HA410 Unit 3 Adaptive Leadership Theory Paper Example

Reviewed by Chester Goodwin, MBA Health Care Leadership Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This HA410 Unit 3 theory application paper reads a stalled change on a composite postpartum unit through Heifetz's adaptive leadership. It was written for Purdue Global HA 410, Health Care Leadership, in the BS in Health Care Administration. Eight months after the unit adopted round-the-clock rooming-in, day audits show 92 percent compliance and night audits at 0200 show 41 percent. A script, a training module and posted audit figures each lifted the night rate for about two weeks. The paper tests those fixes against the technical and adaptive distinction, follows the manager onto the balcony for five nights and finds what the old nursery routine protected for mothers, babies and nurses.

CourseHA410 Health Care Leadership
UnitUnit 3
Paper typeTheory application paper
LengthAbout 1,120 words, 7 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramBS in Health Care Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for HA410 Unit 3

1

The Nursery Light Still On at Two in the Morning: A Theory Application Paper Reading a Stalled Rooming-In Policy on a Composite Postpartum Unit Through Adaptive Leadership and Finding What the Old Night Routine Protected

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

HA410: Health Care Leadership

Unit 3 Theory Application Paper

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The unit, the audit figures and the staff are composite and bracketed; the clinical points are simplified for a leadership paper and are not practice guidance.

What this part is doingThe case comes first and the model second, so the theory is used to explain the situation rather than the situation being used to illustrate the theory.
2

The Case

A composite [28]-bed postpartum unit in a [300]-bed hospital adopted a policy [eight] months ago that healthy newborns stay in the mother's room around the clock unless there is a medical reason or the mother requests otherwise after being informed. Day audits show rooming-in for [92] percent of healthy newborns. Night audits, taken at 0200, show [41] percent. The unit tried three fixes. A laminated script for discussing the nursery with mothers lifted the night figure to [58] percent for two weeks. A training module on the benefits of rooming-in lifted it to [55] percent for about the same time. Weekly posting of audit figures by shift produced a brief rise and some resentment on nights. Each time, the figure drifted back.

Technical and Adaptive Work

Heifetz and colleagues separate two kinds of work (Heifetz et al., 2009). Some problems have known answers that someone in authority can apply. Others can be resolved only when the people involved shift their own priorities, habits or loyalties, a process they feel as a loss, and these the authors call adaptive. A technical fix applied to an adaptive challenge tends to produce a short improvement and then a return to the old pattern. All three fixes treated the problem as technical: nurses lacked the right words, the right knowledge or the right feedback. The two-week pattern suggests otherwise. Night nurses already knew the benefits; most could recite them. Something else was holding the old routine in place. Each fix taught night nurses something they already knew, and none asked what they would lose by changing.

Getting on the Balcony

Adaptive leadership asks a leader to step back from the action and watch the pattern, which the authors call getting on the balcony. The nurse manager spent [five] nights on the unit between 2300 and 0400 without auditing, simply observing. What she saw:

1. Most nursery transfers happened after a mother said she was exhausted, often after a long labor or a cesarean birth.

2. Nurses offered the nursery before the mother asked, usually with kind intent: "Why don't I take her so you can sleep?"

3. Two nurses described near misses in which a mother fell asleep while holding her baby in bed.

4. With [six] mother-baby pairs each, night nurses felt they could not check on every room often enough to feel safe.

What the Old Routine Protected

The nursery at night was protecting three things. For mothers, it protected sleep after an exhausting birth. For babies, in the nurses' view, it protected against falls and unsafe sleep in an adult bed, a real risk that guidance on newborn care explicitly addresses (Feldman-Winter et al., 2016). For nurses, it protected their identity as caregivers who look after exhausted mothers, and their sense of control on a busy night. Rooming-in asked night nurses to give up all three without offering anything in return. The day shift, with more staff and awake mothers, lost almost nothing, which explains the difference between day and night audits.

What this part is doingNaming what each group would lose explains why the stall happened on nights and not on days, which a technical reading could not explain.
3

The Evidence Nurses Know

Rooming-in is associated with longer breastfeeding in some studies, though the evidence is limited in quality (Jaafar et al., 2016). Nurses on this unit were not unaware of the benefits; several said in interviews that they support rooming-in "in principle." The disagreement is not about whether rooming-in is good but about whether it is safe and kind at two in the morning with six pairs.

Regulating the Distress

Adaptive work requires keeping people in a productive range of discomfort: enough pressure to change, not so much that they resist or shut down. The weekly audit postings raised distress without offering any way to address the real concerns, which is why they produced resentment. The manager will lower the pressure from postings and raise the conversation about safety. Audit results will be shared privately with each shift rather than posted, and a night staff meeting will begin with the question, "What would make rooming-in safe for you at two in the morning?"

Giving the Work Back

Adaptive leadership holds that the people with the problem must do the work. The manager will not design the solution herself. Instead, night nurses will form a small group to test changes for [six] weeks. Likely candidates, raised in the first meeting:

1. A safe sleep check on every hourly round, with a bassinet placed at the bedside before the mother falls asleep.

2. A short conversation with each mother in the evening about how she will rest, so the nursery is not offered at 0200 by default.

