community organization. Prompts often ask for the goal, both parties' interests, options, alternatives, limits and an approach to the conversation. Separate interests from positions, as negotiation research recommends. Learn what the other side cares about from conversations and public sources. Design options that give the partner something of value. Know your best alternative if no agreement is reached, and set a walk-away point in advance. Address legal or privacy questions with accurate references. Plan who negotiates, how you will prepare and how success will be measured. Five to seven pages is typical. Plan a short rehearsal with a colleague playing the partner.
How this HD570 Unit 9 example is built
The plan opens with the problem: a measure window of a few weeks and births learned of about five weeks late. Ashcombe's interests and Corliss's likely interests follow, separating the hospital's position on data from its interest in avoiding risk and work. Options address privacy with a narrow data agreement, workload with any existing file format and value with monthly visit data and fast calls for high-risk members. The highlighted sentence states the strategy. The plan's alternative using pharmacy and lab claims sets the walk-away point. Team preparation, measures of success, roles, an opening statement with responses and a timeline close the plan.
HD570 Unit 9 rubric: what earns full points
Negotiation plans are judged on understanding of both parties' interests, creativity of options, realism about alternatives and limits, accuracy on legal points and preparation. Interests earn credit when the partner's are described from evidence, not assumption. Options score well when they give the partner something it values. Alternatives and walk-away points should be specific and set in advance. Accurate treatment of privacy rules matters in health settings. Preparation, including rehearsal and a clear opening, shows readiness. Measures of success after an agreement are valued. A tidy layout and APA references close out the marking. Plans that describe how the team will rehearse, and how success will be tracked after an agreement, often stand out.
HD570 Unit 9 help: mistakes that cost points
Plans often stumble by setting out only one side's wants. Another is no walk-away point, which leaves negotiators exposed to conceding too much. Some plans treat privacy as an absolute barrier when the law permits certain sharing with safeguards. Others write a full script, which can make negotiators rigid. Asking what would make the request easy for the partner to grant usually produces the best options. If you are planning a negotiation of your own, describe both organizations and what each might want, and a writer can help you prepare interests, options and limits. Setting the walk-away point before the meeting protects against conceding too much under pressure.
Get an HD570 Unit 9 example written to your instructions
Negotiation plans turn on the counterpart, so name the counterpart facing you in your HD570 scenario and what you need from them. With the Unit 9 prompt and rubric attached, expect a free first custom sample inside 24-48h: interests mapped for each party, both sides' alternatives estimated, concessions ranked, a walk-away point stated. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More HD570 papers and MS in Health Education samples
- HD570 Unit 1: Discussion Board Post
- HD570 Unit 2: Organizational Placement Analysis
- HD570 Unit 3: Budget Construction
- HD570 Unit 4: Budget Reduction Memo
- HD570 Unit 5: Staffing Plan
- HD570 Unit 6: Seminar Reflection
- HD570 Unit 7: Supervision and Performance Case
- HD570 Unit 8: Resource Proposal
- HD570 Unit 10: Unit Strategic Plan
- HD560 Unit 9: Reporting Strategy
- HD520 Unit 9: Limitations Analysis
- HD550 Unit 9: Media and Timing Strategy
- HD535 Unit 9: Resource and Timeline Plan
HD570 Unit 9 questions, answered
Does the counterpart have to be a real organization?
A composite based on a real type of partner is normal and usually safer. What matters is that the counterpart's interests are realistic: a hospital, school district or employer has constraints you can describe from experience or reading. Avoid naming real individuals, and keep any confidential details from your workplace out of the plan.
What is a walk-away point in a partnership negotiation?
The least favorable agreement you would still accept, set before the meeting so you do not concede past it under pressure. It should follow from your alternative: if a deal is worse than what you can achieve without one, walk away. In the example, a delivery file arriving after 72 hours stops being worth its cost.
Should the plan include a script?
An opening statement and a few prepared responses help, but a full script tends to read as rigid. Most rubrics reward preparation of interests, options and alternatives over rehearsed lines. Where your prompt asks for dialogue, keep it short and show how it responds to the counterpart's likely objections rather than delivering a speech.
Where can I find a free HD570 Unit 9 sample paper?
You can read a complete Unit 9 partnership negotiation plan here, seeking a daily delivery notice from a composite hospital.
How do positions differ from interests in a negotiation?
A position is the stated demand or refusal; an interest is the concern that produces it. A hospital's refusal to share data may rest on interests in avoiding risk and workload.