| Course | PS330 Personality Development |
|---|---|
| Unit | Unit 8 |
| Paper type | Seminar reflection |
| Length | About 780 words, 5 pages double-spaced |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Purdue University Global |
| Program | BS in Psychology |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PS330 Unit 8
Can a Thirty-Eight-Year-Old Change? A PS330 Unit 8 Seminar Reflection on Personality Change
[Student Name]
Purdue University Global
PS330: Personality Development
Unit 8 Seminar Reflection
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The writer, the coach and the classmates are composite; the studies cited are real.
What I Believed
I came to the Unit 8 seminar convinced that adults do not really change. I had watched Darnell, our head coach, argue with referees every season for three years, and I had watched myself make the same promises about procrastination every semester. I assumed that by thirty, who you are is set, and that what looks like change is mostly people behaving differently in new situations.
The Debate
Our instructor assigned half of us to argue that personality is fixed in adulthood and half to argue that it changes. I was on the fixed side, which suited me perfectly at the time. We cited the stability of trait scores over time and twin studies showing substantial heritability (Polderman et al., 2015).
The other side's evidence was harder to answer. Roberts et al. (2006) combined dozens of longitudinal studies and found that people, on average, become more conscientious, more agreeable and more emotionally stable across adulthood, most of it before forty but some of it after. A classmate who works as a probation officer then presented a review by Roberts et al. (2017), which found that interventions, especially therapy, were followed by measurable trait change, largest in emotional stability, within an average of about 24 weeks.
Stability means people keep their rank relative to others; it does not mean nobody moves.
What Changed in My Thinking
I had confused two kinds of stability. Rank-order stability means that people keep roughly the same position relative to others: a conscientious 25-year-old is likely to be among the more conscientious 45-year-olds. But mean-level change means that most people, including that 25-year-old, become more conscientious in absolute terms over time. Both can be true at once. The twin studies I cited showed that traits are heritable, not that they are fixed.
I also realized that I had been judging Darnell by one behavior. His sideline outbursts have not changed, but other things have. Our athletic director told me that in his first season he would not speak to the media after losses, and now he does, calmly. That is a change in emotional regulation in one setting, even if referees still trigger him.
Why Darnell's Outbursts Have Not Changed
The research also helped me think about why Darnell's sideline behavior has stayed the same while other parts of him have shifted. Trait change in the intervention studies followed deliberate effort aimed at a specific pattern. Nothing in Darnell's life has targeted his reactions to referees; if anything, as the Unit 3 analysis suggested, the outbursts are still rewarded now and then. His calmer handling of the media, by contrast, followed a conversation with the athletic director and a season of practice. Change, in other words, seems to happen where someone works on it, and to stall where the old pattern still pays off. That is a less dramatic view than either side of the debate, but it fits what I have watched for three years.
A Conversation With Darnell
After the seminar I asked Darnell whether he thought people could change. He laughed and said his wife would say he already had. He described being, in his twenties, unable to admit a mistake to his players, and now telling them after a loss which of his calls were wrong. He had not noticed that as change until I asked. I suspect much adult personality change looks like that from the inside, for him and probably for me: gradual enough to go unnoticed until someone points to how things used to be.
What I Take for Myself
The intervention research matters more to me than the average change. If deliberate effort, such as therapy or structured practice, can shift traits, then my procrastination is not simply who I am. It is a pattern I could work on, probably slowly, with a plan rather than a promise.
The Doubt I Kept
I cannot yet tell how much of the change in the intervention studies reflects a real shift in personality and how much reflects people describing themselves differently after therapy. Most of the measures were self-reports. I would very much like to know whether outside observers, such as spouses or coworkers, see the same changes. If they do, the case for change is much stronger; if they do not, therapy may change how people describe themselves more than how they act, which would matter for anyone hoping to change a habit like mine.
