GM599 Unit 10 Final Capstone Paper Example

Reviewed by Chester Goodwin, MBA Applied Research Project Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This GM599 Unit 10 final capstone paper answers a transit agency director's question on its first page: eligible operators stopped applying because promotion now costs them pay and seniority. Purdue Global GM 599, Applied Research Project, ends its MS in Management capstone with one continuous paper built from the term's work. An executive summary gives the finding and three costed actions totaling about $160,900 a year. Chapters cover the problem, the literature on pay compression, seniority and new managers, the sequential method, findings from records, 63 survey responses and twelve interviews, and the recommendations. Next steps for the director, a note on other agencies, four limitations and appendices close it, with figures consistent throughout.

CourseGM599 Applied Research Project
UnitUnit 10
Paper typeFinal capstone paper
LengthAbout 1,110 words, 7 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramMS in Management
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for GM599 Unit 10

1

Why Wexmoor's Operators Stopped Applying and What Would Bring Them Back: A Unit 10 Final Capstone Paper

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

GM599: Applied Research Project

Unit 10 Final Capstone Paper

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

Wexmoor Regional Transit, its staff, the respondents and every figure are composite and illustrative; the sources cited are real.

What this part is doingAnswering the reader's question on the first page shows the paper is written for a decision maker, not only for a grader.
2

Executive Summary

Since 2023, road supervisor postings at Wexmoor Regional Transit have drawn an average of 1.9 internal applicants, down from 7.4, and nine of fourteen were filled from outside. Records, a survey of eligible operators and twelve interviews show why. For the most experienced operators, promotion now means a pay cut, because top-quartile operators earn about $88,300 with overtime while the supervisor midpoint is $79,500. It also means losing seniority, with no way back except to the bottom of the list. Seventy percent of survey respondents named pay, and nearly half named seniority.

Three actions are recommended, in this order: a side letter with the union giving promoted operators twelve months to return with seniority intact, at about 60 hours of staff time; paid shadow shifts for up to twenty operators a year, at about $15,100; and a supervisor salary floor of $91,000, at about $145,800 a year. Recurring cost totals about $160,900.

The Problem

Wexmoor runs bus service from three garages with 312 full-time operators and 24 road supervisor posts, whose holders watch service, respond to incidents and support operators on the street. Until 2023, most were promoted from the operator ranks, and they brought knowledge of routes and garages that outside hires must learn. Vacancies now last a median of 97 days, against 41 before. Timothy Ellis and Yair Levy describe a research-worthy problem as one with evidence that it exists and that it matters (Ellis & Levy, 2008); the posting records supply both.

What the Literature Suggests

Three explanations from the literature framed the study. Pay compression, in which lower-level hourly workers earn as much as or more than salaried supervisors, is a known cause of reluctance to accept promotion (Milkovich et al., 2020). In union work groups, seniority carries heavy weight, so leaving the seniority list is a cost that grows with tenure (Abraham & Medoff, 1985). And new managers often struggle with the shift from peer to supervisor (Hill, 2007).

Method

The study used a sequential explanatory mixed methods design, collecting quantitative data first and qualitative data afterward to explain it (Ivankova et al., 2006). Posting records from 2019 and banded payroll figures came first. A census survey of the 141 operators eligible for promotion followed, with 14 items and no question that, combined with others, could identify a respondent. Twelve interviews came last: nine operators, three per garage, and three supervisors promoted from within. Interviews were coded using thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006). Permissions came from the general manager, human resources, payroll and the union local, which announced the survey but did not endorse it.

Findings

Records. Internal applicants per posting fell from 7.4 to 1.9. Withdrawals rose from 9 of 118 applications to 8 of 27. Two of seventeen operators promoted between 2019 and 2022 returned to driving within six months, both to the bottom of the seniority list.

Survey. Sixty-three of 141 operators responded, 44.7 percent, with tenure bands close to the population's. Forty-four, 70 percent, named pay loss; 31 named losing seniority and run picks; 22 named supervising former coworkers; 6 named the job's difficulty. In the highest earnings band, pay was named by 19 of 21.

