| Course | PS370 Health Psychology |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 3 |
| Paper type | Stress and health paper |
| Length | About 1,150 words, 7 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Psychology |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PS370 Unit 3
Weather, Quotas and a Boat Loan: A PS370 Unit 3 Stress and Health Paper
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
PS370: Health Psychology
Unit 3 Stress and Health Paper
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The captain, his boat, his crew and his family are composite; the theories and studies cited are real.
The Stressors
Paul, 51, owns and captains a scallop boat out of New Bedford, Massachusetts. He bought it seven years ago with a loan that still has a balance of about $640,000. A normal trip lasts ten to fourteen days, and he makes about fifteen trips a year. Scallop fishing is managed through a federal system of allowed days and access areas, and the rules can change from one season to the next. A storm can end a trip early. A broken winch can cost a week. Five crew members depend on his decisions for their pay, and two of them have young children.
More than a year ago, nine days into a trip, Paul had a heart attack and was flown to a Boston hospital for a stent. His cardiologist listed his risk factors as smoking, high cholesterol, high blood pressure and family history. Stress was not on the list. This paper argues that it belongs there, while being careful about how much weight it can bear.
Appraisal and Coping
Lazarus and Folkman (1984) treated stress as a transaction rather than an event: it arises when someone judges that demands strain or outrun what they can bring to bear and that something they value is at risk. The first judgment, primary appraisal, sorts an event as damage already suffered, danger ahead, or an opening with something to win. The second, secondary appraisal, weighs the options for responding.
Paul appraises his stressors differently from how an outsider might. Storms, which frighten his wife, he treats as challenges; he has fished through them for thirty years and believes in his boat and crew. A cut in allowed days, though, he appraises as a threat, because nothing he can do on the water changes it. His secondary appraisal for regulation is bleak: he cannot fish harder, only less. The loan sharpens every threat, since a short season and a broken winch in the same year could put the boat at risk.
For Paul, the most dangerous stressors are not the ones that frighten his wife, but the ones he can do nothing about.
His coping follows the same pattern. With challenges he uses problem-focused coping: he checks forecasts, changes routes and repairs gear. With threats he cannot control, he relies on emotion-focused coping, and much of it is unhealthy. He smokes more on the nights after a regulatory announcement, sleeps less, and, by his own account, stops talking to Ana for days. Lazarus and Folkman do not treat emotion-focused coping as bad in itself, but the forms Paul relies on add risk of their own.
From Appraisal to the Body
A threat appraisal starts two physiological systems. The sympathetic adrenal medullary system releases epinephrine and norepinephrine within seconds, raising heart rate and blood pressure. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis releases cortisol more slowly, mobilizing energy and changing immune and metabolic function. These responses evolved to help an animal escape a predator and then recover.
McEwen (1998) argued that cortisol and the catecholamines, protective over minutes and hours, damage the body when they are called on too often, turned on too long or not turned off. He named the cumulative cost allostatic load. He described four routes to it: alarms that come too often, alarms the body never learns to discount, alarms that keep sounding after the danger passes, and a muted alarm that leaves other systems to overcompensate.
Paul's working life fits at least three. His stressors are frequent; every trip brings weather, breakdowns and decisions about crew pay. Some never end; the loan and regulatory uncertainty continue on land. His sleep, broken into four-hour watches for two weeks at a time, removes the nightly recovery period in which blood pressure and cortisol should fall. McEwen described sleep deprivation as both a product of stress and a cause of further load. On a long trip Paul may never fully turn off. When he comes home, the loan payment and the next season's rules are waiting, so the recovery that land should bring is often cut short as well.
Over years, allostatic load can show up as high blood pressure, abnormal cholesterol, abdominal fat and insulin resistance, which are among Paul's own risk factors. Stress also acts through behavior: Paul smokes more, eats from the galley at irregular hours and has not seen a doctor for a routine visit in nine years.
Weighing the Research
Support for a stress-illness link is firm in some areas and thin in others. Cohen et al. (1991) gave healthy volunteers nasal drops containing a cold virus and found that infection and clinical illness rose with each step up in the volunteers' stress scores, in a dose-response pattern that held after controlling for many health practices. That experiment shows that stress can change the body's response to a real pathogen.
For heart disease, a review of large cohort studies found that job strain, long working hours and other work stressors carried a modest added risk of coronary heart disease, and that stress may also trigger events in people who already have advanced disease (Kivimäki & Steptoe, 2018). The increases are smaller than those for smoking, and stress often works through behaviors such as smoking and poor sleep. Paul's case reflects that picture. Stress did not replace his other risk factors; it fed them.
Implications for Recovery
Paul cannot remove most of his stressors. He can change how often his stress response is called on and whether it switches off. Several steps follow from the analysis. First, his appraisals of regulatory threats could be shifted toward what he can control, such as planning a season around the most likely scenarios with his accountant and other captains. Second, coping that does not add risk, such as calling Ana from the boat or walking the deck during watch breaks instead of smoking, could replace some of what he does now. Third, protecting one block of six hours of sleep on each trip, by sharing the night watch with his most experienced crew member, would restore some recovery time. Cardiac rehabilitation programs often include stress management, and Paul's could be adapted to his schedule between trips.
