PU685 Unit 9 Intervention Proposal Example

Reviewed by Elspeth Marlowe, MSN, RN Issues and Concepts in Maternal and Child Health Purdue University Global Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This PU685 Unit 9 intervention proposal targets the gap between a positive postpartum depression screen and treatment in a composite county, where 13.5 percent of 3,420 mothers screened positive and only 27.9 percent of them began treatment within thirty days. Purdue Global PU 685, Issues and Concepts in Maternal and Child Health, asks MPH students to design an intervention that answers a gap in their own data. Clinician interviews show why screens stall: prescribing uncertainty during breastfeeding, four-month psychiatry waits and referrals that depend on the mother calling. The proposal sets up a perinatal psychiatry consultation line modeled on MCPAP for Moms, with a care coordinator's warm handoff, a logic model, an evaluation target of 50 percent, a budget of 155,000 dollars and named risks.

CoursePU685 Issues and Concepts in Maternal and Child Health
UnitUnit 9
Paper typeIntervention proposal
LengthAbout 860 words, 6 pages double-spaced
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolPurdue University Global
ProgramMaster of Public Health (MPH)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for PU685 Unit 9

1

Screened, Then Stalled: A Unit 9 Intervention Proposal Aimed at the Gap Between a Positive Postpartum Depression Screen and Treatment, Through a Perinatal Psychiatry Consultation Line for a Composite County's Clinicians

[Student Name]

Purdue University Global

PU685: Issues and Concepts in Maternal and Child Health

Unit 9 Intervention Proposal

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The county, its clinics and its figures are composite; the program model, the screening tool and the research cited are real.

What this part is doingThe proposal separates screening from treatment in its first paragraph, which rules out the familiar fix of simply screening more.
2

The Problem in Two Numbers

In the past year, the county's four obstetric practices and three pediatric practices screened 3,420 mothers in the first six months after birth with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, a ten-item questionnaire validated for this purpose (Cox et al., 1987). Of these, 462, or 13.5 percent, screened positive. Of the 462, only 129, or 27.9 percent, had a documented start of treatment, either medication or a first therapy visit, within thirty days. The first number shows that screening works: coverage is high and the positive rate is in the expected range. The second shows where women are lost. More than 330 mothers a year are identified as likely depressed and left without treatment for at least a month. The stakes are high. When review committees in 36 states examined pregnancy-related deaths from 2017 through 2019, mental health conditions, including deaths by suicide and overdose related to substance use, were the most frequent underlying cause of pregnancy-related death (Trost et al., 2022). The county does not have a screening problem. It has a problem in the thirty days after a positive screen.

Why Positive Screens Stall

The county's needs assessment interviewed 22 obstetric and pediatric clinicians. Three reasons dominated. First, uncertainty about prescribing during pregnancy and breastfeeding: most obstetric clinicians said they would treat moderate depression if they could check a medication choice with a psychiatrist, and pediatric clinicians said they do not treat mothers at all. Second, waits: the county's two outpatient psychiatrists report a waiting time of about four months for new patients, and neither specializes in perinatal care. Third, referral loss: when clinicians refer to therapy, the mother must call herself, and the clinic rarely learns whether she did.

The Intervention

A perinatal psychiatry consultation line for clinicians, modeled on Massachusetts' MCPAP for Moms. In its first three and a half years that program enrolled 145 obstetric practices, trained 1,174 providers and served 3,699 women, and providers reported that it helped them detect and address depression and helped women begin treatment (Byatt et al., 2018). Design for the county:

1. Hours: weekdays 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., with a callback from a perinatal psychiatrist within 30 minutes.

2. Staffing: a perinatal psychiatrist at 0.2 full-time equivalent, shared through a regional academic center by telephone, and one full-time care coordinator based in the county health department.

3. Eligible callers: any obstetric, pediatric, family medicine or midwifery clinician in the county caring for a pregnant or postpartum woman up to one year after delivery.

4. Services: same-day medication advice, a one-time telehealth evaluation by the psychiatrist when needed within two weeks, and resource and referral by the care coordinator.

5. Warm handoff: the coordinator calls the mother within two business days of the clinician's call, books a therapy appointment with her on the line and confirms attendance afterward.

6. Training: a 90-minute session in each practice in the first quarter on screening follow-up, safe medication choices and using the line.

What this part is doingThe coordinator's warm handoff answers the third reason screens stall, so each design element maps to a cause the needs assessment found.
3

Logic Model in Brief

Inputs: psychiatrist time, coordinator, phone and telehealth system, training. Activities: consultations, evaluations, handoffs, training. Outputs: clinicians enrolled, consultations per month, handoffs completed. Short-term outcomes: share of positive screens with treatment begun within 30 days. Longer-term outcome: lower depressive symptom scores at six months postpartum.

Evaluation

Primary measure: the share of mothers with a positive screen who begin treatment within 30 days, from the same clinic records used for the baseline of 27.9 percent. Target: 50 percent by the end of year two. Secondary measures: practices enrolled, calls per month, time to callback, completed handoffs and repeat screening scores at six months. The comparison is before and after within the county, with the limits of that design stated, and clinic-level data reported so the effect of enrollment timing can be seen.

Budget, Year One

Psychiatrist, 0.2 full-time equivalent, 68,000 dollars. Care coordinator, 62,000 dollars with benefits. Telehealth platform and phone line, 9,000 dollars. Training and materials, 6,000 dollars. Evaluation, 10,000 dollars. Total 155,000 dollars.

