GM599 Unit 1 Capstone Topic Proposal Example

Reviewed by Chester Goodwin, MBA Applied Research Project Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This GM599 Unit 1 topic proposal chooses a capstone question at a composite regional bus agency because its evidence is within reach. Purdue Global GM 599, Applied Research Project, opens the MS in Management capstone by asking students to propose a researchable workplace problem. A scheduling analyst at Wexmoor Regional Transit asks why eligible operators at three garages have mostly stopped applying for road supervisor postings since 2023. Sixteen postings from 2019 to 2022 averaged 7.4 internal applicants; fourteen since have averaged 1.9, and nine went to outside hires. Fare evasion and absenteeism were considered and dropped for access reasons. The proposal maps five sources to the people who control them and names the supervisor pay review the findings could inform.

CourseGM599 Applied Research Project
UnitUnit 1
Paper typeTopic proposal
LengthAbout 860 words, 6 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramMS in Management
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for GM599 Unit 1

1

Why Operators Stopped Applying: A Unit 1 Capstone Topic Proposal at a Regional Transit Agency

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

GM599: Applied Research Project

Unit 1 Topic Proposal

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

Wexmoor Regional Transit, its staff and every figure are composite and illustrative; the sources cited are real.

What this part is doingChoosing the topic by access to evidence in the lead signals that the proposal is built for a project that can actually be finished.
2

The Question

Why have eligible bus operators at Wexmoor Regional Transit's three garages largely stopped applying for road supervisor postings since 2023?

Why This Question

Road supervisors work on the street. They monitor service, respond to incidents, relieve late buses and support operators when something goes wrong on a route. Wexmoor has 24 road supervisor positions, and for years most were filled by promoting experienced operators, who already knew the routes, the riders and the garages.

That pattern has changed. The agency's posting history shows that sixteen road supervisor postings between 2019 and 2022 drew an average of 7.4 internal applicants each. The fourteen postings since the start of 2023 have drawn an average of 1.9, and nine of those fourteen were filled from outside the agency. A supervisor hired from outside must learn the routes that a promoted operator already knows, and the agency's operations staff say incidents are handled more slowly while new supervisors learn.

Timothy Ellis and Yair Levy argue that a research-worthy problem should be grounded in evidence that the problem exists and matters, not in the researcher's interest alone (Ellis & Levy, 2008). The drop from 7.4 applicants to 1.9 is that evidence.

A drop from 7.4 internal applicants per posting to 1.9 is a measurable change with a likely set of causes, and the people who know those causes work in the same building as the writer.

What this part is doingThe highlighted sentence states the two reasons the topic was chosen: a measured symptom and reachable evidence.
3

Two Topics Considered and Dropped

Fare evasion on Route 14. Operators report frequent fare evasion on the agency's busiest crosstown route. The topic was dropped because the only reliable data, the fare box and automatic passenger counter records, are controlled by a vendor under a contract that prohibits sharing raw data with staff outside finance, and finance declined to release them for a student project.

Absenteeism across the whole workforce. Unscheduled absence has risen across the agency. The topic was dropped because attendance records are tied to medical leave and disciplinary files, which human resources will not release even in aggregate without legal review, and because the scope, every employee group, would be too broad for a single term.

Access to Evidence

Five sources could explain the supervisor question, and each is controlled by someone the writer can reach.

Posting records, 2019 to the present, including applicants, withdrawals and hires. Controlled by human resources, in the applicant tracking system.

Payroll figures for operators and supervisors, including overtime earnings. Controlled by the payroll manager.

Eligible operators, meaning those the promotion rules allow to apply: three or more years on the job and no discipline in the past year. Reachable through garage mailboxes and meetings, with the union local's cooperation.

Three road supervisors promoted from within since 2019, who can describe what the move cost and gained them. Reachable directly.

The supervisor job description and pay range, published by human resources. Publicly available.

The writer works in scheduling, not human resources or management, which means operators may speak more freely, but also that the writer's familiarity with the agency could shape what is noticed. Teresa Brannick and David Coghlan argue that insider researchers bring access and understanding that outsiders lack, provided they are open about their position and its effects (Brannick & Coghlan, 2007).

Boundaries

This study will not evaluate individual supervisors or operators, and it will not judge whether outside hires perform worse than promoted operators, which would require performance records the writer cannot see. It will not propose changes to the collective bargaining agreement itself, though it may identify a provision worth discussing with the union. And it will not study other job families, such as dispatchers or mechanics, even though some may show similar patterns. Keeping these boundaries makes the question answerable in one term with the evidence available.

How the Term Could Unfold

The first weeks would test the question with the people who hold the evidence and refine it. A problem statement and literature review would follow, then a method that uses the posting and payroll records first, a survey of eligible operators second and a small number of interviews last. Data collection would need permissions from human resources, payroll and the general manager, and a plan for keeping answers confidential. The final weeks would analyze the results and turn them into recommendations for the director of operations.