Conclusion
Stress did not cause Paul's heart attack on its own, but it is part of the explanation that a list of risk factors leaves out. His appraisals explain which stressors matter, McEwen's model explains how repeated alarms became wear on his body, and research on work stress gives that wear its proper weight next to smoking. The most useful changes are the ones that let his body turn off between trips.
References
Cohen, S., Tyrrell, D. A. J., & Smith, A. P. (1991). Psychological stress and susceptibility to the common cold. New England Journal of Medicine, 325(9), 606-612. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199108293250903
Kivimäki, M., & Steptoe, A. (2018). Effects of stress on the development and progression of cardiovascular disease. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 15(4), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2017.189
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
McEwen, B. S. (1998). Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. New England Journal of Medicine, 338(3), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199801153380307
Reading the PS 370 Unit 3 instructions
The Unit 3 paper in PS370 asks you to analyze how stress affects health in one person. Identify the person's main stressors concretely. Apply an appraisal and coping framework, explaining how the person judges each stressor and how they cope. Trace the physiological pathway from stress to the body, using a model such as allostatic load. Evaluate how strong the evidence is that stress contributes to the person's health problem, distinguishing direct effects from effects through behavior. Close with recommendations that follow from the analysis. Use APA style with scholarly sources, including at least one empirical study. Four to six pages is usual for this assignment.
Inside the PS370 Unit 3 example
The paper introduces Paul's boat, loan, trips and crew, then notes that stress was missing from his cardiologist's risk list. The appraisal section sorts storms as challenges and quota cuts as threats, with a highlighted line that the dangerous stressors are the ones he cannot change, and shows his emotion-focused coping adding risk. A physiology section explains the two stress systems and McEwen's four routes to allostatic load, matching three of them to his trips. An evidence section uses Cohen's virus experiment and a cardiovascular review to give stress modest weight. Recommendations target appraisal, safer coping and a protected six-hour sleep block. The conclusion returns to the idea that his body rarely gets to turn off between trips.
PS370 Unit 3 rubric: what earns full points
Graders look for stressors described with detail, not a generic list, and an appraisal analysis that explains why the same person reacts differently to different stressors. Physiology should be accurate and connected to the person's life rather than copied from a textbook. The evidence section earns the most credit when it grades the research honestly, separating experimental findings from cohort associations and noting how stress works through behavior. Recommendations need to target the mechanisms identified, such as recovery time or appraisal. Citations for the appraisal model and allostatic load, plus empirical studies, are expected in current APA format. Acknowledging what the person cannot change, and focusing advice on what they can, often marks the strongest papers.
PS370 Unit 3 help from the desk
Weak stress papers list everything stressful about a person's life and then describe the fight-or-flight response, without linking them. A second problem claims stress caused a disease without weighing other risk factors. Students often describe coping as good or bad without explaining what each form does for the person. Recommendations such as reducing stress or practicing self-care are too vague to grade well. For a stronger draft, rank the stressors by how controllable they are, match each to a coping response you can observe, and name which physiological route each feeds. Then ask how much of the health problem stress can honestly explain. The answer usually belongs in its own section.
Get a PS370 Unit 3 example written to your instructions
Send the stressors and the instructions with the rubric. A custom paper traces stress from appraisal to physiology to health risk. It comes back in 24-48h, first one free. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More PS370 papers and BS in Psychology samples
- PS370 Unit 1: Biopsychosocial Model Board Post
- PS370 Unit 2: Health Behavior Theory Paper
- PS370 Unit 4: Chronic Pain Paper
- PS370 Unit 5: Chronic Illness and Illness Perceptions Paper
- PS370 Unit 6: Tobacco and Substance Use Paper
- PS370 Unit 7: Cancer and Coping Paper
- PS370 Unit 8: Discussion Board Post
- PS370 Unit 9: Health Education Program Proposal
- PS370 Unit 10: Health Psychology Treatment Plan
- PS115 Unit 3: Fields of Psychology Comparison
- PS330 Unit 3: Learning and Social-Cognitive Analysis
- PS200 Unit 3: Working Memory Exercise
- PS311 Unit 3: Ethical Decision Model Analysis
PS370 Unit 3 questions, answered
What is allostatic load?
The wear on the body from repeated or prolonged stress responses, described by McEwen.
What is primary appraisal?
Judging whether a situation is a threat, a harm or a challenge.
Does stress cause heart disease?
Work stress is linked to higher risk, though it acts alongside smoking, diet and other factors.
Where can I find a free PS370 Unit 3 sample paper?
This page holds the complete PS370 Unit 3 paper tracing a composite captain's work stress from appraisal through allostatic load to heart disease risk.
Does the PS370 Unit 3 sample claim stress caused the heart attack?
No. It argues stress fed his other risk factors, such as smoking and poor sleep, and carries modest weight on its own.