Interviews. Seven of nine operators described calculating what promotion would cost them. Both operators who had withdrawn did so after learning the seniority rule from a coworker. Every one of the three promoted supervisors called the early months lonely.

Pay made operators stop considering promotion, seniority kept them from taking the chance, and overseeing old coworkers was a price they could live with once those two were fixed.

What this part is doingThe highlighted sentence integrates the three sources into one explanation of the decision.
3

Integrated. The three sources agree. Money comes first, the seniority rule second, and the discomfort of overseeing old coworkers trails both. Training and garage differences, both suggested informally by managers, did not appear.

Recommendations

A return right, first. A side letter giving promoted operators twelve months to return with seniority intact, plus a sentence on every posting explaining the rule. About 60 hours of staff time, owned by the labor relations manager, starting within two months. Measure: withdrawals after application.

Shadow shifts, second. Up to twenty operators a year would each get sixteen paid hours riding along with a supervisor, about $15,100 a year, owned by the training superintendent. Measure: participants who later apply.

A salary floor, third. A road supervisor floor of $91,000, raising fifteen current supervisors at about $145,800 a year with benefits, owned by the human resources and finance directors, in the next budget year. It will be judged by whether internal applications per posting climb back to five or more within a year and a half.

Eric Barends and Denise Rousseau recommend measuring the effects of evidence-based changes and adjusting them as results arrive (Barends & Rousseau, 2018). The human resources director will report the three measures every six months.

What the Director Should Do Next

Three steps would put the recommendations in motion within a month. Ask the labor relations manager to place the return right on the agenda of the next labor-management meeting. Ask human resources to add the seniority sentence to the next supervisor posting, which costs nothing. And ask the finance director to cost the salary floor for the coming budget, using this paper's figures as a starting point. The shadow shifts can begin with the next service period once the training superintendent schedules them.

Beyond Wexmoor

Other transit agencies with overtime-heavy operator pay and union seniority lists may face the same pattern, since the national workforce shortage makes outside supervisor hiring harder everywhere. This study cannot show that, but the method, records first, a short census survey and a few interviews, could be repeated at another agency in a single quarter.

Limitations

Four limitations matter most. Because only Wexmoor was studied, other agencies should treat the results as a lead, not a rule. The survey's 44.7 percent response rate leaves more than half of eligible operators unheard. The writer works at the agency, which provided access but may have shaped what operators chose to say and how the writer read it, as Teresa Brannick and David Coghlan note insiders must acknowledge (Brannick & Coghlan, 2007). And reasons are self-reported, so operators may have named the reasons easiest to state.

Appendices

The appendices hold the survey instrument, the interview consent script, the codebook, the three permission emails and the year-by-year posting counts.

What this part is doingClosing with the appendices shows every figure in the paper can be traced to its source.
4

References

Abraham, K. G., & Medoff, J. L. (1985). Length of service and promotions in union and nonunion work groups. ILR Review, 38(3), 408-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979398503800307

Barends, E., & Rousseau, D. M. (2018). Evidence-based management: How to use evidence to make better organizational decisions. Kogan Page.

Brannick, T., & Coghlan, D. (2007). In defense of being "native": The case for insider academic research. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106289253

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Ellis, T. J., & Levy, Y. (2008). Framework of problem-based research: A guide for novice researchers on the development of a research-worthy problem. Informing Science, 11, 17-33. https://doi.org/10.28945/438

Hill, L. A. (2007). Becoming the boss. Harvard Business Review, 85(1), 48-56.

Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260

Milkovich, G. T., Newman, J. M., & Gerhart, B. (2020). Compensation (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

What the GM599 Unit 10 assignment asks for

The final GM599 unit asks you to assemble your capstone into one paper for its decision maker. Open with an executive summary that answers the question and gives the recommendations with their costs, written so it could be forwarded unchanged. Then present the problem, the literature, the method, the findings and the recommendations as chapters in one voice, rewriting earlier units rather than pasting them. Make every figure agree across chapters. Add the immediate next steps the decision maker could take. Say what, if anything, the study suggests beyond your organization, and how far that can be trusted. State the limitations that matter most. List the appendices that hold the instruments, permissions and data. Expect about twenty pages in APA format, with references at the end.