References
Polderman, T. J. C., Benyamin, B., de Leeuw, C. A., Sullivan, P. F., van Bochoven, A., Visscher, P. M., & Posthuma, D. (2015). Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nature Genetics, 47(7), 702-709. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3285
Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117-141. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000088
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
PS330 Unit 8 instructions, in plain terms
After the Unit 8 seminar, PS330 asks you to reflect on the debate over whether personality can change. Begin with the view you held and why. Describe the evidence presented on both sides accurately, including key studies and what they measured, and credit classmates by role. Explain what changed in your thinking, especially any distinction that resolved an apparent contradiction, such as rank-order stability and mean-level change. Apply the conclusion to a person you know and to yourself with specific examples. End with a question about the evidence that remains open for you, ideally a methodological one. Use the first person, cite each study discussed in APA style, keeping the focus on reasoning rather than on the debate's format.
Inside the PS330 Unit 8 example
Her reflection starts from a conviction that adults are set by thirty, reinforced by three seasons of the coach's outbursts and her own procrastination. The debate section reports twin evidence on her side and the opposing side's longitudinal and intervention findings, under a highlighted line separating rank from movement. The change section explains the two kinds of stability and reinterprets the coach's calmer media handling. A section explains why his sideline behavior has not changed while other things have, and a conversation with the coach adds his own account. The writer applies the intervention findings to herself and closes by questioning whether self-reported change matches what observers see.
Reading the PS330 Unit 8 grading rubric
Reflections on this debate earn credit for accurate evidence and a clear change in reasoning. Instructors look for the starting view stated honestly, studies described with what they measured and found, and a distinction that explains how stability and change can both be true. Applying the conclusion to a specific person and to the writer adds depth. A methodological question at the end, such as the reliance on self-report, shows critical thinking about the evidence that changed the writer's mind. Classmates appear by role. Accurate citations for the longitudinal and intervention studies are expected, and the reflection should sound like the student rather than a summary of readings.
Common PS330 Unit 8 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Many reflections report that the seminar was interesting and that both sides had points, without saying what the writer now believes. Another frequent issue treats heritability as proof that personality cannot change. Students often summarize studies without what they measured. Personal applications are sometimes missing or vague. The final question tends to be rhetorical rather than about evidence. Before submitting, state your view before and after in one sentence each, name one study per side with its finding, explain rank-order and mean-level change in your own words, give one example from someone you know and end with a question a future study could answer. Those five checks make the change in thinking visible to the grader.
Get a PS330 Unit 8 example written to your instructions
Send what the seminar covered, your notes and the prompt with its rubric. A custom reflection connects the debate to your own view. The first is free, delivered within 24-48h. The paper above is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Purdue University Global document.
More PS330 papers and BS in Psychology samples
- PS330 Unit 1: Person-Situation Debate Board Post
- PS330 Unit 2: Psychodynamic and Humanistic Comparison
- PS330 Unit 3: Learning and Social-Cognitive Analysis
- PS330 Unit 4: Biological Perspectives Paper
- PS330 Unit 5: Culture and Identity Paper
- PS330 Unit 6: Big Five Trait Assessment Paper
- PS330 Unit 7: Attachment and Personality Paper
- PS330 Unit 9: Abnormal Personality Paper
- PS330 Unit 10: Integrative Personality Analysis
- PS115 Unit 8: Psychology Skills Inventory
- PS311 Unit 8: Supervision and Peer Support Paper
- PS200 Unit 8: Decision-Making Heuristics Analysis
- PS300 Unit 8: Phone and Walking Survey Design
PS330 Unit 8 questions, answered
What if I missed the PS330 seminar?
Most sections offer a written alternative; check its instructions.
Can therapy change personality traits?
A review found that interventions, especially for emotional stability, were followed by measurable trait change.
Should the reflection include a personal example?
Yes, a trait you have seen change or stay the same.
Where can I find a free PS330 Unit 8 sample paper?
This page holds the complete PS330 Unit 8 reflection on whether personality can change, with a composite coach and the writer's own habits.
What distinction resolves the debate in the PS330 Unit 8 sample?
Rank-order stability, keeping one's position relative to others, can coexist with mean-level change in which most people shift over time.