3. A partner or support person encouraged to stay overnight to help.

4. A lower ratio on nights with several cesarean births, negotiated with the director.

5. The nursery kept available on request, with the mother's informed choice documented.

Protecting the Voices of Dissent

What this part is doingTreating critics as sources of information is one of the model's moves, and the paper applies it to named roles in the case.
4

Two senior night nurses have been the most open critics of the policy. Adaptive leadership treats dissenters as sources of information about what the change threatens. The manager will invite both to the group, where their concerns about falls and fatigue can shape the safeguards.

Measures

The group will track night rooming-in rates, near misses involving infants in adult beds, mothers' satisfaction with rest and nurse-reported safety. If near misses rise, the group will adjust before pushing the rate higher.

Limits of the Model

Adaptive leadership offers a way to see the problem but not a quick solution. It depends on time, trust and a manager willing to tolerate a slower climb. Staffing, a technical resource, may still be needed; the model does not replace a ratio conversation.

What a Technical Leader Would Have Done Next

A fourth technical fix was already being planned: a requirement that nurses document a reason for every night nursery transfer. It would likely have produced another two-week rise and further resentment, because it would have added paperwork to the same unresolved concerns.

Conclusion

The stall was not a knowledge problem. Night nurses were protecting mothers' rest, infants' safety and their own sense of good care. Reading the case through adaptive leadership turns the next step from another script into a conversation about loss and safety, led by the people who work the night shift.

5

References

Feldman-Winter, L., Goldsmith, J. P., Committee on Fetus and Newborn, & Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. (2016). Safe sleep and skin-to-skin care in the neonatal period for healthy term newborns. Pediatrics, 138(3), Article e20161889. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1889

Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard Business Press.

Jaafar, S. H., Ho, J. J., & Lee, K. S. (2016). Rooming-in for new mother and infant versus separate care for increasing the duration of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(8), Article CD006641. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006641.pub3

HA410 Unit 3 instructions, in plain terms

Unit 3 commonly asks students to apply a leadership theory to a real or composite workplace situation. Instructions usually require a description of the case, an explanation of the theory with its source, a detailed application to the facts, recommendations that follow from the theory and a discussion of its limits. Many instructors want the theory applied in stages rather than summarized. Expect to cite the theory's primary source and research on the clinical or operational issue in APA style, with the setting composite. Choosing a case that the theory can explain better than common sense, such as a change that keeps slipping back, gives the analysis room to show what the theory adds.

How the HA 410 Unit 3 example is put together

The sample opens with the case and its audit figures, then three failed fixes, with a margin note on putting the case before the model. A section explains technical and adaptive work and tests each fix, and the highlighted sentence says none asked what nurses would lose. The manager's five nights of observation follow. A section names what the old routine protected, citing guidance on newborn sleep safety, with a margin note. Sections cite evidence on rooming-in, then apply regulating distress, giving the work back and protecting dissent, with a third note. Measures, limits, the technical fix avoided and a conclusion close the paper.

Where the points sit in the HA410 Unit 3 rubric

Theory application rubrics in HA 410 tend to award points for describing the case, explaining the theory, applying it in depth, deriving recommendations, discussing limits, citing sources and organizing clearly. Case points depend on specific facts and figures. Theory points depend on stating the model correctly and naming its authors. Application points reward using several concepts from the theory against the facts, not just naming them. Recommendation points require actions that follow from the analysis. Limit points go to what the theory cannot do. Source points need the primary source and topic research. Papers that explain a pattern common sense could not, such as day and night differences, often earn the strongest marks.

Common HA410 Unit 3 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Theory papers often lose points by summarizing the model for two pages and then applying it in a paragraph. Another gap is choosing a case that any approach could explain, so the theory adds nothing. Some papers recommend actions that do not come from the theory. Others ignore what the model cannot do. Lead with the case, introduce the theory briefly and apply its concepts one at a time to specific facts. Then derive each recommendation from a concept and name a limit. If staff resist a change, ask what the old way protected for them; that question often turns a technical reading into an adaptive one, and it gives you material the theory can work with.

Get an HA410 Unit 3 example written to your instructions

A practice your unit keeps sliding back from is the material here; describe it, what has been tried, and the model your Unit 3 reading assigns, then attach the prompt and rubric. The paper applies that model in stages within 24-48h, with no charge for a first sample and your audit figures bracketed until you supply them. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More HA410 papers and BS in Health Care Administration samples

HA410 Unit 3 questions, answered

Where can I find a free HA410 Unit 3 sample paper?

The complete HA410 Unit 3 theory application paper is available here, reading a stalled rooming-in policy on a composite postpartum unit through adaptive leadership, with three sources. You can apply a theory to your own stalled change the same way.

How does the HA410 Unit 3 paper sort technical from adaptive work?

Technical problems have known solutions that authority can apply; adaptive challenges require people to change values or habits and feel like a loss.

What does getting on the balcony mean?

Stepping back from the action to observe patterns, such as a manager watching night shifts without auditing them.

Why do quick fixes fail for adaptive problems?

They address skills or knowledge people already have and leave untouched the losses that keep the old habit in place.

How long is the HA410 Unit 3 paper?

Usually about five pages, organized as a case followed by a staged application of the theory.