How the GM 599 Unit 10 example is put together

The executive summary states the fall from 7.4 to 1.9 applicants, the $88,300 and $79,500 figures, 70 percent naming pay and three actions totaling about $160,900. The problem chapter cites Ellis and Levy. The literature chapter cites Milkovich and colleagues, Abraham and Medoff and Hill. The method chapter cites Ivankova and colleagues and Braun and Clarke. Findings report records, the 44.7 percent survey response, reasons by band and interview themes, and the highlighted sentence integrates them. Recommendations give the return right, shadow shifts and salary floor with owners and measures, citing Barends and Rousseau. A next steps section lists three requests the director can make within a month, a short section notes the method could be repeated elsewhere, four limitations cite Brannick and Coghlan on insider position, and appendices list the survey, consent script, codebook, permissions and posting counts.

Reading the GM599 Unit 10 grading rubric

GM599 instructors grade the final paper on whether it answers the decision maker's question clearly and holds together as one document. An executive summary that could be forwarded unchanged earns significant credit. Chapters should be rewritten into one voice, with cross-references and consistent figures. Each chapter should do its job without repeating the others. Findings should be integrated, and recommendations should be traceable to them. Next steps for the decision maker show practical value. Limitations should be the ones that matter most, stated plainly. Appendices should hold the evidence a reader may want. Ellis and Levy, Milkovich, Newman and Gerhart, Abraham and Medoff, Hill, Ivankova, Creswell and Stick, Braun and Clarke, Barends and Rousseau and Brannick and Coghlan form the references in APA 7.

GM599 Unit 10 help from the desk

Many GM599 Unit 10 papers paste earlier units together, so the voice shifts and figures disagree between chapters. Others bury the answer to the decision maker's question in the middle of the paper. A common gap is consistency: a response rate, a cost or a count that changes between chapters undermines trust in all of them. Some writers pile up limitations of every kind instead of naming the few that change how the findings should be read. Answer the question on page one, rewrite each chapter into one voice, check every figure against every other, add next steps, state the limits that matter and list the appendices.

Get a GM599 Unit 10 example written to your instructions

Pull together your earlier unit work, your final data and the capstone paper instructions and rubric, noting who your sponsor is. The paper you receive is rewritten into one voice with the answer first, chapters that reference each other, consistent figures and appendices for verification. No fee applies to a first request, and delivery takes 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More GM599 papers and MS in Management samples

GM599 Unit 10 questions, answered

How much of my earlier work can go into the final paper?

Most of the substance, rewritten. Earlier units supply the problem statement, literature, method and findings, but each was written as a standalone piece. The final paper needs one voice, forward and backward references between chapters and figures updated to their final values. Pasting sections unchanged usually shows.

Should the paper include a presentation?

Only if your section requires one, and many do in the final unit, often as recorded slides with notes. When it does, the presentation usually follows the executive summary: finding, recommendations, costs and the test of success. The paper itself stays the full record, with the presentation as a shorter version for the sponsor's meeting.

What if my sponsor disagrees with the findings?

Report the findings as the evidence shows them and note the sponsor's view, if appropriate, in the discussion. A capstone paper is judged on whether conclusions follow from data, not on whether the organization likes them. The page's recommendations are framed as options with costs, which leaves the decision where it belongs.

Where can I find a free GM599 Unit 10 sample paper?

This page carries a full GM599 Unit 10 final capstone paper written for a transit agency's director of operations, with an executive summary, integrated chapters, costed recommendations and APA 7 references.

What should the director do first?

Put the return right on the next labor-management agenda, have human resources add the seniority rule to the next supervisor posting at no cost and ask finance to cost the salary floor for the coming budget.