Sustainability

The proposal requests two years of foundation funding and, in year two, pursues a state contract under the federal maternal mental health program and billing for the psychiatrist's direct evaluations. At about 330 untreated mothers a year, raising treatment starts to 50 percent would reach about 100 more mothers each year, at a cost near 1,500 dollars per additional mother treated in year one, falling as fixed costs spread.

Risks

Low clinician uptake, addressed by in-practice training and a callback promise. Psychiatrist availability, addressed by a regional backup. Therapy capacity, the hardest risk, since a faster handoff into a full therapy system only moves the wait; the coordinator will maintain a list of therapists with openings and telehealth options.

What this part is doingThe proposal names therapy capacity as its hardest risk rather than hiding it, since a reviewer who knows the local system would otherwise raise it first.
4

References

Byatt, N., Straus, J., Stopa, A., Biebel, K., Mittal, L., & Moore Simas, T. A. (2018). Massachusetts Child Psychiatry Access Program for Moms: Utilization and quality assessment. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 132(2), 345-353. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002688

Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150(6), 782-786. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.150.6.782

Trost, S. L., Beauregard, J., Njie, F., Berry, J., Harvey, A., & Goodman, D. A. (2022). Pregnancy-related deaths: Data from maternal mortality review committees in 36 US states, 2017-2019. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

PU685 Unit 9 instructions, in plain terms

Unit 9 typically asks you to propose an intervention for a maternal or child health problem in a defined population. Start with data that locate the problem precisely, distinguishing where the gap is from where things already work. Analyze causes, using local evidence such as interviews or needs assessments. Choose an intervention with evidence behind it and adapt its design to the causes you found, specifying hours, staffing, eligibility and processes. Provide a logic model, an evaluation plan with a primary measure and target, a budget and a sustainability plan. Identify realistic risks and responses. Proposals are usually eight to ten pages. Make sure each design element answers a cause; reviewers notice components that solve nothing in particular.

How this PU685 Unit 9 example is built

The proposal opens with two numbers, screening and treatment, and a highlighted line declares the county's problem to be the thirty days after a positive screen. National committee data on mental health and pregnancy-related deaths establish stakes. A causes section summarizes three findings from clinician interviews. The intervention cites the Massachusetts program's reach, then lists six design elements, with a margin note showing how the warm handoff answers the third cause. A brief logic model, an evaluation plan with a baseline and target, a five-line budget and a sustainability section with cost per additional mother treated follow. A risks section names therapy capacity as the hardest problem.

Where the points sit in the PU685 Unit 9 rubric

Purdue Global proposal rubrics generally reward alignment between problem, cause and intervention. Points go to a precisely located problem supported by data and to a causal analysis grounded in evidence. Credit rises when the chosen model has published support and when each design element maps to a cause. Instructors look for a logic model and an evaluation plan with a measurable primary outcome and realistic target. A budget and sustainability plan make the proposal credible. Honest risks with responses add marks. Writing quality, structure and APA citations complete the score. Proposals that address a problem the data do not show, such as screening more when screening is already high, lose points.

PU685 Unit 9 help: mistakes that cost points

The most common weakness is proposing a familiar intervention without checking whether it fits the local gap. Locate the gap first. Another is a causal analysis copied from the literature instead of drawn from local evidence. Students often specify the intervention vaguely; say who answers the phone, when and what happens next. Avoid evaluation measures the program cannot collect. Include a budget even if the prompt does not demand one, and address how the program continues after the grant. Name risks honestly. Send us your county's data and the problem your prompt names, and we will write the proposal with design, evaluation and budget.

Get a PU685 Unit 9 example written to your instructions

Say which gap the PU685 Unit 9 proposal is meant to close, with the data that identified it, and attach the prompt, rubric and any funder format. What arrives in 24-48 hours, free as a first custom sample, is a proposal whose every component, from causal analysis to evaluation measure, answers that gap. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.

More PU685 papers and MPH samples

PU685 Unit 9 questions, answered

Why not propose universal screening in the PU685 Unit 9 example?

Because the county's clinics already screen most mothers, and the data show the loss occurring afterward. A proposal to expand screening would enlarge the number of women identified and left untreated. That reasoning, an intervention chosen because it fits the documented gap rather than because it is the familiar answer, is usually what earns the marks.

What is MCPAP for Moms?

The Massachusetts Child Psychiatry Access Program for Moms, launched in 2014, gives obstetric, pediatric and primary care clinicians rapid telephone consultation with perinatal psychiatrists and helps connect mothers to community resources. Similar programs now operate in many states, several supported by HRSA grants. The example adapts its model rather than copying it, and says which features were scaled down.

Does the proposal need a budget?

Prompts for this assignment often ask for at least a summary, and a proposal without one reads as unfinished. The example gives personnel, telephone and data systems, training and evaluation as categories, each with its arithmetic, and keeps the total modest enough for a county. Where a prompt names a funder, the sample follows that funder's categories.

Where can I find a free PU685 Unit 9 sample paper?

The complete Unit 9 proposal for a perinatal psychiatry consultation line, with design, evaluation and budget, is on this page.

What is a warm handoff in perinatal mental health?

A coordinator contacts the mother directly after the clinician's referral, books the appointment with her and confirms she attended, instead of leaving her to call on her own.