The Decision the Findings Could Feed

The agency's director of operations will review road supervisor pay in the next budget cycle. The findings could tell that review whether pay is the reason operators stopped applying, or whether other causes, such as losing seniority on promotion, matter as much. Eric Barends and Denise Rousseau describe evidence-based management as combining organizational data, stakeholder views and research to inform a specific decision (Barends & Rousseau, 2018). This project is designed to do that for one decision, and the director will receive its results before budget work starts.

What this part is doingEnding on the decision the project will inform shows the proposal is aimed at use, not only at a grade.
4

References

Barends, E., & Rousseau, D. M. (2018). Evidence-based management: How to use evidence to make better organizational decisions. Kogan Page.

Brannick, T., & Coghlan, D. (2007). In defense of being "native": The case for insider academic research. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106289253

Ellis, T. J., & Levy, Y. (2008). Framework of problem-based research: A guide for novice researchers on the development of a research-worthy problem. Informing Science, 11, 17-33. https://doi.org/10.28945/438

The Purdue Global GM599 Unit 1 instructions

The first GM599 unit asks you to propose a capstone topic you can actually complete. State the question in one sentence. Show evidence that the problem exists and matters, using figures from your organization where you can. Describe one or two topics you considered and dropped, and say what access problem ruled each out, since this shows the topic was chosen rather than defaulted to. Then map the evidence the question needs to the people or offices that control it. Acknowledge your own position in the organization and how it may affect access and interpretation. Set boundaries on what the project will not do. Sketch how the term might unfold. Close by naming the decision your findings could inform and who makes it. Expect about three pages, citing sources on research problems and evidence-based management in APA 7.

Inside the GM599 Unit 1 example

The proposal states its question and explains the road supervisor's role: monitoring service, responding to incidents and relieving late buses. Posting history shows internal interest down by three quarters and nine of fourteen outside hires, framed by Ellis and Levy on research-worthy problems, and the highlighted sentence gives the two reasons for the choice. Fare evasion on Route 14 was dropped because a vendor controls the fare data; absenteeism because records tie to medical and disciplinary files. Five sources follow with their controllers: posting records, payroll, eligible operators, three promoted supervisors and the published pay range. Brannick and Coghlan support the insider position. Boundaries exclude performance comparisons and contract changes. A term sketch runs from records through survey and interviews, and Barends and Rousseau frame the supervisor pay review as the decision.

GM599 Unit 1 rubric: what earns full points

GM599 instructors look first for a question that is answerable with evidence the writer can obtain. A symptom stated in figures from the organization earns credit because it shows the problem is real. Rejected topics with their access problems show feasibility was tested. Mapping each source to its controller carries significant weight, since access decides whether a capstone finishes. Acknowledging the writer's position shows awareness of insider effects. Boundaries keep the scope to one term. Naming the decision and its owner shows the project is aimed at use. Ellis and Levy in Informing Science, Barends and Rousseau's Evidence-Based Management and Brannick and Coghlan in Organizational Research Methods supply the citations in APA 7.

GM599 Unit 1 help: mistakes that cost points

Many GM599 Unit 1 proposals choose a topic the writer cares about without checking whether the evidence can be obtained. Others state a broad theme, such as employee morale, rather than a question. A common gap is access: a proposal that never names who controls the data often stalls in the fourth or fifth week. Some writers skip the decision the findings would feed, leaving the project without a reader. State one question, show the symptom in figures, explain the topics you dropped and why, map each source to its controller, acknowledge your position, set boundaries and name the decision your findings will inform.

Get a GM599 Unit 1 example written to your instructions

Let us know which workplace problems you are weighing and what records or people you could reach, with your section's topic proposal instructions and rubric. Expect a proposal that chooses among them on access, names who controls each source and ties the question to a decision someone must make. No payment is due for your first sample, which usually takes 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More GM599 papers and MS in Management samples

GM599 Unit 1 questions, answered

Is Wexmoor Regional Transit a real agency?

No. The agency is invented, its posting counts, pay figures and garage layout assembled to hang together the way a mid-sized public bus system's might. Your own proposal will draw on an organization you can reach, usually your employer. What it offers is a pattern for choosing a topic against access; nothing on it describes a real transit system.

Why include the topics that were rejected?

Because reviewers want evidence that the topic was chosen rather than defaulted to. A short paragraph on each rejected candidate, and the access problem that ruled it out, shows the writer tested feasibility before committing. It also gives an instructor alternatives to suggest if the chosen question later runs into trouble.

Can I study my own workplace if I work there?

Usually, and many applied projects do. The proposal should say so plainly and explain how the writer's position shapes access and interpretation. Being outside the participants' chain of command helps; so does keeping interview notes and coding decisions where someone else could review them. Your section's rules on workplace research govern the details.

Where can I find a free GM599 Unit 1 sample paper?

This page carries a full GM599 Unit 1 capstone topic proposal choosing a bus agency's supervisor vacancies as a research question, with rejected topics, an access map and APA 7 references.

What evidence shows the problem is real?

The agency's posting history: sixteen road supervisor postings from 2019 to 2022 averaged 7.4 internal applicants, while fourteen since 2023 averaged 1.9, and nine of those fourteen were filled from outside.